Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeMost candidates lose money during salary negotiations because they improvise. They either ask too aggressively and create friction, or they undersell themselves out of fear of losing the offer. The strongest salary negotiation scripts are not about “winning.” They are about positioning. Hiring managers and recruiters expect negotiation for many professional roles. The candidates who succeed know how to communicate value, preserve rapport, and make the employer feel like they are solving a business problem rather than creating one.
The best negotiation scripts follow a simple principle: express excitement, reinforce fit, and then discuss compensation from a position of evidence rather than emotion.
If you use the right language, you can negotiate salary without sounding difficult, greedy, or risky. And in many cases, one well-phrased conversation can increase your total compensation by thousands of dollars.
Most online advice sounds like it was written by people who have never hired anyone.
You see advice like:
“Always ask for 20% more.”
“Never give the first number.”
“Act confident.”
“Be willing to walk away.”
Real hiring decisions do not work that way.
Hiring managers are balancing:
Internal pay bands
Team equity concerns
Budget approvals
Candidate risk assessment
Urgency of hiring
Competition from other employers
Negotiation is rarely about whether they can pay more.
It is often about whether they believe paying more for you makes sense.
Candidates who understand this negotiate better.
Most candidates assume recruiters ask:
"What salary do you want?"
What recruiters are often actually trying to determine:
Are you aligned with budget?
Will compensation become a problem later?
Are you realistic about market value?
Will you accept if we extend an offer?
Are there hidden expectations?
Recruiters are not looking for confrontation.
They're trying to reduce uncertainty.
Strong negotiators reduce uncertainty while increasing perceived value.
That changes the entire conversation.
Use this framework:
Excitement → Value → Question
Structure:
“I’m very excited about the opportunity and the role feels like a strong fit. Based on my experience with X, Y, and Z, I was hoping we could discuss compensation. Is there flexibility around the offer?”
Why it works:
Starts positively
Reinforces interest
Reminds them why they selected you
Opens a conversation instead of making a demand
Small wording changes create major differences.
This is the most common scenario and often the strongest negotiating position.
Good Example
"Thank you. I'm genuinely excited about the opportunity and the chance to join the team. After reviewing the offer and considering my experience leading similar initiatives, I wanted to discuss compensation. Based on market research and the value I believe I can bring, I was hoping there may be flexibility to move closer to $125,000."
Why this works:
Shows enthusiasm
Signals appreciation
Connects salary to value
Uses collaborative language
Weak Example
"I need at least $125,000 or I'll probably decline."
Problems:
Creates pressure
Introduces unnecessary conflict
Sounds transactional
Removes collaborative tone
Recruiters frequently become defensive when candidates lead with ultimatums.
Early salary discussions can feel dangerous.
Give a rigid number too early and you may price yourself out.
Give a number too low and you may lock yourself into an unnecessary ceiling.
Use:
"I'm most focused on finding the right opportunity and learning more about responsibilities and expectations before discussing specific compensation. That said, based on similar roles and market data, I would expect something competitive within the market range."
If they push:
"Based on my experience and current market conditions, I would anticipate a range between $110,000 and $125,000, depending on the overall compensation package."
Notice the language:
You are giving context rather than a hard demand.
Remote roles introduce complexity.
Employers increasingly use location-based compensation models.
Use:
"I'm excited about the opportunity and wanted to discuss compensation. Given my background and the results I've delivered in similar roles, I was hoping we could explore whether there is flexibility within the salary range."
Avoid:
"I work remotely so location shouldn't matter."
Whether candidates agree or disagree with location-based pay structures, arguing philosophy rarely changes compensation decisions.
Value discussions perform better.
Many candidates believe leverage requires competing offers.
Not true.
Your leverage may include:
Specialized skills
Rare experience
Industry expertise
urgency in hiring
Strong interview performance
Revenue impact history
Script:
"I'm very excited about the role. Based on my experience in similar environments and the impact I've had in prior positions, I wanted to discuss whether there may be flexibility in compensation."
Do not invent leverage.
Experienced recruiters detect fake pressure immediately.
Competing offers create leverage if used carefully.
Good Example
"I wanted to be transparent that I'm currently considering another opportunity. However, this role remains my top choice because of the team and long-term fit. Given that context, I was wondering whether compensation flexibility exists."
Why this works:
Signals market demand
Avoids sounding manipulative
Reinforces interest
Weak Example
"Another company offered more. Beat it."
Hiring managers often view aggressive comparisons negatively.
Sometimes salary itself has limited flexibility.
Smart candidates negotiate total compensation.
Areas that may move:
Signing bonus
Equity
Annual bonus
Additional PTO
Hybrid flexibility
Professional development budget
Relocation assistance
Review cycle acceleration
Script:
"I understand salary ranges may have constraints. Are there other components of the compensation package we could discuss?"
Many candidates never ask.
Recruiters often expect it.
Email works best when you want precision.
Use:
Subject: Follow Up on Offer Discussion
Thank you again for the offer. I'm excited about the opportunity and appreciate the team's confidence in me.
After reviewing the package, I wanted to discuss compensation. Based on my experience and market research for comparable positions, I was hoping we might explore flexibility around the base salary.
I'm enthusiastic about the role and would love to find a package that reflects both the responsibilities and value I can bring.
Thank you again and I look forward to continuing the conversation.
Simple.
Professional.
Collaborative.
Candidates often fail for reasons they never realize.
Do not negotiate before demonstrating why you deserve more.
The employer already chose you.
Remind them why.
Negotiation is not debate.
Strong candidates collaborate.
Weak candidates pressure.
Avoid:
Rent costs
Student loans
Family obligations
Personal financial stress
Hiring managers care about business value.
Personal expenses rarely affect compensation decisions.
Candidates frequently negotiate blindly.
Know:
Market range
Industry norms
Geographic differences
Role seniority
Internal title equivalents
Confidence without evidence sounds random.
The strongest moment to negotiate is usually after the company decides they want you and before acceptance.
Before offer stage:
Interest remains uncertain.
After acceptance:
Leverage drops dramatically.
After they mentally picture you joining the team:
Negotiating power increases.
Hiring psychology changes once a decision becomes emotionally real.
That shift matters.
Strong candidates say:
"Is there flexibility?"
"I wanted to discuss..."
"Based on my experience..."
"I’m excited about the opportunity..."
"Could we explore options?"
Weak candidates say:
"I deserve..."
"I need..."
"You have to..."
"That's not enough."
"My bills are expensive."
Subtle wording affects perceived professionalism.
Hiring decisions are often emotional before they become logical.
Most candidates negotiate as if they are defending themselves.
The strongest candidates negotiate as if they are already part of the team.
That mindset changes language.
It changes tone.
And it changes outcomes.
Employers generally do not remember candidates who negotiate professionally.
They remember candidates who negotiate poorly.
The goal is not to force a bigger offer.
The goal is to make paying you more feel like an easy decision.
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin
