Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeNext.js App Router architecture is the modern way to build scalable Next.js applications using Server Components, nested layouts, route based rendering, streaming UI, caching, Server Actions, middleware, and edge aware deployment decisions. The core idea is simple: render as much as possible on the server, send less JavaScript to the browser, and choose the right rendering pattern for each route.
For developers, this means understanding more than routing. You need to know when to use SSR, SSG, ISR, dynamic rendering, static rendering, Client Components, Server Components, streaming, and route cache strategies. For hiring managers, strong App Router knowledge signals that a developer can build production grade applications with better LCP, TTFB, bundle size, hydration cost, and long term maintainability.
The App Router changed Next.js from a page based framework into a full rendering architecture for modern React applications. In older Next.js projects, developers often relied heavily on client side rendering or page level data fetching. With App Router, the default model is server first.
That matters because production applications are judged by outcomes, not framework syntax. A well architected App Router application can improve page speed, reduce client JavaScript, simplify data fetching, improve SEO consistency, and make large applications easier to scale.
The biggest mistake is treating App Router like the older Pages Router with different folder names. That usually leads to unnecessary Client Components, weak caching decisions, poor streaming structure, and slower applications.
The App Router is built around route segments, layouts, Server Components, and rendering boundaries. Each route can have its own rendering behavior based on the data it needs, how fresh that data must be, and whether the content is personalized.
A strong production mental model looks like this:
Use Server Components by default
Use Client Components only for interactivity
Keep layouts persistent and reusable
Choose static rendering when content can be cached
Use dynamic rendering only when request time data is required
Use ISR when content needs periodic updates
Use streaming when parts of the page load at different speeds
Use middleware only when request level logic is truly needed
Use edge runtime selectively, not automatically
This is the difference between simply using Next.js and actually designing Next.js architecture.
Server Components are one of the most important concepts in App Router. They render on the server and do not send component JavaScript to the browser. That can significantly reduce bundle size and hydration cost.
Client Components are still necessary, but only when the browser must handle interaction.
Use Client Components for:
Form interactions
Click handlers
Browser APIs
Local state
Animations
Interactive dashboards
Real time UI behavior
Use Server Components for:
Data heavy pages
Layouts
Static content
SEO content
Database connected content
Product pages
Blog pages
Documentation
Non interactive UI
The strongest App Router developers think in terms of boundaries. They ask, “What actually needs to run in the browser?” Everything else should stay on the server.
Next.js App Router supports several rendering patterns. The right choice depends on the page’s purpose, data freshness, personalization needs, SEO value, and performance goals.
Static rendering is best when the content does not need to change on every request. It is ideal for marketing pages, documentation, blog posts, landing pages, and evergreen SEO content.
Static rendering usually provides the best performance because pages can be cached and served quickly.
Dynamic rendering happens when a route depends on request specific information. This includes authentication, cookies, headers, personalized content, or uncached data.
Dynamic rendering is useful, but it should be intentional. Using it everywhere increases server work and can hurt scalability.
Server side rendering is valuable when pages must be generated at request time. It is commonly used for dashboards, authenticated pages, search results, personalized feeds, and frequently changing data.
The tradeoff is cost. SSR gives flexibility, but it can increase TTFB if the server has too much work to do.
Static site generation is best for pages that can be generated ahead of time. It is highly effective for SEO pages, company websites, knowledge bases, and content libraries.
SSG is often underused because developers assume dynamic frameworks require dynamic rendering. In reality, static rendering is often the fastest and most scalable option.
Incremental Static Regeneration lets teams update static pages after deployment without rebuilding the entire site. It is especially useful for ecommerce, publishing, large content libraries, product catalogs, and CMS driven pages.
ISR is powerful because it balances speed and freshness. You get many of the performance benefits of static rendering while keeping content reasonably current.
Client side rendering still has a place, but it should not be the default for SEO critical content. CSR works well for highly interactive sections, internal tools, logged in app experiences, and UI elements that depend heavily on browser behavior.
The risk is delayed content visibility, heavier JavaScript, and weaker initial performance.
A strong rendering decision starts with the user experience and business requirement.
Ask these questions:
Does this page need to be indexed by Google?
Does the content change for every user?
Does the content change every few seconds, minutes, hours, or days?
Can the page be cached safely?
Is the page mostly informational or highly interactive?
Does the first visible content depend on slow data?
Would static rendering create stale or inaccurate information?
Is personalization required before the page loads?
Use static rendering when the content is stable. Use ISR when content changes periodically. Use SSR when request time accuracy matters. Use Client Components only where interaction requires browser execution.
This is the kind of reasoning senior engineers are expected to explain in interviews.
Layouts are one of the biggest architectural advantages of App Router. Instead of rebuilding shared UI on every route change, layouts can persist across sections of the application.
This improves:
Navigation experience
Rendering efficiency
Shared state continuity
Design consistency
Application structure
Developer productivity
A strong layout architecture usually separates global layout, application layout, dashboard layout, marketing layout, and feature specific layouts.
The mistake many teams make is placing too much logic into the root layout. That creates unnecessary coupling and makes the application harder to scale.
Good layout architecture keeps shared UI persistent while keeping route specific concerns close to the route that owns them.
Streaming allows a page to show meaningful content before every part of the page has finished loading. Instead of blocking the whole page, slower sections can load progressively.
This matters for real users because perceived speed often matters as much as raw speed. A page that shows the main content quickly feels faster than a page that waits for every widget, recommendation, or analytics section to finish.
Streaming is especially useful for:
Dashboards
Product pages
Search experiences
Content feeds
Personalized modules
Data heavy pages
The common mistake is using one large loading boundary around the entire page. That removes much of the benefit. Strong architecture creates thoughtful loading boundaries around slower, less critical sections.
Caching is one of the most important and misunderstood parts of App Router architecture. Many performance problems are not caused by React. They are caused by poor caching decisions.
A good cache strategy defines:
Which data can be reused
Which routes must always be fresh
Which pages can regenerate periodically
Which content should be cached at the CDN
Which user specific data must never be cached publicly
Which actions should trigger revalidation
The goal is not to cache everything. The goal is to cache safely and intentionally.
For SEO pages, caching usually improves speed and scalability. For authenticated dashboards, caching must be handled more carefully because user specific content can create privacy and accuracy risks.
Middleware runs before a request reaches the route. It is useful for authentication checks, redirects, localization, A/B testing, and request rewriting.
Edge runtime can reduce latency by running logic closer to the user, but it is not automatically better for every workload. Some workloads require Node.js capabilities, longer processing, or backend service access that may not fit edge constraints.
Use middleware when the decision truly belongs at the request level. Do not use it as a dumping ground for business logic.
Strong production judgment means knowing when edge execution improves TTFB and when it adds unnecessary complexity.
Route Handlers are used for server side endpoints, webhooks, integrations, file handling, authentication callbacks, and API like behavior within App Router.
Server Actions simplify server side mutations, especially for forms and direct user actions. They reduce boilerplate because the application can execute server logic without creating unnecessary client side request layers.
The practical distinction is simple:
Use Server Actions for tightly connected form submissions and mutations
Use Route Handlers for external integrations, webhooks, public endpoints, and API boundaries
Use dedicated backend services when the system requires independent scaling, queues, or complex business workflows
Good architecture avoids both extremes. Server Actions should not replace every API, and Route Handlers should not be used when a simpler server side mutation would work better.
App Router is the strategic direction for modern Next.js applications, but migration should be practical.
App Router is best for:
New Next.js applications
Large React applications
SEO focused sites
Performance sensitive products
Applications with complex layouts
Teams adopting React Server Components
Projects that need streaming or modern caching
Pages Router may still be acceptable for:
Stable legacy applications
Small projects with no performance concerns
Systems where migration risk outweighs benefit
Teams without App Router expertise yet
The best migration strategy is usually incremental. Build new sections in App Router, migrate high value routes first, and avoid rewriting stable code just for technical fashion.
App Router architecture should be evaluated by measurable performance outcomes.
The most important KPIs include:
TTFB improvement
LCP improvement
JavaScript bundle reduction
Hydration reduction
Server response optimization
Better cache hit rates
Faster route transitions
Lower client CPU usage
Improved Core Web Vitals
Hiring managers and technical interviewers care about whether a developer can connect architecture decisions to outcomes. Saying “I used App Router” is weak. Saying “I reduced hydration cost by moving non interactive UI into Server Components” shows real production understanding.
The most common mistake is overusing Client Components. This usually happens when developers bring old React habits into App Router. The result is heavier bundles, slower hydration, and weaker mobile performance.
Another common mistake is forcing dynamic rendering when static rendering or ISR would be better. This increases server load and slows down pages that could have been cached.
Teams also make mistakes with streaming by creating broad loading states instead of granular ones. That makes the user wait unnecessarily.
Other frequent issues include:
Misusing middleware for application logic
Ignoring cache behavior
Fetching data too late in the browser
Creating layout structures that are too deeply coupled
Treating Server Components as a minor optimization instead of the default architecture
Migrating from Pages Router without changing rendering strategy
The best App Router architecture is not the most complex one. It is the one that makes rendering, caching, data flow, and interactivity clear.
From a hiring perspective, App Router experience is valuable only when it shows production judgment. Recruiters may scan for keywords, but hiring managers evaluate tradeoff thinking.
Strong candidates can explain:
Why they chose SSR, SSG, ISR, or dynamic rendering
How Server Components reduced browser JavaScript
How they used Client Components selectively
How they improved LCP or TTFB
How caching affected scalability
How they handled migration from Pages Router
How they structured layouts for a large application
How they used streaming to improve perceived performance
When they avoided edge runtime because it was not the right fit
Weak candidates describe features. Strong candidates explain decisions, constraints, and results.
A production ready App Router application should have clear answers to these questions:
Which routes are static, dynamic, or regenerated?
Which components must be client side and why?
Which data is cached, revalidated, or always fresh?
Which pages are SEO critical?
Which routes depend on authentication?
Which sections can stream independently?
Which layouts should persist across navigation?
Which logic belongs in middleware?
Which mutations belong in Server Actions?
Which integrations require Route Handlers?
Which performance KPIs are being measured?
This checklist prevents the biggest App Router failure pattern: building first and discovering rendering problems later.
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin
