Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeFor computer science students, the best resume template is not the most visually impressive one. It is the one that gets parsed correctly by ATS systems, highlights technical projects immediately, showcases programming skills clearly, and helps recruiters scan information in under 10 seconds.
Many computer science students make the same mistake: they choose overly designed templates with columns, graphics, icons, or portfolio-style layouts that look modern but weaken readability and hurt applicant tracking system compatibility. Recruiters hiring for software engineering internships, developer roles, and technical programs typically prioritize fast information access: projects, technologies, experience, GitHub links, and technical depth.
The strongest resume templates for CS students create structure around how technical hiring actually works. They reduce friction, surface proof of ability, and support both ATS systems and human reviewers. The goal is not decoration. The goal is faster evaluation and stronger signal quality.
Computer science resumes operate differently from many other student resumes.
Recruiters reviewing marketing or communications roles may prioritize narrative and presentation. Technical recruiters often review high volumes of resumes looking for evidence of skills and execution.
Most computer science hiring decisions begin with rapid filtering:
Programming languages
Technical projects
Internship experience
Frameworks and tools
GitHub activity
Problem-solving evidence
Education and GPA, when relevant
Most students search for templates by asking:
“Which one looks the most modern?”
But recruiters rarely ask:
“Which resume looked coolest?”
Instead, they ask:
“Can I quickly identify if this student can contribute?”
That difference changes everything.
A visually attractive template can fail if:
Project sections appear too low on the page
Technical skills become buried
Sidebars reduce ATS compatibility
Visual elements disrupt parsing
Formatting creates inconsistent hierarchy
Relevant coursework
Technologies used in real scenarios
A template should help surface these immediately.
Strong templates optimize:
ATS readability
Information hierarchy
Project visibility
Scan speed
Recruiter workflow efficiency
Technical credibility
Weak templates optimize appearance at the expense of usability.
Information becomes harder to scan
Students frequently spend hours adjusting colors and formatting while ignoring workflow structure.
The highest-performing computer science resumes usually feel surprisingly simple.
Different template styles serve different hiring scenarios.
The ideal choice depends on experience level and career goals.
This is the safest and strongest option for most computer science students.
Why it works:
Clean hierarchy
ATS-friendly structure
Easy recruiter scanning
Works across internship systems
Reduces parsing failures
Typical structure:
Contact information
Education
Technical skills
Projects
Experience
Leadership
Additional information
This layout mirrors how recruiters naturally review candidates.
For early-career CS students, projects often matter more than traditional work history.
Single-column layouts place projects where they receive attention.
Many computer science students have limited formal experience but strong project work.
Project-first templates elevate:
GitHub projects
Hackathons
Open-source contributions
AI experiments
Web applications
Personal tools
Software builds
This structure helps students avoid appearing inexperienced.
Recruiters frequently evaluate proof of capability over job history.
Strong projects can outperform weak internship experience.
Students with previous internships should use templates that emphasize applied work.
Best for:
Software engineering interns
Data science interns
Cloud engineering interns
Startup roles
Technical co-op positions
Internship sections should emphasize outcomes rather than responsibilities.
Weak Example
“Worked on backend systems”
Good Example
“Developed REST APIs in Node.js, reducing request latency by 32% across internal services.”
Technical hiring managers care about measurable impact.
Templates should create space for results.
Some students build:
GitHub repositories
SaaS products
AI tools
Machine learning applications
Technical blogs
Portfolio sites
Portfolio-oriented templates help integrate:
GitHub links
Website links
Project showcases
Product launches
But there is a risk.
Too much design often creates ATS issues.
Templates should integrate portfolio elements without becoming visually cluttered.
Modern resume workflows increasingly involve AI-assisted optimization.
Students now use AI for:
Bullet improvement
Keyword optimization
Resume tailoring
Content refinement
Formatting automation
Role matching
AI-friendly templates maintain consistency while making updates faster.
Platforms like NewCV increasingly support workflows combining:
ATS compatibility
Modern design
Recruiter readability
AI-assisted optimization
Fast editing workflows
This matters because students frequently apply to dozens or hundreds of roles.
Workflow efficiency becomes valuable.
One of the biggest misconceptions online is that modern resumes need sidebars.
This advice often creates problems.
Multi-column templates may:
Confuse ATS systems
Disrupt parsing order
Hide technical projects
Reduce readability on mobile devices
Break formatting during uploads
Recruiters often download resumes through internal systems.
When formatting breaks, candidate evaluation suffers.
A visually impressive layout can become a workflow problem.
Simple templates outperform complex ones more often than students realize.
The template matters, but section order matters more.
For most CS students, the strongest structure looks like this:
Include:
Name
Phone
GitHub
Portfolio link
Avoid:
Full address
Photographs
Unnecessary social profiles
Include:
Degree
University
Graduation date
GPA if strong
Relevant coursework if helpful
Organize skills into categories.
Languages:
Python
Java
C++
JavaScript
Frameworks:
React
Node.js
TensorFlow
Tools:
Git
Docker
AWS
Databases:
PostgreSQL
MongoDB
Avoid giant keyword lists.
Recruiters notice skill inflation immediately.
For computer science students, this section frequently determines interview outcomes.
Strong projects include:
Problem solved
Technologies used
Implementation details
Measurable outcomes
Projects should prove capability.
Include:
Internships
Research roles
Freelance work
Leadership roles
Teaching assistant positions
Optional sections include:
Certifications
Hackathons
Open-source contributions
Awards
Only include information that adds signal value.
Most resume advice focuses on formatting basics.
But recruiters often reject resumes because of workflow friction.
Students sometimes create massive skill sections:
Python | Java | C | C++ | SQL | AWS | Docker | Kubernetes | TensorFlow | React | Angular | Node.js | Flask | Django | Git | Linux | Redis | GraphQL
Large lists create noise.
Recruiters ask:
“Can this person actually use these technologies?”
Templates should support context.
Projects validate skills.
Lists alone do not.
Students frequently bury their strongest content.
Early-career candidates often gain interviews through projects.
Projects should rarely sit at the bottom.
Large text blocks reduce scan efficiency.
Technical resumes should optimize:
Short bullets
Measurable outcomes
Technology context
Implementation details
Many students imagine recruiters reading every word.
Reality is different.
Typical first-pass review behavior looks like this:
Recruiter opens resume
Scans school, degree, and graduation date
Checks technical skills
Looks for projects or internships
Opens GitHub or portfolio if the resume creates enough interest
Decides whether the candidate has enough technical signal to move forward
Templates must support this workflow.
Resume design is really information architecture.
Many outdated ATS recommendations continue circulating.
Not true.
Modern ATS systems handle moderate formatting well.
Problems occur with:
Graphics
Tables
Text boxes
Complex columns
Unusual formatting structures
Also false.
ATS increasingly evaluates contextual relevance.
Repeated keyword lists often look unnatural.
Skills should appear inside:
Projects
Internship outcomes
Technical experience
Context matters.
Students applying broadly often discover otherwise.
Software engineering internships, AI research roles, and frontend jobs prioritize different signals.
Templates should make customization easy.
Use this decision model.
Use:
Single-column template
Project-first layout
Technical skills emphasis
Use:
Experience-focused structure
Measurable outcomes
Project support sections
Use:
Hybrid ATS portfolio template
GitHub visibility
Personal brand integration
Use:
AI-assisted workflow tools
Editable templates
ATS-first structures
This approach reduces future rework.
Students rarely submit one application.
Real behavior often looks like:
Internship applications
Co-op applications
Referral applications
Networking opportunities
Career fairs
Startup outreach
A resume workflow requiring extensive manual editing becomes inefficient.
Students increasingly value systems enabling:
Rapid edits
Version control
AI-assisted refinement
Formatting consistency
Role-specific customization
Platforms like NewCV fit this shift because users increasingly want workflows combining ATS performance, modern design, speed, and recruiter readability without constantly rebuilding formatting.
The major shift is not template quality alone.
It is workflow efficiency.
Great computer science resume templates are not design assets.
They are evaluation systems.
They help recruiters answer critical questions:
Can this student code?
Can they solve problems?
Have they built real things?
Can they contribute quickly?
Everything else becomes secondary.
Templates succeed when they reduce decision friction.
The strongest resumes create clarity, not decoration.
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin
