Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeYour LinkedIn About section should quickly explain who you are professionally, what kind of work you do, what problems you solve, and why a recruiter or hiring manager should keep reading. In the Canadian job market, this section is not just a personal bio. It is positioning. Recruiters use LinkedIn to understand your career story before deciding whether your profile matches a role, whether your resume makes sense, and whether reaching out is worth their time.
The biggest mistake I see is candidates treating the About section like a mini resume, a motivational speech, or a wall of buzzwords. It should do none of those things. A strong LinkedIn About section gives context, direction, credibility, and relevance. It helps people understand your professional value without making them work for it.
Your LinkedIn About section is the part of your profile where you control the story behind your experience. Your headline tells people what you do. Your work history shows where you have done it. Your About section explains the professional thread connecting everything.
That is why this section matters more than many candidates realize. When I look at a LinkedIn profile, I am not reading the About section for personality first. I am reading it to answer practical hiring questions.
I am looking for things like:
What type of candidate is this?
What level are they operating at?
What industries, functions, or problems do they understand?
Is their career direction clear?
Do their claims match their experience?
Would this person make sense for the role I am working on?
That last question is the one most candidates forget. Your About section is not there to impress everyone. It is there to help the right people understand your relevance faster.
Most people searching for “LinkedIn About section” do not simply want to know what the section is. They want to know what to write, how to sound credible, what recruiters expect, and how to avoid sounding awkward.
The real goal is usually one of these:
“I need to improve my LinkedIn profile for job searching.”
“I want recruiters to take me seriously.”
“I do not know how to talk about myself without sounding fake.”
“I want my profile to look professional, but not robotic.”
“I need examples of what works and what does not.”
That is the correct intent to focus on. This is not a page about every part of LinkedIn. It is not a broad LinkedIn profile optimization article. It is specifically about the About section and how to write it in a way that supports real hiring decisions.
In Canada, where many job seekers apply across industries, provinces, remote roles, hybrid roles, and employer types, clarity matters. A recruiter in Toronto, Vancouver, Calgary, Montreal, or anywhere else does not have time to decode a profile that sounds polished but says very little.
A vague About section creates friction. It makes recruiters guess. And recruiters guessing is not a strategy. It is how good candidates get skipped because their positioning is unclear.
Most weak LinkedIn About sections fail for one simple reason: they are written for the candidate’s ego instead of the reader’s decision process.
That sounds harsh, but it is true.
Candidates often write what they want people to feel about them. Recruiters read to understand whether the person fits a role. Those are not the same thing.
A weak About section usually has one of these problems.
It starts with generic self praise. Phrases like “passionate professional,” “results driven individual,” “dynamic leader,” and “motivated team player” sound safe, but they are empty unless they are supported by specifics.
It repeats the resume. If your About section only restates your job titles and years of experience, it adds very little. Your experience section already does that job.
It tries to sound impressive instead of useful. Some candidates write like they are building a personal brand billboard. The problem is that hiring managers do not hire billboards. They hire people who can solve specific problems.
It is too broad. “I help organizations grow through strategy, communication, collaboration, and innovation” could describe almost anyone in a corporate office with decent WiFi and a reusable water bottle. It gives no real signal.
It does not show direction. If your About section does not make it clear what kind of work you do or want to do next, recruiters may not know where to place you.
Here is the practical reality: recruiters do not dislike confident candidates. They dislike unclear candidates. Confidence works when it is attached to evidence. Without evidence, it becomes noise.
Recruiters scan profiles quickly, but that does not mean they are careless. A good recruiter is looking for alignment. Your About section can either speed up that alignment or make it harder.
When I read a strong About section, I usually notice these things:
The candidate’s core professional identity is clear
Their skills are connected to real business problems
Their industry or functional context is easy to understand
Their career direction feels intentional
Their tone sounds human, not inflated
Their claims are believable because they are specific
What I question immediately is exaggeration. If someone calls themselves a “visionary transformational leader” but their experience section shows two years in an entry level coordinator role, the profile starts to feel misaligned. That does not mean the person is not capable. It means the positioning is trying too hard.
Recruiters are not only reading what you say. They are comparing what you say against your work history, skills, seniority, and career pattern. Your About section needs to fit the evidence on the rest of your profile.
That is where many candidates go wrong. They think the About section is a place to make bigger claims. It is actually a place to make clearer claims.
A strong LinkedIn About section does not need to be complicated. It needs to answer the right questions in the right order.
The structure I recommend for most Canadian job seekers is:
Start with your professional identity and focus
Explain the type of work you do and the problems you solve
Add specific strengths, tools, industries, or areas of expertise
Show your value through outcomes or patterns
Clarify your direction or the roles you are interested in
End with a practical, professional closing line
This structure works because it mirrors how recruiters think. First, they identify your category. Then they assess relevance. Then they look for proof. Then they decide whether your direction matches the opportunity.
Your opening should tell the reader what you do without making them dig.
Weak Example
“I am a passionate and hardworking professional who enjoys helping businesses succeed through collaboration and innovation.”
The problem is not that this sounds bad. The problem is that it says almost nothing.
Good Example
“I am a marketing coordinator focused on campaign execution, content planning, and performance reporting for consumer brands.”
This is stronger because it gives a clear professional category, work focus, and context.
A recruiter now understands the person faster. Marketing coordinator. Campaign execution. Content planning. Reporting. Consumer brands. That is useful.
After your opening, explain what you help with in practical terms. Avoid making this too emotional or too abstract.
For example:
“I help teams turn campaign ideas into organized timelines, clear deliverables, and measurable content plans.”
That line tells me how the candidate contributes. It also shows the kind of work environment they understand.
For a project manager, it might be:
“I help cross functional teams move complex projects from unclear requirements to structured execution, stakeholder alignment, and on time delivery.”
That tells me the candidate understands the messy middle of project work. Not just the polished version on a job description.
This is where you can include keywords naturally, but do not stuff the section with every skill you have ever touched.
Relevant details may include:
Industry experience
Technical tools
Functional strengths
Client groups
Business problems
Certifications
Languages
Leadership scope
Types of employers
For example, a supply chain candidate in Canada might mention vendor coordination, inventory planning, ERP systems, logistics, procurement support, and experience with retail or manufacturing environments.
A newcomer to Canada might mention international experience, transferable industry knowledge, and familiarity with Canadian workplace communication, if true. That can be useful, but it should be framed professionally, not apologetically.
This is where many people overdo it. They write like they are trying to win a personal branding contest.
You do not need to say you are exceptional. Show what you consistently help improve.
For example:
“I am often the person teams rely on to bring structure to unclear processes.”
“My work usually sits at the intersection of customer needs, operational detail, and practical execution.”
“I have a strong track record of improving reporting clarity so leaders can make faster decisions.”
These lines are stronger than generic self praise because they describe a practical pattern.
Your LinkedIn About section should usually be long enough to give context, but short enough to be scanned. For most job seekers, that means around 150 to 300 words.
Senior leaders, consultants, career changers, and specialists may need more space because their positioning requires more context. Entry level candidates usually need less.
The issue is not word count alone. The issue is density. A 180 word About section with strong clarity is better than a 600 word section full of motivational filler.
Here is what I usually recommend:
Entry level candidates: 100 to 180 words
Mid career professionals: 150 to 300 words
Senior professionals and leaders: 250 to 450 words
Consultants, founders, and portfolio professionals: 300 to 500 words if the positioning is complex
In the Canadian market, especially for competitive roles, people often apply with similar titles and similar responsibilities. Your About section should not be long just to look serious. It should be specific enough to separate your profile from people with the same job title.
Your LinkedIn About section should include the information that helps someone understand your professional value and relevance.
The most useful elements are:
Your current or target professional identity
Your area of specialization
The industries or environments you understand
The problems you help solve
Your strongest relevant skills
Tools, systems, or methods when relevant
Evidence of impact or contribution
Your career direction
A clear way to understand what opportunities fit you
For example, if you are a data analyst, do not just say you are skilled in data analysis. Explain whether you work with reporting, dashboards, SQL, Excel, Power BI, Tableau, stakeholder insights, sales data, operations data, financial data, or customer behaviour.
Specificity is what gives recruiters confidence.
A hiring manager does not want to decode “data driven professional.” They want to know what kind of data, what kind of decisions, what tools, what business context, and what level of independence.
That is the difference between looking qualified and looking relevant.
There are a few things I would avoid because they usually weaken the section.
Do not open with a life story unless it directly explains your professional direction. Your childhood passion for problem solving may be meaningful to you, but recruiters are usually trying to assess fit quickly.
Do not overuse buzzwords. Words like strategic, innovative, collaborative, passionate, driven, and dynamic are not automatically bad, but they need proof. Without proof, they create the exact opposite effect. They make the profile sound generic.
Do not write in the third person unless there is a strong reason. “Simar is a highly accomplished professional” sounds like a speaker bio, not a LinkedIn profile. For job seekers, first person usually feels more natural and credible.
Do not include desperate language. Avoid phrases like “actively seeking any opportunity” or “willing to do anything.” I understand the pressure behind those words, especially in a tough job market. But on LinkedIn, they can make your positioning look unfocused. It is better to say what roles, industries, or functions you are targeting.
Do not list every skill. A long skill dump looks like ATS panic. LinkedIn is searchable, yes, but humans still read it. Give people enough keyword context without turning your About section into a storage unit.
Examples help, but only when they show the difference between weak positioning and useful positioning.
Weak Example
“I am a passionate marketing professional with strong communication skills and experience helping brands grow. I enjoy working with creative teams and developing innovative campaigns that drive results.”
This sounds acceptable at first glance, but it is too broad. It does not tell me what kind of marketing, what level of responsibility, what channels, what results, or what business context.
Good Example
“I am a marketing coordinator focused on campaign execution, content planning, and performance reporting for consumer and retail brands. I enjoy the part of marketing where ideas become organized plans, deadlines, assets, and measurable outcomes.
My work has included coordinating social content, email campaigns, product promotions, reporting dashboards, and cross functional communication between creative, sales, and operations teams. I am strongest when I can bring structure to a busy campaign environment and help teams stay aligned on priorities, timelines, and performance.
I am interested in marketing roles where I can continue building experience in campaign management, digital content, and brand growth within the Canadian consumer market.”
This works because it explains the person’s role, scope, strengths, tools, and direction without sounding inflated.
Weak Example
“I am an experienced project manager with excellent leadership skills and a proven ability to deliver successful projects on time and on budget.”
This is the classic project management line. It is not wrong. It is just overused and unsupported.
Good Example
“I am a project manager focused on helping cross functional teams move from unclear requirements to structured execution. My work often involves aligning stakeholders, clarifying priorities, managing timelines, tracking risks, and keeping delivery realistic when business needs shift.
I have supported projects involving process improvement, technology implementation, vendor coordination, and internal operations. I am comfortable working with teams that need structure, communication, and practical follow through rather than more meetings for the sake of meetings.
I am especially interested in project management roles where I can support operational efficiency, stakeholder alignment, and delivery discipline in a Canadian business environment.”
This version gives me more hiring signal. I understand the candidate’s operating style, project context, and value.
Weak Example
“I am transitioning into human resources and looking for an opportunity to grow. I am passionate about people and excited to start a new chapter in my career.”
This is honest, but it positions the candidate mainly around what they want. Employers also need to understand what they bring.
Good Example
“I am transitioning into human resources after building experience in customer service, team coordination, and administrative support. My background has given me strong exposure to employee communication, scheduling, documentation, conflict resolution, and the practical side of supporting people in busy work environments.
I am now focused on building my HR career in recruitment coordination, HR administration, employee support, or people operations. I am especially interested in roles where strong organization, confidentiality, communication, and follow through matter.
I bring a service focused mindset, comfort working with different personalities, and a realistic understanding that good HR work is not just about liking people. It is about consistency, judgement, documentation, and trust.”
This is much stronger. It acknowledges the transition, but it does not make the candidate sound empty handed.
Start by writing the most practical version before you try to make it sound polished. Most candidates get stuck because they try to sound impressive too early.
Ask yourself:
What do I do professionally?
What kinds of problems do I help solve?
What industries, teams, or customers have I worked with?
What skills do I want to be known for?
What roles would make sense for me next?
What would a recruiter need to understand quickly?
Then write a plain version. Not a fancy version. Plain is usually closer to useful.
For example:
“I am a customer success specialist who helps B2B software clients adopt products, resolve issues, and get more value from their accounts.”
That sentence is already better than most “passionate professional” openings because it gives a recruiter something real to work with.
Once you have the plain version, add context:
“I have worked with onboarding, renewal support, product training, support tickets, account reviews, and internal coordination with sales and technical teams.”
Then add value:
“I am strongest in roles where I can translate customer frustration into clear action, keep communication calm, and help teams spot recurring issues before they become bigger retention problems.”
Now it sounds like a real person who understands the job.
That is the goal.
LinkedIn search matters. Recruiters often search by job title, skill, industry, location, tool, certification, and function. But stuffing keywords into your About section is not the answer.
The better approach is to use keywords in context.
Instead of writing:
“Project management, stakeholder management, Agile, Scrum, Jira, risk management, communication, leadership, process improvement, change management.”
Write:
“My project work has included stakeholder management, Agile delivery environments, Jira tracking, risk management, process improvement, and change communication across technical and business teams.”
That reads naturally and still includes searchable terms.
For the Canadian market, useful context may include:
Canadian workplace experience
Provincial markets when relevant
Remote, hybrid, or national teams
Canadian regulations or industry standards when relevant
Bilingual English and French communication when relevant
Experience with Canadian clients, employers, vendors, or customers
Do not force Canadian context into every sentence. But if your background is relevant to Canada, include it clearly. Search engines and recruiters both need context. Subtle clarity beats awkward repetition.
This is the test I wish more candidates used before publishing their About section.
After reading your About section, would a recruiter know what type of role to consider you for?
Not vaguely. Specifically.
If your About section says you are interested in “new opportunities where I can grow and make an impact,” I still do not know what to do with you.
If it says you are interested in “HR coordinator, recruitment coordinator, or people operations roles supporting employee documentation, scheduling, onboarding, and internal communication,” I know exactly where to place you.
That does not guarantee you will get contacted. Hiring is not that magical. But it removes confusion, and confusion is one of the quiet killers in job search.
Hiring teams often reject or ignore candidates not because they are unqualified, but because their positioning is unclear. The candidate may have useful experience, but the profile does not make the fit obvious.
Your LinkedIn About section should reduce interpretation. It should make the right conclusion easier.
The most common mistake is exaggerating seniority. If you are early in your career, you do not need to sound like a vice president. You need to sound clear, capable, and ready for the right level of responsibility.
Another mistake is using emotional language instead of professional evidence. “I have always loved helping people” is not enough for HR, customer success, healthcare administration, education, or social services. It may be true, but employers need to know how that shows up in work.
A third mistake is trying to appeal to every employer. When you try to sound suitable for everything, you usually sound specific to nothing. That is not flexibility. That is unclear positioning wearing a nice outfit.
Candidates also weaken their About section by avoiding their actual target. They think being broad creates more opportunity. Sometimes it does the opposite. Recruiters search for patterns. Hiring managers look for fit. If your profile avoids a clear direction, you make both jobs harder.
Finally, many candidates forget that LinkedIn is public. Do not write anything you would not want a current employer, future employer, recruiter, colleague, or client to read. Professional does not mean bland, but it does mean intentional.
Use this formula if you need a simple starting point.
“I am a [role or professional identity] focused on [main work area] for [industry, team, client type, or business context]. I help with [problems you solve or outcomes you support].
My background includes [relevant skills, tools, responsibilities, industries, or achievements]. I am strongest in situations where [working style, value, or differentiator].
I am interested in [target roles, environments, or next step], especially where I can contribute to [specific business value].”
Here is how that might look filled in:
“I am an operations coordinator focused on process support, scheduling, documentation, and team communication in fast moving service environments. I help teams keep daily work organized, reduce confusion, and follow through on operational details that affect customers and staff.
My background includes vendor coordination, reporting, inventory support, administrative systems, and communication across frontline and management teams. I am strongest in situations where priorities shift quickly and someone needs to bring structure without making everything more complicated.
I am interested in operations, administration, and coordination roles in Canada where I can support smoother workflows, clearer communication, and practical execution.”
This is not dramatic. That is why it works. It is clear, credible, and useful.
A personal tone can work well when it supports your professional positioning. It becomes a problem when it replaces substance.
You can include a personal element if:
It explains your career direction
It connects to your work values
It makes your profile more memorable without distracting from your skills
It helps clarify why you are suited to a certain field
For example, a newcomer to Canada might write:
“After building my career in banking operations internationally, I am now focused on applying that experience in the Canadian financial services market, especially in roles involving client documentation, compliance support, account administration, and process accuracy.”
That is personal, but still professionally useful.
A career changer might write:
“My move into data analytics came from years of working in operations roles where I kept noticing the same problem: teams had data, but not always the reporting structure to use it well.”
That gives story and logic. It helps the reader understand the transition.
What does not work is a long personal essay that never tells the recruiter what you can actually do. Personality is welcome. Vagueness is not.
A good LinkedIn About section should pass four checks.
First, the clarity check. Can someone understand your professional identity in the first few lines?
Second, the relevance check. Does the section include keywords, skills, and context that match the roles you want?
Third, the credibility check. Do your claims match your experience, or do they sound bigger than your actual background?
Fourth, the recruiter action check. Would a recruiter know what kind of opportunity to contact you about?
If the answer is no, revise it.
You do not need to sound perfect. You need to sound understandable. That is where many candidates overcomplicate things. They think stronger writing means more impressive language. Usually, it means cleaner thinking.
The best LinkedIn About sections do not scream for attention. They create confidence. They make the reader think, “I understand this person, I understand their value, and I understand where they could fit.”
That is exactly what your profile should do.
Your LinkedIn About section is not a decoration. It is a positioning tool. It helps recruiters, hiring managers, employers, clients, and professional contacts understand who you are, what you do, and where you fit.
In the Canadian job market, where competition can be strong and many candidates have similar titles, vague positioning is expensive. It costs attention. It costs recruiter interest. It can even make strong experience look weaker than it is.
Write your About section like someone who respects the reader’s time. Be clear about your work. Be specific about your value. Be honest about your level. Give enough context for the right opportunities to make sense.
And please, do not open with “passionate professional.”
We have all suffered enough.
Written by Simar Malhi, a recruiter and headhunter with international recruitment experience. I write about CVs, job applications, hiring decisions, and the reality behind recruitment processes. My goal is to help candidates understand more honestly how employers, recruiters, and hiring managers actually select candidates.
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin