Choose from a wide range of CV templates and customize the design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised CV and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our CV builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your CV faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact CV rules employers look for.
Create CV
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact CV rules employers look for.
Create CVIf you’re searching for a “resume generator with ATS score,” you’re not just looking for a tool that gives you a number.
You’re trying to answer a much more critical question:
“Will my resume actually pass automated screening AND convince a recruiter to move me forward?”
Most tools fail here. They optimize for a score, not for real hiring outcomes.
This guide shows you how ATS scoring actually works, how recruiters interpret resumes after the ATS stage, and how to generate a resume that performs in both environments.
An ATS score is a simulation, not a real hiring decision.
It typically evaluates:
Keyword match with job description
Formatting compatibility
Section structure
Skills alignment
But here’s the truth:
An ATS score does NOT decide if you get hired. It only decides if you get seen.
Most resume generators with ATS scoring tools:
Over-prioritize keyword density
Ignore storytelling and clarity
Generate robotic, generic content
This creates resumes that:
Pass filters
Fail humans
ATS systems are not AI hiring managers.
They:
Parse your resume into structured data
Match keywords against job requirements
Rank based on relevance
They do NOT:
Understand nuance
Evaluate potential deeply
Appreciate creativity
Once your resume passes ATS, a recruiter looks at it for 6–10 seconds.
They scan:
Job title alignment
Skill relevance
Evidence of impact
Clarity of communication
This is where most ATS-optimized resumes fail.
To win, your resume must satisfy BOTH:
Clean formatting
Keyword alignment
Standard sections
Clear positioning
Impact-driven bullets
Strong narrative
A real high-performing tool should:
Analyze job descriptions dynamically
Suggest role-specific keywords
Evaluate readability and clarity
Flag weak bullet points
Provide contextual feedback, not just a score
Most tools show scores out of 100.
Here’s how to interpret them:
60–75 → Needs improvement
75–85 → Competitive
85–92 → Strong
95–100 → Often over-optimized
Why 100% is dangerous:
It usually means:
Keyword stuffing
Loss of natural language
Poor readability
Extract:
Required skills
Keywords
Responsibilities
Use the tool to:
Structure sections
Identify missing keywords
Do NOT accept default content.
Transform bullets into:
Action + Skill + Outcome
Weak Example:
“Responsible for handling customer data.”
Good Example:
“Analyzed customer datasets using Excel, improving reporting accuracy by 25%.”
Check:
Missing keywords
Formatting issues
Score improvement
Ask:
Is this clear in 6 seconds?
Does this show impact?
Would a recruiter care?
Integrate keywords naturally:
Stuff keywords:
This is heavily weighted.
Include:
Hard skills
Tools
Technologies
ATS scans for:
Job titles
Responsibilities
Keywords
Especially important for entry-level roles.
Tables
Graphics
Columns
Top candidates:
Identify repeated keywords
Mirror terminology
Align bullet points with responsibilities
Helps build structure
Suggests content
Evaluates match
Provides score
You need BOTH.
Name: Samantha Lee
Job Title: Entry-Level Marketing Analyst
Location: Chicago, IL
PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY
Data-driven Marketing graduate with hands-on experience in campaign analytics, SEO optimization, and digital performance tracking. Skilled in Google Analytics, Excel, and content strategy. Proven ability to analyze marketing data and improve campaign effectiveness through targeted insights.
SKILLS
Google Analytics, Excel, SQL
SEO, Content Marketing, PPC
Data Analysis, Campaign Optimization
Tableau, Marketing Automation Tools
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science in Marketing
University of Illinois
GPA: 3.7
Relevant Coursework:
Digital Marketing
Consumer Behavior
Marketing Analytics
Data-Driven Decision Making
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
SEO Optimization Project
Conducted keyword research and optimized website content, increasing organic traffic by 40% in a simulated environment
Analyzed performance metrics using Google Analytics to refine strategy
Marketing Campaign Analysis
Evaluated multi-channel campaign performance using Excel and Tableau
Identified key insights that improved conversion rates by 18%
INTERNSHIP EXPERIENCE
Marketing Intern | Bright Digital Agency
Assisted in managing PPC campaigns, improving ROI by 15%
Analyzed campaign data and generated performance reports
Collaborated with the content team to optimize SEO strategy
Use this model:
How well do you align with the job?
Are critical terms included?
Is your content clear?
Do you show results?
False. A 90% score with strong storytelling beats a 100% robotic resume.
Most ATS systems filter, not reject.
Humans still make decisions.
Only if they are contextual and relevant.
ATS score above 80?
Keywords aligned with job description?
Bullet points show impact?
Resume readable in 6 seconds?
No formatting issues?
Upload CV
Import from Linkedin
