Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeFigma resume templates give users unmatched design flexibility, branding control, and portfolio-style presentation. They work well for designers, creatives, and professionals building a strong visual identity. But many Figma resumes introduce formatting risks that can break parsing in Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS), especially when templates rely on columns, custom layouts, text layers, visual elements, or export inconsistencies.
ATS templates prioritize machine readability and recruiter workflow efficiency. They are structured to parse accurately, preserve hierarchy, and survive resume screening systems used by employers.
The problem is that most comparisons oversimplify the decision. It is not simply "creative vs ATS-friendly." Modern job seekers increasingly want both: strong design and strong ATS performance. The real decision depends on workflow, career context, hiring channels, and how resumes actually move through recruiting systems.
Most users evaluating Figma resume templates versus ATS templates are trying to solve one problem:
"I want a resume that looks impressive without hurting my chances of getting interviews."
That sounds simple. It rarely is.
The distinction starts with how resumes are consumed.
Figma templates are designed for humans.
ATS templates are designed for systems first and humans second.
Modern hiring workflows usually involve both.
A typical resume path looks like this:
•Candidate uploads resume
• ATS parses content
• Keywords and sections get indexed
• Recruiter searches or filters candidates
• Human reviews the document visually
If parsing fails at step two, visual quality becomes irrelevant.
This workflow reality is where many attractive resume designs quietly fail.
Many SEO articles treat Figma templates as inherently bad for hiring outcomes. That misses why professionals use them.
Figma solves problems traditional resume builders often cannot.
Figma advantages include:
•Complete visual control
• Custom typography
• Strong personal branding
• Flexible layouts
• Portfolio integration
• Precise spacing and hierarchy
• Collaborative editing
• Easy versioning across roles
For professionals where presentation matters, design influences perception.
Examples include:
•Product designers
• UX researchers
• Creative directors
• Brand strategists
• Art directors
• Marketing creatives
• Startup founders
A recruiter reviewing a design candidate often notices layout quality immediately.
A generic ATS template can sometimes underrepresent visual professionals.
The issue is not Figma itself.
The issue is how Figma resumes are built.
This is where competing articles usually stay shallow.
The problem is not "PDFs cannot pass ATS."
Modern ATS systems handle PDFs well.
The issue is structural complexity.
Many Figma templates contain hidden problems:
•Multi-column designs
• Floating text boxes
• Manual spacing hacks
• Decorative graphics
• Tables used for alignment
• Icons replacing labels
• Layered content structures
• Text exported as outlines
• Inconsistent section hierarchy
ATS software does not interpret design like humans.
It attempts to identify patterns.
For example:
Recruiters understand:
"Experience"
ATS systems search for recognizable structures:
Company
Role
Dates
Responsibilities
When formatting interrupts these patterns, parsing quality drops.
The result:
•Missing keywords
• Lost job titles
• Broken date fields
• Skills categorized incorrectly
• Work experience misread
The resume still looks beautiful.
The system simply misunderstands it.
The largest frustrations usually happen silently.
Users often receive no warning that parsing failed.
A left sidebar contains:
Skills
Tools
Languages
The main body contains:
Experience and projects
The template looks polished.
The ATS reads sections in unpredictable order.
Skills appear after experience.
Dates become disconnected.
Keywords scatter.
Single-column hierarchy:
Header
Summary
Experience
Skills
Education
Projects
Consistent spacing and section logic remain intact.
The visual appearance stays strong while machine readability improves.
The hidden issue is workflow architecture, not aesthetics.
ATS templates are built around predictability.
They optimize for:
•Parsing consistency
• Resume indexing
• Keyword recognition
• Recruiter search visibility
• Section clarity
• Standard document hierarchy
• Faster recruiter scanning
Most recruiters review resumes quickly.
Very quickly.
Multiple studies and hiring observations suggest initial review windows can be seconds, not minutes.
This means formatting must support speed.
Strong ATS templates reduce cognitive friction.
Recruiters immediately find:
•Experience
• Skills
• Career progression
• Achievements
• Education
Clean information architecture matters.
ATS-focused content often ignores another reality:
Over-optimized ATS templates can become visually forgettable.
Problems include:
•Generic layouts
• Poor differentiation
• Weak branding
• Minimal personality
• Similar appearance across candidates
Users frequently assume ATS success equals interview success.
Not necessarily.
Recruiters still make human decisions.
If every resume looks identical, candidates lose differentiation.
Particularly in:
•Design hiring
• Marketing roles
• Startup environments
• client-facing positions
• leadership applications
Machine readability alone is not a complete strategy.
This is where users make better decisions.
Not all hiring channels behave the same.
•Applying through large company career portals
• Applying to enterprise organizations
• Uploading resumes into job boards
• Applying through LinkedIn Easy Apply
• Competing in keyword-heavy hiring systems
• Applying at scale
These environments often involve automated screening.
•Networking directly
• Sending resumes to founders
• Applying through referrals
• Presenting portfolios
• Interviewing in creative industries
• Attaching resumes to personal websites
Human-first environments allow design to contribute more.
This distinction is often overlooked.
High-performing applicants increasingly use two versions.
Version one:
ATS version
Purpose:
System optimization
Version two:
Branded version
Purpose:
Human presentation
This workflow eliminates tradeoffs.
Users stop forcing one file to solve every hiring scenario.
Professional workflows increasingly involve resume stacks:
•ATS upload version
• Referral version
• Portfolio version
• Industry-specific versions
• Role-specific tailoring
Resume optimization increasingly behaves like content strategy.
Context matters.
Historically users had to choose:
ATS performance or visual quality.
That tradeoff created friction.
Modern platforms increasingly combine:
•ATS-friendly structure
• premium visual presentation
• automation
• branding flexibility
• AI-assisted optimization
This is one reason newer resume workflows are changing.
Platforms like NewCV focus on preserving recruiter readability while improving design quality and workflow efficiency.
Rather than forcing users into rigid ATS templates or fully manual Figma editing, the workflow centers around balancing:
•machine compatibility
• visual professionalism
• faster creation
• personal identity
• structured formatting
The biggest workflow advantage is reducing manual design decisions that users often unintentionally break.
Because many resume issues are structural rather than visual.
CategoryFigma Resume TemplatesATS TemplatesVisual flexibilityHighLowATS parsing consistencyMedium to lowHighPersonal brandingHighLimitedRecruiter readabilityDepends on designHighLayout customizationExtensiveRestrictedCreation speedModerateFastScaling multiple versionsLowerEasierRisk of formatting errorsHigherLowerPortfolio integrationStrongWeakEnterprise application suitabilityLowerHigher
No universal winner exists.
Workflow context determines effectiveness.
Candidates frequently overestimate visual creativity and underestimate information usability.
Recruiters often prioritize:
•Immediate clarity
• easy scanning
• role relevance
• progression
• measurable achievements
• consistent formatting
Design helps.
Clarity wins.
Highly visual resumes sometimes force recruiters to work harder.
Anything increasing cognitive effort creates friction.
The best resumes reduce effort.
Choose ATS templates if:
•You apply heavily through online systems
• You submit large application volumes
• You target enterprise employers
• You need scalability
• You prioritize interview conversion
Choose Figma templates if:
•Visual presentation affects hiring outcomes
• You have a portfolio-driven role
• You rely heavily on referrals
• Personal branding matters significantly
Choose hybrid workflows if:
•You want flexibility
• You apply through mixed channels
• You need ATS performance and presentation quality
Most professionals fit the third category.
Figma resumes often create maintenance friction.
Examples:
You update:
•dates
• achievements
• keywords
• projects
• job titles
Across:
•multiple files
• role variants
• export versions
Manual design workflows become difficult to scale.
This matters for:
•active job seekers
• consultants
• freelancers
• candidates tailoring resumes weekly
Resume creation is increasingly a workflow problem, not just a document problem.
Users often optimize design while ignoring maintenance cost.
Figma resume templates are not bad.
ATS templates are not automatically better.
The strongest strategy aligns format with hiring workflow.
If you are applying at scale into modern hiring systems, ATS-first structure usually wins.
If you operate in portfolio-heavy environments, branding and visual presentation become more important.
For most professionals today, hybrid workflows outperform extremes.
The future is not choosing between ATS and design.
The future is reducing the tradeoff entirely.
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin
