Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeIf you're choosing between an AI resume builder and ChatGPT, the answer is simple: ChatGPT is powerful for content generation, but AI resume builders create a more complete, reliable resume workflow. ChatGPT excels at brainstorming, rewriting, and improving resume language. AI resume builders combine content generation with formatting, ATS optimization, structure, design systems, and workflow automation.
The real difference isn't AI capability. It's workflow architecture.
Most people don't struggle because they can't write resume bullets. They struggle because resume creation involves multiple hidden tasks: choosing structure, formatting correctly, optimizing for ATS systems, tailoring content for job descriptions, maintaining consistency, and creating something recruiters can actually scan quickly.
ChatGPT solves part of the process.
AI resume builders solve the entire process.
Understanding where each wins—and where each breaks down—can save hours of rework and dramatically improve resume quality.
ChatGPT is a general-purpose AI assistant. It generates text from prompts.
An AI resume builder is a specialized system built specifically around resume workflows.
That distinction matters more than many users realize.
With ChatGPT, users often manually manage:
Resume structure
Section ordering
Formatting decisions
ATS compatibility
Design consistency
Tailoring workflows
Content organization
Resume export formatting
Keyword optimization
An AI resume platform typically integrates these into one workflow.
Instead of asking:
"Write resume bullets for a marketing manager."
The workflow becomes:
Import experience
Select a template
Generate AI-assisted content
Optimize keywords
Tailor for a target role
Export ATS-friendly formatting
The difference is friction reduction.
Many users underestimate how much resume creation is actually workflow management rather than writing.
Most comparison articles say ChatGPT creates resumes.
Technically that's true.
Practically, the process often becomes messy.
Users typically start with enthusiasm:
"I'll just paste my experience and let AI write everything."
Then several problems appear.
ChatGPT produces content—not structured documents.
Users still need to:
Build layouts
adjust spacing
create hierarchy
maintain consistency
choose readable formats
Formatting errors become common.
Many users assume ChatGPT automatically understands ATS requirements.
It doesn't.
ATS systems don't grade resumes based on AI quality.
They parse:
structure
readability
consistency
section labels
formatting behavior
Even excellent content can fail because of layout decisions.
Tailoring resumes through ChatGPT often requires:
copying job descriptions
re-prompting repeatedly
editing manually
preserving formatting afterward
This becomes slow at scale.
Especially during active job searches.
The strongest AI resume tools are not simply AI text generators.
They're workflow platforms.
Instead of solving one task, they reduce cumulative friction.
A modern AI resume workflow often includes:
AI-generated bullet suggestions
keyword matching
ATS structure validation
resume scoring
formatting automation
design templates
content rewriting
version management
export systems
This changes user behavior significantly.
Users stop fighting document formatting and focus on decision-making.
That distinction becomes increasingly valuable when applying to many roles.
ATS compatibility gets discussed poorly online.
Most advice focuses on myths:
Avoid colors
Never use columns
Use Times New Roman
Never use design
Modern ATS systems are more sophisticated.
The issue is consistency—not aesthetic minimalism.
However, AI resume builders usually outperform ChatGPT because they create standardized formatting systems.
ChatGPT can produce strong wording but cannot guarantee:
parser-friendly hierarchy
export behavior
semantic structure
section consistency
AI builders frequently control:
heading systems
resume architecture
spacing logic
export formatting
That reduces unexpected ATS parsing issues.
This is where ChatGPT becomes surprisingly strong.
For content generation specifically:
ChatGPT often creates stronger first drafts than many AI resume builders.
Especially for:
rewriting weak bullet points
clarifying achievements
improving action verbs
creating accomplishment language
reducing repetition
For example:
Weak Example
Responsible for social media management and content posting.
This sounds passive and generic.
Good Example
Led multi-platform content strategy that increased engagement by 42% across LinkedIn, Instagram, and email campaigns.
The improvement isn't ATS optimization.
It's specificity.
ChatGPT often performs extremely well here because large language models excel at language transformation.
The issue is workflow integration afterward.
Job searching creates repeated tasks.
Users often underestimate this.
Applications require:
multiple resume versions
keyword adaptation
formatting updates
design consistency
export management
ChatGPT can create great content.
But speed declines when repeated manually.
A specialized workflow platform becomes valuable because:
content stays organized
resume versions remain centralized
templates stay consistent
edits scale faster
Time savings compound significantly over weeks of applications.
Many users think ChatGPT underperforms.
Often the real problem is prompting.
Poor prompts create generic resumes.
Example:
Weak Example
Write my resume.
The AI lacks context.
A stronger workflow prompt:
Good Example
Rewrite this sales experience for an Account Executive role. Prioritize quota attainment, pipeline generation, CRM ownership, and measurable outcomes.
Better prompts create better outputs.
But most users do not naturally think this way.
AI resume platforms reduce this burden because prompts are embedded into the workflow.
Users answer guided questions instead of becoming prompt engineers.
That lowers cognitive load.
ChatGPT works well if:
you already have a structured resume
formatting skills are strong
you understand ATS behavior
you enjoy editing content manually
you want maximum content flexibility
you only need writing assistance
Power users often fit this category.
ChatGPT can become a highly effective resume assistant.
But users still manage workflow complexity themselves.
AI resume builders usually make more sense if:
you're creating a resume from scratch
you apply frequently
you need ATS confidence
formatting slows you down
you want templates and structure
you dislike repeated manual editing
workflow speed matters
This is where specialized platforms outperform general AI tools.
Not because AI is smarter.
Because workflow design matters.
Many users no longer want to choose between:
ATS optimization
modern design
personalization
speed
AI assistance
Traditional resume builders often prioritize templates.
ChatGPT prioritizes language generation.
Platforms like NewCV increasingly sit between both models.
The workflow combines:
AI-assisted writing
recruiter-friendly formatting
ATS-compatible structure
visual presentation
personal branding
fast editing workflows
Instead of forcing users to manually connect multiple tools, the workflow becomes centralized.
That reduces friction while maintaining customization.
The biggest productivity gain isn't AI itself.
It's eliminating workflow fragmentation.
Most users evaluate AI resume tools incorrectly.
They compare output quality only.
But resume success depends on workflow outcomes.
Common mistakes:
judging AI after one prompt
assuming ATS optimization equals keyword stuffing
overvaluing design alone
ignoring editing time
forgetting scalability during active job searches
assuming content quality guarantees resume performance
The fastest workflow often wins.
Not the most sophisticated AI.
ChatGPT is an exceptional content engine.
AI resume builders are workflow systems.
If you need help writing stronger bullets, rewriting achievements, or improving language quality, ChatGPT often performs remarkably well.
If you need a repeatable system for building, tailoring, organizing, optimizing, and exporting resumes efficiently, AI resume builders usually create a better overall experience.
The question isn't:
"Which AI is smarter?"
The better question is:
"Which workflow removes more friction from how I actually apply for jobs?"
For most active job seekers, workflow efficiency becomes the deciding factor.
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin
