Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeA resume does not show enough impact when it lists what you were responsible for but fails to explain what changed because of your work. In the Australian job market, recruiters and hiring managers do not just want to know that you managed tasks, supported teams, handled clients, improved processes, or delivered projects. They want to understand the value behind those actions. Did you save time? Reduce risk? Improve quality? Increase revenue? Strengthen compliance? Make a team work better? If your resume only describes activity, it sounds like a job description. If it explains outcomes, context, scale, and contribution, it starts to sound like evidence. That is the real difference between a resume that gets skimmed and a resume that gets taken seriously.
Most candidates think their resume is weak because they have not used the right words. In reality, the bigger problem is usually that the resume has not given the reader enough proof.
Recruiters are not reading your resume in a calm little café with a flat white and unlimited emotional patience. They are scanning quickly, comparing you against other candidates, checking whether your background matches the role, and deciding whether your experience is worth moving forward. Hiring managers are doing something similar, but from a different angle. They are asking, “Can this person actually solve the problem I need solved?”
That is where impact matters.
A responsibility tells me what sat inside your job description. Impact tells me what you did with it.
For example, saying you “managed stakeholder relationships” tells me almost nothing. Stakeholders exist in almost every corporate role. The useful question is: what kind of stakeholders, how difficult was the environment, what did you manage, and what improved because of it?
In Australian hiring, especially for professional, corporate, government, healthcare, education, operations, sales, finance, technology, administration, and leadership roles, impact helps separate candidates who merely occupied a role from candidates who actively contributed.
That does not mean every resume needs dramatic numbers, huge revenue wins, or heroic transformation stories. Not everyone works in a role where impact is neat and measurable. But every strong resume needs to show evidence that your work mattered.
A resume usually sounds flat because it is written from the candidate’s memory, not from the employer’s decision process.
Most candidates write by asking themselves, “What did I do in this job?” That produces a list of duties.
A stronger resume starts with a different question: “What would a recruiter or hiring manager need to understand to believe I can do this next role well?”
That question changes everything.
It forces you to explain relevance, not just history. It pushes you to show judgment, not just tasks. It helps you select achievements that match the job you want, not every tiny thing you have ever touched.
This is where many Australian job seekers get stuck. They are often too modest, too literal, or too afraid of sounding like they are bragging. So they write safe sentences like:
Weak Example: Responsible for preparing reports and supporting internal teams.
There is nothing technically wrong with that sentence. That is exactly the problem. It is harmless, forgettable, and could belong to almost anyone.
A stronger version would be:
Good Example: Prepared weekly operational reports that helped senior managers identify workload issues, reduce reporting delays, and make faster resourcing decisions across the team.
This does not sound arrogant. It sounds useful. It gives the reader a reason to care.
Impact is not bragging. Impact is context.
When I read a resume, I am not looking for decorative language. I am looking for signals.
The strongest resumes usually give me clear answers to several questions:
What kind of environment did this person work in?
What level of responsibility did they carry?
What problems did they help solve?
What changed because of their work?
How complex was the work?
Who depended on them?
Did they operate independently or only with close direction?
Are their achievements relevant to the role they are applying for?
Is there evidence of growth, judgement, ownership, or commercial awareness?
A lot of candidates underestimate how much recruiters infer from small details. A resume that says “supported recruitment activities” is vague. A resume that says “coordinated interview scheduling, candidate communication, reference checks, and onboarding paperwork for high-volume retail recruitment campaigns” gives me far more to work with.
That second version shows pace, process, stakeholders, candidate management, and administrative discipline. It still does not need to be dramatic. It just needs to be specific.
The point is not to make every bullet sound world-changing. The point is to stop making real work sound smaller than it was.
Many candidates tell me they do not have achievements. Usually, they do. They just do not recognise them because they are looking for the wrong thing.
They think an achievement must be something like:
Increased revenue by 40%
Won a major award
Led a national transformation project
Managed a huge team
Saved the company millions
Those are achievements, yes. Lovely when they exist. But most professional impact is quieter than that.
In real hiring, useful achievements can include:
Making a process faster
Improving accuracy
Reducing complaints
Preventing errors
Supporting a difficult transition
Training new staff
Handling increased workload
Improving customer response times
Helping a team meet deadlines
Coordinating a complex piece of work
Supporting compliance or audit readiness
Making information easier for managers to use
Stabilising a messy system or process
Building trust with stakeholders
Taking ownership of work that had previously been inconsistent
Australian employers often value reliability, practicality, clear communication, and the ability to get things done without unnecessary drama. Your resume should show that. Not by saying “I am reliable and practical”, which tells me very little, but by showing where those qualities created a useful outcome.
A good resume does not invent impact. It uncovers it.
This is one of the biggest resume problems I see.
Candidates often confuse duties with achievements. They list normal role expectations and hope the reader will understand the value behind them. The reader usually will not. They are busy. They are comparing. They are not doing emotional archaeology on your behalf.
A duty describes what you were expected to do.
A responsibility describes what you owned or managed.
Impact explains the result, value, improvement, or reason the work mattered.
Here is how that looks in practice.
Weak Example: Managed customer enquiries.
This tells me the task.
Good Example: Managed high-volume customer enquiries across phone and email channels, resolving issues efficiently and helping reduce escalation pressure on senior staff.
This tells me the task, context, and value.
Weak Example: Assisted with payroll processing.
This sounds junior and passive.
Good Example: Supported fortnightly payroll processing for over 300 employees, maintaining accurate employee records and helping resolve pay queries before payroll cut-off.
Now I understand scale, accuracy, time sensitivity, and operational importance.
Weak Example: Worked on process improvements.
This is one of those phrases that looks useful until you realise it says almost nothing.
Good Example: Reviewed manual tracking processes and introduced a clearer spreadsheet workflow, reducing duplicate data entry and improving visibility of outstanding actions for the team.
Now the reader can see what you actually improved.
Impact does not always require a number. But it does require meaning.
Generic resume language is dangerous because it gives the illusion of professionalism while removing the evidence.
Phrases like “excellent communication skills”, “strong attention to detail”, “team player”, “results-driven”, and “fast-paced environment” are not automatically wrong. They are just overused to the point where recruiters mentally glide past them.
Here is the blunt reality: if a phrase could appear on 500 other resumes without changing anything, it is not doing much work for you.
Hiring managers do not hire “excellent communication skills”. They hire someone who can explain technical issues to non-technical stakeholders, calm down an unhappy client, write clear reports, influence internal teams, manage competing expectations, or handle sensitive conversations without making things worse.
So instead of saying:
Weak Example: Excellent communication and stakeholder management skills.
Say something closer to:
Good Example: Communicated project updates to internal stakeholders, clarified risks early, and kept managers informed when timelines, dependencies, or priorities changed.
That is more convincing because it shows the behaviour behind the claim.
The same applies to “attention to detail”.
Weak Example: Strong attention to detail.
Good Example: Reviewed contracts, invoices, and client records for accuracy, identifying errors before submission and reducing rework for the wider administration team.
Now the claim has evidence.
This is one of the simplest ways to increase resume impact. Stop claiming qualities. Show the work that proves them.
The easiest way to find impact is to stop asking, “What did I do?” and start asking better questions.
Use these prompts:
What problem existed before I got involved?
What would have gone wrong if I had not done this work properly?
Who relied on my work?
What became faster, easier, safer, clearer, cheaper, more accurate, or more organised?
Did I reduce pressure on someone else?
Did I help a team meet a deadline?
Did I improve a process, even slightly?
Did I handle more volume, complexity, or responsibility over time?
Did I support customers, clients, patients, students, stakeholders, or staff in a way that improved their experience?
Did I prevent mistakes, delays, complaints, compliance issues, or unnecessary escalation?
Did I train, guide, coordinate, review, analyse, implement, resolve, or streamline anything?
These questions are useful because they move your thinking away from task description and towards employer value.
For example, an administration candidate may say, “I just booked appointments.” But when you ask better questions, you may find they managed complex calendars for senior leaders, handled last-minute changes, reduced scheduling conflicts, coordinated with external stakeholders, and kept meetings moving across multiple locations.
That is not “just booking appointments”. That is coordination, judgement, prioritisation, communication, and operational support.
Candidates often minimise work because it became normal to them. But what feels normal to you may still be valuable to an employer.
A strong resume bullet usually includes four elements: action, context, scale, and outcome.
You do not need all four every single time, but the more clearly you can include them, the stronger the bullet usually becomes.
What did you actually do?
Use clear verbs such as managed, coordinated, analysed, improved, delivered, supported, implemented, reviewed, resolved, prepared, trained, negotiated, monitored, advised, developed, streamlined, or maintained.
Avoid weak openings like “responsible for” when you can use a stronger action verb.
What kind of situation, environment, task, stakeholder, or problem was involved?
Context helps the reader understand difficulty. “Managed reports” is vague. “Prepared monthly board reports for senior leadership” is clearer. “Handled customer issues” is vague. “Resolved complex customer complaints across billing and service delivery” is stronger.
How big, frequent, complex, or important was the work?
Scale can include team size, customer volume, budget, territory, number of employees, systems used, deadlines, frequency, project size, or operational complexity.
Not all roles have impressive numbers. That is fine. Scale can be practical, not flashy.
What changed, improved, reduced, increased, strengthened, prevented, enabled, or supported?
This is where many resumes fall apart. They explain the work but not the point of the work.
A practical structure looks like this:
Good Example: Coordinated weekly rostering for a 35-person team, balancing leave, shift coverage, and operational demand to reduce last-minute gaps and maintain service continuity.
That bullet shows action, context, scale, and outcome. It tells me far more than “managed rosters”.
Here is another:
Good Example: Analysed customer complaint trends and shared recurring issues with team leaders, helping improve response consistency and reduce repeat complaints.
Again, not dramatic. Just useful.
That is what impact often looks like in real resumes: clear evidence that the candidate noticed problems, handled responsibility, and contributed to better outcomes.
Metrics can make a resume stronger, but only when they are honest, relevant, and properly explained.
Some career advice makes candidates feel as if every bullet must have a number. That is not realistic. It also leads to weird, inflated resume writing where every person apparently improved everything by 37%. Recruiters notice when numbers feel decorative.
Good metrics help answer questions like:
How much?
How many?
How often?
How quickly?
Compared to what?
Across what size team, portfolio, region, or customer base?
What was the measurable improvement?
Useful metrics might include:
Revenue growth
Cost savings
Customer satisfaction scores
Error reduction
Processing time
Caseload volume
Number of employees supported
Project budget
Team size
Recruitment volume
But numbers need context. “Improved efficiency by 20%” sounds good, but if the resume does not explain what process changed, how it was measured, or why it mattered, the number can feel suspiciously polished.
A stronger version would be:
Good Example: Streamlined invoice follow-up processes by introducing a shared tracking system, reducing overdue payment follow-ups by approximately 20% within three months.
Now the number has a story. It feels more credible.
If you do not have exact metrics, use honest scale indicators:
High-volume
Multi-site
Weekly
Monthly
Senior stakeholders
National team
Large customer base
Time-sensitive
Regulated environment
Complex caseload
That is still better than leaving the reader with no sense of size or complexity.
The rule is simple: use numbers when they make the impact clearer. Do not force them when they make the resume sound fake.
Experienced candidates often assume their seniority is obvious. It rarely is.
A job title can suggest level, but it does not prove contribution. Two people can have the same title and operate at completely different levels of complexity, accountability, and influence.
This happens often in the Australian job market because job titles vary heavily between organisations. A “Coordinator” in one company may be doing basic administration. A “Coordinator” in another may be managing projects, stakeholders, reporting, compliance, scheduling, suppliers, and half the operational chaos of the business while everyone pretends it is fine.
This is why resume impact matters so much. Your title does not always tell the full story.
If you are experienced and your resume still sounds junior, it may be because you are:
Listing tasks instead of decisions
Describing support work without showing ownership
Mentioning systems without explaining what you used them for
Naming projects without explaining your contribution
Saying you managed stakeholders without showing complexity
Describing leadership without showing team outcomes
Giving responsibilities without showing business value
Using passive wording that makes your role sound smaller than it was
A senior resume should show judgement. It should help the reader understand not only what you did, but how you thought, prioritised, influenced, solved problems, and made decisions.
For example:
Weak Example: Attended project meetings and provided updates.
This sounds passive.
Good Example: Represented the operations team in project meetings, flagged delivery risks early, and coordinated follow-up actions to keep implementation milestones on track.
That sounds like someone who was actively contributing, not just sitting politely in meetings while drinking bad office coffee.
Impact looks different depending on the role. This is why generic resume advice often fails. A strong sales resume does not show impact the same way a nursing resume, administration resume, project management resume, or government resume does.
Weak administration resumes often list tasks like filing, data entry, calendar management, inbox management, and document preparation. Stronger resumes show accuracy, coordination, confidentiality, prioritisation, stakeholder support, and operational flow.
Good Example: Managed executive calendars, meeting logistics, travel bookings, and internal correspondence, helping senior leaders stay organised across competing priorities and tight deadlines.
Weak customer service resumes often say “served customers” or “handled complaints”. Stronger resumes show volume, issue complexity, resolution quality, customer retention, escalation reduction, and communication skill.
Good Example: Resolved customer enquiries across phone, email, and live chat, balancing speed and accuracy while reducing repeat contact through clearer explanations and follow-up.
Weak sales resumes often list products sold or say “met sales targets”. Stronger resumes show pipeline management, conversion, account growth, territory ownership, negotiation, revenue impact, and customer retention.
Good Example: Managed a portfolio of small business clients, identifying upsell opportunities and maintaining strong renewal rates through regular account reviews and practical product advice.
Weak project resumes list projects without showing ownership. Stronger resumes show scope, stakeholders, risks, timelines, budgets, dependencies, delivery outcomes, and problem-solving.
Good Example: Coordinated cross-functional project activities across operations, IT, and finance teams, tracking risks and dependencies to support on-time delivery of a new reporting process.
Weak HR resumes list processes. Stronger resumes show employee experience, compliance, hiring outcomes, stakeholder management, process improvement, and advisory value.
Good Example: Supported end-to-end recruitment for corporate support roles, improving candidate communication and reducing delays between shortlist, interview, and offer stages.
Weak finance resumes list reconciliations, reporting, and invoices. Stronger resumes show accuracy, deadlines, compliance, cash flow support, audit readiness, and decision-making value.
Good Example: Prepared monthly reconciliations and variance reports, identifying discrepancies early and supporting cleaner month-end reporting for the finance leadership team.
Weak technology resumes list tools and systems. Stronger resumes show what was built, fixed, protected, automated, integrated, supported, or improved.
Good Example: Automated recurring reporting tasks using Power BI and Excel, reducing manual preparation time and giving managers faster access to performance data.
Weak leadership resumes say “managed a team”. Stronger resumes show team size, performance improvement, coaching, retention, accountability, commercial outcomes, and operational discipline.
Good Example: Led a team of 12 customer service staff, improving coaching routines and workload allocation to lift response consistency during peak demand periods.
The pattern is the same across roles: impact is not just what you touched. It is what improved, changed, stabilised, prevented, delivered, or became easier because you were involved.
Many resumes lose impact because of small writing choices that quietly weaken the candidate’s positioning.
Phrases like “responsible for”, “duties included”, and “assisted with” are not banned, but they often make your resume sound passive.
Better wording shows ownership:
Weak Example: Responsible for preparing weekly reports.
Good Example: Prepared weekly reports for senior managers, summarising team performance, outstanding issues, and priority actions.
If your bullet could belong to almost every person in the same role, it needs more detail.
Weak Example: Provided administrative support to the team.
Good Example: Provided administrative support to a team of 20 consultants, coordinating documentation, client updates, diary changes, and internal reporting deadlines.
Recruiters scan fast. Put the strongest evidence early in the bullet.
Instead of burying the outcome after a long sentence, lead with the contribution.
Good Example: Reduced reporting delays by creating a shared deadline tracker for weekly team submissions.
Simply naming systems is not impact. Tools matter, but only when connected to work.
Weak Example: Used Salesforce, Excel, and Power BI.
Good Example: Used Salesforce, Excel, and Power BI to track sales activity, identify pipeline gaps, and prepare weekly performance summaries for managers.
This is very common, especially with capable candidates who have been taught to “just work hard and be grateful”. Unfortunately, humility does not always translate well on a resume.
A resume is not the place to be loud. It is the place to be clear.
You do not need to exaggerate. You do need to stop making your work invisible.
Not every task deserves space. If you include too many basic duties, your stronger achievements get diluted.
A good resume is not a storage unit for everything you have ever done. It is a selection document. Its job is to position you for the next role.
When improving a weak resume bullet, I usually look for the missing piece. Is the action unclear? Is the context missing? Is there no scale? Is there no outcome? Is the language too passive? Is the bullet focused on the task rather than the value?
Here are practical transformations.
Weak Example: Helped with onboarding.
Good Example: Coordinated onboarding paperwork, system access, and first-week schedules for new starters, helping managers create a smoother and more organised employee experience.
Why it works: It explains what “helped” actually means and connects the task to a better onboarding process.
Weak Example: Managed reports.
Good Example: Prepared monthly performance reports for department leaders, highlighting trends, risks, and follow-up actions to support better operational decisions.
Why it works: It shows audience, purpose, and business value.
Weak Example: Worked with clients.
Good Example: Managed client communication throughout service delivery, clarifying requirements, resolving issues, and maintaining trust when timelines or priorities changed.
Why it works: It shows relationship management under real conditions, not just polite communication.
Weak Example: Improved processes.
Good Example: Reviewed manual approval processes and introduced a clearer tracking system, reducing missed follow-ups and improving visibility of pending requests.
Why it works: It explains the actual problem and the practical improvement.
Weak Example: Assisted the manager with daily tasks.
Good Example: Supported the branch manager with rostering, reporting, customer escalations, and stock coordination, helping maintain smooth daily operations during peak trading periods.
Why it works: It turns vague support into operational contribution.
The best rewrite usually comes from asking, “So what?” after every bullet.
Managed reports. So what?
Supported onboarding. So what?
Handled complaints. So what?
Coordinated meetings. So what?
If the resume does not answer that question, the impact is still hidden.
Not every bullet needs to be a major achievement. That would look unnatural and exhausting. The goal is balance.
For most roles, I like to see a mix of:
Core responsibilities that prove role fit
Achievement-focused bullets that show contribution
Context-rich bullets that show scale and complexity
Technical or process details that support credibility
Stakeholder, leadership, or communication examples where relevant
For a recent role, you may include more detail because it is usually more relevant. For older roles, you can reduce detail and focus on the strongest transferable impact.
A current or recent role may include 5 to 7 bullets if the role is highly relevant. Older roles may only need 2 to 4 bullets. Very early roles may only need a short summary unless they support the direction you are now targeting.
This is where strategy matters. A resume should not give equal weight to everything. It should guide the reader towards the evidence that matters most for the next job.
If you are applying for a business analyst role, your resume should emphasise analysis, stakeholder engagement, process improvement, documentation, requirements gathering, and decision support. It should not spend half the page explaining general administration from eight years ago.
If you are applying for a team leader role, your resume should show coaching, team performance, escalation handling, workflow management, and accountability. It should not rely only on “helped team members” or “worked collaboratively”.
Impact should match the role you want.
Impact expectations change depending on career stage.
For entry-level candidates, impact may be about reliability, learning speed, customer service, accuracy, initiative, and contribution to team workflow. No sensible recruiter expects a graduate or junior administrator to have transformed the business before lunch.
For mid-level candidates, impact should show independence, problem-solving, technical skill, stakeholder communication, and ownership of meaningful work. At this level, a resume that only lists duties can make the candidate look less developed than they are.
For senior professionals, impact should show judgement, influence, commercial awareness, risk management, leadership, strategic contribution, or complex delivery. The resume should explain not just what was done, but why it mattered to the organisation.
For managers and executives, impact becomes even more connected to business outcomes. Hiring managers want to see evidence of team performance, operational improvement, financial accountability, transformation, stakeholder influence, culture, governance, or growth.
The mistake is using the same resume style at every level.
A junior resume can show strong potential through practical contribution. A senior resume must show evidence of decision-making and outcomes. If a senior candidate’s resume reads like a task list, it creates doubt. The reader may wonder whether the person truly led the work or simply participated in it.
That may sound harsh, but it is exactly how screening works. Recruiters are not only reading what you wrote. They are also noticing what is missing.
Employers often say they want a “proactive self-starter with strong communication skills who can work in a fast-paced environment”. Stunningly original, I know.
What they usually mean is more specific.
When an employer says they want someone proactive, they often mean they do not want to constantly chase you for updates.
When they say strong communication skills, they often mean they need someone who can explain issues clearly, manage expectations, and avoid creating confusion between teams.
When they say fast-paced environment, they often mean priorities change, systems may not be perfect, and the person needs to stay organised without falling apart.
When they say attention to detail, they often mean mistakes in this role create rework, complaints, compliance issues, payment problems, customer frustration, or manager headaches.
When they say stakeholder management, they often mean there are competing personalities, unclear expectations, shifting deadlines, and people who need careful handling.
Your resume has more impact when it translates your experience into the employer’s actual concerns.
Do not just write that you are proactive. Show where you anticipated issues, followed up early, improved a process, clarified responsibilities, or kept work moving.
Do not just write that you communicate well. Show where your communication prevented delays, improved handovers, resolved complaints, aligned stakeholders, or supported decision-making.
Do not just write that you work in a fast-paced environment. Show workload, volume, deadlines, competing priorities, or operational pressure.
The closer your resume gets to the employer’s real problem, the more impactful it becomes.
Before sending your resume, review each role and ask whether the reader can clearly understand your value.
Use this checklist:
Does each recent role include outcomes, not only duties?
Have I explained the scale of my work where possible?
Have I included numbers where they are honest and useful?
Have I shown who benefited from my work?
Have I explained process improvements clearly?
Have I removed vague phrases that do not prove anything?
Have I shown how I solved problems, reduced issues, improved quality, or supported decisions?
Have I made my strongest achievements easy to spot?
Have I tailored the impact to the type of role I want next?
Have I avoided exaggeration while still giving myself proper credit?
Does my resume sound like a real person doing real work, not a copied job description?
Would a recruiter understand my contribution within a quick scan?
That last question matters. You are not writing for someone who already knows how good you are. You are writing for someone who has to decide based on the evidence in front of them.
The biggest misconception is that impact means making every bullet sound impressive.
It does not.
Impact means making every important bullet clearer, more useful, and more connected to employer value.
Sometimes impact is commercial. Sometimes it is operational. Sometimes it is about service quality, accuracy, risk reduction, time savings, customer experience, team support, compliance, delivery, communication, or consistency.
A warehouse supervisor improving shift handovers has impact.
A receptionist reducing booking errors has impact.
A payroll officer resolving pay issues before cut-off has impact.
A project coordinator keeping dependencies visible has impact.
A nurse improving patient handover documentation has impact.
A recruiter reducing candidate drop-off has impact.
A finance officer catching discrepancies before month-end has impact.
A team leader coaching underperforming staff has impact.
The problem is not that candidates lack value. The problem is that their resumes often fail to translate that value into evidence.
That translation is what gets attention.
If your resume does not show enough impact, it is probably not because you have nothing valuable to say. It is more likely because you are describing your work from the inside of the role instead of from the perspective of the person deciding whether to interview you.
A job description explains what the company expected from the role.
A resume should explain what you contributed while you were in it.
That difference matters.
In the Australian job market, where recruiters and hiring managers are often comparing many candidates with similar titles, similar tools, and similar responsibilities, impact is what helps your resume become more memorable. It shows that you understand your work, not just your tasks. It shows that you can connect effort to outcomes. It gives the reader confidence that you can bring value into the next role, not just repeat duties from the last one.
Your resume does not need to be louder. It needs to be sharper.
Written by Simar Malhi, a recruiter and headhunter with international recruitment experience. I write about CVs, job applications, hiring decisions, and the reality behind recruitment processes. My goal is to help candidates understand more honestly how employers, recruiters, and hiring managers actually select candidates.
Sales pipeline value
Audit outcomes
Service level performance
Response times
Training completion
Retention improvement
Stock loss reduction
Cross-functional team
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin