Choose from a wide range of CV templates and customize the design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised CV and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our CV builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your CV faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact CV rules employers look for.
Create CV
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact CV rules employers look for.
Create CVAcademic hiring pipelines increasingly rely on structured parsing systems before human committee review begins. Even in universities where faculty members manually read dossiers, the initial document ingestion, indexing, and candidate sorting is frequently handled through ATS-style academic recruitment platforms such as Interfolio, PeopleAdmin, AcademicJobsOnline, and Workday.
Because of this, an ATS friendly academic CV template is not simply a formatting preference. It directly influences:
Whether publication records are indexed correctly
Whether grant history is searchable in review dashboards
Whether teaching experience appears in keyword filtering
Whether hiring committees see the complete academic record
Unlike corporate resumes, academic CVs are long-form research dossiers. However, most academic CV failures occur not because of weak scholarship, but because of structural formatting choices that break ATS parsing logic.
This guide explains how academic CVs are actually evaluated inside modern academic recruitment systems, the structural logic behind ATS friendly templates, and the real formatting patterns that allow committees to properly evaluate candidates.
Most scholars assume academic CVs are exempt from ATS constraints because universities conduct human review. That assumption is incorrect.
Nearly all large institutions now use structured recruitment management systems, which extract information from uploaded CVs and categorize it into searchable fields.
When a CV is poorly structured, systems fail to correctly identify:
Publications
Grants
Teaching appointments
Institutional affiliations
Conference presentations
Research impact indicators
This leads to partial candidate profiles inside the evaluation interface, even though the full CV exists in the attachment.
Recruiters and faculty committees often review candidates through , meaning the ATS-generated profile strongly influences initial evaluation.
Academic hiring systems extract structured information by scanning for recognizable academic sections.
If the CV uses expected academic categories, systems can correctly identify the candidate’s research portfolio.
The core architecture of an ATS friendly academic CV template typically follows this hierarchy:
Candidate identity and institutional affiliation
Academic appointments and institutional roles
Education and doctoral training
Research output (peer-reviewed publications)
Grant funding history
Teaching experience
Conference presentations
Academic CV templates that perform best in ATS systems rely on clear section segmentation with standardized headings.
These headings should always appear as plain text headings rather than stylized formatting.
Recommended structure:
This section should contain structured contact information without graphical formatting.
Include:
Full name
Academic title
Institutional affiliation
Email address
Research profile links (Google Scholar, ORCID)
Avoid embedding links inside images or icons.
Common failure patterns include:
Publications embedded inside paragraph text
Mixed citation styles that break publication indexing
Research grants listed inside employment sections
Tables used for formatting
Two-column academic CV layouts
Non-standard section naming
An ATS friendly academic CV template prevents these failures by structuring scholarship data in predictable parsing segments.
Academic service and editorial roles
Awards and fellowships
Professional memberships
The ordering matters because evaluation committees review academic profiles in predictable patterns:
Research output first
Grant funding second
Institutional appointments third
Teaching record fourth
If these elements are buried in inconsistent formatting, committee reviewers must manually locate them, increasing the likelihood of screening drop-off.
Academic systems scan this section to determine:
Institutional progression
Tenure track movement
Postdoctoral experience
Research appointments
Each role should follow consistent formatting:
Institution
Position Title
Location
Dates
This consistency allows ATS systems to automatically map academic career progression.
Doctoral training is heavily weighted in academic hiring evaluation.
Include:
Degree type
Discipline
Institution
Dissertation title (optional but valuable)
Advisor (important in research networks)
The dissertation title often improves keyword indexing for research specialization.
This is the most critical section for academic ATS parsing.
Publications should never be embedded inside paragraph text.
Use citation formatting that preserves:
Author order
Year
Title
Journal name
Volume and issue
ATS systems frequently scan for journal titles and publication years, which help committees evaluate research trajectory.
Grant history is a major evaluation metric in academic hiring.
Each grant entry should contain:
Funding agency
Grant title
Funding amount
Role (PI, Co-PI)
Funding period
Grant sections allow hiring systems to quickly identify external funding competitiveness.
Teaching records should list:
Course title
Institution
Term or year
Role (Instructor, Teaching Fellow)
Some universities automatically categorize courses by department using course codes if included.
This section strengthens visibility of research dissemination.
Include:
Presentation title
Conference name
Location
Year
ATS platforms frequently extract conference names to measure disciplinary engagement.
Faculty committees strongly value service contributions.
Include:
Editorial board roles
Peer review activities
Departmental committees
Grant review panels
These signals demonstrate academic citizenship and institutional contribution.
Even well-structured CVs can break ATS parsing if formatting choices interfere with text extraction.
High-performing academic CV templates follow these formatting constraints:
Two-column academic CVs frequently break ATS text reading order.
Single-column layout ensures content is read sequentially.
Tables are commonly used for formatting publications or grants.
However, many ATS systems flatten tables incorrectly, causing:
Author names to separate from publication titles
Grant agencies to detach from funding amounts
Text boxes are invisible to many ATS parsing engines.
Important content placed inside text boxes may never be indexed.
Use:
Times New Roman
Georgia
Arial
Calibri
Decorative fonts can cause character recognition issues.
Use predictable academic headings such as:
Publications
Research Grants
Teaching Experience
Unusual headings like “Scholarly Contributions” or “Knowledge Production” may not be recognized by automated systems.
From a recruiter perspective, academic CV screening follows a structured reading pattern.
The typical evaluation flow looks like this:
Institutional pedigree and doctoral training
Publication trajectory
Grant competitiveness
Institutional appointments
Teaching breadth
If these elements are easy to locate, the candidate advances.
If the committee must search the document to understand the candidate's research profile, the CV creates friction during evaluation.
ATS friendly academic CV templates reduce that friction.
Several formatting habits cause strong academic profiles to underperform in ATS-based hiring platforms.
Weak Example
Research interests include political behavior and democratic institutions. My research has appeared in journals including American Political Science Review and Comparative Political Studies.
Good Example
Publications
Smith, J. (2024). Electoral accountability in emerging democracies. American Political Science Review.
Smith, J., Carter, L. (2022). Institutional trust and democratic participation. Comparative Political Studies.
Explanation: ATS systems detect journal titles and publication years more reliably when citations appear as structured entries.
Weak Example
Assistant Professor, University of Michigan. Taught courses in political institutions and democratic theory.
Good Example
Academic Appointments
Assistant Professor
University of Michigan
2021–Present
Teaching Experience
Political Institutions
Democratic Theory
Explanation: Separating teaching records allows systems to index teaching history independently from employment data.
Some candidates list funded research projects inside publication sections.
This prevents grant extraction.
Good structure:
Research Grants
National Science Foundation
Democratic Accountability Project
Principal Investigator
$410,000
2022–2026
Academic hiring systems essentially convert CVs into structured databases.
An ATS friendly academic CV template should follow the Academic CV Indexing Model:
Research Output Layer
Peer-reviewed publications
Books and monographs
Book chapters
Funding Layer
Federal grants
Foundation funding
Institutional research awards
Academic Appointment Layer
Faculty roles
Visiting appointments
Postdoctoral positions
Teaching Layer
Courses taught
Curriculum development
Graduate supervision
Service Layer
Editorial boards
Peer reviewing
Department committees
When a CV mirrors this architecture, ATS systems extract structured profiles that committees can filter and compare.
Candidate Name: Dr. Jonathan Carter
Academic Title: Associate Professor of Political Science
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY
Political scientist specializing in democratic institutions, electoral accountability, and comparative governance. Research focuses on institutional trust and political participation across emerging democracies. Author of peer-reviewed publications in leading political science journals and principal investigator on federally funded research examining democratic resilience.
ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS
Associate Professor of Political Science
Boston University
Boston, Massachusetts
2020–Present
Assistant Professor of Political Science
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan
2015–2020
Postdoctoral Research Fellow
Princeton University
Princeton, New Jersey
2013–2015
EDUCATION
PhD in Political Science
Stanford University
Dissertation: Institutional Trust and Democratic Accountability
Advisor: Dr. Laura Simmons
MA in Political Science
University of Chicago
BA in Government
Georgetown University
PUBLICATIONS
Carter, J. (2024). Institutional trust and electoral legitimacy in emerging democracies. American Political Science Review.
Carter, J., Thompson, R. (2023). Political participation and democratic accountability. Comparative Political Studies.
Carter, J. (2021). Electoral transparency and voter behavior. Journal of Politics.
Carter, J., Lee, D. (2019). Institutional credibility and democratic resilience. World Politics.
RESEARCH GRANTS
National Science Foundation
Democratic Accountability Project
Principal Investigator
$450,000
2022–2026
Carnegie Foundation
Institutional Trust and Governance Study
Co-Principal Investigator
$210,000
2019–2022
TEACHING EXPERIENCE
Comparative Political Institutions
Boston University
Democratic Governance
Boston University
Political Institutions in Emerging Democracies
University of Michigan
Graduate Seminar in Comparative Politics
University of Michigan
CONFERENCE PRESENTATIONS
American Political Science Association Annual Meeting
Institutional Trust and Democratic Participation
2023
Midwest Political Science Association Conference
Electoral Accountability in Emerging Democracies
2022
ACADEMIC SERVICE
Editorial Board Member
Journal of Comparative Politics
Peer Reviewer
American Political Science Review
World Politics
Journal of Politics
Department Curriculum Committee
Boston University
AWARDS AND FELLOWSHIPS
National Science Foundation Early Career Award
American Political Science Association Best Paper Award
Stanford University Graduate Research Fellowship
This template succeeds because:
Section headings match recognized academic CV structures
Publications appear in structured citation format
Grant funding is isolated for indexing
Teaching history appears in a dedicated section
Career progression is chronological and clear
When uploaded into academic hiring platforms, this structure allows systems to automatically extract research, teaching, and funding records.
Academic hiring is gradually incorporating AI-assisted evaluation systems that analyze CVs for research productivity patterns.
Emerging academic evaluation models examine:
Publication frequency
Citation indicators
Funding trajectory
Institutional mobility
Collaboration networks
CVs that structure academic output clearly allow these systems to build accurate research profiles, improving candidate visibility.
Poorly formatted academic CVs may prevent AI tools from identifying strong research trajectories.
Upload CV
Import from Linkedin
