Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeEngineering resumes have a unique challenge: they must satisfy two very different audiences at the same time. First, an Applicant Tracking System (ATS) needs to parse your resume correctly. Then recruiters and hiring managers need to quickly evaluate technical skills, project impact, and problem-solving ability.
The best ATS-friendly resume templates for engineers are not simply “plain” templates. They are structured systems designed to balance machine readability with human scanning behavior. Most engineers lose opportunities not because of weak experience, but because of poor formatting decisions, cluttered layouts, hidden keywords, or resume designs that break ATS parsing.
An effective engineering resume template should make technical experience easier to discover, easier to understand, and easier to trust—without sacrificing professionalism or visual quality.
This guide explains exactly what engineering resume templates should include, what commonly breaks ATS systems, and how to choose a format that works in real hiring workflows.
ATS-friendly means the resume can be accurately processed by applicant tracking software while preserving meaning and structure.
For engineering roles, ATS systems typically identify:
•Job titles
• Skills and technologies
• Years of experience
• Education
• Certifications
• Project work
• Employers
• Keywords matching job descriptions
The problem is that many resume templates look impressive visually but create parsing failures behind the scenes.
Common ATS failures include:
•Multi-column layouts that reorder content incorrectly
• Icons replacing text labels
• Graphic skill bars
• Embedded tables
• Text inside images
• Headers and footers containing critical information
• Excessive design elements
• Nonstandard section names
A recruiter may see a polished document while the ATS reads fragmented or missing information.
That disconnect can eliminate qualified candidates before a human review even happens.
Engineering hiring is not identical to general professional hiring.
Recruiters evaluating engineering resumes often review:
•Technology stacks
• Architecture exposure
• Programming languages
• System complexity
• Quantifiable project outcomes
• Technical leadership
• Problem-solving evidence
• Scalability work
• Performance optimization
• Infrastructure ownership
Many generic templates prioritize design aesthetics instead of technical storytelling.
Engineering resumes must support rapid evaluation.
Hiring managers often spend less than ten seconds on an initial scan.
They typically ask:
•What technologies does this person use?
• What systems have they built?
• How complex was the work?
• What measurable impact did they create?
• Is experience relevant to this role?
Templates should support these behaviors—not fight them.
For most engineers, reverse chronological structure consistently performs best.
Recommended structure:
•Name and contact information
• Professional summary
• Technical skills
• Work experience
• Engineering projects
• Education
• Certifications
• Additional sections if relevant
This structure aligns with both recruiter scanning patterns and ATS parsing systems.
Chronological templates work especially well for:
•Software engineers
• Mechanical engineers
• Civil engineers
• Electrical engineers
• DevOps engineers
• Data engineers
• Systems engineers
• Cloud engineers
Functional resumes frequently underperform because they hide timelines and reduce context.
Recruiters generally prefer seeing progression clearly.
Keep contact information simple:
•Full name
• Phone number
• Email address
• LinkedIn
• Portfolio or GitHub if relevant
• Location
Avoid:
•Icons
• Graphics
• Images
• Multiple contact rows
ATS systems occasionally misread decorative header designs.
Strong summaries establish relevance immediately.
Weak summaries often sound generic:
Weak Example
"Motivated engineer with excellent communication skills seeking opportunities."
This says almost nothing.
Good Example
"Backend Software Engineer with 6+ years of experience building distributed systems using Python, AWS, Kubernetes, and PostgreSQL. Led infrastructure optimizations reducing API latency by 38% across high-volume services."
The second version introduces:
•Role alignment
• Technical stack
• Experience level
• Measurable outcome
Recruiters instantly understand fit.
Many engineers unintentionally create keyword chaos.
Bad skill sections:
•Giant keyword dumps
• Alphabetized technology lists
• Endless tools with no structure
Recruiters do not evaluate skills that way.
Group technologies logically:
Languages
•Python
• Java
• JavaScript
• Go
Cloud and Infrastructure
•AWS
• Docker
• Kubernetes
• Terraform
Databases
•PostgreSQL
• MongoDB
• Redis
Frameworks
•React
• Node.js
• Django
Categorization improves:
•ATS extraction
• Human readability
• Faster skill scanning
Most engineering resumes fail here.
Candidates describe responsibilities rather than impact.
Bad bullets:
Weak Example
•Worked on backend APIs
• Helped improve systems
• Participated in team projects
These provide no hiring signal.
Better bullets show outcomes:
Good Example
Designed event-driven microservices supporting 8M+ monthly transactions using Kafka and AWS Lambda
Reduced infrastructure costs by 27% through container optimization and automated scaling policies
Built CI/CD workflows reducing deployment times from 45 minutes to 8 minutes
Notice the difference:
•Scope
• Scale
• Technology
• Results
Recruiters use these signals to infer skill level.
Projects create context that work history sometimes misses.
This matters especially for:
•New graduates
• Career switchers
• Bootcamp graduates
• Junior engineers
• Self-taught developers
Projects should demonstrate:
•Technical decisions
• Architecture choices
• Tool usage
• Business impact
• Scale considerations
Weak projects:
"Created weather app."
Strong projects:
"Built containerized weather analytics platform using React, FastAPI, Docker, and AWS. Reduced response times using Redis caching and automated deployment pipelines."
Specificity changes perceived credibility.
Many high-design templates create hidden workflow problems.
Common failures include:
•Two-column layouts
• Progress bars for skills
• Visual charts
• Text boxes
• Custom graphics
• Heavy colors
• Decorative icons
• Infographics
The issue is not appearance.
The issue is data extraction.
Many templates optimized for aesthetics introduce parsing ambiguity.
This creates invisible resume failures.
Candidates often never know it happened.
Many people believe ATS-friendly means ugly.
This is outdated.
Modern resume workflows no longer require sacrificing presentation entirely.
You do not need to choose between:
•ATS performance
• Design quality
• branding
• speed
• usability
Platforms like NewCV attempt to solve this workflow problem by combining recruiter-readable structure with modern layouts and AI-assisted resume creation workflows. The practical benefit is not aesthetics alone—it reduces friction between resume design and ATS performance.
The goal is balance:
Readable formatting plus parsing consistency.
Not visual minimalism at all costs.
Competing articles often miss this.
Recruiters rarely read engineering resumes top-to-bottom.
Scanning patterns usually look like:
Header → current title → employer → technologies → impact metrics → projects
This creates important implications.
Templates should prioritize:
•Short sections
• visible technical stacks
• measurable outcomes
• easy scanning
• whitespace
• predictable structure
Dense walls of text create friction.
Fast comprehension wins.
When choosing a template, evaluate:
Can systems accurately parse sections?
Can someone identify technologies within seconds?
Can tools and skills be found immediately?
Can projects be highlighted naturally?
Will the template still work as experience expands?
Does it look credible and organized?
Most resume templates optimize only one or two of these dimensions.
Strong templates optimize all of them.
Prioritize:
•Technical stack visibility
• architecture projects
• GitHub links
• measurable outcomes
Prioritize:
•Infrastructure ownership
• CI/CD workflows
• cloud environments
• automation
Prioritize:
•Systems work
• CAD tools
• process optimization
• project outcomes
Prioritize:
•pipelines
• databases
• cloud systems
• scalability metrics
Prioritize:
•project scope
• engineering software
• compliance experience
• budget impact
Template priorities differ because hiring behavior differs.
The highest-performing ATS-friendly engineering resume templates do not merely "pass ATS."
They reduce friction across the entire hiring workflow.
They help machines parse accurately.
They help recruiters scan quickly.
They help hiring managers understand technical capability fast.
And they help engineers communicate impact rather than responsibilities.
Most failed engineering resumes are not technical failures.
They are information architecture failures.
Choosing the right template is ultimately a workflow decision—not a design decision.
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin
