Choose from a wide range of CV templates and customize the design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised CV and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our CV builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your CV faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact CV rules employers look for.
Create CV
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact CV rules employers look for.
Create CVThe hiring pipeline for Vice President of Engineering roles operates very differently from standard engineering or even director-level recruitment. In most organizations, the ATS does not simply filter for programming languages or technical leadership. Instead, it identifies signals of organizational scale ownership, engineering strategy authority, and platform delivery accountability.
A VP of Engineering CV must therefore communicate technical organization leadership, not individual engineering competence. The structure, keyword ecosystem, and narrative logic inside the CV determine whether the ATS classifies the candidate as:
Engineering executive
Senior engineering director
Technical architect
Senior software engineer
Most candidates applying for VP of Engineering roles are incorrectly classified as senior engineers or engineering managers, which immediately removes them from executive search pipelines.
This guide explains the structure of an ATS friendly VP of Engineering CV template based on how executive recruiters, ATS ranking algorithms, and CTO hiring committees evaluate candidates.
The focus is not formatting. The focus is how leadership signals are interpreted inside modern hiring systems.
Executive engineering roles are filtered by three primary classification layers within ATS systems.
The first evaluation stage determines whether the candidate has managed large engineering organizations, not small teams.
High-ranking CV signals include:
Engineering organization leadership
Global engineering teams
Multi-team architecture delivery
Engineering department scaling
Distributed engineering organizations
Engineering leadership reporting structure
Weak signals include:
Executive engineering CVs are evaluated differently from technical resumes. The document structure must reflect organizational leadership before technical depth.
Recommended section hierarchy:
Executive Summary
Engineering Leadership Expertise
Organizational Leadership Experience
Platform & Infrastructure Impact
Engineering Strategy & Transformation Achievements
Technology Ecosystem Leadership
Education & Executive Certifications
This hierarchy ensures the ATS identifies the candidate as , rather than as a technologist.
The summary section must immediately communicate organizational leadership scope and platform accountability.
Weak summaries often describe technical expertise rather than leadership.
Weak Example
"Senior engineering leader with experience in software development, cloud platforms, and agile teams."
This summary communicates technical leadership but not executive authority.
Good Example
"Vice President of Engineering with 18+ years of experience leading large-scale software organizations and delivering global technology platforms serving millions of users. Proven track record scaling engineering organizations from startup environments to enterprise-scale operations while driving platform reliability, cloud infrastructure modernization, and high-performance engineering culture."
Why this works
The ATS detects signals including:
Vice President of Engineering
large-scale software organizations
platform delivery
Led a team of developers
Managed engineering projects
Coordinated software development
These phrases cause the ATS to categorize the candidate as engineering manager rather than VP-level leadership.
VP of Engineering roles are responsible for platform delivery outcomes, not code development.
The ATS looks for signals such as:
Platform scalability architecture
Enterprise product delivery
Engineering infrastructure modernization
DevOps transformation
High availability systems
Engineering operational excellence
If the CV focuses heavily on programming tools, the candidate is classified as technical contributor rather than engineering executive.
Another strong signal in executive screening is engineering team growth and scaling impact.
Key ATS-recognized signals include:
Scaled engineering organization from X to Y engineers
Built global engineering teams
Established engineering leadership layers
Created engineering operational frameworks
Executive search recruiters rely heavily on these signals when scanning VP-level CVs.
engineering organization scaling
cloud infrastructure modernization
These phrases clearly indicate executive engineering leadership.
This section communicates leadership capabilities that ATS systems associate with VP-level roles.
Strong leadership domains include:
Engineering Organization Scaling
Platform Architecture Leadership
Engineering Operational Excellence
Global Engineering Team Management
DevOps Transformation Strategy
Software Delivery Infrastructure
Engineering Culture Development
Technical Leadership Development
Product Engineering Alignment
Platform Reliability Engineering
Executive recruiters often use Boolean searches combining multiple leadership signals.
Example search:
"VP Engineering" AND "engineering organization scaling" AND "platform delivery"
Without these signals, the candidate may never appear in recruiter search results.
The experience section must focus on organizational leadership outcomes rather than engineering activity.
Each role should communicate:
organization size
platform scope
leadership responsibility
measurable impact
Each role should describe:
Engineering organization size
Platform delivery responsibility
Infrastructure or product impact
Team scaling outcomes
Weak Example
"Led engineering teams building backend services and cloud applications."
This describes engineering activity, not organizational leadership.
Good Example
"Led a 120-person global engineering organization responsible for the architecture, delivery, and scalability of a SaaS platform serving 8 million active users across North America and Europe."
Why this works
This statement communicates:
engineering organization scale
platform ownership
product impact
international operations
These signals align with VP-level responsibilities.
VP-level candidates must demonstrate responsibility for technology transformation initiatives, not simply engineering management.
Examples of transformation signals include:
Platform architecture modernization
Cloud infrastructure migration
DevOps operating model redesign
Monolith-to-microservices transformation
Engineering productivity frameworks
Strong descriptions communicate organizational and infrastructure impact simultaneously.
Example
"Led engineering platform transformation transitioning legacy monolithic architecture into microservices-based cloud infrastructure supporting 4x traffic growth and 99.99% platform availability."
This signals strategic engineering impact, not development work.
Although executive roles are leadership-focused, technical credibility remains essential.
Technologies should be grouped by platform architecture domain, not individual programming languages.
Example categories include:
AWS
Microsoft Azure
Google Cloud Platform
Microservices architecture
Distributed systems
Event-driven architecture
API-first platforms
Kubernetes
Docker
CI/CD pipelines
Observability platforms
Data lake infrastructure
Real-time analytics pipelines
Distributed databases
This positioning communicates technology oversight rather than technical implementation.
Michael Harrison
Vice President of Engineering
San Francisco, California, USA
michael.harrison@email.com
(415) 555-0193
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/michaelharrison
PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY
Vice President of Engineering with 20 years of experience leading high-performing engineering organizations delivering global software platforms at enterprise scale. Expert in engineering organization scaling, platform architecture modernization, and cloud infrastructure transformation. Proven ability to build distributed engineering teams, establish operational excellence frameworks, and deliver highly scalable SaaS platforms supporting millions of global users.
ENGINEERING LEADERSHIP EXPERTISE
Engineering Organization Scaling
Platform Architecture Leadership
Engineering Operational Excellence
Global Engineering Team Development
Cloud Infrastructure Strategy
DevOps Transformation
Software Delivery Infrastructure
Engineering Culture & Leadership Development
High Availability Platform Architecture
Product Engineering Alignment
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Vice President of Engineering
NimbusCloud Technologies
San Francisco, California
2019 – Present
Leading global engineering organization responsible for platform architecture, product delivery, and infrastructure reliability across a SaaS platform serving enterprise customers worldwide.
Built and scaled a distributed engineering organization from 45 to 210 engineers across North America and Europe.
Led platform modernization initiative transitioning legacy infrastructure to cloud-native architecture on AWS and Kubernetes.
Established engineering operational excellence framework improving deployment frequency by 320% and reducing production incidents by 45%.
Partnered with product leadership to align engineering roadmap with strategic product expansion across global enterprise markets.
Senior Director of Engineering
Atlas Software Group
Seattle, Washington
2015 – 2019
Oversaw multi-team engineering organization responsible for enterprise platform delivery supporting global retail technology solutions.
Led engineering teams delivering high-scale commerce platform supporting over $5B annual transaction volume.
Directed architecture transformation migrating legacy applications to microservices-based distributed systems.
Established DevOps operating model improving platform reliability and reducing release cycle times by 60%.
Director of Platform Engineering
BrightScale Technologies
San Jose, California
2011 – 2015
Responsible for platform engineering strategy and infrastructure development for enterprise SaaS applications.
Designed distributed platform architecture enabling rapid product expansion across international markets.
Led infrastructure scaling initiatives supporting 10x user growth within three years.
ENGINEERING TRANSFORMATION HIGHLIGHTS
Scaled engineering organization from 45 to 210 engineers supporting global platform expansion.
Led cloud infrastructure migration supporting SaaS platform serving 8 million users.
Established engineering operational excellence program improving deployment velocity and system reliability.
Delivered distributed platform architecture supporting enterprise product expansion across global markets.
TECHNOLOGY ECOSYSTEM LEADERSHIP
Cloud Infrastructure
AWS
Microsoft Azure
Google Cloud Platform
Platform Architecture
Microservices architecture
Distributed systems
Event-driven architecture
API platform design
Engineering Infrastructure
Kubernetes
Docker
CI/CD pipelines
Observability platforms
Data Platforms
Distributed databases
Real-time analytics infrastructure
Data lake architecture
EDUCATION
Master of Science – Computer Science
Stanford University
Bachelor of Science – Software Engineering
University of California, Berkeley
EXECUTIVE CERTIFICATIONS
Certified Kubernetes Administrator
AWS Certified Solutions Architect – Professional
MIT Executive Leadership Program
Even highly experienced engineering leaders often fail ATS screening because their CVs resemble senior engineering profiles rather than executive leadership profiles.
Listing programming languages prominently signals technical contribution rather than organizational leadership.
VP-level CVs should instead emphasize:
engineering architecture oversight
platform delivery
engineering organization growth
Candidates frequently omit engineering team size.
Without this information, recruiters cannot assess leadership scope.
Strong statements include:
led engineering organization of 150+ engineers
managed distributed engineering teams across three continents
Engineering executives must show platform-level responsibility.
Weak profiles describe:
software features
engineering tasks
development work
Strong profiles emphasize:
platform reliability
infrastructure modernization
global product architecture
Executive engineering CVs benefit from semantic clusters of leadership terms.
Important keyword ecosystems include:
engineering organization leadership
global engineering teams
engineering department scaling
engineering leadership development
platform architecture
distributed systems architecture
cloud infrastructure strategy
high availability platform design
engineering productivity frameworks
DevOps transformation
CI/CD platform delivery
engineering operational efficiency
Search engines and ATS ranking algorithms reward semantic leadership ecosystems rather than isolated keywords.
When executive recruiters review VP-level candidates, they evaluate three strategic signals.
Evidence includes:
rapid team growth
leadership development
multi-team management
Evidence includes:
high-scale infrastructure
distributed systems
enterprise platform delivery
Evidence includes:
product engineering alignment
platform strategy ownership
cross-functional leadership
An ATS friendly VP of Engineering CV template must ensure these signals are immediately visible.
Upload CV
Import from Linkedin
