Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeIf you're searching for a resume builder faster than Figma, the short answer is this: modern resume builders dramatically reduce friction because they eliminate layout work, formatting maintenance, manual edits, and repetitive design decisions. Figma is powerful for visual design, but resumes are not design projects for most job seekers. They are workflow systems. People need to create, tailor, update, export, optimize, and send resumes repeatedly across multiple applications. That process breaks down inside general design tools.
A purpose-built resume platform can reduce resume creation time from hours to minutes because it automates structure, formatting consistency, content organization, and recruiter readability. For job seekers applying frequently, switching from Figma to a dedicated resume workflow often creates speed gains that matter more than design flexibility.
The real question isn't whether Figma can create resumes. It can.
The question is whether Figma is the fastest workflow for modern job searching.
For most people, it is not.
Figma became popular for resumes for understandable reasons:
•Full visual control
• Clean modern layouts
• Strong typography options
• Easy alignment tools
• Portfolio-like aesthetics
• Designer familiarity
For product designers, UX professionals, and creative roles, Figma felt natural.
But many users unintentionally turned resume creation into a design exercise instead of an application workflow.
That distinction matters.
Resumes are dynamic documents. They evolve constantly:
•Different job versions
• Role-specific edits
• Industry variations
• Updated achievements
• Skill changes
• Last-minute application adjustments
Design tools prioritize creation freedom.
Resume systems prioritize iteration speed.
Those are fundamentally different workflows.
Most articles focus on visual design.
They miss the actual bottleneck.
The problem isn't making version one.
The problem is version twenty-three.
Real application behavior looks like this:
Monday:
•Apply for a Product Manager role
• Modify summary
• Add analytics experience
Tuesday:
•Apply for a growth position
• Rearrange skills
• Change project emphasis
Wednesday:
•Tailor resume for startup role
• Remove enterprise-heavy language
Thursday:
Inside Figma, every change often triggers additional work:
•Spacing adjustments
• Section movement
• Text box resizing
• Alignment fixes
• Multi-page corrections
• Export checks
The hidden tax compounds over time.
Five minutes here.
Eight minutes there.
Ten more minutes after a layout shifts.
Across dozens of applications, these micro-frictions become workflow debt.
This is where dedicated resume builders begin outperforming design platforms.
The biggest difference between Figma and modern resume platforms is not appearance.
It is system behavior.
Good resume platforms assume users repeatedly modify content.
That changes the architecture.
Instead of manual layout control, they automate:
•Section organization
• Formatting consistency
• Typography hierarchy
• spacing behavior
• page structure
• export optimization
• reusable resume versions
Users spend less time maintaining layouts and more time improving content.
That distinction creates speed.
Search intent here is rarely about software speed.
Users are usually asking:
"Can I stop wasting time formatting resumes?"
Behind the search are common frustrations:
•Resume edits break layouts
• Multiple versions become difficult
• Export quality varies
• Design takes longer than expected
• Resume updates become repetitive
• Tailoring applications feels slow
Competing articles often miss this.
People are not seeking another editor.
They want less friction.
Create canvas.
Design structure.
Adjust spacing.
Build visual hierarchy.
Resize elements.
Manage sections manually.
Export.
Test PDF.
Fix alignment.
Create duplicate versions.
Repeat.
Choose structure.
Import experience.
Edit content.
Generate tailored versions.
Export.
Apply.
Repeat.
One workflow emphasizes design management.
The other emphasizes completion speed.
For active job seekers, completion speed usually wins.
Figma works reasonably well when:
•Resume changes are rare
• Design uniqueness matters heavily
• Visual branding outweighs speed
• Portfolio presentation is central
Problems appear under application volume.
Imagine applying to 50 positions.
Now imagine maintaining:
•3 resume variations
• 2 industries
• custom summaries
• changing achievements
That is where Figma becomes operationally expensive.
Not financially.
Cognitively.
The mental overhead becomes the bottleneck.
People underestimate cognitive friction because it feels small in the moment.
But workflow systems succeed or fail on accumulated friction.
Interesting detail:
The best tools do not necessarily reduce typing.
They reduce decisions.
Decision fatigue slows productivity more than most users realize.
Examples:
Figma asks:
Should spacing be 18px or 24px?
Should headers move?
Should alignment change?
Should this fit on one page?
Resume builders eliminate these decisions.
The result feels faster because users remain focused on outcome rather than design maintenance.
That is a workflow advantage, not just a UI advantage.
ATS conversations online are often exaggerated.
Modern applicant tracking systems have improved substantially.
But formatting complexity still creates unnecessary risk.
Highly customized designs sometimes introduce:
•inconsistent reading order
• unusual text structures
• visual elements replacing content hierarchy
• export inconsistencies
Many Figma resumes work perfectly.
Others create parsing problems users never detect.
That uncertainty becomes stressful.
Purpose-built resume systems usually maintain cleaner document structures by default.
Not because ATS systems are incapable.
Because standardized formatting reduces ambiguity.
Less uncertainty improves workflow confidence.
Most people do not switch because of aesthetics.
They switch because of operational friction.
Common triggers include:
•applying to many roles
• needing rapid edits
• resume version overload
• time pressure
• inconsistent exports
• growing application complexity
Interestingly, many users tolerate friction for months before realizing design tools are creating hidden inefficiencies.
The pain appears gradually.
Not instantly.
Newer resume systems increasingly combine:
•content guidance
• AI-assisted writing
• version management
• personal branding
• resume optimization
• visual consistency
• workflow automation
This changes user expectations.
People increasingly expect software to reduce repetitive work rather than simply provide editing space.
That shift explains why dedicated platforms continue replacing manual workflows.
Modern platforms like NewCV reflect a broader change in how users think about resume creation.
Historically, people had to choose between:
•ATS performance
• attractive design
• speed
• personal branding
Those tradeoffs created frustration.
Design-focused solutions looked great but often slowed iteration.
Simple templates were fast but visually generic.
NewCV attempts to reduce those compromises by combining:
•recruiter-readable formatting
• modern presentation
• AI-assisted workflow support
• faster editing systems
• personal identity elements
• simplified resume management
The advantage is not simply aesthetics.
The workflow becomes easier to maintain over time.
That matters more than users initially realize.
Weak Example
Open Figma.
Duplicate file.
Resize boxes.
Adjust spacing.
Fix layout.
Re-export.
Modify again tomorrow.
This workflow creates maintenance overhead.
Good Example
Open resume builder.
Update achievements.
Generate role-specific version.
Export.
Apply.
This workflow prioritizes momentum.
Momentum usually matters more than perfection.
Switch if these describe your situation:
•You apply frequently
• You create multiple resume versions
• Resume edits consume too much time
• Formatting becomes repetitive
• Layout maintenance feels annoying
• You value speed over design micromanagement
Stay with Figma if:
•You work in highly visual industries
• Custom design strongly influences hiring outcomes
• Resume changes are infrequent
• Portfolio presentation matters more than efficiency
The decision is not about better software.
It is about better workflow alignment.
Competing pages often compare features.
Features are not the core issue.
Workflow friction is.
Users rarely abandon tools because features are missing.
They leave because repetitive actions create invisible fatigue.
The fastest resume builder is usually not the one with the largest template library.
It is the one that removes unnecessary decisions, repetitive formatting work, and version-management friction.
That is what "faster than Figma" actually means in practice.
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin
