Choose from a wide range of CV templates and customize the design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised CV and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our CV builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your CV faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact CV rules employers look for.
Create CVAn ATS friendly CV is not a marketing phrase.
It is a document engineered to survive automated parsing, keyword scoring, and recruiter compression review.
Before a human sees your CV, an Applicant Tracking System:
If your CV fails parsing or lacks contextual keyword reinforcement, it is deprioritized automatically.
This page explains how ATS-friendly CVs are evaluated in real hiring pipelines in 2025.
ATS platforms do not “understand” design. They tokenize text into structured fields:
Parsing errors commonly occur when CVs use:
A high-performing ATS-friendly CV typically follows this hierarchy:
Avoid unconventional section titles such as:
Standard headings increase extraction reliability.
An ATS friendly CV must be:
Modern ATS systems evaluate contextual keyword reinforcement — not isolated skill lists.
Weak:
Strong:
Managed $2.3M annual budget across 4 operational teams while leading 12 cross-functional projects that improved reporting efficiency by 29%.
The second example reinforces:
Keyword clusters embedded within measurable context rank higher.
ATS systems heavily weight exact or near-exact job title matches.
If applying for:
Your CV should reflect that terminology.
If your internal title differs, clarify:
Operations Lead (Project Manager Equivalent)
Title mismatch reduces semantic scoring.
Two CVs may contain identical keywords. The differentiator is scale.
Compare:
Weak:
Coordinated meetings and supported department leaders.
Strong:
Coordinated 110+ monthly meetings across 3 departments, supporting 5 senior leaders and reducing scheduling conflicts by 38%.
ATS scoring systems increasingly weigh measurable indicators such as:
Without quantification, seniority cannot be inferred.
Common structural failures include:
Before submitting, test by:
If it appears scrambled, parsing may fail.
A professional summary should:
Weak:
Dedicated professional with strong skills and a passion for success.
Strong:
Operations Coordinator with 7+ years managing cross-functional workflows, overseeing $1.8M in annual vendor contracts, and improving reporting efficiency by 32%.
Generic summaries carry minimal scoring weight.
Overuse of repeated keywords:
Modern ATS systems evaluate contextual coherence.
Clarity and logical reinforcement outperform repetition.
Current ATS configurations frequently prioritize:
CVs that omit systems and measurable impact appear outdated.
Before submitting, confirm:
If any of these are missing, ranking probability decreases.
Upload CV
Import from Linkedin
