Choose from a wide range of CV templates and customize the design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised CV and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our CV builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your CV faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact CV rules employers look for.
Create CVCV Templates are not neutral design choices.
They directly influence:
•ATS parsing accuracy
• Keyword indexing depth
• Seniority classification
• Recruiter search retrieval
• Human scan efficiency
In high-volume hiring environments, template architecture can determine whether a CV is:
•Fully indexed
• Partially indexed
• Misclassified
• Or never surfaced in recruiter search results
This page analyzes CV Templates strictly through structural performance and screening logic.
Modern Applicant Tracking Systems process resumes through:
•Header detection
• Section mapping
• Date normalization
• Skill extraction
• Title standardization
Certain template structures interfere with this pipeline.
High-risk template elements:
•Dual-column layouts
• Sidebar skill panels
• Timeline graphics
• Icons replacing section headers
• Tables containing experience data
Common failure outcomes:
•Skills extracted without context
• Dates detached from job titles
• Experience duration miscalculated
• Bullet points fragmented across fields
Templates that look “clean” visually may create structural noise during parsing.
Templates with linear hierarchy offer:
•Clear section continuity
• Predictable text flow
• Accurate date-to-title association
• Reliable keyword indexing
Why this matters:
ATS systems often read left-to-right, top-to-bottom.
Multi-column templates can cause:
•Right-column skills indexed as footer content
• Experience descriptions split mid-sentence
• Certifications misclassified as miscellaneous text
Recruiters filtering by:
•Minimum years of experience
• Specific technical stacks
• Required certifications
will never see incorrectly parsed content.
Templates influence how keywords are placed.
Problematic template behaviors:
•Isolated skill boxes
• Decorative progress bars
• Character-limited bullet fields
• Auto-generated generic summaries
These design constraints reduce contextual keyword density.
Example of template-induced weakness:
Skills box:
•Python
• SQL
• Tableau
But experience section contains:
•Worked on data projects
Stronger contextual embedding:
•Built predictive models in Python improving churn prediction accuracy by 19%
• Queried 10M+ records using SQL to identify revenue leakage
• Designed Tableau dashboards used by executive leadership
Templates must allow space for integrated skill-expression within achievement bullets.
Ranking algorithms prioritize contextual usage over isolated lists.
In high-volume applicant pools, recruiters often recognize:
•Overused free template layouts
• Identical spacing patterns
• Identical header typography
• Repetitive formatting rhythm
Visible template clustering creates:
•Reduced differentiation
• Cognitive compression
• Perceived lack of personalization
While ATS scoring is algorithmic, human shortlisting is comparative.
Templates that enforce rigidity may produce homogenous applications.
Homogeneity weakens memorability.
Templates frequently vary in date presentation:
•Month-Year
• Year only
• Timeline graphics
• Floating date alignment
ATS systems calculate experience duration based on consistent pattern recognition.
Inconsistent date formatting can cause:
•Overlapping roles misinterpreted
• Gaps incorrectly inferred
• Total years underestimated
Example:
•“2018 – Present” in one role
• “Jan 2016 – 12/2017” in another
Inconsistent formats may fragment tenure calculations.
Templates should enforce uniform date logic across sections.
Different seniority levels require different structural priorities.
Executive CV Templates must emphasize:
•P&L ownership
• Revenue scale
• Headcount responsibility
• Strategic initiatives
Templates that prioritize visual balance over data density may suppress leadership metrics.
Technical CV Templates must allow:
•Detailed stack descriptions
• Tool grouping
• Architecture references
• Deployment environment specifics
Templates that restrict text length harm technical specificity.
Modern screening increasingly includes:
•AI semantic scoring
• Skill adjacency detection
• Contextual phrase evaluation
Templates that auto-insert generic phrases such as:
•“Results-driven professional”
• “Strong communication skills”
• “Dynamic team player”
increase low-value language density.
AI models weigh:
•Measurable impact
• Technical specificity
• Role-aligned phrasing
• Quantified outcomes
Templates that encourage generic filler weaken AI ranking strength.
Even structurally sound templates can fail during export.
Common risks:
•Layered PDFs
• Non-standard fonts
• Embedded text boxes
• Text converted to images
• Overuse of spacing adjustments
Enterprise ATS systems often:
•Strip layered formatting
• Flatten text
• Break lines unexpectedly
If experience data is embedded in design elements, it may not index properly.
Templates must prioritize machine-readable output over aesthetic complexity.
A high-performance CV Template typically includes:
•Single-column layout
• Clear uppercase section headers
• Plain-text skill lists
• Consistent month-year dates
• No tables for experience
• No graphical skill indicators
The strongest templates are often visually minimal but structurally stable.
Recruiter visibility depends on structural clarity.
Upload CV
Import from Linkedin
