Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeIf you have years of experience and still feel underpaid, your frustration may be justified. In the US job market, experience by itself does not automatically increase compensation. Employers rarely pay for time served. They pay for perceived market value, business impact, scarcity, leverage, and positioning.
This is where many professionals get blindsided. Someone with eight years of experience can earn less than someone with four if the second person communicates stronger results, negotiates better, moves companies strategically, or works in a higher market-value skill area. Hiring managers do not sit around calculating years worked. They ask: What problem can this person solve, and how expensive is that problem?
Being underpaid with experience often comes down to invisible factors that most professionals never realize are affecting their compensation.
One of the biggest career misconceptions is believing experience equals value.
Hiring teams separate these concepts quickly.
Someone can have:
Ten years doing repetitive work with minimal growth
Eight years in the same process and tools
Long tenure without measurable business impact
Deep experience in outdated systems
On paper, that person is experienced.
In practice, they may not command premium compensation.
Meanwhile, another candidate with five years may have:
Led initiatives
Increased revenue
Reduced costs
Managed cross functional projects
Built high demand technical skills
Worked in fast growth environments
Recruiters and compensation teams often classify that candidate as higher value.
Hiring managers do not pay for years. They pay for outcomes.
This is one of the most common causes of underpayment in the US market.
Internal raises often move slowly.
Typical annual increases:
2% to 5%
Sometimes lower during budget constraints
External job changes:
Frequently produce 10% to 25% increases
Can exceed 30% in competitive markets
Companies often allocate larger budgets to acquire talent than retain it.
That creates a painful reality:
Someone joining your company today may be paid more than employees already doing the work.
Recruiters see this constantly.
An employee with seven years at Company A may discover external offers are paying $25,000 to $50,000 more.
Not because they suddenly became more valuable.
Because the market moved while internal pay did not.
Salary history creates invisible ceilings.
Employers may unconsciously anchor compensation around prior earnings.
Here is what happens:
You started at:
$48,000
Raises slowly moved you to:
$61,000
Market compensation for your role now:
$85,000
The gap becomes massive over time.
Many professionals assume employers will eventually correct this.
Usually they do not.
Organizations often think in terms of incremental adjustments.
Markets move in jumps.
This hurts experienced professionals more than early career candidates.
Hiring managers hear statements like:
Weak Example
"I managed client accounts and worked with multiple stakeholders."
That sounds like activity.
Now compare:
Good Example
"Managed a portfolio of 45 accounts generating $2.8M annually while improving renewal rates by 18%."
That sounds expensive.
Expensive problems create larger compensation discussions.
Recruiters screen for impact language because impact predicts business value.
Responsibilities explain what you did.
Results explain why it mattered.
This can be difficult to hear because it feels unfair.
Not all experience carries equal market pricing.
Compensation reflects supply and demand.
Examples:
High market value areas:
AI implementation
Cloud infrastructure
Revenue operations
Cybersecurity
Enterprise sales
Product leadership
Data engineering
Lower premium areas can include:
Administrative work with little specialization
Legacy systems with declining demand
Highly saturated generalist roles
Work easily outsourced or automated
This does not mean your work lacks value.
It means market economics affect compensation.
Hiring managers ask:
"How difficult is this talent to replace?"
That question influences salary more than most people realize.
Job titles create compensation assumptions.
Someone may perform senior work while carrying a lower level title.
Examples:
Coordinator versus Manager
Specialist versus Senior Specialist
Analyst versus Lead Analyst
Titles influence:
Recruiter outreach
Salary bands
Compensation benchmarking
candidate screening
internal promotion pathways
Two people doing similar work can receive dramatically different offers because their titles create different expectations.
Experienced candidates often underestimate this issue.
Not all work receives equal recognition.
Compensation rises around visible impact.
Hiring managers naturally prioritize work tied to:
Revenue
Growth
Profitability
Cost reduction
Risk reduction
Strategic initiatives
Employees sometimes become essential but invisible.
Examples:
Keeping operations stable.
Fixing recurring issues.
Supporting internal processes.
Managing administrative complexity.
Those contributions matter.
But if leadership cannot connect them to measurable outcomes, compensation growth often stalls.
This surprises many professionals.
Compensation teams rarely ask:
"How hard has this person worked?"
They ask:
"What alternatives exist?"
This comparison includes:
Similar talent available now
Market compensation benchmarks
Current hiring conditions
Geographic salary data
Competitive talent supply
Effort matters for performance.
Market comparisons determine compensation.
You can work extremely hard and still become underpaid.
That is not fair.
But it reflects how hiring economics operate.
Experience does not automatically create senior positioning.
Senior professionals often demonstrate:
Decision making ownership
Strategic thinking
Cross functional influence
Business understanding
Initiative without supervision
Executive communication
Hiring managers frequently reject experienced candidates who still operate like task executors.
Years alone do not create seniority.
Behavior often does.
Experienced workers sometimes assume:
"My experience should speak for itself."
Unfortunately, compensation discussions rarely work that way.
Hiring managers expect candidates to advocate for value.
Common mistakes:
Giving salary expectations first
Accepting initial offers immediately
Negotiating emotionally
Using personal reasons instead of market evidence
Assuming loyalty creates leverage
Strong negotiation sounds different.
Good Example
"Based on current market compensation, role scope, and my experience leading similar initiatives, I was targeting a range closer to $115,000 to $125,000."
That shifts the discussion toward value.
Not feelings.
Use this framework recruiters often think through internally.
Ask:
What are people with similar backgrounds earning?
What does your region pay?
What do current job postings suggest?
Ask:
Are your skills increasing or declining in demand?
Have you developed premium capabilities?
Ask:
Can you quantify your impact?
Are you communicating results?
Ask:
Are recruiters reaching out?
Are interviews converting?
Are employers competing?
Ask:
Is your company known for low raises?
Have peers left for higher compensation?
If multiple warning signs appear, underpayment is likely real.
Professionals often assume they need another degree or certification.
Sometimes they do not.
More often they need repositioning.
Actions that frequently work:
Update your resume around measurable outcomes
Benchmark compensation using current market data
Explore external opportunities
Build higher value skills
Correct title positioning
Practice compensation discussions
Increase visibility around business impact
Stop assuming tenure automatically creates leverage
Many experienced workers are not underqualified.
They are underpositioned.
That difference matters.
Companies often pay employees according to what they can retain them for, not what they are fully worth.
If someone continues accepting lower compensation, leadership may never voluntarily close the gap.
This is why some professionals discover they are dramatically underpaid only after interviewing elsewhere.
The market occasionally values you more accurately than your employer does.
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin
