Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeA lateral move can significantly improve or weaken your long term career prospects depending on why you make it and how future employers interpret it. In today's US job market, recruiters and hiring managers do not automatically see a lateral move as career stagnation. In many cases, strategic lateral moves increase skill depth, expand leadership exposure, build cross functional experience, and create stronger promotion paths later. But poorly positioned lateral moves can create questions around progression, ambition, or consistency.
Hiring teams rarely evaluate a move by title alone. They evaluate signal value. They ask: Did this move increase capability, responsibility, influence, business exposure, or market value? Candidates who understand this distinction often create stronger long term career trajectories than people who chase title increases alone.
A lateral move is a job change where title level, compensation, or hierarchy stays relatively similar, but role responsibilities, business exposure, department focus, or skill development change.
Common examples include:
A Marketing Manager moving into Product Marketing
A Software Engineer joining a different technical specialty
A Financial Analyst moving into strategy operations
A Recruiter moving from agency recruiting into corporate talent acquisition
A Sales Manager moving into customer success leadership
The role may not look like a promotion on paper, but its future value can be substantial.
Many professionals assume every move must show upward title progression.
That is not how hiring teams think.
Experienced recruiters typically ask:
Did this person gain broader experience?
Did they solve more difficult business problems?
Did they manage larger scope?
Did they increase influence?
Did they become more valuable in the market?
Does the career path tell a coherent story?
Someone who moved sideways into high visibility initiatives can often outperform someone with three fast title promotions but narrow experience.
Titles create attention.
Capabilities create hiring decisions.
Not all lateral moves create equal value.
The strongest lateral moves improve future opportunities by increasing strategic leverage.
Organizations increasingly value employees who understand how teams work together.
For example:
A project manager moving into operations may gain:
Process ownership exposure
Budget management experience
Executive stakeholder communication
Team leadership opportunities
Later, that candidate becomes more attractive for senior leadership roles.
Many directors and executives have nonlinear backgrounds because broader organizational understanding becomes valuable at higher levels.
Future promotions often depend on capabilities, not tenure.
Strong lateral moves help candidates gain:
Leadership experience
Technical expertise
Client ownership
Revenue accountability
Product strategy exposure
Data analysis skills
Team management experience
Hiring managers routinely choose candidates with broader business capability over candidates with narrow specialization.
Some organizations intentionally encourage lateral movement.
Large companies often prefer internal candidates who understand multiple departments.
A temporary sideways move may later unlock:
Senior manager opportunities
Director pathways
Leadership pipelines
Executive succession planning
Many employees reject lateral opportunities because they focus only on immediate title progression.
Leadership often evaluates future potential differently.
Some industries and departments have limited growth.
Lateral movement can help employees avoid long term stagnation.
Examples:
Moving from administrative support into project coordination
Transitioning from manual operations into technology focused roles
Moving from transactional sales into enterprise sales
Shifting from support functions into strategic functions
A sideways move today can completely change earning potential five years later.
Lateral moves become risky when they create confusion rather than progression.
Recruiters notice patterns.
One move rarely creates concern.
Repeated patterns can.
Hiring managers frequently review candidates who appear to jump unpredictably.
Examples:
Sales to HR
HR to operations
Operations to marketing
Marketing to unrelated consulting
Without a clear reason, recruiters may wonder:
What direction is this person pursuing?
Are they experimenting instead of building expertise?
Do they struggle with commitment?
Career progression should tell a story.
Lateral movement without a visible strategy can create friction.
Moving sideways repeatedly without larger responsibility may create concerns.
Hiring managers sometimes interpret this pattern as:
Limited advancement capability
Performance concerns
Difficulty earning promotions
Lack of specialization
This does not mean lateral movement is bad.
It means growth indicators must still appear.
Those indicators include:
Larger projects
Bigger budgets
Team leadership
Strategic ownership
measurable outcomes
Lateral movement does not always accelerate compensation.
Some candidates make multiple lateral changes without increasing market value.
Over time they discover peers who developed specialized expertise often outpace them financially.
Strong salary growth usually comes from combining:
Broader capability
Specialized value
Leadership potential
Breadth without depth can weaken positioning.
Candidates often underestimate how much interpretation happens during resume screening.
Recruiters rarely receive explanations during first review.
They infer intent.
Here is how thinking often works internally:
Weak Example:
Candidate changed roles every year with similar titles and no visible increase in impact.
Internal reaction:
"I am not sure where this person is heading."
Good Example:
Candidate moved into adjacent functions while increasing project ownership, revenue exposure, and leadership scope.
Internal reaction:
"This person intentionally expanded experience and now has broader business capability."
The move itself matters less than what changed because of it.
Before accepting a lateral role, evaluate it through a recruiter and hiring manager lens.
Ask:
Will I gain skills I cannot get where I am?
Does this increase future market value?
Will I gain exposure to leadership?
Does this create stronger promotion opportunities later?
Will my resume tell a clearer story afterward?
Am I moving toward a long term goal?
How will I explain this move in interviews?
If you cannot clearly explain the strategic value, future employers may struggle too.
Candidates often accidentally frame lateral moves defensively.
Avoid explanations that sound reactive.
Weak Example:
"I wanted something different."
This creates uncertainty.
Good Example:
"I moved into product operations because I wanted direct ownership over strategic initiatives and cross functional leadership experience. That exposure strengthened my ability to lead large scale projects."
Strong explanations focus on:
Skill acquisition
business impact
long term strategy
increased scope
measurable outcomes
Hiring managers respond positively when moves appear intentional.
Not all industries view lateral movement similarly.
Technology companies often reward broader experience.
Consulting firms may value diverse problem solving exposure.
Finance environments sometimes emphasize structured advancement.
Healthcare leadership often values operational breadth.
Startups may reward flexibility while highly traditional industries can prioritize linear progression.
Candidates should evaluate lateral moves within their industry's promotion culture.
The same move can be interpreted differently across sectors.
Many employees optimize for immediate title progression instead of long term positioning.
This creates careers that look impressive for short periods but become difficult to scale.
Senior leadership hiring increasingly prioritizes:
Complexity management
Cross functional collaboration
Strategic thinking
Organizational influence
Decision making ability
Business understanding
Those capabilities often come from carefully chosen lateral experiences.
Career growth is not always vertical.
Sometimes the fastest path upward initially moves sideways.
The strongest careers rarely follow perfectly straight lines.
Top performers often make lateral moves that appear neutral in the short term but create significant leverage later.
The key question is not whether a move is lateral.
The key question is whether the move increases future opportunity.
A well chosen lateral move builds skills, visibility, and strategic positioning.
A poorly chosen one creates confusion.
Future employers are not grading your titles.
They are evaluating your trajectory.
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin
