Choose from a wide range of CV templates and customize the design with a single click.


Use ATS-optimised CV and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our CV builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your CV faster.


Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact CV rules employers look for.
Create CV
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact CV rules employers look for.
An Architecture Student CV is not judged like a business or medical CV.
It is evaluated as a design capability signal layered with technical execution proof.
Recruiters in architecture firms, design studios, and urban planning consultancies do not primarily screen for grades. They screen for:
•Design thinking maturity
• Software fluency
• Concept-to-execution translation
• Technical drawing competence
• Studio rigor
• Portfolio alignment
This page explains how architecture student CVs are evaluated in modern hiring workflows, why most fail despite strong portfolios, and how high-performing candidates structure their CV to support – not compete with – their portfolio.
In architecture hiring, the portfolio carries visual proof.
The CV carries structural credibility.
If the portfolio shows design talent but the CV shows:
•Weak software exposure
• No project context
• No technical involvement
• Vague internship descriptions
The candidate is categorized as “creative but operationally risky.”
Your CV must confirm that your design ideas are technically executable.
Initial screening typically happens in this order:
During the CV scan, firms assess:
•Studio project complexity
• BIM or CAD proficiency
• Real-world project exposure
• Construction documentation familiarity
• Competition participation
• Collaboration experience
If these signals are missing, the portfolio may not even be opened.
Many students write:
•“Designed mixed-use cultural space.”
• “Created sustainable urban concept.”
But fail to mention:
•Structural system used
• BIM workflow involvement
• Material research
• Regulatory constraints addressed
• Scale and site complexity
Firms hire students who understand buildability.
Listing software like:
•AutoCAD
• Revit
• Rhino
• SketchUp
Without context is weak.
Recruiters want to know:
•Were you drafting construction documents?
• Modeling parametric systems?
• Producing full BIM coordination sets?
• Rendering final presentation visuals?
Software is not a checkbox. It is capability proof.
Even limited exposure matters.
If your CV lacks:
•Site visits
• Measured surveys
• Contractor coordination
• Building code research
You appear academically isolated.
Large architecture firms and multidisciplinary consultancies increasingly use ATS filters.
Common keyword triggers include:
•Revit
• BIM
• Construction documentation
• Urban design
• Sustainable design
• LEED
• Rhino Grasshopper
• Technical detailing
If these appear only in the portfolio and not in the CV, your ATS ranking decreases.
Your CV must contain searchable technical language.
Not an artistic statement.
Instead:
Architecture student with advanced BIM modeling experience and strong focus on sustainable mixed-use developments. Delivered fully coordinated Revit-based studio projects integrating structural grid systems and passive design strategies. Experienced in Rhino parametric modeling and construction detailing.
This signals design + technical integration.
Each project should include:
•Project type
• Scale
• Software used
• Technical focus
• Design constraint addressed
• Measurable outcome if applicable
Avoid romantic language. Use professional terminology.
Describe:
•Drawing package involvement
• Client presentation support
• Code compliance research
• Coordination meetings
• Site documentation
Impact matters more than duration.
London, UK
simar@email.com
Portfolio URL
LinkedIn URL
Final-year architecture student with advanced BIM modeling capability and strong focus on sustainable urban design. Delivered multi-scale studio projects integrating structural grid systems, passive environmental strategies, and detailed construction documentation. Experienced in Revit-based workflows, Rhino parametric modeling, and interdisciplinary design collaboration.
Mixed-Use Urban Redevelopment – 18,000 sqm Site
•Developed full Revit BIM model with coordinated floor plans, elevations, and sections
• Integrated passive ventilation and daylight optimization strategies
• Designed structural grid aligned with steel frame system
• Produced construction-level detail drawings at 1:20 scale
Cultural Pavilion – Parametric Timber Structure
•Modeled parametric roof geometry using Rhino and Grasshopper
• Conducted material feasibility research on laminated timber
• Delivered 3D-rendered presentation visuals using Lumion
Architectural Intern – Mid-Sized Urban Practice
•Assisted in preparation of planning submission drawings
• Updated Revit models for residential development project
• Participated in weekly coordination meetings with structural engineers
• Conducted local building regulation compliance research
•BIM & Drafting: Revit, AutoCAD
• Parametric Modeling: Rhino, Grasshopper
• Visualization: Lumion, Adobe Creative Suite
• Documentation: Construction detailing, Planning submissions
BA (Hons) Architecture
University College London
Expected Graduation: 2026
Why this works:
•Technical depth is visible
• Scale is mentioned
• Software usage is contextual
• Construction knowledge is demonstrated
• Portfolio is supported, not duplicated
To outperform peers:
•Include measurable scale (sqm, building height, occupancy)
• Mention sustainability certifications or frameworks
• Highlight interdisciplinary collaboration
• Clarify documentation levels produced
• Reference competition shortlisting if applicable
Firms hire architecture students who can transition into billable production work.
Recruiters subconsciously classify architecture student CVs into:
Tier 1
Design-forward and technically competent
Tier 2
Creative but limited construction exposure
Tier 3
Conceptual academic profile only
The difference is structural clarity and technical specificity.