Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeIf you're choosing between a LaTeX resume and an ATS resume builder, the decision is not really about aesthetics. It is about workflow efficiency, ATS parsing reliability, editing speed, recruiter readability, and long-term usability.
LaTeX resumes appeal to technical users because they offer precision, customization, and clean formatting control. ATS resume builders prioritize speed, structured formatting, compatibility, and easier iteration. The right choice depends less on design preference and more on how you actually manage your resume workflow.
Most people comparing these options ask a simple question: Will ATS systems read my resume correctly? But that is only part of the decision. A resume is a living document. You update it repeatedly, tailor it for roles, optimize for keywords, adjust formatting, and refine personal branding over time.
The biggest mistake people make is evaluating resume creation tools as design systems instead of workflow systems.
That is where the real differences appear.
Most comparison articles oversimplify this decision.
They frame it as:
•LaTeX = advanced users
• Resume builders = beginners
That misses the actual issue.
The real tradeoff is:
Do you want maximum formatting control or maximum workflow efficiency?
LaTeX is essentially a document-engineering system.
ATS resume builders are structured workflow systems.
These are very different approaches.
LaTeX gives users granular control over:
•Spacing
• Typography
• Layout architecture
• Sections
• Custom visual structures
• PDF generation behavior
ATS resume builders focus on:
•Parsing compatibility
• Content structure
• editing speed
• reusable templates
• AI assistance
• recruiter readability
• rapid personalization
The distinction becomes important once you start applying at scale.
A LaTeX resume is built using markup language rather than visual editing.
Instead of dragging sections or typing into templates, you write code-like commands:
The system compiles text into a PDF.
Developers, engineers, researchers, and academics often use LaTeX because it allows extremely precise formatting.
Common resume templates include:
•Deedy Resume
•Awesome CV
•ModernCV
•AltaCV
•Jake Gutierrez templates
LaTeX became popular because users could create highly polished resumes that looked more professional than standard Word documents.
But appearance is only part of the story.
An ATS resume builder uses structured templates and interface-based editing to create resumes optimized for modern hiring systems.
Rather than manually controlling formatting code, users focus on content while the system handles layout architecture.
Most ATS resume builders provide:
•ATS-friendly templates
•drag-and-drop editing
•structured formatting systems
•AI writing support
•keyword optimization workflows
•section automation
•multiple resume versions
The biggest advantage is not convenience.
It is reducing friction.
Resume updates happen continuously:
•new projects
•promotions
•role changes
•targeted applications
•keyword modifications
•design improvements
Resume builders optimize the entire process.
A widespread misconception says:
"ATS systems cannot read LaTeX resumes."
That is inaccurate.
ATS systems do not evaluate whether a document came from LaTeX.
They evaluate whether the exported file structure is machine-readable.
Problems happen when LaTeX templates create:
•multi-column layouts
•text overlays
•unusual PDF encoding
•icons replacing text labels
•tables used for positioning
•non-standard fonts
•broken text extraction
A visually beautiful PDF can still parse poorly.
Recruiters rarely see the issue.
The ATS sees it immediately.
Common parsing failures include:
Weak Example
Some systems extract:
instead of readable information.
Good Example
Structured text almost always performs better.
ATS builders reduce these risks because templates are designed around predictable parsing behavior.
Despite workflow limitations, LaTeX remains popular for valid reasons.
Technical users often value:
•version control through Git
•complete layout customization
•typography quality
•consistency across edits
•advanced formatting precision
•minimal visual clutter
For engineers and developers already working in code environments, editing resumes in LaTeX feels natural.
Some even integrate resume updates into broader workflows:
•GitHub profile updates
•portfolio systems
•publication management
•academic CV maintenance
In these environments, LaTeX fits existing habits.
The issue appears when hiring workflows become iterative.
Top-ranking articles often focus only on ATS parsing.
That misses a larger issue:
Resumes are edited constantly.
Modern applicants rarely send one resume.
They often maintain:
•role-specific resumes
•industry variants
•keyword-targeted versions
•geographic variations
•startup vs enterprise versions
Now imagine making five edits across six LaTeX files.
Small changes become friction.
Friction creates delays.
Delays reduce application volume.
Application volume influences interview opportunities.
This workflow bottleneck rarely gets discussed.
ATS builders usually outperform LaTeX in iteration speed.
Evaluate your workflow using four variables:
How often do you update your resume?
How many targeted applications do you submit?
Do you enjoy editing markup?
How important is visual differentiation?
Patterns emerge quickly.
High customization + frequent edits generally favors builders.
Low editing + technical comfort often favors LaTeX.
Candidates frequently optimize resumes for themselves.
Recruiters optimize for scanning speed.
Recruiters often review resumes in seconds.
Fast scanning depends on:
•visual hierarchy
•spacing consistency
•section predictability
•readable formatting
•content clarity
Complex formatting can reduce usability.
This matters even if ATS parsing succeeds.
The question is not:
"Can recruiters read this?"
The question is:
"Can recruiters extract value instantly?"
Those are different outcomes.
Many highly starred GitHub templates prioritize appearance over usability.
Common issues include:
•compressed text density
•narrow margins
•tiny fonts
•visual overload
•over-engineered layouts
•icon-heavy structures
These resumes often look impressive to creators.
Recruiters experience them differently.
Dense layouts increase cognitive load.
Recruiters scan patterns.
They do not read line by line.
Formatting should reduce work—not create it.
The rise of AI-assisted resume systems changed expectations.
Modern users increasingly want:
•bullet point suggestions
•job description analysis
•keyword alignment
•content rewriting
•role adaptation
•fast experimentation
Traditional LaTeX workflows were never designed around AI productivity.
Resume builders increasingly operate as optimization systems rather than formatting systems.
This changes the decision framework.
Users no longer ask:
"How can I build my resume?"
They ask:
"How quickly can I improve and personalize my resume?"
Those are different goals.
Many users used to think they had to choose between:
•ATS compatibility
•strong design
•editing speed
•personalization
•recruiter readability
Modern platforms increasingly combine these needs.
NewCV reflects this shift by treating resumes as workflow systems rather than static documents.
Instead of forcing users into a tradeoff between ATS structure and presentation quality, newer approaches combine:
•ATS-friendly architecture
•modern visual presentation
•AI-assisted optimization
•faster editing workflows
•personal branding support
This becomes valuable for users managing multiple application versions without wanting the overhead of manual formatting maintenance.
The workflow advantage is often larger than the design advantage.
LaTeX works best for users who:
•already use code-based workflows
•enjoy customization
•need publication-heavy academic layouts
•maintain resumes infrequently
•use Git-driven systems
•prioritize formatting precision
LaTeX is often strongest when resume editing is low-frequency.
ATS builders generally work better for users who:
•apply frequently
•tailor resumes regularly
•optimize around keywords
•value speed
•want AI assistance
•maintain multiple resume versions
For many users, workflow simplicity becomes more important than formatting control.
Ask yourself:
Would you rather optimize document engineering or optimize application workflow?
If your priority is typography control and technical customization, LaTeX remains excellent.
If your priority is application speed, iteration efficiency, recruiter readability, and reduced friction, ATS resume builders usually create better outcomes.
The best resume system is not the one that looks most impressive.
It is the one you can maintain, improve, and adapt consistently.
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin
