Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeFor most Singapore job applications, I would not put a photo on your resume unless the employer specifically asks for one or the role genuinely depends on visual presentation. A resume photo rarely helps a recruiter understand whether you can do the job. In many corporate, tech, finance, operations, HR, admin, engineering, legal, healthcare, and public sector applications, it can distract from what actually matters: your skills, experience, achievements, scope, and fit for the role.
That does not mean photos are completely wrong in Singapore. They may be acceptable in certain customer facing, hospitality, events, media, modelling, cabin crew, front office, or brand ambassador roles where grooming and presentation are part of the job requirements. But for most professional resumes, the safer and stronger move is simple: leave the photo out and use the space to make your value clearer.
In Singapore, a resume photo is not usually necessary. Some candidates still include one because they think it makes the resume feel more personal, polished, or memorable. I understand the logic. Hiring can feel cold, and candidates want to stand out. But from the recruiter side, a photo usually does not make a weak resume stronger. It can sometimes make a strong resume look less modern.
When I screen resumes, I am not thinking, “Nice photo, let us shortlist this person.” I am thinking:
Can this person do the job?
Is their experience relevant?
Have they handled similar scope?
Are they at the right level?
Does the resume answer the hiring manager’s main concerns?
Is there enough evidence to justify an interview?
A photo does not answer any of those questions. It creates an impression, yes. But impression is not the same as job evidence.
The strongest resumes in Singapore usually make the recruiter’s job easier. They are clear, relevant, scannable, and focused on work evidence. A photo often does the opposite. It takes up prime space at the top of the page, adds a visual element that does not help with screening, and can make the document feel dated depending on the industry.
In a competitive Singapore job market, your resume has to work fast. Recruiters are often screening across many roles, job boards, LinkedIn applications, internal referrals, agency submissions, and direct employer databases. Your resume is not being read slowly like a personal profile. It is being assessed quickly for match quality.
The top section of your resume should answer the recruiter’s first question: “Is this person worth opening properly?”
That space is better used for:
A sharp professional summary
Your current or target role
Core skills relevant to the job
Industry experience
Key achievements
The problem is that candidates often overestimate how much a photo helps and underestimate how much it can introduce bias or unnecessary judgement. A recruiter may not consciously reject someone because of a photo, but hiring decisions are still made by humans. Humans notice age, grooming, background, ethnicity, expression, style, and perceived personality before they even read the experience. That is exactly why many modern hiring processes are moving towards cleaner, more skills focused applications.
My practical advice is this: if the photo does not directly support the role, remove it.
Technical tools or certifications
Singapore work eligibility, if useful and appropriate
A photo does not tell me your stakeholder management level, your revenue ownership, your payroll exposure, your coding stack, your audit portfolio, your project scale, or your leadership scope. It tells me what you look like. That is not enough.
There is also a more uncomfortable reality. Some employers say they want “culture fit” when what they really mean is familiarity, comfort, or personal preference. A photo can accidentally feed that kind of judgement before your actual competence has had a fair chance.
This is why I prefer resumes that force the reader to evaluate substance first.
There are Singapore roles where a photo may not be strange, especially when presentation is directly linked to the nature of the work. The key phrase here is directly linked. Not “I want to look approachable.” Not “My friend said it looks professional.” Not “The template had a photo box.” Directly linked to the job.
A photo may be acceptable for roles such as:
Cabin crew
Modelling
Acting
TV or media presenting
Hospitality front office
Events hosting
Brand ambassador roles
Luxury retail client facing roles
Beauty, wellness, or image based service roles
Some customer facing sales roles where grooming standards are explicitly part of the selection criteria
Even then, I would still be careful. If the employer wants a photo, they will often say so in the job advertisement or application instructions. If they ask for a portfolio, grooming photo, profile image, or full body photo for a specific image based role, follow the instructions properly.
But do not assume every customer facing role needs a photo. A business development manager selling enterprise software does not need a resume photo. A relationship manager in banking usually does not need one either. A receptionist role may depend more on communication, reliability, presentation, and service standards than a photo on the resume.
The question is not “Is the role public facing?” The better question is “Will a photo provide legitimate job relevant information that cannot be shown better through experience?”
Most of the time, the answer is still no.
I would avoid a resume photo for most corporate and professional roles in Singapore, especially where hiring is skills based, experience based, technical, regulated, or processed through an applicant tracking system.
Avoid a photo for roles in:
Finance and banking
Technology
Engineering
Data analytics
Cybersecurity
Accounting and audit
Legal and compliance
HR and recruitment
Procurement and supply chain
Admin and operations
Healthcare administration
Education administration
Public sector roles
Management consulting
Corporate communications
Project management
Product management
Research roles
Graduate programmes, unless the employer asks for one
For these roles, a photo can look unnecessary. In some cases, it may even make the resume feel less aligned with modern corporate hiring standards. Hiring teams in these sectors usually care more about role match, systems knowledge, communication quality, problem solving, leadership scope, and measurable outcomes.
I also strongly suggest avoiding a photo if:
The photo is casual, cropped from an event, or taken in poor lighting
The background is distracting
The image makes the resume layout look crowded
You are applying to multinational companies with structured hiring processes
You are applying through an ATS
You are worried about age, gender, ethnicity, or appearance based bias
You are applying for roles where the employer has no reason to assess your appearance
A bad photo can damage your application. A decent photo usually does not improve it enough to justify the risk. That is the part candidates often miss.
Candidates sometimes think the photo is the first thing recruiters notice. Visually, yes, it may be. Professionally, no. A good recruiter moves quickly past appearance and looks for job match signals.
When I open a resume, I am usually checking:
Current role and company
Target role alignment
Years and depth of experience
Industry relevance
Career progression
Scope of responsibility
Achievements and outcomes
Tools, systems, languages, or certifications
Location and work eligibility where relevant
Gaps, short stints, or unexplained transitions
Whether the resume is clear enough to send to a hiring manager
This is why a photo does not solve the real problem. If your resume is vague, a photo will not save it. If your bullet points read like a job description copied from HR, a photo will not make you more competitive. If your achievements are missing, your photo is just decorating an underperforming document.
A recruiter is trying to reduce uncertainty. The hiring manager is trying to reduce risk. Your resume should help both of them feel, “This person is worth speaking to.”
A photo rarely reduces hiring risk. Evidence does.
This is the part people do not always like to discuss, but it matters. A photo can trigger assumptions before your resume has had a fair reading.
The assumptions may be about:
Age
Seniority
Confidence
Personality
Race or ethnicity
Gender
Grooming
Socioeconomic background
Cultural fit
Energy level
Professionalism
Some of those assumptions may be positive. Some may be negative. Most are irrelevant. That is the problem.
Good hiring should be based on skills, experience, ability, and role requirements. But hiring is not always as clean as the policy document makes it sound. Recruiters and hiring managers are human. They are influenced by what they see, even when they do not intend to be.
This does not mean every employer is unfair. It means you should not volunteer extra personal information unless it helps your application.
I often tell candidates: do not give the reader more reasons to make assumptions about you. Give them more reasons to interview you.
Your resume should control the conversation. A photo can pull the conversation into the wrong area before your actual value is understood.
Sometimes employers in Singapore ask for a photo, and candidates feel unsure whether to comply. My view is practical: read the context.
If the role is image based, public facing, or presentation heavy, the request may be connected to the job. For example, modelling, acting, cabin crew, luxury retail, promotional events, or hospitality roles may have legitimate visual presentation requirements.
But if a normal corporate employer asks every applicant for a photo without explaining why, I would pause. It may be old fashioned application practice. It may be admin habit. It may be a company culture that has not updated its hiring process. Or, less comfortably, it may signal that appearance based judgement is part of the screening process.
That does not automatically mean you should reject the company. But you should notice the signal.
Here is how I would interpret common employer wording.
“Please submit a recent photo.”
This usually means the company has a traditional application process or wants a visual profile attached. If the role is not image related, I would question whether this is truly necessary.
“Professional appearance required.”
This usually means grooming, presentation, and client readiness matter. That does not always mean a resume photo is needed. It may be better demonstrated at interview.
“Pleasant looking” or similar wording.
This is a red flag. It is vague, subjective, and not a strong sign of fair or professional hiring. It often means the employer is using appearance as a shortcut for suitability.
“Front line presentation required.”
This may be more legitimate if the role involves customer interaction, events, hospitality, or reception. Still, your experience and service standards should carry the application.
When employers use vague language, candidates often try to decode it alone. My advice is simple: do not panic, but pay attention. The words used in a job ad often reveal how the company thinks.
If you decide a photo is appropriate, make it professional and low distraction. The photo should support the resume, not dominate it.
Use a photo that is:
Recent
Clear
Well lit
Professionally dressed
Neutral in background
Cropped from the shoulders up
Natural in expression
Consistent with the role and industry
Avoid photos that are:
Selfies
Wedding photos
Travel photos
Party photos
Heavily filtered
Poorly cropped
Too glamorous for the role
Too casual for the employer
Taken with distracting backgrounds
This sounds obvious, but I have seen resumes with photos that create exactly the wrong impression. A candidate applying for a corporate finance role should not use a cropped banquet photo. A candidate applying for a senior manager role should not use a selfie from a car. A candidate applying for a front office role should not use an over edited beauty filter that makes the photo look less professional.
If the role genuinely needs a photo, keep it clean. The photo should say, “I understand professional presentation.” It should not say, “I spent more effort on the photo than on explaining my experience.”
Also, do not make the photo too large. A small, neat photo in the top corner is enough. If the photo takes attention away from your name, role title, summary, and key skills, it is too much.
If you remove the photo, use the space strategically. The top of your resume is valuable. Do not waste it with a generic summary like “motivated team player with good communication skills.” That tells recruiters almost nothing.
A stronger top section should quickly position you.
For example, instead of this:
Weak Example
“Hardworking and passionate professional seeking a challenging role where I can contribute to company success.”
This sounds pleasant, but it could belong to almost anyone. It does not tell me your level, function, industry, strengths, or relevance.
Use something more specific:
Good Example
“Operations executive with 5 years of experience supporting regional logistics coordination, vendor follow up, shipment tracking, and process documentation across Singapore and Malaysia markets.”
This gives the recruiter usable information. It tells me function, years, scope, geography, and practical relevance.
Here are better things to use instead of a photo:
A clear professional title aligned to your target role
A short summary that states your function, level, industry, and value
A core skills section matched to the job description
Tools and systems relevant to the role
Certifications or licences required in Singapore
Language ability, only where useful for the role
Work authorisation details, only where appropriate
Selected achievements that prove performance
The best resume top section should make the recruiter think, “Okay, this person is in the right zone.” That is much more useful than a photo.
Here is the framework I would use if a candidate asked me directly whether to include a photo.
Ask yourself these questions.
Did the employer specifically request a photo?
Is visual presentation a real requirement of the role?
Would the photo provide job relevant information?
Is the company or sector traditional enough to expect one?
Is the role client facing in a way where grooming is genuinely assessed?
Will the photo improve the application more than the space it takes?
Could the photo introduce bias or distract from my experience?
Is my resume already strong without it?
If you answer yes to the first three questions, a photo may be acceptable.
If you answer no to most of them, leave it out.
Here is my honest recruiter rule: when in doubt, no photo. A clean, modern, evidence based resume is safer and usually stronger.
Candidates often think standing out means adding something visual. In hiring, standing out usually means being easier to understand, easier to trust, and easier to shortlist.
That comes from clarity, not decoration.
The biggest mistake is assuming a photo adds professionalism. It does not automatically do that. A professional resume is professional because of its structure, relevance, language, accuracy, and judgement.
Here are the mistakes I see most often.
Using a photo because the resume template includes a photo box
Adding a photo to appear friendly or approachable
Choosing a casual photo because it looks “natural”
Using a beauty filter that does not fit the job context
Making the photo larger than the candidate’s actual experience section
Including a photo for corporate roles where it adds no value
Thinking a photo can compensate for weak resume content
Using a photo when applying to employers that prefer bias reduced hiring
Submitting different photo styles across resume, LinkedIn, and portfolio
Forgetting that the photo may print badly or distort in PDF conversion
The template issue is especially common. Many online resume templates are designed to look attractive, not to pass real recruitment screening. A resume can look beautiful and still perform badly. That is the difference between design and hiring effectiveness.
Another mistake is copying practices from another country or industry. Singapore hiring is mixed. Some local SMEs may still be used to photo resumes. Some multinational companies prefer cleaner, skills based resumes. Some image based roles may expect photos. Some corporate roles may quietly dislike them.
This is why the right answer depends on the role, not on general resume fashion.
For most Singapore corporate applications, I recommend no photo. This includes applications through LinkedIn, JobStreet, MyCareersFuture, company career portals, recruitment agencies, and ATS based systems.
For multinational companies, no photo is usually the better choice. MNC hiring processes are often more structured, and many employers are cautious about anything that could create bias in screening.
For local SMEs, the expectation can vary. Some traditional employers may still be used to seeing photos, especially for admin, front desk, sales support, customer service, or hospitality roles. But even then, I would only include one if it genuinely supports the application.
For public sector or government linked roles, keep the resume clean and professional. Unless the form asks for a photo, do not add one unnecessarily.
For creative roles, a photo is still not the main issue. Your portfolio matters more. Designers, writers, content creators, marketers, and video editors should use their resume to show scope, campaigns, tools, results, and portfolio links. A photo is optional at best and often irrelevant.
For hospitality, aviation, events, media, modelling, or luxury service roles, a photo may be acceptable if it matches employer expectations. But the resume still needs substance. Presentation may get attention, but experience, communication, reliability, and service judgement still decide whether you move forward.
For senior leadership roles, I usually prefer no photo. Senior resumes should project judgement, clarity, strategic impact, and business value. A photo can make the document feel less executive if not handled very carefully.
Many candidates worry about applicant tracking systems, but then they add design elements that do not help the system read the resume. A photo is one of those elements. In most ATS applications, the system is trying to parse text: job titles, companies, dates, education, skills, certifications, and keywords.
A photo does not help parsing. It may not damage every application, but it adds no searchable value. Worse, some heavily designed templates with photo boxes, columns, icons, and graphics can confuse parsing or make the resume harder to read after upload.
The ATS is not impressed by your photo. It is not thinking, “This candidate looks professional.” It is extracting information.
The human reviewer is also not looking for visual decoration. They want to see whether your background matches the job.
So if you are applying through an online portal, especially for a corporate role, keep the resume simple:
Use clear section headings
Avoid text inside images
Avoid unnecessary icons
Use standard fonts
Keep formatting clean
Save as PDF unless the employer requests Word
Make sure your contact details are text, not part of a graphic header
Prioritise role relevant keywords naturally
An ATS friendly resume is not ugly. It is readable. That is the goal.
Candidates often include photos because they want to feel less anonymous. That is understandable. But there are better ways to build trust.
You can build trust through:
A sharp LinkedIn profile URL
Clear employment dates
Specific achievements
Relevant technical skills
Named systems and tools
Measurable outcomes
Industry context
Strong role descriptions
A professional email address
Consistent details across resume and LinkedIn
If you want to show personality, do it through judgement and clarity. A well written resume already shows a lot about you. It shows whether you understand relevance. It shows whether you can communicate clearly. It shows whether you know what matters to the employer.
That is more powerful than a headshot.
For example, a hiring manager is more likely to trust this:
Good Example
“Reduced monthly reporting turnaround time from 5 days to 2 days by redesigning Excel tracker logic and standardising inputs across 4 department coordinators.”
Than this:
Weak Example
“Responsible for reports and coordination.”
The first version shows impact, initiative, tools, and collaboration. The second version simply states duties. No photo can fix that difference.
For most Singapore resumes, do not include a photo. It is usually unnecessary, sometimes distracting, and occasionally risky because it can introduce bias before your skills and experience are properly assessed.
Include a photo only when the employer asks for one or when appearance and presentation are genuinely job relevant, such as selected hospitality, aviation, events, media, modelling, front office, or image based roles.
If you are applying for corporate, technical, finance, operations, admin, HR, legal, engineering, public sector, or professional roles, use the space for stronger content instead. Your resume should make the hiring decision easier by proving relevance, not by adding visual noise.
My recruiter advice is simple: make the resume about the work. Show the employer why you are worth interviewing. If your experience, achievements, skills, and positioning are strong, you do not need a photo to make the resume memorable.
The best Singapore resume is not the one with the nicest photo. It is the one that makes the recruiter say, “This candidate makes sense for the role.”
Written by Simar Malhi, a recruiter and headhunter with international recruitment experience. I write about CVs, job applications, hiring decisions, and the reality behind recruitment processes. My goal is to help candidates understand more honestly how employers, recruiters, and hiring managers actually select candidates.
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin