Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeA resume can have excellent experience, strong achievements, and the right keywords—and still fail because of formatting. Recruiters often spend only seconds on an initial review. If your resume feels hard to scan, visually cluttered, inconsistent, or difficult for an applicant tracking system to parse, you create friction immediately. That friction costs interviews.
Most candidates think resume formatting is cosmetic. Hiring teams do not. Formatting affects readability, first impressions, ATS compatibility, and how quickly someone understands your value. A poorly formatted resume forces recruiters to work harder. Most won't.
The biggest resume formatting mistakes that kill interviews are inconsistent structure, poor hierarchy, unreadable layouts, keyword-stuffed designs, and formatting choices that make your accomplishments harder to find. The issue isn't aesthetics. It's candidate positioning.
This guide breaks down what recruiters actually notice, why formatting mistakes hurt interview chances, and what separates resumes that move forward from resumes that quietly disappear.
Hiring managers rarely read resumes like books. They scan.
The first pass often looks something like this:
•Job title progression
• Current or recent company
• Relevant experience
• Skills alignment
• Measurable accomplishments
• Education if relevant
• Signs of quality or risk
Recruiters search for evidence quickly.
Good formatting helps them identify value instantly.
Bad formatting creates uncertainty.
And uncertainty hurts candidates.
Recruiters often make subconscious judgments based on layout quality:
•Is this candidate organized?
• Can they communicate clearly?
• Do they understand professional expectations?
• Is this going to be difficult to review?
People assume hiring decisions are purely objective. They are not.
Presentation influences perception.
Many candidates optimize for design instead of readability.
A resume is not a portfolio homepage.
Highly designed templates frequently create problems:
•Multiple columns
• Text boxes
• Graphic elements
• Icons replacing labels
• Decorative skill bars
• Charts and rating systems
These elements may look impressive but often damage ATS parsing and scanning behavior.
Recruiters do not reward creativity unless the role specifically requires design skills.
For most candidates, clarity wins.
Formatting inconsistency immediately signals lack of attention to detail.
Recruiters notice things like:
•Different font families across sections
• Random bolding styles
• Mixed spacing
• Inconsistent capitalization
• Dates aligned differently across jobs
• Varying bullet formats
Candidates underestimate how distracting this becomes.
Visual inconsistency creates cognitive load.
If a recruiter notices formatting mistakes, they start looking for other mistakes too.
Software Engineer
Google | Jan 2023–Present
Senior Developer
MICROSOFT | February 2020 to December 2022
Different date styles.
Different capitalization.
Different formatting hierarchy.
This creates unnecessary friction.
Software Engineer
Google | Jan 2023–Present
Senior Developer
Microsoft | Feb 2020–Dec 2022
Simple. Consistent. Predictable.
Recruiters process information faster.
Candidates frequently shrink text to fit more information.
This almost always backfires.
Common mistakes:
•9-point font
• Extremely narrow margins
• Dense text blocks
• Reduced line spacing
The assumption:
"If I fit more information, I become more competitive."
Reality:
Recruiters see a wall of text.
Most people scan rather than read deeply.
Recommended formatting:
•10.5–12 point font
• Clean spacing
• Reasonable white space
• Margins around 0.5–1 inch
Your resume should feel easy to consume.
Space is not wasted real estate.
Space improves readability.
One of the fastest ways to lose attention is large text blocks.
Recruiters do not want essays.
They want evidence.
Candidates often write summaries like this:
Results-driven marketing professional with extensive experience across digital initiatives and campaign strategy development with expertise managing stakeholders and implementing scalable growth systems across various business functions while collaborating cross-functionally and improving customer engagement.
Nothing stands out.
No measurable outcomes.
No visual hierarchy.
Growth Marketing Manager with 7+ years of experience scaling acquisition programs and revenue growth.
Key strengths:
•Paid acquisition strategy
• Demand generation
• Conversion optimization
• Cross-functional leadership
Generated 42% year-over-year pipeline growth.
The difference is scan speed.
Recruiters dislike skill bars for a reason.
Examples:
"Excel: 90%"
"Leadership: 4 stars"
"Python: ███████"
These systems communicate almost nothing.
Questions recruiters ask:
90% compared to what?
Who measured it?
What does four stars mean?
Skill ratings create fake precision.
Replace them with proof.
Skills:
•Python
• SQL
• Tableau
• Salesforce
• Data visualization
Then demonstrate use in experience sections.
Evidence beats self-scoring.
Formatting is also about information hierarchy.
Candidates often organize sections based on tradition rather than strategy.
A common mistake:
Contact information
Objective statement
Education
Volunteer work
Interests
Experience
Skills
This pushes important information too far down.
Recruiters care about relevance first.
For experienced professionals:
•Contact information
• Summary if useful
• Skills
• Experience
• Education
• Certifications
For recent graduates:
Education may move higher.
Strong formatting supports hiring logic.
Candidates think bolding creates emphasis.
Too much bolding creates chaos.
Recruiters stop noticing emphasis when everything is emphasized.
Common mistakes:
•Entire bullet points bolded
• Every keyword bolded
• Full paragraphs bolded
• Random skill names highlighted
Formatting should direct attention.
Not fight for attention.
Use bold strategically:
•Job titles
• Company names
• Major achievements when necessary
Think of formatting as visual prioritization.
Two-column templates are extremely popular online.
They're also one of the biggest sources of ATS parsing failures.
Common ATS problems:
•Dates pulled incorrectly
• Skills moved into wrong sections
• Job history split improperly
• Missing experience
Even modern systems struggle with certain templates.
Candidates assume:
"Big companies have advanced ATS systems."
Some do.
Some do not.
Many organizations still use systems with parsing limitations.
Safe formatting usually includes:
•Single-column layout
• Standard section headings
• Traditional structure
Simple formatting creates fewer risks.
Large headers often consume a third of page one.
Examples:
Huge names.
Large graphics.
Multiple social links.
Decorative design elements.
Page one is prime real estate.
Use it carefully.
A cleaner structure:
Name
Phone
Professional email
LinkedIn URL
City and state
Nothing more.
Keep attention on qualifications.
Recruiters notice uneven bullet patterns quickly.
Responsible for managing client relationships
Increased revenue by 21%
Worked with teams
Leadership responsibilities included overseeing projects and operational processes
No consistency.
Different lengths.
Different styles.
Different levels of detail.
Increased customer retention by 24% through lifecycle optimization
Managed strategic accounts worth $3.2M annually
Led cross-functional teams across sales and operations
Clear structure creates stronger reading flow.
ATS optimization often goes too far.
Candidates copy job descriptions repeatedly:
Project management project manager leadership stakeholder management project execution strategic planning cross-functional communication leadership.
Recruiters immediately spot this.
Keyword stuffing creates:
•Awkward formatting
• Poor readability
• Artificial language
ATS optimization should feel natural.
Strong resumes integrate keywords into accomplishments.
Not into keyword dumps.
Candidates often edit resumes across platforms:
Word
Google Docs
Templates
PDF tools
LinkedIn exports
Formatting issues appear:
•Invisible spacing differences
• Broken bullets
• Weird symbols
• Random indentation changes
Always review your resume before sending:
•Open PDF version
• View on desktop
• View on mobile
• Zoom out to 50%
• Check alignment
Small issues become obvious.
Recruiters rarely ask for creative resumes.
They prefer predictable formatting.
An ideal structure usually includes:
•Clean hierarchy
• Easy scan patterns
• Consistent spacing
• Measurable accomplishments
• Standard headings
• ATS compatibility
• White space
The best resumes often look boring.
That is not a flaw.
A resume's job is not visual entertainment.
Its job is securing interviews.
A practical recruiter test:
Open your resume.
Look at it for five seconds.
Then ask:
•Can someone identify your role immediately?
• Is your value proposition obvious?
• Are accomplishments visible?
• Is experience easy to follow?
• Does the layout feel effortless?
If the answer is no, formatting may be hurting you.
Because recruiters rarely give resumes a second chance.
Candidates often think:
"My resume needs to stand out."
That is partially true.
But standing out visually and standing out professionally are different things.
Hiring teams remember candidates who communicate value clearly.
Not candidates with gradient colors and complicated templates.
The strongest resumes reduce effort.
The weaker resumes increase effort.
Formatting determines which category you enter.
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin
