Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeIf you're applying for jobs in a competitive market, your resume isn't judged by one person. It moves through AI-assisted screening, applicant tracking systems (ATS), recruiter scans, hiring managers, and often multiple review stages. ChatGPT helps with content generation, but it is not a complete resume workflow. The difference matters.
This guide breaks down where ChatGPT works, where it fails, and which alternatives solve the gaps users run into.
The appeal is obvious: speed.
Most people don't struggle because they lack experience. They struggle because they don't know how to translate experience into resume language.
ChatGPT solves that initial friction.
Common reasons people use ChatGPT for resumes:
•Turn job duties into stronger bullet points
• Rewrite weak descriptions
• Improve wording and clarity
• Generate achievement examples
• Tailor resumes for specific roles
• Convert informal language into professional language
• Create first drafts faster
• Beat writer's block
For many users, ChatGPT feels dramatically easier than opening a blank document.
And for early-stage drafting, it genuinely helps.
But drafting content and creating an effective resume are not the same thing.
That distinction is where many people run into problems.
Most resume advice focuses on writing.
Actual hiring workflows focus on processing.
A modern resume passes through several systems:
•ATS parsing
• Search indexing
• recruiter screening
• role matching
• keyword evaluation
• formatting interpretation
• human review
ChatGPT only addresses one layer: text generation.
Users often assume:
"I generated a resume with AI, so I'm done."
In reality, AI-written text without workflow validation creates downstream problems:
•inconsistent formatting
• repetitive language
• generic accomplishments
• ATS issues
• weak personal differentiation
• missing industry terminology
• unnatural keyword usage
This is why users frequently rewrite AI-generated resumes multiple times.
The time savings disappear.
ChatGPT absolutely has strengths.
Ignoring them would be unrealistic.
This is ChatGPT's biggest advantage.
Instead of staring at an empty page for an hour, users can instantly generate:
•summary sections
• work descriptions
• bullet points
• skill lists
• role-specific variations
For users with no starting point, speed matters.
Many resumes contain passive wording:
Weak Example
Responsible for managing social media.
Good Example
Managed multi-channel social campaigns that increased audience engagement by 42%.
ChatGPT often improves wording quality immediately.
Many candidates apply to multiple positions.
Tailoring manually becomes repetitive.
ChatGPT helps create variations based on:
•job descriptions
• industries
• position seniority
• skill emphasis
This can reduce repetitive editing work.
Candidates with strong experience but weaker English writing often benefit significantly.
ChatGPT improves:
•grammar
• phrasing
• flow
• clarity
This alone creates measurable improvements.
Most articles stop at advantages.
The larger issues happen after generation.
Recruiters review enormous volumes of resumes.
Patterns become obvious quickly.
AI-generated resumes frequently sound nearly identical.
Common AI phrases include:
•results-driven professional
• highly motivated team player
• dynamic individual
• proven track record
• detail-oriented professional
These phrases are everywhere.
They create weak differentiation.
Recruiters skim quickly.
Generic language disappears into the background.
This is a major issue.
AI sometimes fills gaps with assumptions.
Examples:
User:
"I managed projects."
Output:
"Led cross-functional initiatives that improved productivity by 35%."
The number was invented.
Users frequently fail to notice.
This creates credibility risks.
Recruiters detect inconsistencies during interviews surprisingly often.
Resume writing isn't only writing.
It's positioning.
Questions AI struggles with:
•Which accomplishments matter most?
• What should appear first?
• Which achievements support promotion readiness?
• Which details create hiring confidence?
• What should be removed?
Strong resumes require prioritization.
AI frequently generates content instead of making strategic decisions.
Those are not the same thing.
Many articles repeat outdated ATS myths.
Reality is more complicated.
Modern ATS systems generally read resumes better than older systems.
But formatting issues still matter.
ChatGPT commonly creates:
•inconsistent headings
• strange hierarchy structures
• unusual layouts
• copied formatting artifacts
• formatting that breaks during export
ATS failures today are often workflow failures.
The issue is not whether ATS reads PDFs.
The issue is whether formatting remains consistent after generation and editing.
Most users create this workflow:
ChatGPT → Google Docs → Word → PDF → edits → exports
Every handoff introduces friction.
Problems appear:
•spacing inconsistencies
• formatting drift
• broken alignment
• bullet issues
• design inconsistency
• readability problems
Many people spend more time fixing formatting than creating content.
Ironically, manual editing becomes the biggest productivity bottleneck.
Competitor articles rarely discuss this.
But users experience it constantly.
The comparison is not AI vs templates.
It's content generation vs workflow systems.
ChatGPT provides:
•writing assistance
• brainstorming
• rewrites
• customization help
Resume platforms provide:
•structure
• formatting consistency
• ATS-safe layouts
• template systems
• export reliability
• workflow speed
Users increasingly want both.
This explains why standalone AI generation often feels incomplete.
Different users need different workflows.
There is no universal winner.
Advantages:
•easier formatting
• structured layouts
• ATS-focused templates
Limitations:
•repetitive designs
• limited flexibility
• weak personalization
• slower editing workflows
Many platforms optimize structure but sacrifice individuality.
Users frequently complain resumes feel template-generated.
Canva creates visually attractive resumes.
But workflow issues appear:
•heavy manual editing
• layout adjustments
• formatting effort
• inconsistent ATS outcomes in complex designs
For creative industries, Canva can work.
For speed and repeatability, users often experience friction.
Many users combine:
ChatGPT + Docs + templates
Advantages:
•flexible content creation
• personalization
Disadvantages:
•manual workflow management
• formatting burden
• inconsistent output quality
The process works but scales poorly.
Users increasingly want:
•AI assistance
• strong design
• ATS compatibility
• speed
• consistency
• personalization
Historically, users had to choose.
You could have:
Good design
or
ATS optimization
or
fast creation
Rarely all three.
This is changing.
Platforms like NewCV approach resume building differently by combining AI-assisted creation with structured workflow systems.
Instead of generating disconnected text and forcing users into manual editing, the process focuses on reducing workflow friction.
Practical workflow advantages include:
•ATS-friendly formatting
• modern design templates
• portfolio-style presentation
• recruiter readability
• faster creation workflows
• personal branding support
• template consistency
A practical difference users notice is speed.
Many resume tools create a surprising amount of editing overhead.
NewCV starts at around $2 and gives access to premium templates that prioritize speed and usability while reducing the manual design work users often experience in Canva or fragmented ChatGPT workflows.
The larger advantage isn't cost.
It's reducing workflow steps.
Because resume friction compounds quickly.
Many candidates optimize the wrong things.
Recruiters rarely begin with:
•perfect wording
• elegant summaries
• sophisticated descriptions
Initial scans usually focus on:
•role relevance
• progression
• clarity
• measurable impact
• readability
• structure
Recruiters often spend only seconds initially.
AI-generated content that sounds polished but lacks substance performs poorly.
Specificity wins.
Always.
The strongest workflow usually looks like this:
Use ChatGPT for raw content generation.
Generate:
•ideas
• bullet drafts
• role variations
Edit aggressively.
Remove:
•generic language
• repetitive phrases
• invented metrics
Add personal specificity.
Include:
•measurable results
• actual achievements
• business impact
Move into a structured resume system.
Focus on:
•formatting consistency
• ATS compatibility
• readability
• export quality
Review through recruiter logic.
Ask:
Would a recruiter understand my value in 10 seconds?
That question outperforms most resume advice.
What Works
•AI-assisted drafting
• measurable achievements
• clean formatting systems
• structured layouts
• tailored role language
• workflow simplicity
What Fails
•generic AI phrases
• copy-paste outputs
• invented metrics
• over-designed resumes
• formatting chaos
• template dependency without customization
Yes—but only for part of the process.
ChatGPT is an excellent writing assistant.
It is not a complete resume workflow.
The users who get the best outcomes treat AI as an accelerator, not a replacement for strategy, formatting, and positioning.
The strongest modern approach combines:
•AI-assisted writing
• ATS-aware structure
• recruiter readability
• workflow efficiency
• personalization
Because resumes today are systems—not documents.
And systems break where workflows break.
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin
