Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.


Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume



Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeHow to Import Your LinkedIn Profile Into a Resume Builder
Importing your LinkedIn profile into a resume builder is one of the fastest ways to create a resume, but it only works well if you understand what gets transferred and what doesn’t. Most resume builders can pull your job titles, work history, education, skills, certifications, and profile details directly from LinkedIn. This can save hours of manual work.
But importing isn't a complete resume strategy.
LinkedIn profiles are built for networking and visibility. Resumes are built for recruiter workflows, ATS parsing, and decision-making. If you import your profile and submit it without optimization, you often end up with generic descriptions, weak achievement language, duplicate content, and formatting issues.
The smartest workflow is simple:
•Import your LinkedIn profile
• Clean and restructure the content
• Add measurable achievements
• Optimize for ATS readability
• Adjust wording for your target role
• Review formatting before applying
Done correctly, LinkedIn importing can cut resume creation time dramatically without sacrificing quality.
Most people are trying to solve one problem: speed.
Manually rebuilding years of work history across multiple jobs is frustrating and repetitive. LinkedIn already contains much of the information users need:
•Job titles
• Company names
• Employment dates
• Education history
• Certifications
• Skills
• Awards
• Project details
• Professional summaries
Instead of copying everything manually, importing creates a working draft instantly.
The appeal becomes even stronger for:
•Professionals updating resumes after years
• Job seekers applying to multiple roles
• Career changers reorganizing experience
• Users rebuilding resumes after losing files
• People creating resumes for the first time
The time savings are real.
The problem is that many users expect import tools to create a finished resume automatically. That rarely happens.
Different platforms vary, but most LinkedIn import systems typically pull structured profile data.
Common imported elements include:
•Name and contact information
• Headline
• Work experience
• Education
• Skills
• Certifications
• Profile summary
• Volunteer work
• Projects
• Licenses
Less consistent imports include:
•Recommendations
• Featured sections
• Media content
• Portfolio links
• Publications
• Endorsements
This creates a common workflow problem: users assume all profile information transfers perfectly.
It doesn't.
Imported data quality depends heavily on:
•How complete your LinkedIn profile is
• Whether job descriptions were written clearly
• Platform compatibility
• Resume builder parsing accuracy
Incomplete profiles produce incomplete resumes.
Most imported resumes fail for one reason:
People assume imported data is application-ready.
LinkedIn and resumes operate differently.
LinkedIn content is often written for visibility and networking:
"Responsible for leading team initiatives and driving operational excellence."
Recruiters reviewing resumes want outcomes:
"Led a 12-person operations team and reduced project delivery delays by 28%."
The difference is significant.
LinkedIn tends to encourage broader professional storytelling.
Resumes require:
•Measurable outcomes
• Clear responsibilities
• Hiring relevance
• Scannable formatting
• Role-specific positioning
Imported content usually needs rewriting.
Many articles ignore the structural mismatch between LinkedIn and resume workflows.
Here is where users experience friction:
LinkedInResumeBroad professional identityPosition-specific targetingNetworking-focusedHiring-focusedSEO visibilityATS readabilityLong-form sectionsFast scanningContinuous updatesRole customizationPublic profileSubmission document
Recruiters consume resumes differently.
They often spend only seconds scanning before deciding whether to continue reading.
Imported LinkedIn content frequently contains:
•Long paragraphs
• Generic wording
• Redundant language
• Missing metrics
• Weak prioritization
Importing creates the starting point—not the final version.
Competing articles often stop at "click import."
Real-world workflows are messier.
Common failures include:
Users often repeat information across:
•Summary sections
• Experience sections
• Skills areas
Imported resumes become repetitive quickly.
LinkedIn profiles target broad audiences.
Resumes need targeted role alignment.
A profile optimized for "marketing professional" may fail for:
•Demand generation manager
• Product marketer
• Growth strategist
Keyword alignment matters.
LinkedIn descriptions frequently explain responsibilities rather than outcomes.
Recruiters prioritize impact.
Imported layouts occasionally create:
•Excessive text blocks
• Strange spacing
• Unbalanced sections
• Inconsistent hierarchy
ATS systems prefer simplicity and structure.
The most effective process looks like this:
Before importing:
•Update job titles
• Fix date inconsistencies
• Remove outdated positions
• Rewrite weak descriptions
• Add measurable accomplishments
Garbage in creates garbage out.
A cleaner profile produces a stronger imported draft.
Not all import systems behave equally.
Look for:
•Strong parsing accuracy
• ATS-friendly templates
• Flexible editing
• AI-assisted rewriting
• Section customization
• Design control
Import quality matters more than import availability.
Never assume automation worked perfectly.
Check:
•Missing positions
• Broken formatting
• Incorrect dates
• Skills duplication
• Section ordering
Small errors create credibility problems.
Transform responsibilities into outcomes.
Weak Example
"Managed social media campaigns."
Good Example
"Managed multi-channel social campaigns that increased lead generation by 34% in six months."
The second version supports hiring decisions.
Imported resumes fail when users skip customization.
Adjust:
•Keywords
• Skills emphasis
• Summary language
• Achievements
• Tool mentions
One imported resume should rarely be sent everywhere unchanged.
ATS concerns are often misunderstood.
Importing itself doesn't hurt ATS compatibility.
Formatting decisions after importing create problems.
Avoid:
•Tables
• Graphics-heavy designs
• Text inside images
• Multiple columns when unnecessary
• Decorative layouts
Modern ATS systems handle more formatting than older systems, but consistency still matters.
Machine readability and recruiter readability should work together.
This is where users often face a false choice:
Strong ATS performance versus attractive design.
Modern platforms increasingly combine both.
For example, tools like NewCV focus on workflows where users can import professional information quickly while maintaining recruiter readability, ATS compatibility, modern presentation, and faster editing. That reduces a common workflow issue: rebuilding the same information repeatedly across separate tools.
The real productivity gain is reducing manual friction.
Importing alone saves time.
AI-assisted editing improves quality.
Modern workflows increasingly use AI for:
•Rewriting weak bullet points
• Turning responsibilities into achievements
• Identifying missing metrics
• Improving summaries
• Suggesting keyword improvements
• Eliminating repetitive language
The best systems do not replace judgment.
They accelerate editing.
The workflow becomes:
Import → Analyze → Improve → Customize → Export
That process is dramatically faster than starting from scratch.
Recruiters rarely know whether you imported content.
They do notice imported resumes that were never optimized.
Common signals:
•Generic summaries
• Long paragraphs
• Repeated wording
• Lack of metrics
• Weak prioritization
• Keyword mismatch
Strong resumes feel intentionally written.
Weak imports feel auto-generated.
Hiring decisions often depend on this distinction.
Your imported resume likely needs additional editing if:
•Every bullet starts with "Responsible for"
• Achievements lack numbers
• Content sounds generic
• Skills appear repeated
• Experience sections are overly long
• Formatting feels uneven
• Your resume could apply to dozens of unrelated jobs
A strong resume creates relevance.
Imported drafts often create completeness but not relevance.
For speed and quality together, use this process:
•Optimize LinkedIn profile
• Import into resume builder
• Review imported structure
• Rewrite experience bullets
• Add measurable results
• Match keywords to target role
• Review ATS formatting
• Export final version
This reduces repetitive work while improving resume quality.
Users who skip editing save minutes.
Users who optimize save opportunities.