Choose from a wide range of CV templates and customize the design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised CV and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our CV builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your CV faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact CV rules employers look for.
Create CV
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact CV rules employers look for.
UX Researcher hiring pipelines operate differently from traditional design roles. While portfolios matter, the initial screening stage in most US companies still relies heavily on Applicant Tracking Systems. The ATS must first identify research expertise, methodologies, and product impact signals before a recruiter or design lead reviews the application.
For UX Researcher roles, ATS systems are typically configured to detect evidence of structured research processes, cross-functional product influence, and measurable product outcomes. A resume that simply lists “user research” or “usability testing” without demonstrating research strategy or decision influence often ranks poorly in automated screening.
An ATS friendly UX Researcher CV template must therefore prioritize structured research signals, clearly labeled methodologies, and product decision impact. The goal is to make both the system and the recruiter quickly understand that the candidate drives research-informed product decisions rather than conducting isolated usability sessions.
This guide explains how UX Researcher resumes are evaluated inside ATS pipelines, what recruiters actually scan for during screening, and how to structure a CV template that surfaces real research authority.
ATS platforms categorize UX roles based on research terminology and product collaboration indicators. Systems such as Greenhouse, Lever, Workday, and SmartRecruiters extract structured information from resumes before ranking candidates.
For UX Researcher roles, the ATS typically detects the following categories:
Research methodologies
Study design indicators
Product discovery involvement
Quantitative and qualitative research signals
Collaboration with design and product teams
Research impact on product decisions
If the CV fails to show these signals clearly, the system may incorrectly classify the candidate as a general UX designer or analyst.
Formatting problems can also prevent the ATS from detecting relevant research experience. Over-designed resumes with columns or icons frequently hide keywords from parsing engines.
Once the ATS ranks candidates, recruiters typically scan the top results for specific research signals. The screening process is fast and pattern-based.
Recruiters usually look for three indicators immediately:
Does the candidate lead research studies rather than assist with them?
Do they influence product decisions through research findings?
Do they operate across the full product lifecycle?
If these signals are missing within the first third of the resume, the candidate is often deprioritized even if they possess strong research skills.
UX Researcher CV templates must therefore surface research ownership early in the document.
The most ATS-compatible structure aligns with how hiring systems categorize UX research expertise.
A high-performing UX Researcher CV template typically includes:
Professional Summary
UX Research Expertise
Research Methods and Tools
Professional Experience
Product Research Impact Highlights
Education
Certifications or Research Training
These sections should use clear naming conventions. Creative labels such as “Curiosity Lab” or “Research Journey” reduce ATS parsing accuracy.
Consistency is essential because ATS systems rely on predictable headings to classify information correctly.
Recruiters distinguish between UX designers who occasionally run research sessions and dedicated UX Researchers who structure product insights.
High-impact UX Researcher resumes consistently include signals such as:
End-to-end research study ownership
Mixed-method research strategies
Research roadmapping and prioritization
Research synthesis and insight frameworks
Stakeholder decision influence
These signals demonstrate strategic research capability rather than tactical usability testing.
ATS systems often detect UX research specialization through specific research method keywords. However, listing methods alone is insufficient. Contextual placement within project descriptions improves ranking.
Strong research method signals include:
Moderated usability testing
Remote user testing
Diary studies
Contextual inquiry
Ethnographic research
Survey-based quantitative research
A/B testing interpretation
Card sorting and tree testing
When these methods appear within product-focused achievements, ATS ranking improves significantly.
Recruiters prioritize UX Researchers who demonstrate how research insights influence product decisions. Many resumes fail because they describe research tasks rather than product outcomes.
Research work should always be connected to product improvement.
Weak Example
“Conducted usability testing sessions for mobile app.”
Good Example
“Led usability testing study identifying navigation friction in onboarding flow, leading to redesign that increased activation rate by 22 percent.”
The second statement signals research influence on measurable product metrics.
UX Researchers rarely operate independently. Strong CVs demonstrate collaboration with product managers, designers, engineers, and executives.
Important collaboration signals include:
Research alignment with product roadmap
Stakeholder workshops for research synthesis
Research presentations to leadership teams
Collaboration with design systems teams
Integration of research findings into product strategy
These signals indicate that the candidate operates within real product environments rather than isolated research projects.
Modern product organizations increasingly expect UX Researchers to contribute to research operations and scalable research practices.
Valuable signals include:
Research repository management
Participant recruitment systems
Research playbook development
Research democratization initiatives
Standardized usability testing frameworks
Candidates who include these elements appear more senior and operationally mature.
ATS compatibility requires a structured document layout that allows automated parsing engines to extract keywords and experience accurately.
Recommended formatting approach:
Single column resume layout
Standard professional fonts such as Arial or Calibri
Clear section headings
Avoid icons and graphic elements
Avoid text embedded in images
Use bullet lists for methods and tools
This structure ensures the ATS can correctly identify UX research terminology.
Keyword placement strongly affects ATS scoring. Contextual usage performs significantly better than isolated keyword lists.
For example:
Weak Example
“Skills: usability testing, interviews, surveys.”
Good Example
“Conducted in-depth user interviews and usability testing sessions informing redesign of core product onboarding experience.”
Context provides evidence of real research application.
Candidate Name: Emily Anderson
Target Role: Senior UX Researcher
Location: Seattle, Washington
PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY
UX Researcher with 7+ years leading qualitative and quantitative research across SaaS and mobile product environments. Experienced in designing mixed-method research studies that inform product strategy, improve user experience, and guide data-driven product decisions.
UX RESEARCH EXPERTISE
End-to-End Research Study Design
Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods
Usability Testing and User Interviews
Product Discovery Research
Research Synthesis and Insight Generation
Research Strategy and Roadmapping
Stakeholder Research Communication
Research Operations Development
RESEARCH METHODS AND TOOLS
Moderated Usability Testing
Remote User Testing
Diary Studies
Contextual Inquiry
Survey Research
Card Sorting
Tree Testing
A/B Testing Analysis
User Interviews
Research Platforms: UserTesting, Lookback, Maze, Optimal Workshop
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Senior UX Researcher
NorthPoint Software – Seattle, Washington
2021 – Present
Led cross-functional research initiatives supporting redesign of enterprise SaaS analytics platform used by 50,000+ users.
Designed mixed-method research strategy combining usability testing, interviews, and survey research to identify friction in reporting workflows.
Presented research insights to executive product leadership influencing roadmap priorities for dashboard redesign.
Established research repository enabling design and product teams to access past research insights and findings.
Facilitated research synthesis workshops translating findings into actionable product improvements.
UX Researcher
Brightline Digital Products – San Francisco, California
2018 – 2021
Conducted usability studies evaluating mobile onboarding experience for consumer finance application.
Designed diary study capturing long-term user behavior related to budgeting features.
Collaborated with product managers and designers to translate research insights into product design decisions.
Implemented standardized research reporting templates improving stakeholder understanding of research results.
Junior UX Researcher
Visionary Labs – Portland, Oregon
2016 – 2018
Supported qualitative user research studies for e-commerce platform redesign.
Conducted participant recruitment and moderated usability sessions.
Synthesized research findings into user journey maps and insight reports.
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science in Psychology
University of Washington
CERTIFICATIONS
Nielsen Norman Group UX Research Certification
Human-Centered Design Certificate – IDEO U
Many UX Researcher candidates possess strong portfolios but weak resumes that fail ATS filtering.
Frequent mistakes include:
Listing research methods without product context
Describing research tasks rather than outcomes
Overly creative resume design templates
Missing collaboration with product and design teams
No mention of research impact on product metrics
These issues cause ATS systems to categorize the candidate incorrectly or lower their ranking.
Senior UX Researchers distinguish themselves through strategic research influence rather than operational tasks.
Important differentiators include:
Research strategy ownership
Research prioritization frameworks
Integration of research insights into product roadmaps
Research operations leadership
Cross-team research enablement
Candidates who highlight these signals typically appear in the top ATS-ranked applicant groups.
The UX research field is evolving rapidly as product organizations scale research capabilities. Hiring managers increasingly look for researchers capable of influencing product strategy and supporting data-informed decision making.
Emerging signals gaining importance include:
AI-assisted research synthesis
Continuous discovery research models
Research democratization frameworks
Behavioral analytics integration
Product experimentation research
UX Researchers who incorporate these modern research practices into their CV structure align more closely with evolving ATS ranking patterns.
Upload CV
Import from Linkedin
