Choose from a wide range of CV templates and customize the design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised CV and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our CV builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your CV faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact CV rules employers look for.
Create CVUse professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact CV rules employers look for.
An Academic CV is not a shortened resume. It is a structured record of intellectual production, research credibility, funding history, and institutional contribution.
In faculty hiring, postdoctoral selection, and research grant competitions, the Academic CV is evaluated line-by-line for scholarly depth, trajectory coherence, and field impact.
This document is not optimized for brevity.
It is optimized for academic legitimacy.
Academic screening differs fundamentally from corporate hiring.
Evaluation layers typically include:
•Institutional pedigree
• Publication record quality
• Journal impact tier
• Authorship position
• Grant acquisition
• Teaching portfolio
• Conference presence
• Service contributions
Committees are not scanning for keywords.
They are assessing scholarly maturity and independence.
The first screening filter often includes:
•PhD-granting institution
• Advisor reputation
• Postdoctoral affiliations
• Research lab pedigree
Top-tier institutions increase initial review probability, but publication strength ultimately determines ranking.
Institutional clarity must be precise.
Abbreviations without recognition reduce credibility.
Your publication section is the most scrutinized component.
It must include:
•Full citation formatting
• Journal name
• Publication year
• Authorship position
• DOI (optional but professional)
High-impact signals include:
•First-author publications
• Corresponding-author status
• Publications in top-tier journals
• Consistent publication cadence
• Field-defining contributions
Weak publication entry:
•Co-authored paper in biology journal
Strong publication entry:
•Bennett, A.R., Patel, S. (2024). Mechanisms of T-cell differentiation in autoimmune response. Nature Immunology, 25(3), 412–425.
Precision signals rigor.
Grant acquisition significantly elevates academic CV strength.
Include:
•Grant title
• Funding body
• Role (PI, Co-PI, Contributor)
• Funding amount
• Duration
Example:
•Principal Investigator, NIH R01 Grant – $1.2M (2023–2027)
Independent funding signals academic maturity and tenure-track readiness.
Academic committees evaluate:
•Courses taught
• Level (undergraduate, graduate)
• Curriculum design involvement
• Guest lectures
• Supervision of theses
• Teaching awards
Weak:
•Taught Biology 101
Strong:
•Designed and delivered upper-level Molecular Genetics course to 120 students; supervised 6 undergraduate research theses
Teaching effectiveness supports tenure considerations.
Department of Immunology
Boston, MA
Ph.D., Immunology
Stanford University, 2018
B.S., Molecular Biology
University of Pennsylvania, 2012
Postdoctoral Fellow
Harvard Medical School
2018–2023
•Bennett, A.R., Kim, J. (2024). T-cell regulatory pathways in chronic inflammation. Nature Immunology, 25(3), 412–425.
• Bennett, A.R. (2022). Cytokine signaling modulation in autoimmune disorders. Cell Reports, 39(8), 110234.
• Kim, J., Bennett, A.R. (2021). Immune checkpoint dynamics in inflammatory disease. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 131(14).
•NIH R01 Grant – Principal Investigator – $1.2M (2023–2027)
• American Association of Immunologists Fellowship – $150,000 (2021–2023)
•Lecturer – Advanced Immunopathology (Graduate Level)
• Designed laboratory curriculum for Molecular Diagnostics
• Supervised 3 PhD candidates and 5 undergraduate research assistants
•Keynote Speaker – International Congress of Immunology, 2024
• Oral Presentation – American Association of Immunologists Annual Meeting, 2023
•Peer Reviewer – Nature Immunology, JCI, Cell Reports
• Editorial Board Member – Journal of Translational Immunology
•Strong institutional pedigree
• High-impact journal publications
• Independent grant funding
• Graduate-level teaching
• Recognized conference presence
• Editorial service
It signals tenure-track readiness and independent research capability.
Academic CVs fail for:
•Inconsistent citation formatting
• Weak publication volume
• No first-author papers
• No grant history
• Overemphasis on non-academic roles
• Poor chronological structure
Another frequent issue:
Listing manuscripts “in preparation” excessively without peer-reviewed output weakens credibility.
STEM Fields:
•Publications and grants dominate
• Lab management experience matters
• Technical methodology clarity is critical
Humanities:
•Monographs
• Book chapters
• Conference symposia
• Editorial contributions
Social Sciences:
•Peer-reviewed journal articles
• Policy impact
• Quantitative research tools
• Public scholarship
Each discipline evaluates differently.
Generic formatting reduces competitiveness.
Unlike corporate resumes, Academic CVs:
•Commonly exceed 5–15 pages
• Include full publication lists
• Detail invited talks
• Outline service roles
Length is not penalized.
Lack of depth is.
For early-career researchers:
•Education
• Research experience
• Publications
• Conferences
• Teaching
For senior scholars:
•Academic appointments
• Publications
• Grants
• Teaching
• Service
Order reflects maturity level.
Upload CV
Import from Linkedin
