Choose from a wide range of CV templates and customize the design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised CV and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our CV builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your CV faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact CV rules employers look for.
Create CV
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact CV rules employers look for.
Create CVLegal hiring in the United States increasingly runs through Applicant Tracking Systems before any partner, legal recruiter, or hiring committee reviews a candidate. Large law firms, corporate legal departments, government agencies, and litigation boutiques all rely on systems such as Workday, iCIMS, Greenhouse, Lever, and Taleo to manage legal hiring pipelines.
An ATS friendly Attorney resume template is not about formatting preferences. It is about ensuring the resume communicates practice area alignment, jurisdictional eligibility, case experience, and legal competencies in a format that both ATS systems and legal recruiters can process immediately.
Legal hiring is extremely structured. Recruiters evaluate attorneys based on jurisdictional bar admission, practice specialization, billable experience, litigation exposure, transactional scope, and institutional pedigree. If a resume does not clearly surface these signals in an ATS-readable format, the candidate often never reaches the hiring partner.
This guide explains how ATS systems interpret attorney resumes, the structural resume formats that consistently pass legal hiring pipelines, and how top attorneys position their experience for automated and recruiter screening.
The focus is not general resume advice. The focus is how legal hiring systems actually evaluate attorney resumes today.
Many attorneys assume that law firm recruiting is still purely relationship-driven. While networking remains important, the first stage of hiring at most firms now involves automated resume filtering.
Large firms receiving 300–1,000 applications for a single associate role rely on ATS filtering to reduce the candidate pool.
Legal ATS systems typically scan resumes for:
Jurisdictional bar admission
Practice area alignment
Litigation or transactional experience
Law school credentials
Clerkship experience
Years of legal practice
Legal recruiters and ATS platforms both expect a specific structural hierarchy. Deviating from that structure often creates parsing errors.
An ATS compatible attorney resume generally follows this architecture:
The resume header should communicate the attorney’s professional identity instantly.
Essential components include:
Full name
Attorney designation (Attorney at Law, Esq., or Practice Area)
City and state
Phone number
Email address
Bar admissions
Bar admissions are one of the highest-weighted signals in legal ATS filtering.
If bar admissions are buried inside paragraphs or mixed within other sections, ATS systems may fail to extract them correctly.
The resume should include a dedicated section such as:
BAR ADMISSIONS
New York State Bar
U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
This clarity ensures ATS screening algorithms recognize jurisdiction eligibility quickly.
Court exposure or deal experience
Relevant legal research platforms
If these elements cannot be extracted or detected, the resume receives a low relevance score.
The result is simple: a highly qualified attorney can still be rejected automatically if the resume structure prevents ATS parsing.
Recruiters often search for jurisdiction immediately. Many firms will not review resumes without clear bar eligibility.
Example header format:
John Carter, Esq.
New York, NY
Admitted: New York State Bar | U.S. District Court SDNY
This information must appear in plain text so ATS systems can extract it.
Legal summaries should clarify practice specialization rather than general professional traits.
Recruiters scanning attorney resumes prioritize:
Practice area
Years of experience
Litigation vs transactional exposure
Client types
Industry focus
Weak Example
"Motivated attorney with strong legal research and communication skills seeking opportunities in a respected law firm."
Good Example
"Commercial litigation attorney with 8 years of experience representing corporate clients in complex contract disputes, regulatory investigations, and federal court litigation. Extensive experience managing discovery strategy, motion practice, and trial preparation in high-value commercial cases."
The difference: The strong version immediately signals litigation specialization, case exposure, and experience level, which ATS systems and legal recruiters both prioritize.
The experience section is where ATS systems evaluate the depth and relevance of legal practice.
Legal ATS systems scan for practice-specific keywords such as:
Litigation
Contract negotiation
Due diligence
Regulatory compliance
Mergers and acquisitions
Discovery management
Trial preparation
Each role should contain:
Employer name
Law firm or organization type
Location
Dates of employment
Legal responsibilities
Case or transaction exposure
Legal ATS software attempts to classify attorney candidates by practice specialization.
Therefore the experience section should contain clear practice indicators.
Weak Example
"Handled various legal matters for corporate clients."
Good Example
"Represented corporate clients in complex commercial litigation involving breach of contract, fiduciary duty disputes, and regulatory investigations in federal and state courts."
The difference: The good example allows ATS systems to detect litigation specialization and legal subject matter.
Attorney resumes often fail automated screening simply because the practice area is not clearly described.
Examples of practice-specific terminology that ATS systems search for include:
Corporate Law
Mergers and acquisitions
Corporate governance
Securities compliance
Due diligence
Transaction structuring
Litigation
Motion practice
Discovery management
Trial preparation
Depositions
Federal court litigation
Employment Law
Workplace investigations
Employment litigation
Labor compliance
Wage and hour disputes
These keywords should appear naturally within the experience section.
Modern law practice increasingly relies on legal technology tools.
ATS systems frequently detect these technologies when evaluating attorney resumes.
Relevant tools include:
Westlaw
LexisNexis
Relativity
CaseMap
Clio
DocuSign
Contract lifecycle management platforms
Including these platforms improves keyword matching, especially in corporate legal departments.
Many attorneys unknowingly submit resumes that ATS systems struggle to interpret.
Common formatting mistakes include:
Multi-column resume layouts
Text boxes containing experience
Tables used for employment history
Graphics and icons
These elements disrupt ATS text extraction.
An ATS friendly attorney resume template should follow these formatting standards:
Single column layout
Standard section headings
Reverse chronological experience order
Plain text formatting
Consistent bullet point structure
This ensures that both ATS systems and legal recruiters can read the resume without confusion.
Once the resume passes ATS screening, legal recruiters conduct extremely rapid reviews.
Recruiters typically scan for:
Practice area alignment
Years of experience
Law firm pedigree
Bar admission compatibility
Litigation or deal exposure
A recruiter reviewing a resume for 6–10 seconds should immediately see:
The attorney’s specialization
The candidate’s experience level
The relevant legal work performed
Resumes that hide these signals within vague descriptions are often rejected.
Below is a comprehensive attorney resume example structured specifically for ATS parsing and recruiter review.
Candidate Name: Daniel Thompson, Esq.
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Phone: (312) 555-9146
Email: daniel.thompson@lawmail.com
PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY
Commercial litigation attorney with 10 years of experience representing corporate clients in complex business disputes, contract litigation, and regulatory investigations. Extensive experience managing discovery strategy, motion practice, and federal court proceedings. Skilled in case strategy development, deposition management, and trial preparation for high-value commercial cases.
BAR ADMISSIONS
Illinois State Bar
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Senior Litigation Attorney
Baker & Simmons LLP – Chicago, Illinois
2018 – Present
Represent corporate clients in complex commercial litigation involving breach of contract, shareholder disputes, and regulatory enforcement actions
Manage discovery strategy including document review, electronic discovery coordination, and deposition preparation
Draft and argue motions in federal and state courts including motions to dismiss, summary judgment motions, and discovery motions
Collaborate with partners to develop case strategy for high-value litigation exceeding $10M in dispute value
Utilize Relativity and CaseMap platforms for litigation management and evidence organization
Litigation Associate
Harrison & Cole Law Firm – Chicago, Illinois
2014 – 2018
Represented corporate and financial services clients in commercial litigation matters in state and federal courts
Conducted legal research using Westlaw and LexisNexis for complex regulatory and contract disputes
Prepared pleadings, motions, and discovery responses for multi-party litigation cases
Assisted senior attorneys in trial preparation and courtroom proceedings
Judicial Law Clerk
U.S. District Court – Northern District of Illinois
2012 – 2014
Conducted legal research and drafted memoranda on federal civil litigation matters
Assisted the presiding judge with case analysis, motion review, and judicial opinions
EDUCATION
Juris Doctor
Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law
Bachelor of Arts – Political Science
University of Michigan
LEGAL SKILLS
Commercial litigation
Motion practice
Discovery management
Trial preparation
Regulatory compliance
Corporate dispute resolution
Westlaw
LexisNexis
Relativity
Many attorneys believe a visually sophisticated resume demonstrates professionalism. In reality, overly designed templates often prevent ATS systems from correctly extracting information.
Resumes that consistently pass legal ATS screening typically share these characteristics:
Structured section hierarchy
Clear bar admission placement
Practice area clarity
Keyword-rich legal experience descriptions
These resumes allow both automated systems and recruiters to quickly determine whether the candidate fits the role.
Legal hiring technology is evolving rapidly. Advanced ATS platforms are beginning to use AI-assisted evaluation systems that assess attorney resumes based on practice area relevance and experience depth.
Future systems will increasingly analyze:
Case exposure
Transaction value
Industry specialization
Litigation complexity
Attorneys whose resumes clearly structure this information will continue to outperform candidates using generic resume formats.
Upload CV
Import from Linkedin
