Choose from a wide range of CV templates and customize the design with a single click.


Use ATS-optimised CV and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our CV builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your CV faster.


Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact CV rules employers look for.
Create CV

Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact CV rules employers look for.
Create CVIf your resume isn’t ATS-friendly, it doesn’t matter how qualified you are. You’re invisible.
This isn’t theory. It’s how modern hiring works.
Before a recruiter ever sees your resume, it goes through an Applicant Tracking System (ATS). Then it gets 6–10 seconds of human scanning. Then—if you’re lucky—it gets evaluated by a hiring manager who is comparing you against stronger candidates.
This guide shows you how to create a resume that survives all three stages:
ATS parsing
Recruiter screening
Hiring manager decision-making
Most “ATS resume tips” online are shallow. This is not that.
This is how top candidates actually win.
An ATS-friendly resume is not just about keywords. It’s about machine readability + human persuasion working together.
Here’s how resumes are actually evaluated:
The ATS:
Extracts your text
Categorizes sections (experience, skills, education)
Matches keywords against the job description
Scores or ranks candidates
If your resume is poorly formatted, information gets lost. If keywords are missing, you’re filtered out.
Recruiters are not reading—they are pattern matching:
Use this 4-layer framework:
Most resumes fail because they focus only on layer 1.
Top resumes optimize all four.
Use this structure:
Header (Name, Phone, Email, LinkedIn)
Professional Summary
Core Skills / Competencies
Work Experience
Education
Certifications (if relevant)
Avoid:
Columns
Does this person match the role quickly?
Are results visible?
Is the career trajectory logical?
If your resume is cluttered or generic, you’re skipped.
Now the question becomes:
At this stage, positioning and impact matter more than keywords.
Text boxes
Graphics
Icons
Why? ATS systems often misread them.
Follow these non-negotiables:
Use standard fonts (Arial, Calibri, Times New Roman)
Use simple section headings (Work Experience, Skills)
Save as .docx or PDF (only if ATS-safe)
Use left-aligned text
Avoid tables unless absolutely necessary
Many candidates unknowingly break parsing with:
Fancy templates
Canva resumes
Multi-column layouts
Result: keywords don’t get read → instant rejection.
Look for:
Job titles
Skills
Tools
Certifications
Responsibilities
Don’t keyword-stuff. Integrate naturally.
Weak Example:
Responsible for project management tasks.
Good Example:
Led cross-functional project management initiatives using Agile methodology, delivering projects 15% ahead of schedule.
Recruiters don’t just look for keywords—they look for context + credibility.
Anyone can say “project management.”
Few prove it with results.
This is where 80% of decisions happen.
Each bullet should follow:
Action Verb + Task + Result + Metric
Weak Example:
Managed a team.
Good Example:
Managed a team of 12 sales representatives, increasing quarterly revenue by 28% through performance optimization and targeted coaching.
Scale (team size, budget, scope)
Impact (revenue, cost savings, efficiency)
Ownership (did you lead or assist?)
Your summary is your positioning statement.
Define your role
Show your value
Highlight key achievements
Align with the target job
Weak Example:
Motivated professional seeking opportunities.
Good Example:
Results-driven Marketing Manager with 8+ years of experience scaling B2B SaaS growth, generating $12M+ pipeline through data-driven campaigns and demand generation strategies.
This is your ATS keyword hub.
Group skills into categories:
Technical Skills
Tools & Platforms
Methodologies
Soft Skills (minimal)
Technical Skills: SQL, Python, Data Analysis
Tools: Tableau, Power BI, Excel
Methodologies: Agile, Scrum
Listing generic skills like:
Communication
Teamwork
These don’t differentiate you.
ATS wants keywords.
Recruiters want clarity and results.
Blend both:
Use keywords in context
Avoid keyword dumping
Prioritize readability
Top candidates don’t send one resume. They send targeted versions.
Job title in summary
Keywords
Key achievements
Skills section
Core experience
Truth
Tailored resumes are 2–3x more likely to pass screening.
ATS can’t parse them properly.
Looks unnatural and weakens credibility.
No proof = no impact.
Everyone has them. You need differentiation.
Some PDFs break parsing.
You are not evaluated in isolation.
You are compared.
Hiring managers ask:
Who has the strongest results?
Who shows ownership?
Who fits the role fastest?
Quantified achievements
Clear progression
Relevant experience
JAMES ANDERSON
Senior Product Manager | San Francisco, CA
Phone: (123) 456-7890
Email: james.anderson@email.com
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/jamesanderson
PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY
Strategic Senior Product Manager with 10+ years of experience leading SaaS product development, driving $50M+ in revenue growth through customer-centric innovation, data-driven decision-making, and cross-functional leadership.
CORE SKILLS
Product Strategy
Agile & Scrum
Data Analysis
Roadmapping
Stakeholder Management
A/B Testing
SQL
Jira
WORK EXPERIENCE
Senior Product Manager | TechCorp Inc. | 2019–Present
Led product strategy for SaaS platform generating $30M annual revenue, increasing user retention by 22% through feature optimization
Directed cross-functional teams of 25+ engineers and designers, delivering 15+ product releases annually
Implemented data-driven roadmap prioritization, improving feature adoption by 35%
Product Manager | InnovateX | 2015–2019
Managed full product lifecycle, launching 3 major features that contributed to 18% revenue growth
Collaborated with engineering and marketing teams to scale product usage to 500K+ users
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science in Business Administration
University of California, Berkeley
CERTIFICATIONS
Top resumes do 3 things:
Easy to scan, clear structure.
Metrics visible within seconds.
Not generic—aligned.
Truth: Many systems rank, not reject.
Truth: Strong alignment beats exact match.
Truth: It often gets you filtered out.
Paste into plain text editor (check formatting)
Use ATS simulators (like Jobscan)
Compare against job descriptions
Are headings clear?
Are keywords present?
Is content readable?
Most people:
Write responsibilities
Use generic language
Don’t tailor
Top candidates:
Sell outcomes
Use strategic keywords
Position themselves clearly
That’s the difference between being shortlisted and ignored.
Before submitting, ask:
Is it readable by ATS?
Does it match the job description?
Are achievements quantified?
Is it easy to scan in 10 seconds?
Does it position me as a strong candidate?
If not, revise.