Choose from a wide range of CV templates and customize the design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised CV and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our CV builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your CV faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact CV rules employers look for.
Create CV
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact CV rules employers look for.
Create CVGraduate Teaching Assistant applications are evaluated differently from most early-career roles. Universities, research departments, and academic hiring committees typically use Applicant Tracking Systems to filter applicants before faculty review. However, these systems do not interpret academic language the same way human reviewers do. Graduate candidates frequently describe teaching contributions in narrative form, which prevents ATS algorithms from indexing critical signals such as instructional responsibility, student engagement metrics, assessment design, or course support experience.
An ATS friendly Teaching Assistant graduate resume template must therefore translate academic participation into structured instructional evidence. The template is not designed to “look academic.” It is designed to expose teaching capability signals that both ATS systems and faculty recruiters can quickly detect.
This guide explains the structural logic behind successful Teaching Assistant resumes, the failure patterns commonly seen in graduate applications, and the template architecture that improves screening outcomes in university hiring pipelines.
Graduate candidates often assume that Teaching Assistant roles are informal academic responsibilities that do not require structured resume presentation. As a result, they frequently submit academic CV formats filled with paragraphs describing courses, teaching philosophies, or research interests.
ATS systems struggle with these formats because they cannot identify discrete teaching responsibilities.
Common parsing failures include:
Teaching duties embedded in long paragraphs
Courses listed without describing instructional responsibilities
Assessment grading responsibilities not mentioned explicitly
Tutorial sessions or labs not labeled as instructional roles
Student mentoring work hidden inside research descriptions
Course development contributions not categorized properly
Once a Teaching Assistant resume passes ATS filtering, it is typically reviewed by either a department coordinator, faculty member, or graduate program administrator.
Their evaluation criteria differ from corporate hiring.
Recruiters and faculty reviewers focus on:
instructional support experience
classroom engagement capability
grading and assessment involvement
communication clarity with students
subject-matter mastery
reliability in academic environments
The resume must demonstrate these signals clearly.
Graduate candidates who only list courses they have taken fail this evaluation stage because the reviewer cannot see evidence of teaching contribution.
Teaching Assistant resumes should follow a structure that aligns with both ATS parsing and academic hiring logic.
Recommended section hierarchy:
Professional Summary
Teaching Competencies
Education
Teaching Experience
Academic Research Experience
Curriculum or Course Development
Technical & Instructional Tools
Publications or Academic Contributions
When these signals are not structured correctly, ATS systems may classify the resume as a general graduate student profile rather than a teaching candidate.
That dramatically lowers visibility during candidate ranking.
This ordering allows ATS systems to detect both subject specialization and instructional capability.
Teaching experience should appear before research in most cases when the candidate is targeting teaching roles.
Many graduate resumes begin with vague statements about academic interests.
These summaries are ineffective because ATS systems rely on keyword density to classify candidate specialization.
Weak Example
Graduate student interested in supporting students and gaining teaching experience.
This provides no meaningful hiring signals.
Good Example
Graduate Teaching Assistant specializing in undergraduate instruction support within psychology and behavioral science courses. Experienced facilitating tutorial sessions, grading assessments, and supporting course delivery for classes of 120+ students. Skilled in communicating complex academic concepts clearly while supporting student engagement and learning outcomes.
The stronger summary includes searchable signals such as:
teaching assistant
undergraduate instruction
grading assessments
tutorial facilitation
course delivery
These signals improve ATS classification accuracy.
ATS systems often categorize teaching capability using skill-based taxonomies.
Graduate candidates should clearly define instructional competencies rather than embedding them in experience descriptions.
Example structure:
Teaching & Instruction Skills
Classroom facilitation
Tutorial session leadership
Student mentoring
Academic concept explanation
Assessment & Evaluation
Assignment grading
Exam evaluation
Rubric development
Feedback delivery
Academic Communication
Lecture support
Presentation development
Student discussion moderation
This structure allows ATS systems to index instructional capabilities directly.
The education section plays two important roles in Teaching Assistant resumes.
First, it establishes subject-matter expertise.
Second, it reinforces eligibility for departmental teaching roles.
Education entries should include:
degree title
academic specialization
university name
graduation date or expected completion
research thesis if relevant
Graduate programs that align directly with the teaching subject should be emphasized.
For example, a psychology graduate applying for a psychology TA role should ensure that the specialization appears clearly.
Many graduate students list Teaching Assistant duties as short descriptions beneath course titles.
This is one of the most common resume failures.
Teaching roles must be structured like professional positions.
Each role should include:
role title
institution
department or course
teaching responsibilities
measurable impact where possible
Weak Example
Teaching assistant for Introduction to Sociology course.
This gives no insight into actual teaching contribution.
Good Example
Teaching Assistant – Introduction to Sociology
Facilitated weekly tutorial sessions supporting undergraduate coursework
Assisted faculty with grading assignments and exams for 140 students
Guided classroom discussions to reinforce lecture concepts
Provided academic support and feedback during student office hours
The structured format allows ATS systems to detect instructional responsibilities.
Although the role is teaching-focused, research experience often strengthens Teaching Assistant applications.
Departments prefer candidates who demonstrate academic rigor and subject mastery.
Research sections should focus on:
analytical work
research methodologies
academic collaboration
contributions to publications or presentations
However, research descriptions should not overshadow teaching responsibilities.
Teaching experience remains the primary signal.
Modern universities increasingly use digital learning platforms.
Including instructional tools improves ATS relevance.
Examples include:
Learning Management Systems
presentation software
digital assessment tools
virtual classroom platforms
Example structure:
Instructional Technology
Canvas LMS
Blackboard Learn
Zoom Classroom Tools
Microsoft PowerPoint
These tools indicate teaching readiness in hybrid or online learning environments.
Candidate Name: Michael Carter
Target Role: Graduate Teaching Assistant – Psychology Department
Location: Chicago, Illinois
PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY
Graduate Teaching Assistant specializing in undergraduate psychology instruction support. Experienced facilitating tutorial sessions, grading coursework, and supporting faculty-led lectures in large classroom environments. Skilled in explaining complex behavioral science concepts clearly while promoting student engagement and academic performance.
TEACHING COMPETENCIES
Instructional Skills
Tutorial facilitation
Classroom discussion leadership
Academic concept explanation
Student mentoring
Assessment & Evaluation
Assignment grading
Exam evaluation
Rubric-based assessment
Constructive feedback delivery
Academic Communication
Lecture support
Presentation preparation
Student engagement facilitation
EDUCATION
Master of Science in Psychology
University of Illinois Chicago
Chicago, Illinois
Expected Graduation: 2025
Research Focus
Bachelor of Arts in Psychology
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan
TEACHING EXPERIENCE
Graduate Teaching Assistant – Introduction to Psychology
University of Illinois Chicago
Department of Psychology
Facilitated weekly tutorial sessions supporting lecture material for classes of 120 students
Assisted faculty with grading written assignments and examinations
Led classroom discussions reinforcing psychological theory and research concepts
Provided one-on-one academic support during office hours
ACADEMIC RESEARCH EXPERIENCE
Graduate Research Assistant
Behavioral Science Research Laboratory
Conducted behavioral experiment analysis examining cognitive decision-making patterns
Managed participant data collection and statistical analysis
Collaborated with faculty researchers on experimental design and interpretation
INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY
Canvas Learning Management System
Blackboard Learn
Zoom Classroom Platform
Microsoft PowerPoint
PUBLICATIONS
Cognitive Bias and Decision-Making Behavior
Journal of Behavioral Psychology
2024
Teaching Assistant resumes should remain structurally simple.
Overly designed academic CVs often cause parsing problems.
Common formatting mistakes include:
placing teaching responsibilities inside paragraph text
combining teaching and research roles into one section
using tables or columns to organize course information
adding visual skill charts or icons
ATS systems interpret clean linear formatting most accurately.
Simple section headings and bullet lists consistently perform best.
Many universities now incorporate AI-assisted applicant ranking within their recruitment platforms.
These systems analyze patterns such as:
teaching keyword frequency
subject alignment
grading and assessment responsibilities
student support indicators
instructional technology familiarity
Graduate candidates who clearly structure teaching experience tend to rank higher in these systems.
Templates that emphasize research while minimizing teaching responsibilities often perform poorly.
The strongest Teaching Assistant resumes balance both academic expertise and instructional contribution.
Upload CV
Import from Linkedin
