Choose from a wide range of CV templates and customize the design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised CV and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our CV builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your CV faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact CV rules employers look for.
Create CV
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact CV rules employers look for.
Create CVIf you're using an AI resume builder for the Netherlands job market, you're already ahead of most candidates.
But here’s the reality: most AI-generated CVs fail in real hiring scenarios.
They pass basic formatting. They include keywords. But they lack positioning, relevance, and decision-driving signals.
This guide breaks down how AI resume builders actually perform across:
ATS systems used in the Netherlands
Recruiter screening behavior (6–10 second scan)
Hiring manager decision-making
And more importantly, how to turn AI into a competitive advantage instead of a generic output machine.
The Dutch job market is highly structured, efficient, and increasingly tech-driven.
Companies across Amsterdam, Rotterdam, Utrecht, and Eindhoven rely heavily on:
ATS platforms like Workday, Greenhouse, AFAS, Recruitee
Structured CV parsing
Keyword filtering + recruiter scanning
AI resume builders help candidates:
Generate structured CVs quickly
Align with ATS parsing rules
Improve wording and grammar
But here’s what most candidates miss:
AI optimizes for completeness, not competitiveness.
Most AI resume builders claim “ATS optimization,” but very few explain how ATS actually evaluates your CV.
Here’s what matters in real systems:
ATS scans for:
Standard section headers
Clear structure
Readable formatting
AI helps here, but only if:
You avoid complex designs
You use standard titles like “Work Experience” and “Education”
ATS matches your CV against job descriptions:
After ATS, your CV hits a human.
And this is where most AI CVs fail.
Recruiters in the Netherlands typically:
Spend 6–10 seconds on first scan
Look for clarity and structure
Prioritize relevance over creativity
Job title alignment
Company credibility
Measurable impact
Logical career progression
That means:
Everyone ends up with similar phrasing
Achievements sound generic
Positioning is weak
And in the Netherlands, where recruiters value clarity, impact, and directness, this becomes a major disadvantage.
Skills
Tools
Role-specific terms
But here’s the nuance:
Keyword presence alone does not guarantee ranking.
Relevance and context matter:
“Python” mentioned once ≠ strong match
“Built data pipelines in Python improving processing speed by 40%” = strong match
Advanced ATS systems score based on:
Frequency of relevant terms
Recency of experience
Role alignment
AI builders rarely optimize for this properly.
Generic summaries
Buzzword-heavy language
No clear achievements
Overly long CVs
Recruiter Insight:
“AI-generated CVs are easy to spot. They sound polished but empty. What stands out is specificity.”
AI gives you a draft, not a final CV.
Weak Example:
“Responsible for managing projects and improving processes.”
Good Example:
“Led 5 cross-functional projects reducing operational costs by 18% within 12 months.”
The difference: specificity, ownership, measurable impact.
Candidates try to “game ATS” by stuffing keywords.
Result:
Lower readability
Weak recruiter impression
Better approach:
Embed keywords naturally within achievements.
AI summaries are often useless.
Weak Example:
“Motivated professional with strong communication skills.”
Good Example:
“Data Analyst with 4+ years in fintech, specializing in predictive modeling and SQL-based analytics that improved customer retention by 22%.”
In the Netherlands, CVs typically:
Are 1–2 pages
Include concise, factual content
Avoid exaggeration
AI often produces:
Overly verbose content
American-style exaggeration
You must localize the tone.
Instead of relying blindly on AI, use this framework:
AI is only as good as your input.
Provide:
Real achievements
Metrics
Specific responsibilities
Do not settle for one version.
Generate:
3–5 versions of bullet points
Different summaries
Then select the strongest.
Ask:
Is this specific?
Is this measurable?
Is this relevant to the job?
Balance:
Keywords (ATS)
Clarity and impact (human)
AI makes tailoring easier.
Always adjust:
Summary
Skills
Top achievements
This is where top candidates win.
If your title is unclear internationally:
Example:
Dutch hiring managers value results.
Focus on:
Outcomes
Efficiency improvements
Business impact
Frequent job changes require explanation.
Use:
Clear progression
Promotions
Especially in tech and data roles.
List:
Tools
Platforms
Methodologies
Structure generation
Grammar improvement
Keyword suggestions
Strategic positioning
Differentiation
Contextual relevance
Bottom line: AI is a tool, not a strategist.
Name: Jeroen van Dijk
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Job Title: Senior Data Analyst
Professional Summary
Results-driven Senior Data Analyst with 6+ years of experience in fintech and e-commerce. Specialized in SQL, Python, and data visualization, delivering insights that improved customer retention by 25% and reduced churn by 18%. Proven ability to translate complex datasets into actionable business strategies.
Work Experience
Senior Data Analyst | Adyen | Amsterdam
2021 – Present
Led development of predictive models improving fraud detection accuracy by 30%
Built automated dashboards in Tableau reducing reporting time by 40%
Collaborated with cross-functional teams to optimize payment flows, increasing conversion rates by 12%
Data Analyst | Booking.com | Amsterdam
2018 – 2021
Analyzed user behavior data to improve booking funnel performance
Reduced drop-off rates by 15% through A/B testing initiatives
Developed SQL pipelines handling large-scale datasets
Skills
Python
SQL
Tableau
Power BI
Data Modeling
A/B Testing
Education
MSc Data Science | University of Amsterdam
Certifications
Clear positioning
Measurable impact
Strong keyword integration
Logical structure
ATS-friendly formatting
After analyzing thousands of CVs:
Shortlisted candidates consistently:
Show measurable results
Match job requirements clearly
Communicate value quickly
Rejected candidates:
Sound generic
Lack impact
Over-rely on AI phrasing
The difference is not AI. It’s strategy.
Upload CV
Import from Linkedin
