Choose from a wide range of CV templates and customize the design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised CV and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our CV builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your CV faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact CV rules employers look for.
Create CV
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact CV rules employers look for.
Create CVQuality Assurance engineering roles sit at a unique intersection inside ATS pipelines. Unlike many technical positions where keyword density alone can surface a resume, QA Engineer resumes are often evaluated through pattern matching of tools, testing methodologies, release lifecycle exposure, and defect management environments.
In modern hiring workflows across US tech companies, QA resumes are not screened purely for “testing experience.” Recruiters and ATS systems assess whether the candidate demonstrates practical testing ownership inside real product environments.
An ATS friendly QA Engineer resume template must therefore do three things simultaneously:
Structure testing experience so ATS systems correctly parse tools and frameworks
Demonstrate testing impact within engineering delivery cycles
Reflect operational testing responsibility rather than task-level participation
Most QA resumes fail not because of missing skills, but because the testing context is invisible to ATS parsing and recruiter scanning logic.
This guide explains how QA Engineer resumes are actually interpreted inside hiring pipelines and provides a fully structured ATS friendly QA Engineer resume template aligned with modern screening behavior.
Recruiters reviewing QA resumes typically see three recurring failure patterns:
Many resumes list testing tools but fail to show where they were used.
Example:
Weak Example
Selenium
Postman
JIRA
Automation testing
This structure gives ATS keyword signals but no indication of system complexity, testing ownership, or deployment environment.
Good Example
Built Selenium WebDriver automation suite validating checkout flow across Chrome, Firefox, and Safari environments supporting 2M monthly transactions
ATS platforms used by technology companies (Greenhouse, Lever, Workday, Ashby) evaluate QA resumes using several layered signals.
Systems scan for test automation frameworks, testing tools, and defect tracking systems.
Common ATS recognized QA keywords:
Selenium
Cypress
Playwright
Appium
Postman
REST Assured
TestNG
Below is the structural format that performs best in ATS screening.
Must contain:
Name
City, State
Phone
Avoid:
Icons
Graphics
Designed Postman API regression collection covering 140 endpoints within microservices architecture
Managed defect triage workflow in JIRA integrated with sprint release cycles and CI/CD pipeline validation
The difference: ATS detects identical keywords, but recruiter interpretation changes dramatically because the system environment and scale are visible.
Recruiters see thousands of resumes claiming:
Executed test cases
Performed manual testing
Logged defects
This language signals low ownership testing roles.
Modern QA teams expect engineers who:
Build automated frameworks
Define test strategy
Validate product releases across environments
When resumes emphasize task execution rather than testing ownership, they fail both ATS scoring and recruiter credibility screening.
Many resumes list automation tools but provide no indication of framework architecture.
Example:
Weak Example
Good Example
Recruiters read the second statement and immediately understand this candidate built automation infrastructure rather than running scripts.
JUnit
Cucumber
Jenkins
Git
Docker
Kubernetes
JIRA
TestRail
However, tool recognition alone rarely advances resumes to recruiter review.
Recruiters want evidence that QA engineers operate inside real development environments.
Signals that increase ATS ranking:
Regression testing frameworks
CI/CD validation
API testing environments
Microservices testing
Agile sprint release cycles
Test automation pipelines
Without these signals, the resume appears detached from modern software delivery models.
QA is evaluated as an engineering partner role, not a support role.
Strong resumes show interaction with:
Backend engineering teams
DevOps pipelines
Product managers
Release engineering
ATS systems detect these signals through keywords like:
CI/CD pipeline
Continuous integration testing
Deployment validation
Production monitoring
Tables
These break ATS parsing.
This section must immediately communicate testing domain specialization and environment complexity.
Weak summaries focus on years of experience.
Strong summaries communicate engineering impact in testing environments.
Organized keyword clusters improve ATS matching.
Example structure:
Test Automation Frameworks
Programming Languages
API Testing Tools
CI/CD Integration
Defect Tracking Systems
Test Management Platforms
This allows ATS to correctly map skills to job descriptions.
The most critical section.
Each role must demonstrate:
Testing ownership
Framework implementation
Release validation impact
Engineering collaboration
Bullet points should represent testing outcomes, not testing activities.
ATS systems still use education filters in certain enterprise companies.
Common QA certifications:
ISTQB
Certified Software Test Engineer (CSTE)
Agile Testing Certification
Recruiters quickly scan QA resumes for evidence of engineering maturity.
Strong language patterns include:
Built automation frameworks
Designed test strategy
Led regression testing initiatives
Implemented CI testing pipelines
Reduced manual test coverage through automation
Weak language patterns include:
Performed testing
Assisted with QA
Executed scripts
These signals often determine whether the resume receives 10 seconds or 60 seconds of recruiter attention.
Below is a fully structured resume example aligned with modern ATS screening logic.
JONATHAN CARTER
Senior QA Engineer
Austin, Texas
Phone: (512) 555-0184
Email: jonathan.carter@email.com
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/jonathancarterqa
PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY
Senior QA Engineer with 8+ years of experience designing automated testing frameworks across high-scale SaaS platforms. Specialized in Selenium-based automation architecture, API testing strategies, and CI/CD pipeline validation supporting enterprise product releases. Proven track record reducing regression cycle times through scalable automation suites and integrating testing environments with DevOps deployment pipelines.
CORE TESTING COMPETENCIES
Test Automation Frameworks: Selenium WebDriver, Cypress, Playwright
Programming Languages: Java, Python, JavaScript
API Testing: Postman, REST Assured
CI/CD Integration: Jenkins, GitHub Actions
Defect Tracking: JIRA
Test Management: TestRail, Zephyr
Cloud & DevOps: Docker, Kubernetes
Development Methodologies: Agile, Scrum
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Senior QA Engineer
BrightScale Software – Austin, Texas
2021 – Present
Architected Selenium automation framework covering checkout, billing, and subscription flows supporting SaaS platform serving 1.8M active users
Integrated automated regression suite with Jenkins CI pipeline reducing manual regression testing time by 70%
Implemented REST API testing strategy using Postman collections validating 120+ microservice endpoints
Led release validation testing across staging and production environments supporting bi-weekly deployment cycles
Collaborated with DevOps engineers to embed automated test execution into Kubernetes-based deployment workflows
Reduced defect escape rate by 38% through improved regression test coverage and automated validation processes
QA Automation Engineer
CloudBridge Technologies – Denver, Colorado
2018 – 2021
Developed Cypress-based UI automation framework validating customer onboarding workflows within SaaS CRM platform
Built API testing suite using REST Assured integrated into CI pipeline validating authentication and account management services
Implemented test data generation framework supporting multi-environment testing across staging and QA clusters
Participated in sprint planning and release readiness reviews ensuring testing coverage aligned with product roadmap
Reduced production defects by 32% through improved integration testing and automated regression execution
Software QA Engineer
DeltaWare Systems – Chicago, Illinois
2015 – 2018
Executed full-cycle testing for enterprise logistics platform including UI, API, and database validation
Built initial Selenium automation scripts covering core order management workflows
Managed defect triage process coordinating with engineering teams to prioritize release blockers
Maintained regression testing library covering 200+ critical platform scenarios
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science – Computer Science
University of Illinois
Urbana-Champaign, Illinois
CERTIFICATIONS
ISTQB Certified Tester – Advanced Level Test Automation Engineer
Certified Software Test Engineer (CSTE)
Senior QA candidates often improve recruiter response rates by emphasizing testing architecture rather than tools.
Example transformation:
Instead of:
Stronger positioning:
Recruiters immediately recognize framework ownership rather than script execution.
One of the most overlooked resume signals is test coverage scope.
Strong resumes communicate coverage scale.
Examples:
Regression suite covering 450+ test scenarios
API validation across 120 endpoints
Automation covering 75% of UI workflows
This signals system complexity and testing responsibility, which significantly influences recruiter interest.
Senior QA engineers differentiate themselves by showing responsibility for testing strategy, not just test execution.
Indicators include:
Automation framework architecture
CI/CD testing integration
Cross-team testing strategy
Performance testing environments
Release validation leadership
Without these signals, even experienced candidates may be interpreted as mid-level testers.
QA engineers sometimes use visually complex resumes that fail ATS parsing.
Avoid:
Two-column layouts
Skill bars or charts
Tables for experience sections
Icons for contact details
These elements frequently cause ATS systems to misread sections or drop keywords entirely.
Plain text structure consistently performs better in automated screening.
Upload CV
Import from Linkedin
