Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeIn Canada, most resumes should be one to two pages long. A one page resume works best for students, recent graduates, entry level candidates, and professionals with limited experience. A two page resume is standard for most experienced professionals, managers, specialists, and candidates with several relevant roles, achievements, certifications, or technical skills.
A resume can be longer than two pages only when the extra information is truly relevant, such as for senior executives, academic roles, federal government applications, technical project backgrounds, or highly specialized professionals. But longer does not mean stronger. In recruitment, a resume is not judged by how much you include. It is judged by how quickly a recruiter or hiring manager can understand your fit.
That is the part many candidates miss. Resume length is not really a page count question. It is a relevance question.
The common advice says, “Keep your resume to one page.” That advice is only partly useful, and honestly, it causes a lot of unnecessary damage.
A one page resume is not automatically more professional. A two page resume is not automatically too long. What matters is whether the resume gives the employer enough useful evidence to make a screening decision without forcing them to dig through clutter.
When I review resumes, I am not counting pages first. I am asking:
Can I understand what this person does within a few seconds?
Is the experience relevant to the role?
Are the strongest achievements visible early?
Does the resume explain scope, level, tools, industry, and impact?
Is the content helping the application, or is it just taking up space?
That is the real recruiter lens.
A one page resume that hides strong experience is too short. A two page resume full of duties, old tasks, and generic wording is too long. A three page resume can be acceptable in specific cases, but only when each page earns its place.
Canadian employers are practical. They do not need a biography. They need enough evidence to decide whether you should move forward.
Resume length depends mostly on career stage, relevance, and complexity. Here is the practical breakdown.
Students and recent graduates should usually use a one page resume.
At this stage, hiring managers expect limited work history. They are looking for education, internships, part time work, volunteer experience, projects, technical skills, and signs of reliability or potential.
The mistake I see often is students trying to stretch a resume to two pages by adding weak filler. That usually works against them. If the second page contains short term retail jobs from years ago, school clubs with no clear relevance, or vague soft skills, it does not make the candidate look more experienced. It makes the resume look padded.
For students and new graduates, a strong one page resume should focus on:
Relevant education
Internships, co op placements, or practicums
Part time or seasonal work that shows responsibility
Projects related to the target role
Technical skills, software, languages, or certifications
Volunteer experience when it supports the job target
The goal is not to look senior. The goal is to look ready, credible, and easy to assess.
Entry level professionals usually need one page, sometimes two pages if they have strong relevant experience.
This is where candidates often become unsure. They may have enough experience to say something meaningful, but not enough to justify a dense two page resume.
My advice is simple: use one page if you can show your strongest qualifications clearly. Use two pages only if the extra space adds real value.
A two page resume may make sense for an entry level candidate when they have:
Multiple internships or co op terms
Relevant project experience
Certifications or technical training
Strong measurable achievements
Experience across different tools, systems, or industries
A career change that needs explanation
What does not justify a second page? Repeating the same basic duties under every job.
If every role says you “communicated with customers,” “worked in a team,” and “handled daily tasks,” the issue is not page length. The issue is weak positioning.
Most mid level professionals in Canada should use a two page resume.
This is the most common and most practical resume length for candidates with roughly four to ten years of experience, although the exact number is less important than the complexity of the background.
At mid level, recruiters and hiring managers usually need to see more than job titles. They want to understand:
What level of responsibility you held
What systems, tools, or processes you used
Whether your experience matches the industry or function
What results you produced
How your responsibilities grew over time
Whether you can step into the role without heavy hand holding
Trying to squeeze all of this into one page can make the resume feel thin or rushed. Worse, it can bury the information that would actually get you shortlisted.
This is one of the most common resume mistakes I see: good candidates cutting the wrong things to obey a one page rule they do not actually need to follow.
A mid level resume should not be long for the sake of it, but two pages gives enough room to show progression, achievements, and role fit.
Senior professionals and managers usually need two pages, sometimes three pages if the role requires substantial detail.
At this level, a resume needs to show leadership scope. Titles alone are not enough.
Hiring managers want to know:
Team size
Budget responsibility
Business unit or regional scope
Operational complexity
Stakeholder level
Change, growth, transformation, or performance outcomes
Strategic and hands on responsibilities
A senior candidate who only lists generic leadership duties can look surprisingly weak on paper. “Managed a team” says almost nothing. Managed what kind of team? In what environment? With what targets? During what business challenge? With what outcome?
Two pages are usually enough to show this properly. A third page may be acceptable for executives, consultants, transformation leaders, technical leaders, or candidates with complex project portfolios.
But senior candidates also need discipline. The resume should not become an archive of every job since 1998. Hiring teams care most about the last ten to fifteen years, unless older experience is unusually relevant.
Some candidates can reasonably go beyond two pages, but only in specific situations.
A longer resume may be acceptable for:
Executives with major leadership scope
Academic roles requiring publications, research, teaching, or grants
Federal or public sector applications with detailed requirements
Engineering, IT, construction, healthcare, or scientific specialists with project details
Consultants with selected client engagements
Professionals applying to roles where compliance, credentials, or technical depth matter
Even here, the resume still needs structure. Longer does not mean messy. The first page must still work hard. If page one does not clearly explain who you are, what you offer, and why you fit, page three will not rescue you.
For academic roles, a CV may be longer because the purpose is different. A Canadian academic CV can include publications, conferences, teaching history, grants, research, and professional service. That is not the same thing as a standard resume for private sector hiring.
Yes, a two page resume is completely acceptable in Canada. In fact, for many experienced professionals, it is the expected format.
The myth that Canadian resumes must always be one page is outdated and often misunderstood. Recruiters are not rejecting strong candidates because their resume has a second page. They reject resumes when the content is irrelevant, unclear, repetitive, or difficult to scan.
A two page resume is acceptable when it gives useful information such as:
Relevant work history
Achievements with context
Technical skills or software
Certifications and licences
Leadership scope
Industry specific experience
Projects or operational outcomes
What recruiters do not want is a two page resume that uses the extra space badly.
A two page resume becomes a problem when it includes:
Every task from every job
Old experience that no longer supports the target role
Long paragraphs
Repeated bullet points
Generic soft skills without proof
Personal details that are not needed in Canada
References or “references available upon request”
Here is the practical reality: a recruiter may only spend a short amount of time on the first scan. That does not mean they only accept one page. It means your resume must make the right information easy to find.
The first page earns attention. The second page supports the decision.
A one page resume is better when the candidate’s relevant experience can be presented clearly without cutting important evidence.
It works especially well for:
Students
Recent graduates
Entry level job seekers
Candidates with less than three years of experience
Career changers who need a focused positioning document
Professionals applying to simple, early career, or highly targeted roles
A one page resume can also be powerful when the candidate has a very clear story. For example, someone applying for an administrative assistant role with two relevant roles, strong software skills, and clear achievements may not need two pages.
The danger is overcompressing.
I often see candidates shrink font size, remove spacing, and cram everything into one page because they think one page looks more “professional.” It usually does the opposite. A crowded one page resume feels harder to read than a clean two page resume.
A one page resume should feel intentional, not squeezed.
A candidate with six years of relevant project coordination experience forces the resume into one page by removing achievements, project scope, software, and stakeholder details.
That resume may look tidy, but it gives the hiring manager less reason to interview them.
A recent graduate keeps the resume to one page and highlights education, co op experience, technical tools, relevant projects, and two strong part time work achievements.
That resume matches the candidate’s career stage and gives the recruiter enough evidence without filler.
A two page resume is better when one page would remove information that affects the hiring decision.
This is common for professionals with several years of experience, multiple relevant roles, technical skills, leadership responsibilities, or measurable achievements.
Two pages allow you to show:
Career progression
Relevant accomplishments
Role scope
Industry exposure
Tools, systems, and certifications
Leadership or collaboration level
Business impact
The key is prioritization. Page two should not be a dumping ground. It should contain useful supporting evidence.
A strong two page Canadian resume usually works like this:
Page one gives the strongest summary, skills, recent experience, and most relevant achievements
Page two gives additional experience, earlier roles, education, certifications, and supporting details
If page one does not make the case, the resume has a structure problem.
One of the quiet truths in recruitment is that hiring managers often scan resumes differently from recruiters. Recruiters may look for fit, keywords, salary alignment, location, and basic requirements. Hiring managers often look for depth: projects, tools, team context, client type, industry, or problem solving.
A two page resume can satisfy both audiences when it is written well.
A resume can be longer than two pages in Canada, but the reason must be strong.
A three page resume may be reasonable when the job requires deeper proof of experience. This can apply to senior leadership, technical consulting, engineering, IT architecture, health care, academia, public sector, and specialized project based roles.
But I would be careful here. Many candidates think their resume needs three pages because they have done a lot. That is not the same as needing three pages.
The question is not, “Have I done enough to fill three pages?”
The question is, “Does the employer need this information to decide I am a strong fit?”
Those are very different questions.
A longer resume may be justified when:
The role requires detailed project experience
Credentials, certifications, or technical knowledge are critical
Leadership scope needs explanation
You are applying to government or academic roles with specific criteria
You have consulting engagements that directly support the target role
You need to show selected publications, research, patents, or major deliverables
A longer resume is usually not justified when:
You are listing every job task from older roles
You are including unrelated early career experience
You are repeating similar achievements under multiple positions
You are adding training that is outdated or irrelevant
You are using paragraphs instead of concise achievement statements
You are trying to look more senior by adding volume
Recruiters can tell when a resume is long because the candidate is strategic. We can also tell when it is long because the candidate does not know what to cut. The second version is far more common.
Resume length matters, but it is rarely the first issue. Before I care whether a resume is one page or two pages, I care whether it answers the screening questions.
Most recruiters are trying to quickly figure out:
Are you qualified for this role?
Have you done similar work before?
Is your level aligned with the job?
Are your skills current?
Are you in the right location or open to the required work arrangement?
Does your background match the hiring manager’s real expectations?
Is there enough evidence to justify an interview?
That last point matters. A resume is not supposed to tell your entire career story. It is supposed to create enough confidence for the next step.
The problem with many resumes is not length. It is that they make recruiters work too hard.
A recruiter should not have to decode your career like a crime scene. If your resume is full of vague job titles, unclear company context, generic responsibilities, and no measurable outcomes, page count will not fix it.
A strong Canadian resume helps the reader understand:
Your professional identity
Your target role or direction
Your most relevant experience
Your strongest achievements
Your tools, systems, and technical strengths
Your level of responsibility
Your career progression
That is what page length should support.
A resume is too long when the extra content weakens the message.
The biggest issue with long resumes is not that recruiters are lazy. It is that long resumes often show poor judgement. That sounds blunt, but it is true.
When a resume includes too much, the recruiter starts wondering whether the candidate understands relevance. In many roles, especially professional, managerial, consulting, communications, operations, and client facing roles, judgement matters.
A bloated resume can signal:
You do not know what the employer cares about
You struggle to prioritize information
You are relying on volume instead of impact
You have not tailored the resume to the role
You are listing tasks instead of positioning achievements
This is why “more detail” can actually reduce your chances.
Candidates sometimes tell me, “I wanted to include everything so they can decide what matters.” That is exactly the problem. The employer should not have to sort through everything. Your job is to make the decision easier.
A resume is a positioning document. It is not a storage unit.
A resume is too short when it removes evidence the employer needs.
Some candidates cut so aggressively that their resume becomes vague. It may look clean, but it does not persuade anyone.
A too short resume often creates questions like:
What did this person actually do?
What level were they operating at?
What tools or systems did they use?
Did they lead anything or just support?
What results did they produce?
How similar is their experience to our role?
Why should we interview them over someone else?
This is especially risky for mid level and senior candidates. At that stage, employers expect substance. A thin resume can make a strong candidate look average.
There is also a difference between being concise and being incomplete. Concise writing removes waste. Incomplete writing removes proof.
That is the line candidates need to understand.
The best way to decide your resume length is to start with the target role, not your entire career history.
Before choosing one page or two pages, ask yourself what the employer needs to believe before inviting you to interview.
Use this recruiter based decision framework.
One page is enough when your relevant experience is limited, focused, or early career.
Choose one page if:
You have less than three years of relevant experience
You are a student or recent graduate
You are applying for entry level roles
Your background is simple and easy to summarize
A second page would mostly contain filler
Your strongest qualifications fit comfortably on one page
One page should still include enough detail to prove fit. Do not remove achievements just to obey a rule.
Two pages are best when your experience needs room to show scope, achievements, and relevance.
Choose two pages if:
You have several years of relevant experience
You have multiple roles that support the target job
You need to show technical tools or certifications
You have measurable achievements worth including
You have leadership, project, or stakeholder experience
You are applying for mid level or senior roles
The second page should add confidence, not clutter.
Three pages should be the exception, not the default.
Choose three pages only if:
You are applying for executive, academic, government, technical, or project heavy roles
The employer needs detailed proof of specialized experience
You have selected projects or credentials that are directly relevant
Cutting to two pages would remove important decision making evidence
Even then, make page one strong enough to stand alone.
The first page does most of the heavy lifting. If a recruiter only scans one page first, this is the page that decides whether they keep reading.
Your first page should usually include:
Name and contact details
Professional headline or target role
Short profile summary
Core skills or areas of expertise
Most recent role
Strongest recent achievements
Relevant tools, systems, or industry keywords
The first page should immediately answer, “Why is this person relevant to this job?”
This is where many resumes fail. Candidates use the top of the resume for vague summaries like “hardworking professional with excellent communication skills.” That does nothing. It is not specific. It is not evidence. It could describe half the applicant pool.
A better summary gives context.
Hardworking and motivated professional with strong communication skills and a passion for success.
This sounds pleasant, but it gives the recruiter no useful screening information.
Operations coordinator with five years of experience supporting inventory control, vendor communication, scheduling, and process improvement in fast paced distribution environments. Skilled in Excel, SAP, reporting, and cross functional issue resolution.
This works because it gives role, experience level, environment, tools, and relevant function. The recruiter can place the candidate quickly.
The second page should support the case you made on the first page.
Good second page content may include:
Earlier relevant roles
Additional achievements
Education
Certifications
Professional development
Technical skills
Selected projects
Volunteer experience if relevant
Additional industry experience
The second page is also where you can include older experience in a more compressed way. Not every past job needs the same amount of detail.
For example, your current and most recent roles may need several achievement based bullet points. A job from twelve years ago may only need the title, company, dates, and one short line if it is still relevant.
The mistake is treating every role equally. Recruiters do not weigh every role equally. Recent and relevant experience matters most.
Your resume should reflect that.
Most Canadian resumes should focus on the last ten to fifteen years of relevant experience.
That does not mean you must delete everything older. It means older experience should be included only when it supports your current target.
For example, if you are applying for a senior operations role and your older experience shows early supervisory progression, you may include it briefly. If your older experience is unrelated, outdated, or distracting, it can be removed or summarized.
This is especially important for experienced candidates. A resume that goes back twenty five years in full detail can create several problems.
It may:
Dilute your current positioning
Make the resume too long
Emphasize outdated tools or responsibilities
Distract from your strongest recent experience
Invite unnecessary assumptions about career stage
Canadian employers generally care most about whether your recent experience fits the role they are hiring for now. Older experience can support the story, but it should not dominate it.
Applicant tracking systems, often called ATS, do not reject resumes simply because they are two pages long. That is another common myth.
ATS software is mainly used to store, parse, search, filter, and manage applications. The exact setup varies by employer. Some companies use screening questions. Some recruiters search resumes by keywords. Some hiring teams review manually. Some systems parse information badly if the formatting is too complicated.
Page length itself is usually not the issue.
What matters more for ATS readability is:
Clear headings
Standard section names
Simple formatting
Relevant keywords used naturally
No text hidden in graphics
No overly complex tables or design elements
Consistent job titles, dates, and company names
A two page resume with clean formatting and relevant keywords is usually far better than a one page resume that is visually fancy but difficult to parse.
Do not write for ATS only. That is how candidates end up with stiff, keyword stuffed resumes that no human wants to read. Write for both: structured enough for systems, clear enough for recruiters, and persuasive enough for hiring managers.
Most resume length problems come from poor prioritization, not from choosing the wrong page count.
One page is not a universal rule in Canada. It is a good option for early career candidates, but it can be too limiting for experienced professionals.
A strong two page resume is better than a weak one page resume that removes important proof.
More content does not make you more qualified. It can make your resume harder to evaluate.
A two page resume should be two pages because the content deserves the space, not because the candidate wants to look more experienced.
Recent, relevant roles deserve more detail. Older or less relevant roles should be shorter.
This is one of the easiest ways to control resume length without losing value.
Responsibilities tell the employer what your job description was. Achievements show how you performed.
A resume full of duties usually feels longer than it is because the reader has to search for impact.
High school details, old technical tools, unrelated jobs, personal information, and references usually do not belong on a modern Canadian resume.
Every line should have a reason to be there.
Tiny fonts, narrow margins, dense paragraphs, and cramped spacing are not strategic. They are signs that the resume needs editing.
Readable formatting matters because recruiters are moving quickly. Do not punish the reader for trying to understand your career.
Here is the test I would use before sending a resume.
Read every section and ask:
Does this help the employer understand my fit for this specific role?
Does this show evidence, not just activity?
Is this recent enough to matter?
Is this relevant enough to keep?
Would I ask about this in an interview?
Is this stronger than something else I could include?
Does this make the resume clearer or heavier?
If the content helps the decision, keep it. If it only proves that you were employed, consider cutting or compressing it.
A resume should feel edited. That does not mean stripped down. It means intentional.
The best resumes are not the ones with the fewest pages. They are the ones where every section has a job.
For most job seekers in Canada, the best resume length is one to two pages.
Use one page if you are a student, recent graduate, entry level candidate, or someone with a focused background that does not need more space.
Use two pages if you are an experienced professional, manager, specialist, or candidate with enough relevant achievements, skills, and career progression to justify the second page.
Use three pages only when the role genuinely requires detailed evidence, such as executive, academic, technical, government, or project based applications.
The real goal is not to hit a perfect page count. The goal is to make the hiring decision easier. A Canadian resume should be long enough to prove fit and short enough to stay sharp.
That is the balance.
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin