Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeA resume feels relevant to employers when it quickly answers the question sitting in their head: “Can this person do this job, in this environment, with the problems we actually have?” In the Australian job market, relevance is not about stuffing your resume with keywords or listing every task you have ever done. It is about making the employer see the match fast. Your resume needs to connect your experience to the role, show evidence of capability, and remove doubt before the recruiter or hiring manager has to work too hard. That is where many candidates lose momentum. They are qualified, but their resume makes the reader search for the point. Hiring people rarely have the patience for that. Fair? Not always. Real? Absolutely.
When employers say they want a relevant resume, they do not mean they want a life story with every job, duty, course, and system you have touched since 2011.
They mean they want a resume that helps them make a hiring decision.
That distinction matters because candidates often write resumes from their own memory rather than from the employer’s decision process. They think, “What have I done?” The employer thinks, “Does this person fit what we need?”
Those are not the same question.
A relevant resume shows the strongest connection between your background and the role you are applying for. It does not make the recruiter translate your experience, guess your level, or piece together whether your achievements matter. It does the positioning work for them.
In practical terms, a relevant resume tells the employer:
What kind of candidate you are
What roles, industries, or problems you are strongest in
What level of responsibility you have handled
What results or improvements you have delivered
I have seen very capable candidates get overlooked because their resume did not make the match obvious. Not because they lacked experience. Not because they were not smart. Not because the employer hated their font, despite what some online resume advice would have you believe.
They were overlooked because the resume created friction.
A recruiter or hiring manager should not have to dig through dense paragraphs to find the parts that matter. If your best evidence is buried under routine tasks, old responsibilities, and generic claims, the reader may never reach the good stuff.
The most common reason qualified candidates look irrelevant is that they write every job with equal weight. They give the same attention to old roles, minor tasks, outdated systems, and responsibilities that have nothing to do with the target job.
That creates a resume that may be accurate but not persuasive.
There is a big difference between an accurate resume and an effective resume. An accurate resume records your work history. An effective resume positions your work history for a specific hiring decision.
For example, if you are applying for a project coordinator role, the employer does not need five lines about general administration before they see your scheduling, stakeholder coordination, reporting, risk tracking, and project documentation experience. If you are applying for an account manager role, your resume should not hide client retention, revenue growth, relationship management, and negotiation behind generic “managed customer enquiries” language.
Relevance is created by emphasis.
You are not lying. You are not exaggerating. You are choosing what to foreground because that is what hiring teams do when they assess you.
What tools, systems, processes, or environments you understand
Why your experience makes sense for this role now
This is especially important in Australia, where hiring teams often receive strong applications from local candidates, migrants, returning professionals, internal applicants, and career changers. The person who looks most relevant on paper often gets the first serious conversation, even when another candidate may have broader experience.
That is the uncomfortable bit. The best candidate does not always get shortlisted. The clearest candidate often does.
Most resumes begin in the wrong mental place.
Candidates start with, “Here is everything I have done.”
Employers start with, “Here is what we need someone to solve.”
That is why your first task is to understand the role as a business need, not just a job ad.
A job ad is rarely a perfect description of the role. It is a mix of real requirements, recycled wording, HR language, hiring manager wish lists, compliance wording, and sometimes a bit of optimistic fiction. The trick is to decode what the employer is actually trying to hire for.
When reading a job ad, look for:
The repeated responsibilities
The problems implied by the role
The level of ownership expected
The tools, systems, or processes mentioned
The stakeholders involved
The pace and complexity of the environment
The outcomes the person will likely be judged on
For example, if a job ad keeps mentioning stakeholder management, reporting deadlines, cross functional coordination, and competing priorities, the employer is not just looking for someone who “communicates well”. They are probably looking for someone who can keep multiple moving parts under control without constant hand holding.
That is the kind of insight your resume needs to reflect.
A weak resume says:
Weak Example: Managed stakeholders and completed reports.
A stronger resume says:
Good Example: Coordinated weekly reporting across operations, finance, and delivery teams, improving visibility of project risks and upcoming deadlines.
The second version feels more relevant because it shows context, action, and value. It gives the employer something to believe.
A professional summary should not be a soft introduction full of personality adjectives. I see too many summaries that say things like “hardworking, motivated, passionate, results driven professional with excellent communication skills”.
That tells me almost nothing. It also sounds like every second resume.
Your summary should position you. It should tell the reader what type of professional you are, where your experience sits, and why your background is relevant to the role.
A useful summary usually answers:
What is your professional identity?
What industries, functions, or role types do you understand?
What strengths are most relevant to the target role?
What outcomes or business problems have you contributed to?
What makes your application make sense?
For the Australian job market, keep it clear and grounded. Hiring managers generally do not need an overly polished personal brand statement. They need a practical snapshot that helps them understand where to place you.
Weak Example: I am a passionate and enthusiastic professional with strong communication skills and a proven ability to work in fast paced environments.
Good Example: Operations coordinator with experience supporting high volume service teams across rostering, reporting, supplier communication, and process improvement. Strong background in managing competing deadlines, resolving operational issues, and keeping managers informed with accurate data and practical updates.
The better version does not try to sound impressive. It sounds useful. That is the point.
The summary should not be too broad either. If it could apply to an office manager, customer service officer, project coordinator, HR assistant, and sales administrator, it is probably too vague.
A relevant resume makes the reader feel, “Yes, this person belongs in this conversation.”
Yes, keywords matter. Applicant tracking systems can help filter, organise, and search applications. Recruiters also scan for role specific language. But keyword stuffing is not strategy. It is panic dressed up as optimisation.
The goal is not to copy the job ad word for word. The goal is to mirror the employer’s language where it genuinely matches your experience.
If the job ad asks for “vendor management” and your resume only says “worked with suppliers”, you may be underselling yourself. If the ad asks for “case management” and your resume says “helped clients”, you may not be using the language the employer expects.
This is where many candidates lose relevance without realising it. They have the experience, but they describe it in a way that sounds smaller, vaguer, or less aligned than it is.
Look at the job ad and identify the language that matters:
Role title variations
Core responsibilities
Technical skills
Industry terms
Compliance requirements
Systems and tools
Stakeholder groups
Measurable outcomes
Then adjust your wording honestly.
For example:
Weak Example: Helped with staff paperwork.
Good Example: Supported employee onboarding documentation, contract updates, HRIS data entry, and compliance checks for new starters.
The second example is not inflated if it is true. It is clearer. It uses the language HR and recruitment teams actually recognise.
The warning is this: do not add keywords you cannot defend in an interview. If you put “advanced Excel” on your resume and then panic when someone asks about pivot tables, lookup formulas, or data cleaning, you have created a problem for yourself. Relevance must be real, not decorative.
Responsibilities tell the employer what you were meant to do. Evidence tells them how well you did it, at what scale, and in what context.
Most resumes are too heavy on duties and too light on proof.
A duty based resume says:
Responsible for customer service
Managed reports
Assisted managers
Handled enquiries
Worked with stakeholders
That may be accurate, but it does not give the employer enough to assess you. Many people have the same duties on paper. The question is whether you handled them well, at the right level, in a relevant environment.
Evidence can include:
Volume
Frequency
Scale
Complexity
Outcomes
Improvements
Stakeholder level
Tools used
Commercial impact
Risk reduced
Time saved
Quality improved
You do not need a number in every bullet. Not every job produces neat metrics. But you do need enough detail to make the experience feel real.
Weak Example: Managed customer enquiries.
Good Example: Managed 40 to 60 customer enquiries per day across phone and email, resolving order issues, delivery updates, and account questions while maintaining service level targets.
Weak Example: Assisted with recruitment.
Good Example: Supported end to end recruitment coordination, including interview scheduling, candidate communication, reference checks, onboarding paperwork, and weekly vacancy tracking.
Weak Example: Improved processes.
Good Example: Identified recurring invoice approval delays and created a tracking process that reduced follow up time for managers and improved payment visibility.
Notice what the stronger examples do. They do not shout. They clarify. They give the employer a reason to trust the claim.
In recruitment, believable detail beats big vague statements almost every time.
Relevance is not only about skills. It is also about level.
A resume can look irrelevant if it positions you too junior, too senior, too operational, too strategic, too narrow, or too broad for the role.
This is one of the most overlooked parts of resume writing.
If you are applying for a manager role, your resume needs to show decision making, leadership, accountability, stakeholder influence, team outcomes, budget responsibility, process ownership, or strategic contribution. If it only lists hands on tasks, the employer may see you as capable but not ready.
If you are applying for an individual contributor role after being in leadership, your resume may need to reassure the employer that you are comfortable being hands on. Otherwise, they may quietly worry you are overqualified, too expensive, or likely to leave quickly.
Employers often do not say these concerns out loud. They just move to another candidate who feels like a cleaner fit. Annoying, yes. Common, very.
To match the level, ask yourself:
Is this role execution focused, advisory, operational, technical, strategic, or leadership based?
Does my resume show the right level of ownership?
Am I overemphasising tasks that make me look too junior?
Am I overemphasising seniority that may scare employers away from a practical role?
Does my language match the level of responsibility in the job ad?
For a mid level role, avoid making yourself sound like you only followed instructions. For a senior role, avoid making yourself sound like you merely participated.
Compare these:
Weak Example: Attended meetings and provided updates.
Good Example: Represented the operations team in weekly planning meetings, providing updates on resourcing risks, workflow issues, and service delivery priorities.
The better version shows ownership and context. Same person, stronger positioning.
A relevant resume is not created only by adding better content. Sometimes it becomes stronger because you remove what weakens the signal.
This is hard for candidates because everything feels important when it is your own career. I understand that. You remember the effort, the late nights, the messy projects, the manager who changed their mind five times and still called it “agile”. But the employer only needs the parts that support the hiring decision.
Information can be true and still not useful.
Consider reducing or removing:
Very old duties that do not support your current direction
Short courses unrelated to the target role
Repetitive bullet points across multiple jobs
Basic tasks that make you look more junior than you are
Personal interests unless genuinely relevant
Outdated technology unless still required
Excessive detail from roles held more than 10 to 15 years ago
Generic soft skill claims with no evidence
This does not mean deleting your history. It means controlling emphasis.
For older roles, you can often use shorter entries. For highly relevant recent roles, give more detail. Your resume should guide the reader’s attention, not treat every job as equally important.
A common mistake is using the same resume for every application and hoping the employer will connect the dots. That is not a strategy. That is outsourcing your positioning to a busy stranger.
And busy strangers are not famous for doing unpaid detective work.
If you are changing careers, industries, or role types, relevance becomes even more important. You cannot rely on job title recognition alone. You need to build a bridge between where you have been and where you are going.
Career changers often make one of two mistakes. They either focus too much on their old identity, or they write such a broad resume that they sound like they could do anything. Employers rarely hire “anything”. They hire for a specific problem.
Your resume needs to explain the transferable value clearly.
For a career change resume, focus on:
Transferable skills that are genuinely used in the target role
Similar stakeholder groups
Relevant systems, processes, or compliance exposure
Commercial or operational problems you have solved
Projects, training, or experience that support the move
A summary that makes the transition understandable
For example, a teacher moving into learning and development should not only list classroom teaching duties. They should translate the experience into facilitation, curriculum design, learner engagement, assessment, stakeholder communication, content development, and behaviour management where relevant.
A retail manager moving into recruitment should not simply say they “worked with people”. They should show interviewing, performance conversations, rostering, sales targets, coaching, candidate like assessment, customer judgement, and fast decision making.
The bridge must be specific.
Weak Example: Looking to change careers and use my skills in a new environment.
Good Example: Customer facing team leader moving into recruitment coordination, with strong experience in candidate style screening, interview scheduling, onboarding support, compliance checks, stakeholder communication, and high volume people coordination.
The second version gives the employer a reason to keep reading.
Your resume often has two audiences.
The recruiter looks for match, clarity, risk, salary fit, availability, location, communication, and whether you are worth presenting or shortlisting.
The hiring manager looks for capability, team fit, practical experience, technical depth, problem solving, and whether you can reduce their workload rather than create more of it.
A relevant resume needs to satisfy both.
Recruiters often scan quickly because they are comparing many candidates against a role brief. They need clear titles, relevant keywords, dates, location, systems, and evidence. If they cannot understand your fit quickly, you may be passed over before the hiring manager ever sees you.
Hiring managers usually read with a different lens. They imagine you in the job. They wonder whether you can handle the real pressure, the messy stakeholders, the workload, the customer complaints, the reporting rhythm, the systems, the team culture, and the things the job ad politely avoided mentioning.
That means your resume should include enough practical detail to feel credible.
For example, instead of only saying “stakeholder management”, mention the actual stakeholders where relevant:
Senior leadership
External vendors
Government clients
Internal operations teams
Finance and payroll
Customers and account holders
Hiring managers
Field staff
Technical teams
Specificity helps the reader picture your experience.
This is where generic resumes fail. They say all the right words but create no picture. A recruiter may see keywords, but a hiring manager sees fog.
A resume does not need to be flashy. In fact, in many Australian hiring processes, a clean and simple resume is more effective than a heavily designed one.
Readable beats clever.
Use clear section headings, consistent formatting, enough white space, and bullet points that are specific but not bloated. Avoid huge paragraphs. Avoid tables or design elements that may not parse well in some applicant tracking systems. Avoid squeezing everything into tiny font because you are emotionally attached to every sentence.
The best resumes are easy to scan but not thin.
A useful structure usually includes:
Name and contact details
Professional summary
Key skills or areas of expertise
Professional experience
Education and qualifications
Certifications, systems, or technical skills where relevant
Your key skills section should not be a dumping ground. It should reflect the role you want. If you are applying for a payroll role, skills like payroll processing, awards interpretation, superannuation, reconciliations, employee records, and payroll systems may matter. If you are applying for a marketing role, campaign reporting, content strategy, CRM, email marketing, analytics, stakeholder management, and brand execution may be stronger.
Do not make the skills section so broad that it becomes meaningless.
A weak skills section says:
Communication
Leadership
Teamwork
Problem solving
Microsoft Office
A stronger skills section for a project support role might say:
Project coordination
Risk and issue tracking
Meeting minutes and action registers
Stakeholder updates
Project reporting
Budget tracking support
Vendor communication
Microsoft Project, Excel, SharePoint, and Teams
That tells the employer much more.
Resume bullet points should be clear, specific, and connected to the role. They should not sound like you swallowed a corporate strategy deck.
The best bullet points usually include:
What you did
Who or what it involved
The scale or complexity
The outcome or purpose
You do not need to force every bullet into the same formula, but you do need to avoid lazy phrasing.
Useful action verbs include:
Coordinated
Delivered
Managed
Improved
Supported
Resolved
Analysed
Implemented
Reviewed
Prepared
Led
Maintained
Streamlined
Partnered
Advised
But the verb alone is not enough. “Managed” can mean almost anything. Managed what? For whom? At what scale? With what result?
Weak Example: Managed administration tasks.
Good Example: Managed daily administration for a 25 person service team, including reporting, rostering updates, supplier communication, document control, and manager support.
Weak Example: Worked on sales.
Good Example: Managed inbound and outbound sales activity across small business accounts, identifying customer needs, preparing quotes, and supporting monthly revenue targets.
Weak Example: Responsible for compliance.
Good Example: Reviewed onboarding documents, licence checks, and employee records to support compliance with internal policy and Australian workplace requirements.
The good examples work because they feel grounded. They do not rely on puffed up language. They show the actual work.
Some resume mistakes are obvious. Spelling errors, messy formatting, missing dates, and wrong contact details are still a problem. But the more damaging mistakes are usually strategic.
The resume looks fine, but it does not persuade.
Here are the mistakes I see most often.
A general resume feels general. That sounds obvious, but candidates still do it constantly.
You do not need to rewrite your entire resume every time. You do need to adjust the summary, key skills, and bullet point emphasis so the most relevant evidence appears early and clearly.
Employers care about your goals, but only after they understand your value. A summary that says you are “seeking an opportunity to grow” may be honest, but it does not help the employer assess your fit.
Show what you bring first. Growth can come later.
A task list tells me you were present. Evidence tells me you contributed.
If your bullet points all begin to blur together, add context, scale, and outcomes.
If the strongest match is on page two, you are making the reader work too hard. Bring relevant skills, systems, achievements, and industry experience closer to the top.
Words like “professional”, “dynamic”, “motivated”, and “team player” are not harmful by themselves, but they rarely add value. Replace them with proof.
Australian employers generally expect a resume that is clear, direct, and practical. You usually do not need a photo, marital status, date of birth, or overly personal information. Focus on professional relevance, work rights where useful, local context, qualifications, systems, and evidence.
When I review a resume, I am not just checking whether it looks nice. I am checking whether it answers the hiring question quickly and convincingly.
Use this framework before applying.
Ask what the employer is really hiring for. Are they trying to reduce workload, improve service, replace someone who left, add technical capability, support growth, fix process issues, manage compliance, or bring stability to a messy function?
Your resume should speak to that problem.
Choose the experience that best proves you can do the job. This may include achievements, responsibilities, systems, industries, stakeholders, or projects.
Do not include everything at equal volume.
Use terminology the employer recognises, but only where it truthfully reflects your background. This helps both recruiter screening and applicant tracking system searchability.
Make sure your resume shows whether you have supported, owned, led, advised, delivered, managed, or transformed something. Level matters.
Cut or reduce anything that distracts from the target role. Your resume should feel focused, not stuffed.
The first page should make the fit clear. If the reader needs page two to understand why you applied, your positioning is too slow.
A relevant resume is not louder. It is sharper.
A relevant resume gives the reader a quiet sense of confidence. It does not make them fight for the information. It does not rely on buzzwords. It does not try to be everything to everyone.
It makes the match feel obvious.
As a recruiter, when I see a strong resume, I can usually answer these questions quickly:
What role is this person suited for?
What level are they operating at?
What environments have they worked in?
What problems have they solved?
What evidence supports their claims?
What would I ask them in an interview?
Would a hiring manager understand the value?
That last question is important. Sometimes a resume is keyword rich but hiring manager poor. It may pass a basic scan, but it does not create confidence in the person’s actual capability.
The best resumes balance searchability with substance.
They use the right language, but they also show judgement. They are tailored, but not fake. They are confident, but not inflated. They make the employer feel that the candidate understands the role and has chosen their evidence carefully.
That is what relevance really means.
Written by Simar Malhi, a recruiter and headhunter with international recruitment experience. I write about CVs, job applications, hiring decisions, and the reality behind recruitment processes. My goal is to help candidates understand more honestly how employers, recruiters, and hiring managers actually select candidates.
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin