Choose from a wide range of CV templates and customize the design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised CV and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our CV builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your CV faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact CV rules employers look for.
Create CV
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact CV rules employers look for.
Create CVAcademic hiring has adopted many of the same screening technologies used in corporate recruitment. Universities, research institutes, and large academic medical centers increasingly rely on Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) to manage large faculty applicant pools. For professor roles, ATS does not replace peer review or hiring committees, but it absolutely determines which applications reach those committees.
An ATS friendly professor resume template is not about formatting aesthetics. It is about structuring academic credentials, publications, grants, and teaching history in a way that the system can accurately parse, categorize, and rank. Many highly qualified academics fail at this stage because their CVs are optimized for human readers but incompatible with parsing algorithms.
This page examines how ATS systems evaluate professor resumes, how academic screening logic works, and how to design a professor resume template that consistently passes automated screening before reaching faculty review committees.
Academic ATS screening follows a hybrid logic combining keyword classification, structured data extraction, and institutional filtering.
Unlike corporate resumes where experience progression dominates, professor resume screening prioritizes structured academic output signals.
ATS platforms categorize academic applicants based on identifiable data fields. These fields determine candidate ranking before committee review.
Primary data extraction fields include:
Academic appointments and institutional affiliations
Peer reviewed publications
Research grants and funding awards
Teaching experience and course leadership
Academic service roles
The most effective professor resume template mirrors how academic hiring databases structure faculty profiles internally.
Instead of writing a narrative CV, the template should function like a structured academic database.
An optimized professor resume template follows a hierarchy aligned with faculty evaluation criteria.
Recommended section order:
Professional Summary
Academic Appointments
Research Interests
Education
Peer Reviewed Publications
Grants and Research Funding
Faculty recruiters and academic search administrators often review ATS generated candidate summaries before sharing applications with hiring committees.
These summaries are auto-generated from the extracted resume data.
If the ATS fails to correctly extract publications, grants, or teaching roles, the candidate appears significantly weaker than they actually are.
When reviewing ATS extracted profiles, administrators typically look for three academic indicators.
Research productivity
Teaching record
Funding success
These signals are quickly visible when resumes are structured correctly.
When the template hides these signals, the system summary underrepresents the candidate.
This dramatically affects which applicants are forwarded to committees.
Editorial board participation
Conference presentations
Citations and research impact metrics
Education and doctoral training
Professional society memberships
If the ATS cannot identify these fields clearly, the applicant profile becomes incomplete within the system database.
Incomplete profiles rarely reach faculty screening committees.
Many professors maintain long-form academic CVs that evolved through years of academic promotion cycles. These documents are often incompatible with modern ATS architecture.
Typical parsing failures include:
Publication lists embedded in tables or columns
Grant information buried in narrative paragraphs
Teaching experience mixed within research sections
Section titles that vary widely between institutions
Unstructured conference presentation lists
Non-standard formatting for academic appointments
ATS systems rely heavily on section labeling to classify academic achievements.
When sections are not clearly labeled, the system may misclassify publications as general experience or ignore them entirely.
This is one of the most common hidden reasons strong faculty candidates are filtered out early.
Teaching Experience
Conference Presentations
Academic Service and Leadership
Editorial and Peer Review Roles
Professional Affiliations
Honors and Awards
This structure matches how faculty applicant tracking systems classify academic profiles.
Unlike corporate ATS systems, academic screening tools rely heavily on section recognition.
For example:
A section labeled “Publications” is automatically indexed.
But a section labeled “Scholarly Contributions” may not be detected depending on the parsing configuration.
Consistency across applications increases parsing accuracy.
Publications represent one of the most important ranking signals for professor positions.
However, poorly formatted publication lists often break ATS parsing.
Publications should be listed individually with consistent formatting.
Include:
Author names
Year of publication
Article title
Journal name
Volume and issue
DOI when available
Avoid:
Multi column formatting
Numbered references embedded in paragraphs
Footnote based citations
ATS systems are optimized to detect standard citation patterns.
Weak Example
“Various publications in top journals including research on machine learning, AI systems, and distributed computing.”
Good Example
Smith, J., Carter, A. (2023). Scalable Machine Learning Architectures for Distributed Data Systems. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research.
Carter, A., Nguyen, P. (2022). Optimization Algorithms for Neural Network Training. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.
Why the good example works
The ATS can detect individual publications, extract the journal names, and associate them with academic research output. Narrative summaries cannot be parsed effectively.
Research funding is a major evaluation factor for tenure track and senior professor positions.
ATS systems frequently extract funding data to calculate research productivity indicators.
Grant entries should include:
Funding agency
Grant title
Role in grant
Funding amount
Grant duration
Many academic applicants omit funding amounts, which reduces perceived impact.
Weak Example
“Received multiple grants from NSF and NIH for computational research.”
Good Example
National Science Foundation. Principal Investigator. Scalable Data Systems for Autonomous Infrastructure. $1.8M Grant. 2021–2025.
National Institutes of Health. Co Investigator. AI Driven Diagnostics in Radiology. $950K Grant. 2019–2023.
Why the good example works
ATS systems can classify the funding agency, detect leadership role, and record funding value as a measurable research indicator.
Teaching data must be structured clearly so the ATS can associate faculty candidates with curriculum delivery experience.
Teaching experience should always include course level indicators.
Include:
Course title
Academic level
Institution
Years taught
Example structure:
Advanced Machine Learning. Graduate Level Course. Stanford University. 2020–2024.
Introduction to Data Science. Undergraduate Course. University of Michigan. 2018–2022.
This format ensures the ATS identifies teaching depth and curriculum coverage.
Several formatting patterns consistently reduce ATS visibility.
Many senior academics rely heavily on narrative descriptions rather than structured sections.
ATS systems cannot extract structured achievements from long prose.
Tables frequently break ATS parsing engines.
Publication lists, grants, and teaching history should never be placed inside tables.
Examples include:
“Research, Teaching, and Service”
These combined sections prevent the system from categorizing accomplishments.
Separated sections perform significantly better.
Academic ATS systems also incorporate keyword ranking similar to corporate hiring software.
Keywords usually originate from the job posting.
Examples include:
tenure track faculty
research funding
peer reviewed publications
graduate supervision
curriculum development
interdisciplinary research
These keywords must appear naturally in the resume within relevant sections.
Over optimization is unnecessary because academic screening relies heavily on structured outputs.
Below is a comprehensive ATS optimized professor resume example reflecting modern academic hiring standards.
Candidate Name: Dr. Jonathan Carter
Target Position: Professor of Computer Science
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY
Distinguished computer science researcher and educator with more than 18 years of academic experience in artificial intelligence, distributed systems, and scalable machine learning. Proven record of securing multi million dollar research funding, publishing in top tier peer reviewed journals, and leading interdisciplinary research teams. Experienced graduate supervisor with extensive curriculum development and doctoral mentorship across leading research universities.
RESEARCH INTERESTS
Artificial Intelligence
Distributed Computing
Machine Learning Systems
Autonomous Data Infrastructure
Scalable Cloud Architectures
ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS
Professor of Computer Science
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
2018–Present
Associate Professor of Computer Science
University of Michigan
2013–2018
Assistant Professor of Computer Science
University of Texas at Austin
2008–2013
EDUCATION
PhD Computer Science
Stanford University
Master of Science Computer Science
Carnegie Mellon University
Bachelor of Science Computer Engineering
University of California Berkeley
PEER REVIEWED PUBLICATIONS
Carter, J., Williams, L. (2024). Distributed Learning Architectures for Large Scale Data Systems. Journal of Machine Learning Research.
Carter, J., Liu, R. (2023). Adaptive Optimization Methods for Autonomous AI Platforms. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.
Carter, J., Hernandez, M. (2022). High Performance Neural Training Systems for Distributed Infrastructure. ACM Transactions on Computing Systems.
Carter, J., Patel, S. (2021). Large Scale Data Processing Using Autonomous Learning Systems. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research.
GRANTS AND RESEARCH FUNDING
National Science Foundation. Principal Investigator. Autonomous Machine Learning Infrastructure. $2.4M Grant. 2022–2026.
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. Co Principal Investigator. Distributed AI for Defense Systems. $1.7M Grant. 2020–2024.
National Institutes of Health. Co Investigator. Machine Learning for Predictive Diagnostics. $1.2M Grant. 2019–2023.
TEACHING EXPERIENCE
Graduate Seminar in Machine Learning Systems
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
2019–Present
Advanced Distributed Computing
University of Michigan
2015–2018
Introduction to Artificial Intelligence
University of Texas at Austin
2009–2013
CONFERENCE PRESENTATIONS
International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML)
Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS)
IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems
ACADEMIC SERVICE AND LEADERSHIP
Department Graduate Admissions Committee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Faculty Research Advisory Board
University of Michigan
PhD Dissertation Committee Chair for 12 Doctoral Graduates
EDITORIAL AND PEER REVIEW ROLES
Editorial Board Member
Journal of Machine Learning Research
Peer Reviewer
IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks
Peer Reviewer
ACM Transactions on Computing Systems
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Association for Computing Machinery
IEEE Computer Society
HONORS AND AWARDS
NSF Career Award
ACM Distinguished Researcher Award
MIT Excellence in Graduate Teaching Award
Academic hiring systems are evolving quickly.
Large universities increasingly integrate research databases such as ORCID, Google Scholar, and Scopus into applicant tracking systems.
This means future ATS systems will automatically cross reference:
citation counts
h index
publication databases
Resumes that clearly align with these research indicators will rank higher within automated faculty candidate profiles.
Upload CV
Import from Linkedin
