Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeSome resume words do not look harmful at first. In fact, many job seekers use them because they sound professional. The problem is that recruiters and hiring managers read hundreds of resumes every week. Certain words repeatedly show up on weak resumes, inflated resumes, and resumes filled with vague claims. Over time, these words become credibility killers.
Words like “hardworking,” “team player,” “responsible for,” and “go getter” rarely help candidates stand out. They often signal weak evidence, generic positioning, and a lack of measurable results. Recruiters do not reject resumes because of one bad word. They reject resumes when language creates a pattern of weak signals.
If your resume feels polished but generates few interviews, the issue may not be your experience. It may be the words quietly reducing your perceived value.
Recruiters rarely read resumes line by line during the first review.
Most initial screening looks more like pattern recognition.
Within seconds, recruiters ask:
Does this candidate sound credible?
Does this person show results?
Does this resume sound specific?
Can I quickly understand impact?
Weak wording creates friction.
Hiring teams are trained by repetition. After reading thousands of resumes, they begin associating certain language with candidates who overstate skills or fail to provide evidence.
The issue is not vocabulary itself.
The issue is what the word signals.
“Hardworking” creates almost no hiring value.
Every candidate claims they work hard.
Recruiters immediately ask:
Hardworking compared to whom?
Without proof, the word feels like self promotion.
Weak Example
Hardworking sales professional with strong communication skills.
Good Example
Exceeded annual sales quota by 128% and generated $1.2M in new business revenue.
The second version proves effort through outcomes.
This phrase became so overused that many recruiters mentally ignore it.
Organizations want collaborative employees, but they want evidence of collaboration.
Weak Example
Strong team player who works well with others.
Good Example
Partnered with product, engineering, and marketing teams to launch a new onboarding process that increased activation rates by 24%.
Recruiters trust behavior more than labels.
This is one of the biggest hidden resume mistakes.
“Responsible for” describes duties.
Recruiters hire outcomes.
Candidates often accidentally write job descriptions instead of achievement statements.
Weak Example
Responsible for managing customer accounts.
Good Example
Managed a portfolio of 180 enterprise accounts with a 96% annual retention rate.
One describes assignment.
The other shows value.
Many candidates use personality language that sounds energetic.
Hiring managers usually see the opposite.
Terms like:
Go getter
Self starter
Dynamic individual
Motivated professional
Results driven person
often feel empty unless evidence follows.
Recruiters interpret these phrases as filler.
Hiring managers absolutely care about attention to detail.
But saying it directly creates a trust problem.
People who are genuinely detail oriented usually demonstrate it rather than announce it.
Ironically, resumes claiming “detail oriented” often contain formatting errors.
A stronger approach:
Good Example
Maintained 99.8% inventory accuracy across a 12,000 SKU operation.
That proves precision.
Nearly everyone writes this.
Recruiters rarely believe it.
Communication is one of the hardest skills to evaluate through self description.
Show communication through action.
Weak Example
Excellent communication and interpersonal skills.
Good Example
Presented quarterly business reviews to executive stakeholders across six departments.
Many candidates use strategic because it sounds executive.
But recruiters look for actual evidence of strategic thinking.
Questions hiring managers ask internally:
Did this person influence direction?
Did they make decisions?
Did they identify opportunities?
Did they improve outcomes?
Without proof, strategic becomes another invisible word.
Passionate can work in very limited contexts.
But many resumes overuse it.
Examples include:
Passionate marketer
Passionate leader
Passionate developer
Passionate professional
Hiring managers usually care more about evidence than emotional language.
Passion alone does not solve business problems.
Results do.
Calling yourself an expert creates risk.
The moment someone labels themselves an expert, expectations rise dramatically.
Recruiters often become skeptical.
Especially if experience level appears junior.
Safer positioning:
Advanced
Experienced
Specialized in
Led initiatives involving
These sound more credible.
Corporate jargon damages readability.
Examples include:
Synergy
Leverage
Thought leader
Innovative thinker
Cutting edge
Best in class
Value add
Outside the box
These phrases create noise.
Recruiters skim quickly.
Simple language wins.
Many candidates assume this is only a recruiter issue.
It is not.
Modern resume screening increasingly combines ATS filtering with recruiter review.
Generic wording creates several problems:
Important role specific keywords get crowded out
Strong technical terms receive less visibility
Skills become vague
Search relevance weakens
Resume specificity drops
For example:
“Results driven marketing professional” tells systems almost nothing.
“Demand generation manager with HubSpot, Salesforce, SEO, paid acquisition, and lifecycle marketing experience” creates clearer keyword alignment.
Strong resumes usually follow a predictable pattern.
Instead of adjective driven language, they use evidence driven language.
A practical framework:
Action + Scope + Result
Examples:
Reduced customer churn by 18% through redesigned onboarding workflows
Led migration of 4,000 users to a new CRM platform ahead of deadline
Increased email conversion rates by 31% after rebuilding campaign segmentation strategy
This structure immediately answers recruiter questions.
What happened?
How large was the work?
What changed?
Many weak resumes have recurring patterns beyond obvious buzzwords.
Candidates often stack descriptors:
Highly motivated, exceptionally driven, detail oriented, proactive professional.
This creates skepticism.
High performers usually present evidence and let recruiters draw conclusions.
Candidates often substitute traits for accomplishments.
Traits are difficult to verify.
Achievements are easier.
Some candidates unintentionally oversell experience.
A coordinator role suddenly becomes:
Directed transformational enterprise initiatives.
Hiring managers spot this immediately.
Over positioning creates trust problems.
Candidates frequently believe recruiters remember wording.
Usually they remember signals.
After screening resumes, hiring managers often summarize candidates mentally like this:
Strong metrics
Clear ownership
Operational thinker
Good leadership examples
Vague resume
Heavy buzzword use
Duties only
That last category often loses interviews.
Replace claims with evidence.
Replace personality with behavior.
Replace adjectives with measurable outcomes.
Stronger language patterns include:
Increased
Reduced
Generated
Built
Led
Implemented
Streamlined
Improved
Delivered
Scaled
Launched
Optimized
These create movement.
Recruiters naturally associate action with impact.
A useful hiring test:
Remove every adjective from your resume.
Now read it again.
Does it still sound impressive?
Top performing resumes survive that test because their impact comes from evidence rather than self description.
Strong candidates rarely announce they are hardworking, strategic, or motivated.
Their experience proves it.
That difference quietly separates resumes that get ignored from resumes that get interviews.
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin
