Choose from a wide range of CV templates and customize the design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised CV and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our CV builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your CV faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact CV rules employers look for.
Create CV
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact CV rules employers look for.
Create CVHiring pipelines for Learning and Development (L&D) leadership roles operate very differently from generic management hiring. Recruiters evaluating a Learning and Development Manager CV are not looking for broad HR generalist experience or generic training facilitation. They are evaluating whether a candidate can design enterprise learning systems that align with organizational capability gaps, leadership development strategy, workforce transformation initiatives, and measurable learning ROI.
Modern ATS platforms used by Fortune 500 companies and scaling tech organizations—such as Workday, Greenhouse, SmartRecruiters, and Lever—parse CVs with a structured logic that rewards clear competency mapping, measurable learning outcomes, leadership development program ownership, and enterprise learning architecture experience.
An ATS friendly Learning and Development Manager CV template must therefore reflect the operational reality of how talent leaders evaluate learning strategy leaders. The CV must clearly communicate program ownership, measurable impact, and cross-functional learning initiatives rather than listing generic training responsibilities.
This guide explains the real screening logic recruiters apply when evaluating L&D leadership CVs and demonstrates how to structure a CV that survives both ATS parsing and senior recruiter review.
ATS systems do not understand storytelling. They map skills, leadership scope, and operational keywords against the job description.
For L&D management roles, ATS systems prioritize structured evidence of:
Enterprise learning strategy
Leadership development programs
Organizational capability building
Instructional design frameworks
Learning technology ecosystem management
Talent development analytics
Workforce transformation initiatives
A strong CV structure mirrors how recruiters evaluate capability layers in Learning and Development leadership roles.
The document should follow a capability hierarchy:
Strategic learning leadership
Learning program architecture
Organizational development impact
Learning technology ecosystem
Talent development metrics
Team leadership and scale
When CVs follow this logical structure, ATS parsing accuracy increases and recruiter comprehension improves.
The header must clearly signal seniority and specialization.
Recruiters frequently search ATS databases using title variations like:
Learning and Development Manager
L&D Manager
Talent Development Manager
Organizational Learning Manager
Corporate Training Manager
Your header must align with these search patterns.
Weak Example
Michael Johnson
Trainer
Good Example
Michael Johnson
Learning and Development Manager | Leadership Development | Workforce Capability Strategy
Location: Boston, MA
Learning ROI measurement
If these concepts are not explicitly written in the CV, the ATS cannot match the candidate to the role—even if the candidate actually performed those responsibilities.
Recruiters reviewing ATS-shortlisted L&D CVs typically ask three immediate questions:
Did the candidate design or own learning programs, or simply deliver training?
Did the candidate influence organizational capability or leadership pipelines?
Can the candidate demonstrate measurable learning impact?
An ATS friendly CV must answer these questions within seconds.
Email: michael.johnson@email.com
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/michaeljohnson
Why this works:
The header immediately aligns with ATS keyword queries and signals strategic learning leadership rather than operational training delivery.
Recruiters scanning an L&D CV are assessing scope of learning ownership, not training delivery experience.
The professional summary should establish:
Organizational learning strategy ownership
Leadership development program design
Learning transformation initiatives
Global workforce development scale
Weak Example
Experienced training manager with strong facilitation skills and a passion for helping employees grow.
Good Example
Learning and Development Manager with 12+ years leading enterprise workforce capability initiatives across technology and healthcare sectors. Proven track record designing leadership development frameworks, global onboarding academies, and digital learning ecosystems supporting 4,000+ employees. Expert in aligning learning strategy with organizational transformation, leadership succession planning, and measurable learning ROI through data-driven development programs.
Why this works:
The summary positions the candidate as a strategic capability builder rather than a trainer.
Learning and Development leadership roles require highly specific capability keywords. Missing these reduces ATS match scores.
Critical competency categories include:
Learning strategy development
Leadership development frameworks
Talent development lifecycle design
Instructional design models (ADDIE, SAM)
Learning management systems (LMS)
Learning experience platforms (LXP)
Organizational capability development
Workforce reskilling programs
Leadership pipeline development
Learning analytics and impact measurement
Digital learning transformation
Coaching and mentoring frameworks
These competencies must be listed in a structured section so ATS systems can parse them correctly.
Recruiters do not evaluate L&D roles based on the number of workshops delivered. They evaluate organizational capability outcomes.
The experience section should demonstrate:
Learning strategy ownership
Enterprise program design
Learning program adoption rates
Business performance improvements linked to learning
Weak Example
Delivered training sessions for new hires and facilitated workshops for employees.
Good Example
Designed enterprise onboarding academy supporting 1,200 annual hires across sales, engineering, and customer success teams
Implemented leadership development framework increasing internal leadership promotion rate by 32%
Led organization-wide reskilling initiative preparing workforce for cloud platform migration
Introduced digital learning platform reducing instructor-led training dependency by 45%
Why this works:
The statements demonstrate learning strategy impact rather than training activity.
To rank strongly in ATS searches, the CV should include terminology used by talent development leaders.
Common recruiter search terms include:
Leadership development programs
Talent development strategy
Organizational capability development
Corporate learning strategy
Workforce transformation learning
Digital learning ecosystem
Learning analytics and reporting
Learning experience design
Executive leadership development
Learning culture development
Embedding these concepts naturally in experience descriptions improves ATS ranking.
Modern L&D leadership roles require ownership of learning technology infrastructure.
Recruiters expect familiarity with systems such as:
Learning Management Systems (LMS)
Learning Experience Platforms (LXP)
Microlearning platforms
Skills assessment platforms
Performance enablement tools
Digital course authoring tools
A strong CV demonstrates strategic implementation rather than just platform usage.
Example impact statements:
Led LMS migration supporting 3,500 employees across global offices
Implemented AI-driven skills platform mapping workforce capability gaps
Integrated learning analytics dashboards for executive reporting
L&D managers increasingly operate at the intersection of learning and organizational transformation.
Strong CVs demonstrate impact in areas such as:
Leadership pipeline development
Cultural transformation programs
Change management capability development
Workforce reskilling during digital transformation
Succession planning initiatives
Recruiters view these signals as indicators of strategic learning leadership.
Learning and Development leaders who quantify program impact dramatically increase their interview conversion rate.
Key measurable outcomes include:
Learning program adoption rates
Leadership promotion rates
Employee capability improvement metrics
Employee engagement scores related to development
Reduction in time-to-productivity for new hires
Weak Example
Improved employee development programs.
Good Example
Reduced new hire time-to-productivity by 28% through redesigned onboarding academy
Increased leadership bench strength by launching internal leadership development pathway
Achieved 91% participation rate in enterprise digital learning platform
Why this works:
Quantified outcomes demonstrate business value of learning initiatives.
Below is a fully structured executive-level ATS optimized CV example.
James Carter
Learning and Development Manager
New York, NY
james.carter@email.com
linkedin.com/in/jamescarter
PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY
Strategic Learning and Development Manager with 14 years of experience designing enterprise talent development ecosystems within Fortune 500 organizations. Proven ability to architect leadership development frameworks, workforce reskilling initiatives, and global learning programs supporting 5,000+ employees. Recognized for aligning learning strategy with organizational transformation, leadership succession planning, and measurable capability growth across technology, finance, and consulting environments.
CORE COMPETENCIES
Enterprise Learning Strategy
Leadership Development Programs
Workforce Capability Development
Instructional Design Frameworks (ADDIE, SAM)
Learning Experience Platforms (LXP)
Learning Management Systems (LMS)
Organizational Development
Executive Coaching Programs
Talent Development Analytics
Digital Learning Transformation
Global Learning Program Deployment
Learning ROI Measurement
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Senior Learning and Development Manager
GlobalTech Solutions – New York, NY
2019 – Present
Designed enterprise leadership development framework supporting 2,300 managers across global operations
Implemented digital learning ecosystem integrating LMS, microlearning platforms, and skills analytics tools
Led workforce reskilling initiative preparing engineering teams for cloud infrastructure migration
Reduced new hire onboarding time by 35% through structured capability development pathways
Partnered with executive leadership to design succession planning development programs
Learning and Development Manager
StratEdge Consulting – Boston, MA
2014 – 2019
Created corporate learning academy supporting consultants across strategy, operations, and digital transformation practices
Built leadership development curriculum used to prepare senior consultants for partner roles
Introduced learning analytics dashboards measuring capability improvement and leadership readiness
Increased internal promotion rate by 40% through structured development pathways
Training and Development Lead
BrightPath Financial – Chicago, IL
2010 – 2014
Designed enterprise onboarding academy for financial advisory workforce
Implemented digital learning platform reducing classroom training dependency
Developed mentorship and coaching programs supporting leadership development pipeline
EDUCATION
Master of Science – Organizational Development
Columbia University
Bachelor of Business Administration
University of Illinois
CERTIFICATIONS
Certified Professional in Talent Development (CPTD)
Instructional Design Certification
Executive Coaching Certification
Experienced recruiters reviewing L&D leadership candidates typically filter applicants based on several capability signals.
Key evaluation signals include:
Ownership of enterprise learning programs
Leadership development program design
Workforce transformation initiatives
Learning technology ecosystem leadership
Strategic partnership with executive leadership
Candidates lacking these signals are usually categorized as training coordinators rather than strategic L&D leaders.
Many L&D professionals unintentionally position themselves as trainers rather than learning strategists.
Common CV failure patterns include:
Listing workshop delivery instead of learning program architecture
Missing leadership development experience
Lack of measurable learning impact
Absence of learning technology ecosystem management
Overemphasis on facilitation rather than capability building
Recruiters interpret these signals as tactical training roles rather than strategic L&D leadership.
Senior recruiters often apply an informal evaluation model when reviewing Learning and Development leadership candidates.
A simplified evaluation framework includes:
Learning Architecture
Capability Impact
Leadership Development
Organizational Influence
Learning Technology Strategy
Candidates who demonstrate strength across these dimensions are significantly more likely to progress through hiring pipelines.
The expectations for L&D leadership roles are evolving rapidly.
Recruiters increasingly prioritize:
Skills-based workforce development
AI-driven learning personalization
Data-driven learning analytics
Continuous workforce reskilling strategies
Leadership capability acceleration programs
Candidates who reflect these emerging trends in their CV positioning will remain competitive in modern talent markets.
Upload CV
Import from Linkedin
