Choose from a wide range of CV templates and customize the design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised CV and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our CV builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your CV faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact CV rules employers look for.
Create CV
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact CV rules employers look for.
Create CVThe hiring market for Generative AI Engineers has evolved faster than most resume advice online. Recruiters screening these roles are not simply searching for “AI experience.” They are evaluating a very specific technical signal stack: LLM architecture familiarity, inference optimization, model integration into production systems, and measurable impact on AI-driven products.
An ATS friendly Generative AI Engineer CV template must reflect how modern AI teams actually hire. Recruiters reviewing these resumes typically come from machine learning engineering, platform engineering, or AI product teams. They screen for architectural depth, model deployment capability, and real-world generative AI applications.
A resume that merely lists AI technologies rarely passes screening. Modern ATS filters combined with recruiter triage systems prioritize candidates who demonstrate concrete interaction with generative models, production pipelines, and scalable infrastructure.
This page explains how an ATS friendly Generative AI Engineer CV template must be structured to pass modern hiring pipelines and recruiter evaluation.
Most candidates misunderstand how ATS filters identify generative AI engineers.
Recruiter searches are rarely generic. Instead, hiring teams search combinations of architecture signals, generative model frameworks, and infrastructure tools.
Typical ATS queries used by recruiters include:
“LLM fine-tuning AND Python AND HuggingFace”
“LangChain OR LlamaIndex AND RAG”
“Diffusion models AND PyTorch AND GPU optimization”
“Prompt engineering AND LLM evaluation”
“Vector database AND embedding pipelines”
A resume fails ATS screening when it lacks architecture context.
Many resumes say:
Weak Example
“Worked on AI models and machine learning pipelines.”
Recruiters cannot infer generative AI capability from this statement.
Recruiters screening generative AI engineers are evaluating five technical dimensions.
Recruiters look for evidence of interaction with large models beyond API calls.
Signals include:
Fine-tuning strategies
Prompt optimization frameworks
Model evaluation pipelines
Token optimization techniques
Model benchmarking methods
Resumes that only reference “OpenAI API” without context appear junior.
Strong resumes show engineering interaction with model behavior.
Generative AI engineers are hired to integrate models into products.
The structure of the resume significantly affects ATS scoring.
Generative AI engineers benefit from a signal-heavy layout rather than narrative descriptions.
An effective Generative AI Engineer CV typically includes:
Professional Summary
Core Generative AI Expertise
LLM Architecture Experience
Professional Experience
Generative AI Projects
Infrastructure & Tools
Good Example
“Designed retrieval-augmented generation pipelines using LangChain, OpenAI GPT models, and Pinecone vector databases to power enterprise document intelligence systems.”
The difference is architectural specificity.
ATS systems rank resumes higher when they contain technical entity combinations commonly associated with generative AI production environments.
Recruiters look for signals such as:
Retrieval augmented generation systems
AI copilots embedded into platforms
Document understanding systems
AI powered search infrastructure
Conversational AI architectures
Generative AI systems require infrastructure.
Recruiters scan resumes for:
GPU orchestration
inference pipelines
distributed training
vector databases
model serving frameworks
ATS scoring improves when these infrastructure signals appear in proximity to generative AI frameworks.
Companies deploying LLMs require evaluation frameworks.
Signals include:
hallucination mitigation
benchmark testing
prompt evaluation systems
automated model validation
reinforcement learning feedback loops
Resumes that include evaluation infrastructure often stand out immediately.
Recruiters prioritize engineers who built real AI systems.
High performing resumes include measurable impact such as:
reduced latency in LLM responses
increased answer accuracy
improved AI search relevance
deployed generative features to millions of users
Education
Each section contributes to keyword clustering that ATS ranking systems evaluate.
ATS systems increasingly rely on semantic grouping of technical terms.
High performing resumes often contain clusters like these.
GPT models
Llama models
Claude models
HuggingFace Transformers
fine-tuning techniques
LangChain
LlamaIndex
RAG pipelines
vector databases
embedding models
Kubernetes
GPU clusters
distributed inference
Docker
cloud AI infrastructure
data preprocessing pipelines
training dataset curation
embedding generation
feature engineering
When these clusters appear throughout a resume, ATS algorithms interpret the candidate as deeply specialized in generative AI.
From a recruiter perspective, the most useful evaluation model looks like this.
Recruiters often categorize candidates across four dimensions.
Signals:
transformer architecture familiarity
prompt engineering frameworks
tokenization understanding
fine-tuning pipelines
Signals:
RAG implementations
multi-agent architectures
AI orchestration frameworks
vector search pipelines
Signals:
distributed inference
GPU optimization
model deployment frameworks
latency optimization
Signals:
AI features shipped to production
AI adoption metrics
revenue impact from AI systems
measurable improvements in AI performance
The strongest resumes show all four dimensions.
Certain resume patterns consistently weaken generative AI resumes.
Recruiters hiring generative AI engineers are not primarily searching for classic ML roles like regression models or basic classifiers.
Weak Example
“Built predictive machine learning models using scikit-learn.”
Good Example
“Implemented retrieval-augmented generation architecture using GPT-4, LangChain orchestration, and Pinecone embeddings to power contextual enterprise search.”
The improvement is alignment with generative AI architectures.
Weak Example
“Skills: Python, PyTorch, HuggingFace, OpenAI API.”
Good Example
“Developed fine-tuned transformer models using PyTorch and HuggingFace to generate domain-specific responses across 12 million knowledge base documents.”
Tools must be tied to engineering outcomes.
Resumes that mention AI but never mention RAG, embeddings, or prompt systems often fail screening.
Below is a high-level example of how a Generative AI Engineer resume should be structured.
Candidate Name: Michael Anderson
Job Title: Senior Generative AI Engineer
Location: San Francisco, California
PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY
Generative AI Engineer specializing in large language model systems, retrieval-augmented generation architectures, and AI platform engineering. Experienced in designing scalable generative AI products using transformer-based models, vector databases, and distributed GPU infrastructure. Proven track record deploying production-grade AI copilots, conversational agents, and enterprise knowledge retrieval systems supporting millions of user interactions.
CORE GENERATIVE AI EXPERTISE
Large Language Models (GPT, Llama, Claude)
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) Systems
Prompt Engineering & Evaluation Pipelines
Transformer Model Fine-Tuning
AI Agent Architectures
Vector Database Systems
Embedding Model Optimization
AI Infrastructure & GPU Orchestration
LLM ARCHITECTURE EXPERIENCE
Designed scalable RAG pipelines integrating LangChain orchestration with OpenAI and HuggingFace transformer models.
Implemented semantic search architectures using embedding models and vector databases including Pinecone and Weaviate.
Built multi-agent AI systems capable of autonomous task orchestration using LLM-based reasoning pipelines.
Developed automated prompt evaluation frameworks measuring hallucination rate, answer accuracy, and response latency.
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Senior Generative AI Engineer
Nimbus AI Technologies – San Francisco, CA
Led development of enterprise generative AI platforms powering AI-driven document intelligence and conversational assistants.
Architected retrieval-augmented generation infrastructure integrating LangChain, OpenAI GPT models, and Pinecone vector indexing.
Reduced AI response latency by 42% through optimized token management and model inference pipelines.
Built AI copilots used by over 600,000 enterprise users for knowledge discovery and document summarization.
Implemented automated evaluation pipelines measuring hallucination rate and answer relevance across production AI systems.
Designed embedding generation pipelines processing over 50 million enterprise documents.
Machine Learning Engineer (Generative Systems)
Atlas Data Platforms – Seattle, WA
Specialized in transformer-based generative models and AI infrastructure deployment.
Fine-tuned domain-specific transformer models for automated report generation across financial datasets.
Built LLM-powered AI search platform integrating vector similarity search and generative response synthesis.
Implemented distributed inference pipelines using Kubernetes and GPU clusters.
Improved AI response relevance by 38% through prompt optimization and retrieval architecture redesign.
GENERATIVE AI PROJECTS
Enterprise Knowledge Copilot
AI system enabling contextual retrieval and conversational interaction with corporate knowledge repositories.
Integrated LLM models with document embeddings and vector search infrastructure.
Designed retrieval pipelines capable of answering complex domain-specific questions.
Implemented automated evaluation metrics monitoring hallucination rates and response reliability.
Autonomous AI Research Agent
Multi-agent generative AI system capable of researching technical topics and producing structured reports.
Implemented agent orchestration using LangChain agent frameworks.
Integrated web data retrieval pipelines with transformer-based reasoning models.
Built evaluation pipelines validating research output accuracy.
AI INFRASTRUCTURE & TOOLS
Python
PyTorch
HuggingFace Transformers
LangChain
LlamaIndex
Pinecone
Weaviate
Docker
Kubernetes
AWS AI Infrastructure
EDUCATION
Master of Science – Artificial Intelligence
Stanford University
Bachelor of Science – Computer Science
University of Washington
ATS platforms do more than keyword detection. Modern systems build semantic profiles of candidates.
Key factors that influence ranking include:
Generative AI frameworks appearing throughout the resume increase relevance scoring.
ATS systems detect relationships between terms.
For example:
“LangChain + RAG + vector database” signals generative AI system architecture.
Candidates who include titles such as:
Generative AI Engineer
LLM Engineer
AI Platform Engineer
are easier for ATS systems to categorize.
Generative AI hiring trends are evolving quickly.
Recruiters increasingly look for experience with:
AI agents
autonomous LLM workflows
multimodal generative systems
LLM evaluation frameworks
fine-tuned domain models
Candidates who incorporate these signals often outperform those with traditional ML resumes.
The most competitive resumes position the candidate as a system architect rather than a model user.
This means highlighting:
end-to-end AI pipelines
production deployment
architecture design
AI performance optimization
Recruiters consistently prioritize engineers who built complete generative AI systems rather than experimental prototypes.
Resumes should explicitly mention retrieval augmented generation architecture and its components together. ATS systems identify RAG expertise when terms like embeddings, vector database, LangChain orchestration, and LLM response synthesis appear within the same work description. Listing “RAG experience” without describing system architecture often fails ATS relevance scoring.
Including prompt engineering as a skill is useful, but ATS systems rank resumes higher when prompt engineering appears within system implementations. For example, describing prompt evaluation pipelines, prompt optimization experiments, or automated prompt testing frameworks provides stronger evidence than listing prompt engineering as a standalone skill.
Yes. Recruiter searches frequently include model names. Resumes referencing GPT models, Llama models, Claude models, or HuggingFace transformers create stronger ATS matching signals. Generic references to “large language models” do not perform as well as explicit model ecosystem terminology.
Vector databases are one of the strongest ATS signals for generative AI roles. Recruiters often search for candidates with Pinecone, Weaviate, FAISS, or Milvus experience because these systems are core components of retrieval pipelines powering enterprise generative AI systems.
Yes, but only if the projects demonstrate system architecture. Recruiters value projects showing multi-agent systems, autonomous AI tools, retrieval pipelines, or AI copilots. Small experimental notebooks or tutorial-based projects rarely contribute meaningful signals in ATS screening.
GPU Clusters
Upload CV
Import from Linkedin
