Choose from a wide range of CV templates and customize the design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised CV and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our CV builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your CV faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact CV rules employers look for.
Create CV
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact CV rules employers look for.
Create CVUsing prompts to build a resume is one of the most powerful modern strategies.
But here’s the reality from inside hiring:
Most prompt-generated resumes fail.
Not because prompts don’t work, but because candidates use them incorrectly.
They:
Generate content instead of positioning
Focus on wording instead of impact
Trust AI output without strategic control
This guide shows you how to build a resume with prompts the right way, using AI as a precision tool, not a shortcut.
Resume prompts are structured instructions given to AI tools to generate resume content.
They can be used to:
Rewrite bullet points
Generate summaries
Extract achievements
Optimize keywords
But prompts do not replace thinking.
They amplify it.
From a recruiter perspective, prompt-generated resumes often:
Sound overly polished and artificial
Lack real metrics
Use generic phrasing
Repeat common patterns
Recruiters instantly recognize:
“This was AI-generated without depth.”
Result: rejection.
To use prompts effectively, you must understand evaluation layers:
Parses structure
Matches keywords
Scans for relevance and impact
Filters weak candidates quickly
Evaluates depth and credibility
Assesses problem-solving ability
Your prompts must produce content that works across ALL three.
Top candidates don’t use random prompts.
They use structured frameworks.
Use this structure:
“Rewrite this experience focusing on measurable impact, including metrics, scale, and outcomes. Avoid generic phrases.”
This forces AI to:
Focus on results
Avoid fluff
Produce stronger content
Before using prompts, write your raw experience:
What you did
What changed
What results occurred
AI cannot invent your impact.
Bad approach:
“Write my resume”
Good approach:
“Rewrite this bullet point to highlight measurable impact and business outcome”
Use prompts like:
“Add realistic metrics and quantify impact where possible based on this experience”
But verify accuracy.
Never fake numbers.
Use this:
“Rewrite this experience to align with the following job description, emphasizing relevant skills and achievements”
This improves:
ATS matching
Recruiter relevance
Prompt:
“Write a concise professional summary that positions me as a [role] with [years] experience, highlighting my strongest measurable achievements and specialization”
“Transform this responsibility into a results-driven bullet point with action, context, and measurable outcome”
“Integrate relevant keywords from this job description naturally into the resume without keyword stuffing”
“Rewrite this sentence to be more concise, specific, and impactful, avoiding generic language”
“Rewrite this content to reflect a senior-level candidate with leadership and strategic impact”
Managed social media campaigns
Responsible for managing and executing social media strategies to enhance engagement
Executed multi-platform social media campaigns, increasing engagement by 48% and driving 22% growth in inbound leads
The difference is prompt quality.
Creates:
Unrealistic tone
Generic phrasing
AI may:
Guess numbers
Inflate results
This destroys credibility.
Prompt misuse leads to:
Keyword stuffing
Reduced readability
To pass screening, your resume must communicate:
Ownership of work
Clear outcomes
Relevance to role
Authenticity
If it reads like:
A template
A script
A generic AI output
It fails instantly.
Instead of one prompt, use multiple layers:
Improve clarity
Quantify impact
Match job description
Remove AI tone
This creates:
Natural
Strategic
High-performing content
Highest impact area
Positioning layer
Keyword alignment
Career decisions
Job selection
Role positioning
These require human strategy.
Candidate Name: Michael Thompson
Target Role: Senior Data Analyst
Location: Chicago, IL
Professional Summary
Senior Data Analyst with 8+ years transforming complex datasets into actionable business insights. Proven ability to increase revenue by $3.5M through predictive analytics and data-driven strategy.
Core Skills
Data Analysis
SQL
Python
Data Visualization
Machine Learning
Professional Experience
Senior Data Analyst – InsightCorp (2020–Present)
Developed predictive models that increased revenue by $2.1M through customer segmentation
Automated reporting processes, reducing manual workload by 60%
Collaborated with cross-functional teams to improve decision-making efficiency
Data Analyst – DataWorks (2017–2020)
Analyzed large datasets to identify trends, improving operational efficiency by 25%
Built dashboards that reduced reporting time by 40%
Education
Bachelor’s in Statistics – University of Illinois
Certifications
Using vague prompts like “make this better”
Accepting AI output without editing
Not verifying metrics
Ignoring job-specific customization
Each leads to weaker resumes.
When you already have strong experience
When refining existing content
When optimizing for specific roles
When starting from nothing
When relying fully on AI
When skipping strategic thinking
The best candidates don’t use prompts to create resumes.
They use prompts to refine and sharpen already strong positioning.
That’s the difference between:
AI-generated resumes
High-conversion resumes
Only one gets interviews.
Upload CV
Import from Linkedin
