Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeA modern web developer coding interview is no longer just about solving algorithm problems. Most frontend interviews now evaluate how well you build real UI components, debug JavaScript issues, structure React applications, optimize performance, and communicate technical decisions under pressure. Hiring managers want developers who can write maintainable frontend code, explain tradeoffs clearly, and handle live coding challenges without freezing.
The strongest candidates are not always the ones with the deepest computer science backgrounds. They are usually the developers who understand browser behavior, component architecture, responsive design, accessibility, debugging workflows, and practical JavaScript execution. That is especially true for frontend developer interviews at startups, SaaS companies, product teams, and mid-sized tech organizations.
This guide breaks down the exact frontend coding interview topics companies evaluate today, including JavaScript interview questions, React coding exercises, live coding expectations, debugging challenges, and recruiter-level insights into what actually gets candidates hired.
Most candidates incorrectly assume frontend interviews are primarily about frameworks. In reality, strong interviewers evaluate how you think through UI engineering problems.
A frontend technical interview usually measures five core areas:
JavaScript fundamentals and execution behavior
Frontend architecture and maintainability
Browser and rendering knowledge
Real-world UI implementation skills
Communication and debugging ability
Hiring managers are trying to answer questions like:
Can this person build production-quality interfaces?
This is the most common frontend interview format today.
You may be asked to:
Build a responsive component
Create a modal or dropdown menu
Fetch and display API data
Implement search filtering
Build form validation
Debug broken React code
Optimize rendering performance
Many candidates memorize trivia instead of understanding JavaScript execution behavior.
Strong frontend interviewers focus on practical understanding.
Common interview question:
“How do closures work in JavaScript, and where would you use them?”
Strong answer includes:
Functions retaining access to outer scope variables
Encapsulation patterns
Event handlers
Memoization
Private state management
Weak candidates only recite textbook definitions.
Can they debug issues independently?
Do they understand performance implications?
Can they collaborate with designers and backend engineers?
Will their code scale in a shared codebase?
This is why many candidates fail interviews even after grinding LeetCode for months. Frontend hiring is heavily practical.
Explain accessibility decisions
Interviewers are watching more than the final solution.
They evaluate:
Code organization
Naming conventions
State management decisions
Problem-solving flow
Communication under pressure
Debugging methodology
UI edge-case awareness
A candidate who communicates clearly while building a decent solution often outperforms someone who silently writes perfect code.
Take-home assignments are common for mid-level and senior frontend positions.
Typical projects include:
Building a dashboard UI
Creating a responsive landing page
Consuming REST APIs
Building reusable React components
Implementing pagination or filtering
Adding accessibility improvements
Writing tests
Recruiters and engineering managers usually evaluate:
Folder structure
Reusability
Readability
State management choices
Performance awareness
Documentation quality
Attention to UX details
Most rejected take-home projects fail because candidates overcomplicate architecture or submit rushed, unpolished UI.
More common at senior level.
Topics may include:
Component scalability
Design systems
State management architecture
Rendering optimization
Frontend caching strategies
SSR vs CSR tradeoffs
API orchestration
Microfrontend architecture
Senior frontend interviews increasingly resemble backend engineering interviews in complexity.
You should understand:
Call stack
Microtasks vs macrotasks
Promises
async/await
setTimeout behavior
API request timing
A common live coding failure is mishandling async state updates in React.
Interviewers often ask candidates to implement these manually.
You should know:
Search input optimization
Scroll event optimization
Resize event handling
API rate reduction
This directly connects to frontend performance optimization.
Even React developers are often tested on core DOM behavior.
Expect questions about:
Event bubbling and capturing
Event delegation
Query selectors
Dynamic DOM updates
Memory leaks from listeners
Companies want developers who understand what frameworks abstract away.
React interviews increasingly focus on architecture quality instead of syntax memorization.
Interviewers care less about whether you know Redux and more about whether you understand when state should exist.
You should explain:
Local vs global state
Context API tradeoffs
Prop drilling solutions
Server state handling
State normalization
A strong candidate explains reasoning, not just tools.
High-level frontend interviews often test:
Re-render triggers
useEffect dependency behavior
Memoization strategies
useMemo vs useCallback
Key prop usage
Virtual DOM reconciliation
One of the biggest interview red flags is a developer who uses optimization hooks without understanding why.
Strong frontend engineers build maintainable UI systems.
Interviewers look for:
Separation of concerns
Reusable components
Controlled vs uncontrolled inputs
Smart vs presentational components
Composition patterns
Messy component structure is one of the fastest ways to fail a senior frontend interview.
Many developers underestimate HTML and CSS interviews. That is a mistake.
Frontend teams care deeply about maintainable UI implementation.
Strong candidates understand:
Accessibility implications
SEO benefits
Correct element usage
Screen reader behavior
Landmark regions
Common interview question:
“When should you use a button instead of a div?”
This question filters out developers who rely entirely on frameworks without understanding browser semantics.
Expect practical implementation tasks.
Typical coding exercises:
Responsive card layouts
Sticky sidebars
Centering challenges
Adaptive navigation menus
Dashboard layouts
Interviewers want candidates who can implement layouts efficiently without fighting CSS.
Most frontend coding interviews now include responsive behavior evaluation.
You should understand:
Mobile-first design
Media queries
Fluid layouts
Responsive typography
Breakpoint strategies
Viewport behavior
A common rejection reason is building desktop-only UI during live coding.
Accessibility is no longer optional in frontend hiring.
Many companies now explicitly evaluate WCAG awareness.
You should understand:
ARIA labels
Keyboard navigation
Focus management
Semantic structure
Contrast issues
Accessible forms
Screen reader support
Interviewers often ask:
“How would you make this modal accessible?”
Weak candidates only mention ARIA attributes.
Strong candidates discuss:
Focus trapping
Escape key handling
Initial focus placement
Keyboard tab order
Screen reader announcements
Debugging ability is massively undervalued by candidates.
Engineering managers love developers who can isolate issues quickly.
You may be asked to debug:
Infinite React re-renders
API race conditions
CSS specificity conflicts
Event propagation bugs
Memory leaks
Broken responsive layouts
Performance bottlenecks
Strong debugging candidates:
Reproduce the issue methodically
Explain hypotheses aloud
Use browser dev tools effectively
Narrow root causes logically
Panic-debugging is a major interview failure pattern.
Modern frontend teams care heavily about performance because it directly impacts revenue, retention, and SEO.
You should understand:
Lazy loading
Code splitting
Bundle optimization
Image optimization
Render minimization
Caching strategies
Lighthouse metrics
Web Core Vitals
Interviewers increasingly ask:
“How would you improve frontend performance on a slow page?”
Strong answers include both technical and UX considerations.
Senior frontend interviews often evaluate browser internals.
Topics include:
Critical rendering path
Reflow vs repaint
Layout thrashing
GPU acceleration
CSS rendering cost
Hydration behavior
Rendering pipeline
This area separates true frontend engineers from framework-only developers.
Practice building:
Pricing cards
Navigation menus
Dashboards
Modals
Accordions
Multi-step forms
These are extremely common interview exercises.
Focus on practical frontend logic instead of pure algorithms.
Examples:
Search filtering
Debouncing
Pagination
Infinite scroll
Drag-and-drop behavior
Form validation
State synchronization
Practice:
Todo apps with persistence
API data fetching
Dynamic filtering
Reusable modal systems
Theme switching
Context API implementations
Companies prefer practical React fluency over obscure trivia.
Useful for JavaScript fundamentals and problem-solving speed.
Best for:
Arrays
Objects
Async logic
Algorithm basics
Less useful for real UI implementation.
Excellent for realistic frontend coding exercises.
Best for:
Responsive design
Accessibility
UI precision
Layout implementation
Highly valuable for junior and mid-level frontend interviews.
Commonly used in automated screening interviews.
Practice:
Timed JavaScript challenges
Debugging exercises
DOM manipulation
Frequently used by startups and larger tech employers.
Focus areas:
Timed coding performance
Real-time evaluation
JavaScript execution logic
Excellent for frontend experimentation and live coding confidence.
Great for:
CSS practice
Animation testing
UI prototyping
Interview simulation
Useful for improving CSS precision and layout creativity.
Not essential, but helpful for sharpening CSS problem-solving speed.
Most candidates focus only on technical correctness.
That is not enough.
Hiring teams also evaluate:
Can you explain your thinking clearly?
Strong candidates narrate:
Assumptions
Tradeoffs
Alternative solutions
Debugging logic
Silence during live coding creates uncertainty.
Interviewers know candidates get nervous.
What matters is whether you recover effectively after mistakes.
Panic spirals hurt candidates more than small bugs.
Senior candidates especially are judged on:
Maintainability
Scalability
Simplicity
Team collaboration mindset
Overengineering is a common rejection reason.
Candidates memorize answers about closures, hooks, or async behavior without understanding execution flow.
Interviewers detect this immediately.
Accessibility awareness strongly impacts frontend credibility today.
Ignoring keyboard navigation or semantic HTML hurts candidates badly.
Silent coding creates doubt.
Strong candidates explain decisions continuously.
Interviewers prefer maintainable solutions over clever solutions.
Simple, readable code wins interviews.
Many candidates freeze when something breaks.
Strong engineers debug systematically instead of randomly changing code.
Spend less time memorizing trivia and more time building interfaces.
Practice:
Responsive layouts
Dynamic components
API integration
Form handling
State management
Accessibility
Practice coding while speaking aloud.
This dramatically improves interview performance.
Understand:
Rendering
Events
DOM updates
Async execution
Storage behavior
This creates stronger frontend intuition.
Break your own projects intentionally.
Learn to:
Read console errors
Trace execution
Inspect network requests
Use React DevTools
Debugging confidence directly impacts interview success.
The biggest improvement usually comes from combining three things:
Real frontend project building
Live coding simulation
Deep JavaScript understanding
Candidates who only study theory struggle during implementation.
Candidates who only build projects often struggle explaining technical decisions.
The strongest frontend interview candidates combine practical execution with technical clarity.
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin
