Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeWhen an employer asks about your salary expectations in Canada, the best answer is a researched range tied to the role, market, location, seniority, and total compensation. Do not give your current or previous salary as your anchor. Do not say “I’m flexible” without context. A strong answer sounds like: “Based on the responsibilities, my experience, and the current Canadian market for this type of role, I’m targeting a range of $85,000 to $95,000, depending on the full compensation package and scope.”
That answer does three important things. It shows you understand your value, it leaves room for discussion, and it avoids making you look either underprepared or unrealistic. Salary conversations are not just about money. They are also a screening moment. Employers are quietly assessing judgement, communication, expectations, and whether hiring you will become complicated later.
When a recruiter or hiring manager asks, “What are your salary expectations?”, they are usually not asking casually. They are trying to solve a practical hiring problem.
They want to know whether your expectations fit the budget, whether you understand the level of the role, whether you are likely to accept an offer, and whether compensation will become an issue at the end of the process. That is the polite version.
The real version is this: nobody wants to spend three interviews, involve a hiring manager, collect feedback, prepare an offer, and then discover the candidate wanted $20,000 more than the company can pay. Hiring teams hate wasted process. Candidates hate it too, obviously, but employers often use salary questions early because they are protecting time, budget, and internal credibility.
There is also another layer candidates often miss. Your answer tells the employer how you position yourself. A strong candidate who gives a thoughtful range sounds commercially aware. A strong candidate who says, “I don’t know, whatever you think is fair,” sounds unprepared, even if they are excellent at the job.
That does not mean you need to be aggressive. It means you need to be clear.
In Canada, salary expectations can be especially tricky because pay varies heavily by province, city, industry, company size, remote work arrangement, public versus private sector, and whether the role includes bonus, commission, equity, pension, overtime, or benefits. A $90,000 salary can be strong in one market and below target in another. This is why a random number copied from a salary website is not enough.
A strong salary expectations answer should include three parts: your researched range, your reason, and your flexibility based on the full package.
Good Example
“Based on the scope of the role, my background, and the current market for similar positions in Canada, I’m targeting a base salary in the range of $85,000 to $95,000. I’d also want to understand the full compensation package, including benefits, bonus, flexibility, and growth opportunities, before making a final decision.”
This answer works because it is specific without being rigid. It gives the employer a usable number, but it does not trap you into accepting the lowest possible offer. It also signals that you understand compensation is more than base salary.
Weak Example
“I’m open. What is the budget?”
This can work if said well, but on its own it often sounds evasive. Some recruiters will answer. Some will push back. Some will assume you do not know your market value. Fair? Not always. Real? Yes.
A better version is:
“My expectation depends a bit on the final scope and total compensation package, but based on similar roles I’ve been considering, I’m targeting somewhere around $85,000 to $95,000. Is that aligned with the range you have budgeted?”
That is a much stronger answer. It gives a range, protects your position, and invites transparency.
The biggest mistake candidates make is choosing a salary number based on emotion instead of evidence. Wanting more money is completely reasonable. Wanting more money without understanding the role, market, and level is where candidates get into trouble.
Before you answer, build your range using these factors:
The actual level of the role: Job titles are messy. A “manager” in one company may manage people, budget, and strategy. In another company, it may be an individual contributor title with no real authority. Do not price yourself on title alone.
The location in Canada: Toronto, Vancouver, Calgary, Ottawa, Montréal, Halifax, Winnipeg, and remote national roles can have very different salary norms. Remote work has not magically made compensation equal across Canada, no matter how nicely some job ads phrase it.
The industry: Tech, finance, energy, healthcare, public sector, manufacturing, retail, education, and non profit organizations can all pay very differently for similar functions.
The company size and funding model: A large bank, funded startup, government agency, family owned business, and global corporation do not usually build compensation bands the same way.
The full compensation package: Base salary is only one part. Bonus, commission, equity, pension, RRSP matching, paid time off, benefits, overtime eligibility, remote work, professional development budget, and job security all matter.
Your proof of value: Employers pay more confidently when they can connect your experience to business outcomes. If your value is vague, your salary ask feels like a wish. If your value is clear, your salary ask feels easier to justify.
I often see candidates choose a number because they saw it online, heard it from a friend, or simply want a certain lifestyle. I understand that completely. But employers do not usually pay based on what your rent became, how expensive groceries are, or what your friend earned at a different company. They pay based on budget, internal equity, market range, urgency, and how badly they believe they need you.
That may sound cold, but it is useful. Once you understand the employer’s logic, you can position your answer properly.
In most Canadian hiring situations, give a salary range, not one fixed number.
A range gives you room to negotiate after you learn more about the role. It also reduces the risk of disqualifying yourself too early. The range should not be absurdly wide, though. Saying “I’m looking for $70,000 to $120,000” does not make you look flexible. It makes you look like you have not done the work.
A useful range is usually tight enough to be meaningful and wide enough to allow discussion. For many professional roles, that might mean a range of roughly $10,000 to $15,000. For executive, sales, technical, or highly variable compensation roles, the range may need more nuance because bonus, equity, commission, and long term incentives can change the picture.
Good Example
“I’m targeting $75,000 to $85,000 base, depending on the full package and role scope.”
Weak Example
“I would like at least $80,000.”
The second answer is not terrible, but it gives the employer one anchor and no context. If the budget is $75,000 to $82,000, they may hear your answer and think you will be disappointed. If the budget is $90,000, you may have just underpriced yourself. Lovely little hiring trap, that one.
A range gives you more control.
If the salary range is posted, use it. Do not ignore it and pretend the budget is a mystery.
In parts of Canada, pay transparency rules are changing how salary information appears in job postings. Some employers are now required to include compensation information in public postings, while others include ranges voluntarily. Even when a range is posted, candidates still need to read it carefully.
A posted range is not always as clear as it looks.
Sometimes the range is realistic. Sometimes it is broad enough to be almost decorative. Sometimes the top of the range is reserved for someone who matches every requirement, has direct industry experience, and would need very little ramp up. Sometimes the posted range includes internal compensation structure rather than what the company is genuinely prepared to offer most candidates.
This is where candidates need to be sharp.
If the posting says $70,000 to $90,000, do not automatically assume $90,000 is available to you. Also do not assume you must accept $70,000. Your job is to connect your ask to the evidence.
Good Example
“I saw the posted range is $70,000 to $90,000. Based on the responsibilities and my experience with similar projects, I’d expect to be in the upper part of that range, likely around $84,000 to $90,000, depending on the full package.”
That answer is much stronger than simply saying, “I want the maximum.” Employers hear that all the time. What they need is a reason.
This is where candidates need to be careful.
In some Canadian provinces, employers face restrictions around asking candidates about previous pay or compensation history. Rules vary, and candidates should always check the current requirements in their province. But from a negotiation perspective, even where the question is asked, your previous salary should not be the anchor for your next role.
Your past salary may reflect underpayment, a different industry, a smaller company, a lower cost market, outdated compensation, or simply a bad negotiation from years ago. None of that should define your current value.
If asked about current or previous salary, you can redirect professionally.
Good Example
“I’m focusing on the market value and scope of this role rather than my previous compensation. For this opportunity, I’m targeting a range of $85,000 to $95,000 depending on the full package.”
That is firm, calm, and relevant.
Weak Example
“I currently make $72,000, but I’m hoping for $90,000.”
This may be honest, but it gives away too much. Some employers will still offer fairly. Others will quietly think, “Great, we can probably get them for $78,000.” Not every employer does this, but enough do that you should not hand over your negotiation leverage for free.
You are not being difficult by redirecting. You are keeping the conversation focused on the role you are interviewing for.
Online applications are annoying because they often force you into a box before you have had a real conversation. Sometimes the field allows text. Sometimes it requires a number. Sometimes it accepts a range. Sometimes it behaves like it was designed during someone’s lunch break and never tested by an actual human.
If the application allows text, use a short answer.
Good Example
“Targeting $85,000 to $95,000 base, depending on role scope and total compensation.”
If the application requires a single number, choose a number that sits near the middle or lower middle of your acceptable range, but not below what you would seriously accept. Do not enter your dream number if it will screen you out. Do not enter a panic number that you will resent later.
If the form lets you enter “negotiable,” only use that if you are comfortable with the risk. It may keep you in the process, but it may also weaken your anchor.
For roles where compensation can vary significantly, such as sales, executive leadership, consulting, or roles with bonus or equity, include total compensation language wherever possible.
Good Example
“Target base salary of $110,000 to $125,000, depending on bonus structure, equity, and total compensation.”
The key is to avoid looking either careless or unrealistic. A salary field is not just administrative. It can influence whether a recruiter calls you.
The recruiter screen is usually where salary expectations come up first. This is not the moment to give a speech. Recruiters need clarity. They are comparing your expectations with the approved range, other candidates, and what the hiring manager will accept.
A good recruiter screen answer is direct and calm.
Good Example
“I’m currently targeting $90,000 to $100,000 base for my next move, depending on the full compensation package. Does that align with the range for this role?”
That last sentence matters. It turns the conversation into a two way exchange. You are not just being evaluated. You are evaluating the opportunity too.
If the recruiter says the range is lower, do not panic. Ask for clarity.
Good Example
“Thanks for sharing that. Is the range fixed, or is there flexibility for someone with stronger direct experience?”
This question is useful because sometimes the range is firm. Sometimes it is not. Recruiters may say “the budget is tight” when they mean “there might be room, but I need a reason to push.” Other times they mean “there is absolutely no room, please do not make this painful.”
Listen carefully to the answer.
If the budget is far below your minimum, be honest.
Good Example
“I appreciate the transparency. Based on what I’m targeting, I think we may be too far apart for this to make sense right now.”
This saves everyone time and, frankly, makes you look professional. Dragging out a process you already know will not work is not strategy. It is unpaid emotional admin.
With a hiring manager, your salary answer should connect more strongly to scope, responsibility, and impact.
Recruiters usually think in terms of range, process, and fit. Hiring managers think more about whether your skills solve their problem. That does not mean hiring managers ignore budget. They absolutely do not. But they are often more persuaded by the connection between your experience and the work.
Good Example
“Based on what we’ve discussed about leading the team, improving process efficiency, and owning cross functional stakeholder management, I’d be looking at a base salary around $100,000 to $110,000. I’m open to discussing the full package, but that range feels aligned with the scope as I understand it.”
This answer does something important. It ties your number to the work. You are not randomly asking for more. You are connecting compensation to responsibility.
That is how stronger candidates negotiate. They do not just say, “I want more.” They explain why the role, expectations, and their ability to deliver support the number.
If you genuinely do not have enough information, say that, but do not hide behind vagueness forever.
Early in the process, you can ask for the employer’s range first.
Good Example
“I’d like to understand the role scope a bit more before giving a final number. Could you share the approved range for the position?”
If they push you to answer first, give a researched range with flexibility.
Good Example
“Based on similar roles in the Canadian market, I’d expect something in the $80,000 to $90,000 range, depending on scope and total compensation. I’m happy to refine that once I understand the role more clearly.”
This is better than refusing to answer. Some candidates have been told never to give a number first. In theory, I understand the advice. In practice, it can become awkward if handled badly. If you dodge the question three times, the recruiter may start wondering whether your expectations are wildly out of range.
The goal is not to be secretive. The goal is to avoid anchoring yourself badly.
Most poor salary answers fail for one of three reasons. They are too vague, too apologetic, or too disconnected from the role.
Weak Example
“I’m flexible.”
This sounds cooperative, but it gives the employer nothing. Flexibility is useful only when it has boundaries. Without a range, “flexible” can sound like “please decide my value for me.” That is not a position I recommend.
Better Example
“I’m flexible depending on the full package, but I’m targeting $75,000 to $85,000 based on the role and market.”
Weak Example
“I just need more than I make now.”
That may be true, but it frames your expectation around personal need rather than market value. Employers are not usually building offers around your personal financial gap. They are building offers around budget, internal equity, and perceived value.
Better Example
“I’m looking for compensation that reflects the scope of the role and my experience. Based on similar positions, I’m targeting $85,000 to $95,000.”
Weak Example
“I saw online that this job should pay $120,000.”
Salary websites can help, but they are not a complete argument. They often mix industries, cities, company sizes, seniority levels, and outdated data. Use them as input, not as your entire case.
Better Example
“Based on market research, the responsibilities listed, and my direct experience in this area, I’d expect a range of $110,000 to $120,000.”
The difference is positioning. One sounds like you found a number. The other sounds like you understand the role.
Recruiters do not just hear the number. They interpret the number against the role, your profile, the market, and the employer’s budget.
If your expectation is slightly above range but your experience is strong, a recruiter may still continue. If your expectation is far above range and your experience is only loosely aligned, they may not. If your expectation is below range, a good recruiter may still pay fairly, but not every process works that way. Some employers will see it as an opportunity to save budget.
This is why underpricing yourself is not harmless.
Candidates sometimes think a lower number makes them more attractive. Sometimes it does. But it can also create doubt. If a senior candidate gives a surprisingly low salary expectation, recruiters may wonder if the candidate misunderstands the role, lacks confidence, is leaving something out, or is not operating at the level the title suggests.
Low salary expectations can also backfire after the offer. If you accept too little and then realize the role is bigger than expected, resentment starts early. That is bad for you and bad for the employer.
On the other side, an unrealistic number can make you look disconnected from the market. Employers may not argue. They may simply move on. Candidates often expect a negotiation, but many hiring teams do not negotiate with candidates they believe are too far outside budget. They just select someone else.
The strongest answer is not the highest answer. It is the most defensible answer.
In Canada, compensation can include much more than base pay. A role with a lower base salary but strong pension, bonus, benefits, paid time off, remote flexibility, and stability may be more valuable than a higher base salary with weak benefits and constant chaos wearing a blazer.
You should understand the full package before making a final decision.
Ask about:
Base salary: The fixed amount you are paid before bonus, commission, or overtime.
Bonus: Whether it is guaranteed, discretionary, company based, individual performance based, or historically paid.
Commission: How targets are set, how many people hit quota, when commission is paid, and what happens during ramp up.
Equity or stock options: Whether the value is realistic, vested, liquid, or mostly motivational confetti.
Pension or RRSP matching: Especially important in public sector, unionized, corporate, and long term career roles.
Benefits: Health, dental, vision, disability coverage, mental health support, and dependants coverage.
Paid time off: Vacation, personal days, sick leave, statutory holidays, and closure periods.
Work arrangement: Remote, hybrid, in office, travel expectations, commuting cost, and flexibility.
Overtime and hours: Whether extra hours are paid, expected, seasonal, or quietly normalized.
A higher salary can still be a worse deal if the workload, commute, unpaid overtime, weak benefits, or instability are extreme. Candidates often focus only on the base number because it is easiest to compare. Recruiters and hiring managers know the full package can change the real value of an offer.
So when you answer salary expectations, leave space for total compensation.
Good Example
“My base salary target is $95,000 to $105,000, but I’d consider the full package, including bonus, benefits, pension or RRSP matching, flexibility, and growth potential.”
That is a mature answer. It does not sound desperate. It sounds like someone who evaluates offers properly.
Some candidates have a harder time answering salary expectations because their background does not map neatly to Canadian salary bands. This includes newcomers to Canada, career changers, parents returning after a career break, internationally experienced professionals, and candidates moving from one sector to another.
The mistake is assuming you must discount yourself heavily.
You may need to account for local market knowledge, licensing, Canadian regulatory context, language requirements, sector differences, or gaps in direct experience. But that is not the same as starting from zero.
For internationally experienced candidates, the strongest approach is to translate your experience into Canadian employer language. Employers may not fully understand your previous company, market, title, or scope. Do not expect them to connect the dots. Connect them yourself.
Good Example
“Based on my experience managing similar responsibilities internationally and my understanding of the Canadian market for this role, I’m targeting $80,000 to $90,000. I’m open to discussing where I fit within the range based on the level of local market knowledge required.”
That answer is honest without shrinking your value.
For career changers, tie your salary expectation to transferable value and realistic level.
Good Example
“Because I’m moving into this function from a related area, I’m targeting $70,000 to $80,000 for a role where my project management and stakeholder experience are directly useful, while still recognizing there will be some ramp up.”
That sounds thoughtful. It tells the employer you are realistic without sounding like you are asking for permission to be paid fairly.
For returners, do not over explain the break. Focus on current readiness.
Good Example
“I’m targeting $75,000 to $85,000 based on the role scope, my previous experience, and the level I’m returning at. I’d want to understand the expectations and full compensation package before finalizing.”
You do not need to apologize for having a non linear career. Most careers are not as neat as LinkedIn makes them look. Very suspiciously neat, sometimes.
This happens often. A candidate gives a number early, learns more about the role, then realizes the job is bigger than expected. You can still adjust, but you need to do it professionally and with a reason.
Do not suddenly jump your expectation without context. That feels unreliable. Instead, explain what changed.
Good Example
“After learning more about the scope of the role, especially the leadership expectations and cross functional ownership, I’d revise my target range to $95,000 to $105,000. My earlier range was based on a narrower understanding of the position.”
This is reasonable. You are not pretending you never gave the first number. You are explaining that new information changed the compensation picture.
If you receive an offer below what you want, respond with appreciation and a clear counter.
Good Example
“Thank you for the offer. I’m excited about the role and the team. Based on the scope we discussed and my experience, I was hoping to be closer to $95,000. Is there flexibility to move the base salary closer to that level?”
This works because it is calm, specific, and connected to the role. Do not overdo the emotional essay. Hiring teams do not need your life story to consider a counteroffer. They need a clear ask and a business reason.
The salary question is simple on the surface, but candidates make the same avoidable mistakes again and again.
Giving a number before understanding the role: If you answer too quickly, you may price the job before you understand the scope.
Using your current salary as your anchor: Your current pay may be below market, outdated, or unrelated to the new role.
Saying “negotiable” with no range: This may feel safe, but it often weakens your position.
Choosing a number from one salary website: Salary data is useful, but it needs context.
Ignoring total compensation: A role with pension, bonus, benefits, and flexibility may compare differently than base salary alone suggests.
Giving a range that is too wide: A huge range signals uncertainty, not flexibility.
Asking for the top of the range without proof: Wanting the maximum is not a strategy. Showing why you belong near the top is.
Sounding apologetic: Do not whisper your salary expectation like you are asking for a personal favour. Compensation is part of the employment agreement.
Over negotiating too early: Do not turn the first recruiter screen into a courtroom drama. Give a range, check alignment, and move forward if it makes sense.
Waiting until the offer to reveal a major gap: If your minimum is $100,000 and the role pays $75,000, that should come out early.
The best salary conversations are not combative. They are clear. You are trying to find alignment, not win a debate.
Use this framework when you are preparing your answer.
Start with your target range. Tie it to the market and scope. Mention total compensation. Ask whether it aligns with the employer’s range.
Formula
“My target range is [salary range], based on [role scope, experience, and market]. I’m open to considering the full compensation package, including [bonus, benefits, pension, flexibility, or other relevant factors]. Does that align with the range budgeted for the role?”
Example for a mid level professional role
“My target range is $80,000 to $90,000, based on the role scope, my experience, and the current market for similar positions in Canada. I’m open to considering the full compensation package, including benefits, bonus, and flexibility. Does that align with the budget for the role?”
Example for a senior role
“Based on the leadership scope and the level of ownership we discussed, I’d be targeting $115,000 to $130,000 base. I’d also want to understand the bonus structure, benefits, and long term growth path before making a final decision.”
Example when the employer has not shared enough information
“I’d like to understand the scope a bit more before giving a final number, but based on similar roles, I’d expect something in the $90,000 to $100,000 range depending on total compensation.”
Example when the range is posted
“I saw the posted range is $75,000 to $90,000. Based on my direct experience with the responsibilities listed, I’d expect to be in the upper part of that range, depending on the full package.”
Keep it simple. A confident salary answer does not need to be long. It needs to be researched, relevant, and calm.
Salary expectations are not a personality test, even though some hiring processes make them feel like one. They are a business conversation.
Your goal is not to say the perfect magic number that makes everyone clap politely in a Teams call. Your goal is to avoid underpricing yourself, avoid wasting time on roles that cannot meet your needs, and communicate your value in a way that makes sense to the employer.
A strong salary expectations answer in Canada should be specific enough to be useful, flexible enough to allow discussion, and grounded enough to be credible. Do your research. Understand the role. Think in ranges. Protect your anchor. Consider total compensation. And please, do not answer with “I’m open” unless you enjoy letting other people do your market positioning for you.
The best answer is not the most aggressive one. It is the one that shows you know your value and understand how hiring decisions actually get made.
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin