Choose from a wide range of CV templates and customize the design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised CV and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our CV builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your CV faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact CV rules employers look for.
Create CV
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact CV rules employers look for.
Fellowship selection pipelines differ significantly from corporate hiring pipelines, yet they increasingly rely on the same digital infrastructure: applicant tracking systems (ATS), automated document parsing, and structured evaluation dashboards used by academic committees, policy organizations, medical institutions, and research foundations.
An ATS friendly fellowship application CV template is therefore not simply a formatting preference. It determines whether key achievements, publications, research grants, clinical experience, or policy contributions are correctly parsed into reviewer dashboards. When parsing fails, the candidate is not rejected by an algorithm alone. Instead, their work is structurally invisible to fellowship reviewers.
Modern fellowship selection processes now operate through three sequential evaluation layers:
ATS parsing layer
Administrative eligibility screening
Expert committee evaluation
A CV template optimized for ATS compatibility ensures that each layer receives correctly structured information without distortion or data loss.
This page examines the structural logic of ATS compatible fellowship CVs, common formatting failures seen in fellowship applications, and the template architecture that survives modern parsing systems used by universities, research councils, and global fellowship programs.
Many high-performing candidates assume fellowship applications are reviewed purely by committees. In practice, most programs use digital application platforms such as:
Submittable
InfoReady
Interfolio
SmartSimple
SurveyMonkey Apply
AcademicWorks
These systems extract data fields directly from CV uploads. When a CV uses design-heavy layouts, multi-column formats, or ambiguous section titles, the system fails to map information into structured application fields.
Recruiters and program administrators frequently see these issues:
Unlike general resumes, fellowship CVs contain highly specialized academic and research data. Parsing systems look for predictable hierarchies and terminology to categorize this information.
Three structural rules govern successful ATS parsing.
Section titles must match commonly recognized academic CV headings. Creative titles break parsing logic.
Recognized headings include:
Professional Experience
Education
Publications
Research Experience
Grants and Funding
Awards and Fellowships
ATS systems do not make fellowship decisions, but they shape what reviewers see first.
Recruiters and program administrators typically compile candidate summaries using extracted data fields.
The committee dashboard often displays:
Name
Current institution
Research focus
Key publications
Funding history
Fellowships and awards
If the ATS fails to extract this information, the candidate profile appears thin compared to competitors.
This creates a subtle bias during initial screening, especially when committees evaluate hundreds of applications.
An ATS friendly fellowship CV template ensures that the most important scholarly outputs appear clearly in these summary dashboards.
Publications appearing under employment history
Grants parsed as job titles
Fellowships interpreted as education entries
Author order lost in publication lists
Research interests truncated or ignored
When this occurs, committees reviewing applicant dashboards see incomplete candidate profiles. The CV itself may still be downloadable, but many reviewers rely heavily on the system-generated summary.
The ATS friendly fellowship application CV template prevents this failure by structuring information according to machine-readable patterns recognized by parsing engines.
Teaching Experience
Clinical Experience
Policy Work or Advisory Roles
Unrecognized headings such as “Impact Portfolio” or “Professional Journey” prevent the ATS from assigning information to correct categories.
Multi-column templates frequently cause parsing errors.
In ATS extraction, information is read line by line from left to right. Multi-column layouts result in fragmented entries where dates, institutions, and titles become separated.
A safe fellowship CV structure always follows:
Single column layout
Left-aligned headings
Consistent date formatting
Chronological ordering
Every professional entry must follow a consistent pattern that parsing systems recognize.
Correct structure:
Role
Institution
Location
Dates
Inconsistent patterns reduce extraction accuracy.
Weak Example
Research Fellow — 2023
Harvard Medical School
Good Example
Research Fellow
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
2023 – Present
The second format preserves hierarchy and improves parsing reliability.
Certain sections are particularly vulnerable to ATS misinterpretation.
Publications must be structured consistently with author order preserved.
Incorrect formatting often breaks parsing.
Weak Example
Nature, 2023 – Smith et al.
Good Example
Smith, J., Anderson, M., Patel, R.
“Neural Regeneration Pathways in Traumatic Injury.”
Nature, 2023.
Consistent author listing and journal formatting allow parsing systems to recognize publication entries.
Funding history is often a key selection criterion in competitive fellowships.
ATS systems frequently misinterpret grant entries when amounts or roles are embedded mid-sentence.
Weak Example
Awarded NIH grant for $250,000 for neural recovery research.
Good Example
Principal Investigator
NIH Research Grant — $250,000
Project: Neural Recovery Mechanisms
2022 – 2024
This structure enables parsing engines to correctly categorize funding data.
Awards must be clearly distinguished from employment roles.
Many candidates list them under experience sections, causing classification errors.
Correct format:
Award Name
Awarding Institution
Year
Clear separation preserves the distinction between recognition and employment.
Top fellowship candidates use CV frameworks that prioritize machine readability without sacrificing scholarly detail.
A reliable ATS friendly fellowship CV template typically follows this order:
Professional Summary
Research Interests
Education
Research Experience
Publications
Grants and Funding
Teaching Experience
Policy or Advisory Experience
Awards and Fellowships
Professional Affiliations
Conference Presentations
Skills and Methodologies
This sequence aligns with how many fellowship programs evaluate academic impact.
Candidate Name: Daniel Carter
Target Role: Global Health Policy Fellowship Applicant
Location: Washington, DC
PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY
Global health policy researcher with 10+ years of experience leading cross-border health initiatives, advising international organizations, and producing peer-reviewed research on infectious disease response systems. Principal investigator on federally funded public health projects totaling $1.8M in grant support. Contributor to WHO policy frameworks addressing pandemic preparedness and vaccine equity.
RESEARCH INTERESTS
Global pandemic response systems
Vaccine distribution equity
Health policy governance
Cross-border disease surveillance
Public health infrastructure development
EDUCATION
Doctor of Public Health (DrPH)
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Baltimore, MD
Master of Public Policy
Georgetown University
Washington, DC
Bachelor of Science in Biology
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, VA
RESEARCH EXPERIENCE
Senior Research Associate
Global Health Policy Institute, Washington, DC
2021 – Present
Led multi-country research initiative examining pandemic supply chain resilience across Southeast Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa.
Managed interdisciplinary research teams across five partner institutions.
Developed policy recommendations adopted by international health advisory boards.
Research Fellow
Center for Global Disease Policy, Boston, MA
2017 – 2021
Conducted large-scale epidemiological policy analysis evaluating national preparedness frameworks.
Contributed research to international pandemic response guidelines used by multiple national health agencies.
PUBLICATIONS
Carter, D., Nguyen, T., Alvarez, M.
“Structural Failures in Global Vaccine Distribution Systems.”
The Lancet Global Health, 2023.
Carter, D., Henderson, P.
“Public Health Governance in Cross-Border Epidemics.”
Global Health Policy Review, 2022.
Carter, D.
“Pandemic Response Models for Resource-Limited Nations.”
International Journal of Health Systems, 2021.
GRANTS AND FUNDING
Principal Investigator
NIH Global Health Systems Grant — $950,000
Project: Pandemic Preparedness Infrastructure in Emerging Economies
2022 – 2025
Co-Investigator
Gates Foundation Research Grant — $850,000
Project: Vaccine Distribution Strategy Evaluation
2020 – 2023
TEACHING EXPERIENCE
Adjunct Lecturer
Georgetown University School of Public Policy
Course: Global Health Governance
Designed graduate-level curriculum on international disease policy systems.
Supervised policy research projects addressing pandemic readiness frameworks.
POLICY AND ADVISORY EXPERIENCE
Policy Advisor
World Health Organization Advisory Panel
Senior Policy Consultant
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
AWARDS AND FELLOWSHIPS
Emerging Global Health Scholar Award
International Public Health Association
Global Policy Innovation Fellowship
Brookings Institution
Johns Hopkins Public Health Leadership Fellowship
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
American Public Health Association
Global Health Council
International Society for Infectious Disease Policy
CONFERENCE PRESENTATIONS
World Health Summit
Berlin Global Health Forum
International Pandemic Preparedness Conference
SKILLS AND METHODOLOGIES
Epidemiological policy analysis
Global health systems modeling
Grant-funded research management
Cross-national policy evaluation
Data analysis using R and Python
Even strong candidates frequently introduce formatting issues that damage ATS readability.
Tables are commonly used for publications or grants.
ATS systems often interpret tables as disorganized text blocks, leading to incomplete entries.
Icons for phone, email, or LinkedIn profiles frequently cause parsing errors.
Plain text contact information is more reliable.
Inconsistent date formats disrupt chronological sorting.
Preferred format:
Month Year – Month Year
or
Year – Year
Consistency improves extraction accuracy.
Academic committees understand abbreviations, but ATS systems may not.
Use full institution names when possible.
Beyond parsing, committees assess fellowships through several implicit evaluation filters.
These include:
Research trajectory coherence
Funding credibility
Publication influence
Institutional reputation
Policy or societal impact
A well-structured ATS friendly fellowship CV template makes these signals immediately visible.
Reviewers should quickly identify:
Research focus continuity
Increasing leadership responsibility
Independent research capability
Policy or real-world influence
If these signals are buried inside poorly structured sections, reviewers often overlook them during initial screening.
Academic institutions and research fellowships are increasingly adopting structured CV formats.
Examples include:
narrative CV models used by research councils
competency-based academic CV frameworks
machine-readable academic profiles
These systems rely even more heavily on accurate parsing.
Candidates using ATS friendly fellowship CV templates are already aligned with these emerging evaluation models.
Upload CV
Import from Linkedin
