Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeIf your CV is being opened but you still get no reply, the problem is usually not that your application disappeared into a black hole. It means your CV created enough initial interest for someone to look, but not enough confidence for them to take action. In the UK job market, recruiters and hiring managers often open far more CVs than they can seriously progress. They are not only asking, “Can this person do the job?” They are also asking, “Is this person worth spending interview time on compared with the other candidates in front of me?” That is the part many candidates miss. Getting your CV opened is a visibility signal. Getting a reply is a trust signal. Your CV has to earn both.
When candidates tell me, “They opened my CV but never replied,” I always want to separate two very different things: attention and conversion.
An opened CV means your application made it past the first tiny barrier. Maybe your job title looked relevant. Maybe your keywords matched the role. Maybe the recruiter was reviewing a batch of applicants and clicked through your profile. That is positive, but it is not the same as being shortlisted.
This is where a lot of job seekers misread the process. They think an opened CV means a recruiter seriously considered them. Sometimes yes. Often no. In real hiring workflows, a CV may be opened for a few seconds, scanned quickly, compared against the vacancy criteria, then parked, rejected, or ignored because there is not enough evidence to justify moving the candidate forward.
That sounds harsh, but it is better to understand the truth than build a job search around hope and refreshing your inbox like it owes you money.
In UK recruitment, especially for competitive roles, recruiters are usually balancing speed, hiring manager expectations, salary ranges, notice periods, location requirements, sponsorship constraints, seniority fit, and candidate volume. Your CV does not get read in a calm little bubble with tea and biscuits. It gets judged against pressure, limited time, and other applicants who may have made their relevance clearer.
The most common reason is simple: your CV looks relevant enough to open, but not strong enough to progress.
That does not always mean you are unqualified. It often means your CV fails to answer the recruiter’s practical questions quickly enough.
When I screen a CV, I am not admiring the formatting first. I am trying to answer questions like:
Does this person clearly match the role I am hiring for?
Is their recent experience relevant enough?
Are they operating at the right level of seniority?
Have they done similar work in a similar environment?
Can I understand their impact without decoding vague duties?
Would a hiring manager see this CV and want to interview them?
Is there anything risky, unclear, or mismatched that I need to investigate?
If your CV creates questions faster than it creates confidence, it becomes easy to move on.
That is the uncomfortable hiring reality. Recruiters do not usually reject candidates because one tiny detail is imperfect. They reject or ignore CVs because the overall signal is not strong enough compared with the role and the competition.
A CV can be opened because it has the right keywords, but still ignored because it lacks proof, positioning, clarity, or commercial relevance.
This is one of the biggest misconceptions candidates have.
A recruiter may open your CV and scan it for less than a minute. That does not mean they were lazy. It means they are looking for evidence in a very specific order.
The first scan usually focuses on:
Current or most recent job title
Current or most recent employer
Industry relevance
Location or work eligibility
Core skills linked to the vacancy
Career progression
Clear achievements
Obvious red flags
Salary or seniority assumptions where visible
Whether the CV feels easy to represent to the hiring manager
If those signals are not clear, your CV may technically be opened but practically dismissed.
This is why generic CV advice like “make sure your CV is two pages” misses the real issue. Length is not the point. Clarity is. A concise CV can still be useless if it hides the important evidence. A longer CV can still work if every section earns its place and supports the hiring decision.
The recruiter is not trying to uncover your potential like a detective in a prestige crime drama. They are trying to fill a role. Your CV has to help them do that quickly.
There are several reasons this happens, and not all of them are personal.
Applicant tracking systems and job boards can surface your CV because of keywords. That does not mean your experience fits the hiring manager’s actual brief.
For example, your CV may include “project management”, “stakeholder management”, and “budget ownership”. That might get you opened for a project manager role. But if the employer needs someone with enterprise technology transformation experience and your background is mainly events or operations, the recruiter may quickly decide the fit is not close enough.
This is why keyword matching alone is not enough. Keywords get attention. Context gets interviews.
Many candidates put their strongest selling points too low down the CV. They write a vague personal profile, then list responsibilities, then finally mention outcomes somewhere near the bottom.
By that point, the recruiter may already have moved on.
Your best evidence needs to appear where the decision is being made. Usually that means your professional profile, key skills, and most recent role need to make your fit obvious quickly.
This is probably the most common CV problem I see.
A job description explains what the role involved. A strong CV explains what you did, how well you did it, and why it mattered.
Weak Example:
Responsible for managing client relationships and supporting sales activity.
Good Example:
Managed a portfolio of 40 SME clients, improved renewal rates through proactive account reviews, and supported £850,000 in annual recurring revenue.
The weak version tells me what the job existed to do. The good version tells me what the candidate actually contributed.
Recruiters notice this instantly. A CV full of duties makes the candidate look passive, even if they were excellent in the role.
Sometimes the issue is not whether you can do the job. It is whether the recruiter can confidently place you at the right level.
This happens when a CV is too vague about scope. For example, “managed projects” could mean coordinating a small internal process or leading a multimillion pound transformation programme. “Led a team” could mean mentoring one junior colleague or managing a department of 25.
Hiring managers care about scale. Recruiters care because they need to avoid sending candidates who look too junior, too senior, too expensive, or misaligned with the role.
Your CV should make the scale of your work clear.
Use evidence such as:
Team size
Budget size
Revenue responsibility
Client portfolio size
Project value
Market or region covered
Systems used
Stakeholder seniority
Complexity of work
Measurable outcomes
Without this, your CV may look interesting but uncertain. Uncertainty rarely gets prioritised.
Some candidates try to keep their CV open to many roles. I understand why. The market can feel brutal, and people do not want to close doors.
But a CV that tries to appeal to everyone often convinces no one.
If your profile says you are open to operations, marketing, administration, project management, customer success, HR, and business development, the recruiter may not know what to do with you. That kind of flexibility can sound positive in your head, but on paper it can look unfocused.
Employers are not usually hiring “a good all round person”. They are hiring someone to solve a specific problem.
Your CV needs to be broad enough to show transferable value, but specific enough to make your target obvious.
Once your CV is open, the recruiter is usually looking for evidence across four areas: relevance, credibility, momentum, and risk.
Relevance is the fastest decision point. The recruiter wants to know whether your background fits the vacancy closely enough.
This includes:
Similar job titles
Similar responsibilities
Similar industry or customer type
Similar tools, systems, or technical skills
Similar seniority level
Similar business environment
Relevance does not mean you need to be a perfect match. It means the connection between your background and the role must be obvious.
If the recruiter has to work too hard to understand why you applied, your CV is doing too much silent hoping.
Credibility comes from proof. It is built through specific outcomes, accurate language, realistic achievements, and clear career history.
A CV loses credibility when it uses big claims without evidence.
Phrases like “highly motivated”, “excellent communicator”, “results driven”, and “dynamic professional” do almost nothing on their own. They are not illegal, sadly, but they rarely help.
A hiring manager does not want to be told you are results driven. They want to see the results.
Recruiters look at career movement. Not in a judgemental way, but in a pattern recognition way.
They are asking:
Has this person progressed?
Do their moves make sense?
Are they building depth in a clear area?
Are there unexplained gaps or sharp changes?
Does this move look realistic as a next step?
Career changes, gaps, and lateral moves are not automatic problems. The issue is when the CV gives no context and leaves the reader to guess.
And I can tell you from experience, when hiring teams guess, they often guess badly.
Every hiring process involves risk. A recruiter is constantly trying to reduce it before presenting a candidate.
Risk can come from:
Unclear work eligibility
Frequent short roles with no explanation
Seniority mismatch
Salary mismatch
Location mismatch
Overqualification
Underqualification
Vague responsibilities
Inflated claims
A strong CV does not remove every possible concern. It manages concerns before they become reasons to ignore you.
This is the part candidates find frustrating, and fairly so. Being good at your job does not automatically make your CV effective.
I have seen strong candidates undersell themselves badly. They assume their value is obvious because they know what they did. But recruiters and hiring managers only see what is on the page.
A good candidate can get ignored because:
Their CV is too task based
Their achievements are vague
Their job titles do not clearly reflect their actual work
Their industry transition is not explained
Their strongest experience is hidden in older roles
Their profile is generic
Their CV is not tailored to the role
Their application arrives late when stronger candidates are already being interviewed
Their salary expectations are assumed to be outside range
Their experience looks relevant but not recent enough
The painful truth is that the hiring process does not reward hidden quality. It rewards visible, relevant, credible evidence.
That does not mean you should exaggerate. Please do not. Recruiters can smell inflated nonsense from across the ATS. It means you need to translate your experience into hiring language without turning yourself into a corporate slogan.
A CV that gets opened usually has surface relevance. A CV that gets replies has decision relevance.
Surface relevance looks like:
The right job title
Some matching keywords
A familiar industry
A readable format
A broadly suitable background
Decision relevance goes further. It shows:
Why you fit this specific role
What level you operate at
What problems you solve
What outcomes you have delivered
Why your background makes sense as the next hire
What makes you safer or stronger than similar applicants
This is where most candidates need to improve.
You do not need to write a theatrical CV. You need to write a CV that makes the hiring decision easier.
That means the recruiter should be able to look at your CV and quickly understand:
What you do
Where you add value
What kind of roles you are suitable for
What evidence supports that
Why a hiring manager should care
If those answers are not clear, your CV may be opened and quietly abandoned.
Your profile should not read like it was assembled from spare LinkedIn adjectives.
Weak Example:
I am a hardworking, enthusiastic and passionate professional with excellent communication skills and a proven ability to work well independently and as part of a team.
This tells me almost nothing. It could belong to a finance assistant, teacher, software engineer, office manager, or someone applying to be the next Prime Minister. Although, to be fair, it might be too clear for that last one.
Good Example:
Commercially focused account manager with six years of experience supporting UK B2B clients across SaaS and professional services. Strong track record in client retention, onboarding, renewal conversations, and identifying growth opportunities across SME and mid market accounts.
This works because it gives role type, experience level, market, strengths, and commercial context.
Responsibilities tell the recruiter what you were supposed to do. Outcomes show whether you did it well.
You do not need a number in every bullet, but you do need evidence of value.
Instead of only saying:
Strengthen it with context:
The second version gives me more to work with. It connects activity to business value.
A generic CV often gets opened because it contains enough broad keywords. But it does not get replies because it does not feel aligned.
If you are applying for a customer success role, your CV should highlight retention, onboarding, product adoption, client relationships, renewals, stakeholder management, and customer outcomes.
If you are applying for an operations manager role, it should highlight process improvement, team leadership, service delivery, efficiency, reporting, systems, compliance, and operational performance.
Same person. Different emphasis. That is not dishonesty. That is positioning.
Recruiters pay heavy attention to your most recent role. If your latest job looks unrelated, unclear, or too junior, your application may stall even if your older experience is strong.
This is especially important for career changers, returners, contractors, and candidates who took a temporary role for practical reasons.
Do not leave the recruiter to connect the dots alone. Use your profile and key skills section to bring the relevant thread forward.
Some CVs are ruined by trying too hard.
Phrases like “visionary leader”, “world class strategist”, “transformational change agent”, and “exceptional thought leader” can sound impressive in the candidate’s head but vague on the page.
In UK hiring, especially outside very senior executive contexts, this kind of language can feel overdone. Recruiters prefer precise, credible evidence.
Say what you did. Show the scale. Explain the outcome. That is usually stronger than decorating the sentence until it collapses.
The goal is not to make your CV prettier. The goal is to increase recruiter confidence.
The top third of your CV carries a lot of weight because it frames the rest of the document.
It should quickly show:
Your target role or professional identity
Your relevant experience level
Your strongest role specific skills
Your industry or functional background
Your most persuasive evidence
Any UK market context that matters, such as right to work, location, or sector experience
This section should not be stuffed with every skill you have ever touched. It should act like a relevance filter.
When I read it, I should immediately understand why you are applying for this role.
Look at every bullet in your recent roles and ask: “So what?”
If the bullet does not answer why the work mattered, strengthen it.
Weak Example:
Handled internal reporting and prepared weekly updates.
Good Example:
Produced weekly performance reports for senior stakeholders, improving visibility of service issues and supporting faster operational decisions.
The good version explains audience, purpose, and value.
Add scale where possible.
For example:
Managed a team of eight across customer service and operations
Supported a £2 million annual client portfolio
Delivered reporting for senior leadership across three UK sites
Coordinated onboarding for 120 new starters during a period of rapid growth
Managed supplier relationships across facilities, IT, and professional services
These details help the recruiter understand your level without guessing.
Job titles can be misleading. Two companies can advertise the same title and mean very different things.
Before applying, read the vacancy carefully and identify what the employer seems to care about most.
Look for repeated themes around:
Technical skills
Stakeholder groups
Industry background
Leadership expectations
Commercial goals
Systems and tools
Compliance requirements
Pace and environment
Problems the hire is expected to solve
Then adjust your CV emphasis accordingly.
This does not mean rewriting your entire CV for every application. It means making sure the most relevant evidence is visible for the role in front of you.
A CV is not a storage unit for your entire professional existence. It is a decision document.
Remove or reduce anything that distracts from the target role.
That may include:
Outdated technical skills
Irrelevant early career detail
Generic soft skills
Long lists of basic responsibilities
Hobbies that do not support your candidacy
Repeated information across roles
Buzzwords without proof
Excessive formatting that slows down scanning
A stronger CV is often not about adding more. It is about making the right evidence impossible to miss.
Sometimes your CV is good and the silence is still not your fault.
This matters because job seekers can end up overediting themselves into madness. Not every no reply is a personal failure or a CV disaster.
You may get no reply because:
The role was already close to offer stage
An internal candidate was preferred
The vacancy was paused
The recruiter received too many suitable applicants
The employer changed the brief
The salary range did not match your seniority
The company wanted very specific sector experience
Your application was reviewed after interviews had already started
The hiring manager was slow, unclear, or unresponsive
The recruitment process was simply badly managed
This is why I do not like simplistic advice that says, “If you are not getting replies, your CV must be bad.”
Maybe. Maybe not.
The better question is: Are you seeing a pattern?
If your CV is opened occasionally and you get some replies, the market may be competitive but your CV is working at least partly.
If your CV is opened repeatedly and you get no replies at all, that is a signal. Not a reason to panic. A reason to diagnose.
Use this practical framework before rewriting everything.
Your issue is likely visibility. That could mean poor keyword alignment, weak job titles, applying to the wrong roles, using job boards badly, or relying too heavily on easy apply applications.
Your issue is likely conversion. The CV is attracting attention but not creating enough confidence.
Focus on:
Stronger profile positioning
Clearer evidence in recent roles
Better alignment with the job advert
More measurable achievements
Clearer seniority and scope
Removing vague or generic content
Your CV may be working, but something else is breaking the process. This could be salary expectations, communication, availability, right to work, location, notice period, or how you explain your background.
That is usually not a CV issue anymore. It becomes an interview performance, role alignment, competition, or hiring manager confidence issue.
This distinction matters because many candidates keep rewriting their CV when the real problem is elsewhere.
If your CV is being opened but ignored, I would not start by changing fonts, colours, or layout. I would start with the hiring signals.
Review your CV and ask:
Is my target role obvious within the first few seconds?
Does my profile match the type of role I am applying for?
Does my most recent experience clearly support my next move?
Have I included achievements, not just responsibilities?
Can a recruiter understand the scale of my work?
Have I used language that matches the UK job market and the vacancy?
Does the CV make me look focused or scattered?
Is there anything unclear that could make me look risky?
Would I confidently send this CV to a hiring manager if I were the recruiter?
That last question is important. Recruiters are not only deciding whether they like you. They are deciding whether they can represent you.
A recruiter has to put your CV in front of a hiring manager and, in some cases, explain why you are worth interviewing. If your CV does not give them enough evidence to make that case, they may not reply even if you seem broadly suitable.
A CV does not get replies because it is “nice”. It gets replies because it reduces doubt.
That is the real function of a strong CV.
It shows the recruiter:
You understand the kind of role you are applying for
You have relevant experience
You have delivered value before
Your level matches the vacancy
Your background makes sense
You are worth a conversation
Most candidates think their CV is a record of their career. It is not. Not in a hiring process.
Your CV is a case for why you should be interviewed.
That case needs to be clear, specific, evidence led, and relevant to the role. Especially in the UK job market, where employers can receive large volumes of applications for professional, administrative, graduate, customer facing, technology, finance, marketing, HR, and operations roles.
If your CV gets opened but receives no reply, the opportunity is not to chase the recruiter with “just checking in”. The opportunity is to make the next recruiter’s decision easier.
Written by Simar Malhi, a recruiter and headhunter with international recruitment experience. I write about CVs, job applications, hiring decisions, and the reality behind recruitment processes. My goal is to help candidates understand more honestly how employers, recruiters, and hiring managers actually select candidates.
Poor formatting that makes the CV difficult to scan
A profile that does not match the role applied for
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin