Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeOverleaf became popular because LaTeX resumes can look exceptionally clean. But many users eventually realize they are spending more time managing formatting and templates than improving the actual quality of their applications. That creates a hidden productivity problem most comparison articles ignore.
This guide explains where Overleaf works, where it creates friction, and what a better modern resume workflow looks like.
Most users don't discover Overleaf because they searched for resume software.
They arrive through:
•University communities
• Computer science programs
• Engineering departments
• GitHub resume templates
• Reddit recommendations
• Academic networks
The appeal is understandable.
Overleaf provides:
•Professional typography
• Fine-grained layout control
• Template flexibility
• Collaboration features
• Consistent formatting
• Technical credibility among STEM audiences
For engineering and research applicants, LaTeX often feels like the “serious” option.
But that assumption creates an important distinction:
A document that looks impressive is not automatically optimized for hiring workflows.
Modern hiring systems and recruiter behavior create entirely different requirements.
Most users think:
"I need software that creates a beautiful resume."
The real workflow is closer to:
"I need software that helps me create, customize, optimize, update, and repeatedly adapt resumes efficiently."
That difference matters.
Creating one PDF is easy.
Managing 30 tailored applications is where workflows break.
Competing pages often compare design quality and ignore actual usage behavior.
Real resume workflows include:
•Editing multiple versions
• Tailoring keywords
• Updating achievements
• Adjusting role positioning
• Managing industry variations
• Tracking application changes
• Maintaining ATS readability
• Improving speed across repeated applications
Overleaf wasn't designed around these workflows.
Overleaf users often underestimate the cost of small edits.
Changing one section may require:
•Template adjustments
• Spacing fixes
• Package conflicts
• Formatting debugging
• Recompiling documents
For technical users this may seem minor.
For active job seekers, repeated friction compounds quickly.
If you apply to:
•20 jobs
• 50 jobs
• Multiple industries
• Internship cycles
Even small editing delays become productivity losses.
The issue isn't capability.
It's workflow efficiency.
Modern applications increasingly reward targeted resumes.
Hiring systems and recruiters often prioritize:
•Relevant skills alignment
• role-specific keywords
• measurable achievements
• contextual experience framing
Overleaf templates frequently create friction because content and formatting become tightly coupled.
Users spend time protecting layout instead of improving messaging.
A stronger workflow separates:
Content optimization from design maintenance.
That distinction dramatically reduces editing time.
Many articles spread oversimplified ATS advice:
"Overleaf resumes fail ATS."
That isn't universally true.
Many LaTeX resumes parse perfectly.
But issues happen when templates introduce:
•Complex columns
• Custom symbols
• unusual spacing structures
• text boxes
• icon-heavy formatting
• package-generated formatting quirks
The problem isn't LaTeX itself.
The problem is unpredictable template architecture.
ATS systems today are significantly better than older systems, but parsing reliability still depends heavily on structure consistency.
What works:
•Clear section hierarchy
• standard headings
• logical reading order
• machine-readable PDFs
• simple formatting systems
What often fails:
•decorative complexity
• visually clever layouts
• non-linear content structures
Users frequently don't know whether their resume parses correctly until after applications disappear into a hiring pipeline.
The shift usually happens for one reason:
The resume becomes part of a larger workflow.
Users eventually want:
•Faster customization
• AI assistance
• version management
• design flexibility
• portfolio integration
• personal branding
• ATS confidence
• reduced editing friction
Overleaf remains excellent for document creation.
But resume creation evolves into workflow management.
That is where many users start switching.
Not every replacement solves the same problem.
Choosing a better tool depends on what you're optimizing for.
Look for systems that prioritize:
•drag-and-drop editing
• reusable content blocks
• fast duplication
• quick customization
The hidden cost of resume creation isn't writing.
It's repeated editing.
Speed compounds across applications.
Choose builders that emphasize:
•structured layouts
• machine-readable formatting
• tested templates
• predictable parsing behavior
Avoid systems built primarily around visual design.
Many attractive templates create invisible compatibility problems.
Modern resume workflows increasingly include:
•content suggestions
• rewriting support
• bullet optimization
• role tailoring
• achievement enhancement
• skill prioritization
AI reduces repetitive editing.
But effectiveness depends on implementation.
Poor AI simply generates generic resume content.
Useful AI improves workflow speed without destroying authenticity.
Many users think they must choose:
Either:
Beautiful design
or
ATS compatibility
That tradeoff is increasingly outdated.
Platforms like NewCV attempt to remove this decision entirely by combining:
•recruiter-friendly structure
• modern layouts
• AI-assisted optimization
• personal branding features
• ATS-aware formatting
• faster editing workflows
The practical advantage isn't aesthetics.
It's reducing workflow tradeoffs.
Users increasingly want systems that improve speed and readability simultaneously.
•Find template
• Learn structure
• Edit LaTeX
• Fix formatting issues
• Export PDF
• Repeat process for variants
•Choose structure
• Add content
• optimize with AI assistance
• duplicate versions
• export instantly
The gap becomes larger as application volume increases.
One resume is manageable.
Fifty resumes changes the equation.
Most comparison articles focus on features.
Users actually complain about friction.
Common complaints include:
•tiny formatting changes breaking layouts
• hours spent editing spacing
• difficult template customization
• resume versions becoming hard to manage
• lack of personalization workflows
• content updates becoming tedious
• repeated export cycles
These issues aren't obvious during initial setup.
They emerge over repeated usage.
That distinction matters because resume tools are long-term workflow systems, not one-time software decisions.
A better system isn't simply easier.
It improves outcomes.
The strongest resume workflows optimize:
Reduced editing overhead.
Easy role-specific customization.
Predictable ATS readability.
Professional without creating complexity.
Fast updates and version control.
Support for modern professional identity.
Less time managing software.
More time improving applications.
Most users eventually realize they don't need maximum formatting control.
They need maximum application efficiency.
Despite its limitations, Overleaf remains excellent for:
•academic CVs
• research resumes
• technical portfolios
• publication-heavy documents
• users deeply comfortable with LaTeX
• engineering applicants maintaining highly structured documents
If you enjoy LaTeX workflows, there may be little reason to switch.
But if your goal is faster job applications and easier optimization, alternatives often create better outcomes.
The better question is:
Good for what?
Overleaf excels at document precision.
Modern resume platforms increasingly optimize for:
•hiring workflows
• recruiter behavior
• speed
• adaptability
• repeated customization
• workflow efficiency
For many users, that becomes more valuable than formatting control.
The strongest resume system is not the one with the most customization.
It's the one that helps you create better applications with less friction.
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin
