Choose from a wide range of CV templates and customize the design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised CV and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our CV builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your CV faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact CV rules employers look for.
Create CV
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact CV rules employers look for.
ATS keywords for software engineers determine how applicant tracking systems classify, rank, and retrieve engineering resumes inside recruiter search workflows. This page is strictly and exclusively about how ATS platforms interpret software engineer keywords, how those keywords affect visibility, and how real-world hiring systems behave at scale when evaluating engineering candidates.
ATS systems do not evaluate “software engineer” as a single role. They decompose resumes into role signals, stack signals, and scope signals.
For software engineers, ATS classification typically involves:
If keyword signals conflict or lack depth, the resume may be misclassified or excluded from recruiter searches entirely.
ATS systems evaluate software engineer resumes across multiple keyword layers, not flat lists.
These keywords anchor how the ATS categorizes the candidate.
Examples of high-impact role keywords:
Non-standard or inflated titles reduce match accuracy and can prevent resumes from appearing in role-specific searches.
Language keywords are weighted based on context and usage, not frequency.
ATS systems evaluate:
Mentioning languages only in skill lists without execution context significantly reduces ranking weight.
These keywords define how engineering work is performed.
ATS systems look for:
Framework keywords disconnected from responsibilities are often discounted.
These keywords signal production exposure, not just coding ability.
Common ATS interpretations:
Absence of infrastructure keywords can down-rank otherwise strong engineers in modern hiring systems.
ATS platforms weight keywords differently based on location and structure.
High-impact placement zones:
Low-impact or ignored zones:
For software engineers, verbs + tools + outcomes outperform repetition.
Below is a single ATS-safe example showing correct keyword usage for software engineers.
Core Platform Team | April 2020 – Present
•Designed and maintained backend services using Python and Django to support internal APIs
• Built and optimized data access layers using PostgreSQL for high-traffic applications
• Deployed and monitored services on AWS using Docker and ECS
• Implemented CI/CD pipelines with GitHub Actions to automate testing and deployments
• Collaborated with frontend engineers to integrate REST APIs into React-based applications
This example works because it:
Each keyword reinforces how engineering work was actually performed, not just which tools were used.
Repeating tools or languages without describing how they were used often results in downweighted relevance.
Using “software engineer” without stack or system context reduces ATS role matching accuracy.
Mixing unrelated domains (mobile, data science, DevOps) can confuse ATS role classification models.
ATS systems cannot reliably map internal tool names or custom job titles to known keyword dictionaries.
Recruiters rely on boolean logic and filtered keyword queries, not manual browsing.
Common ATS search patterns include:
Resumes missing these keyword intersections are invisible regardless of candidate quality.
ATS keyword precision is most impactful when:
In these contexts, keyword misalignment equals zero visibility.
Upload CV
Import from Linkedin
