Choose from a wide range of CV templates and customize the design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised CV and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our CV builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your CV faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact CV rules employers look for.
Create CVA CV review is not a proofreading exercise.
In real hiring pipelines, it is a structural and strategic audit that determines whether a CV will:
•Survive ATS parsing
• Meet qualification thresholds
• Rank competitively
• Signal expertise depth
• Reduce recruiter uncertainty
This page explains how CV reviews are conducted from an ATS and recruiter evaluation standpoint — not from a cosmetic editing perspective.
A high-level CV review evaluates five core layers:
•Structural integrity
• Keyword alignment
• Qualification validation
• Evidence density
• Narrative coherence
Most candidates assume formatting is the main issue.
In reality, ranking failure usually stems from misalignment or weak proof signals.
The first stage of CV review checks:
•Section heading clarity
• Chronological consistency
• Layout parsing stability
• File format reliability
• Bullet readability
Red flags include:
•Two-column layouts
• Missing dates
• Inconsistent formatting
• Paragraph-heavy experience
• Graphics or skill charts
Structural issues often cause ATS misreads before content is evaluated.
A serious CV review compares the document against:
•Target job descriptions
• Required competencies
• Industry terminology
• Certification requirements
Reviewers look for:
•Exact skill phrasing
• Required tools stated verbatim
• Clear years-of-experience markers
• Matching job title logic
If the CV says:
•“Worked with databases”
But the job requires:
•SQL
The review flags this as optimization failure.
Precision improves ranking.
Recruiters screen CVs against baseline eligibility:
•Required certifications
• Degree requirements
• Years of experience
• Location eligibility
• Industry exposure
A CV review verifies whether these are:
•Explicitly stated
• Clearly measurable
• Positioned prominently
Ambiguous language weakens qualification confirmation.
One of the most common CV weaknesses is responsibility language.
Example flagged during review:
Weak
• Responsible for managing projects
Strong
• Led cross-functional team of 8 delivering $1.4M cost reduction initiative
Reviewers assess:
•Percentage improvements
• Revenue impact
• Cost savings
• Efficiency gains
• Scope of responsibility
Evidence increases both ATS weight and recruiter confidence.
A CV review also evaluates trajectory:
•Does the career progression make sense?
• Is specialization clear?
• Are role transitions explained logically?
• Is there increasing scope over time?
Fragmented career stories lower recruiter confidence.
Strong CVs demonstrate:
•Direction
• Expertise focus
• Growth in responsibility
Project Manager
•Managed multiple projects
• Coordinated with stakeholders
• Handled budgets
Senior Project Manager
•Directed 12 cross-functional projects valued at $3.8M annually
• Reduced project cycle time by 22% through process redesign
• Managed $1.2M budget with zero variance over fiscal year
The revised version improves:
•Keyword density
• Measurable impact
• Seniority clarity
• ATS alignment
Review Focus:
•Internship validation
• Skill proof
• Academic alignment
• Project quantification
Review Focus:
•Leadership evidence
• Business impact
• Tool specialization
• Promotion progression
Review Focus:
•Strategic initiatives
• Revenue accountability
• Organizational influence
• Long-term transformation impact
Each level requires different optimization emphasis.
Professional CV audits frequently uncover:
•Inflated skill sections
• Missing measurable results
• Inconsistent tense usage
• Role misalignment
• Underdeveloped summaries
• Weak keyword integration
Most rejection issues are content-based, not formatting-based.
Advanced screening systems now evaluate:
•Semantic similarity to job descriptions
• Skill proximity to impact statements
• Recency of relevant experience
• Title-to-role alignment
• Contextual keyword placement
A proper CV review accounts for:
•Technical optimization
• Strategic narrative positioning
• Measurable performance signals
Generic edits are insufficient.
During review, confirm:
•Required skills appear verbatim
• Metrics appear in most roles
• Job titles align to target role
• Experience is chronologically clear
• Summary reflects specialization
• No graphics interfere with parsing
Effective CV review increases ranking potential and recruiter clarity.
Upload CV
Import from Linkedin
