An APS statement of claims is not a mini cover letter. It is your evidence document. The panel is reading it to decide whether your skills, experience, judgement, communication style, and motivation match the role and APS classification level. A good statement of claims gives clear examples, links your work to the job requirements, and shows the kind of thinking the role needs. A weak one sounds polished but says very little. I see this often: candidates write about being passionate, adaptable, collaborative, and committed to public service, but they forget to prove anything. The best APS statement of claims examples are specific, concise, evidence based, and written for the actual vacancy, not copied from a generic government application template.
An APS statement of claims is usually a short written pitch that explains why you are suitable for a specific Australian Public Service role. Depending on the job ad, it may ask you to respond to selection criteria, address the ideal candidate section, describe your relevant skills and experience, or explain how you meet the duties of the role.
That is the formal answer. The real answer is simpler.
Your statement of claims helps the panel answer this question:
Can this person do the job at this APS level, in this agency context, with enough evidence for us to confidently shortlist them?
That last part matters. APS recruitment is not only about sounding capable. Panels need evidence they can defend. Your application is being compared against other applicants, and the panel needs to document why some candidates progressed and others did not. This is why vague claims are risky. They give the panel very little to work with.
When I read APS applications, I am not looking for dramatic storytelling. I am looking for alignment. I want to see whether the candidate understands the work, can operate at the right level, communicates clearly, and has examples that prove the claims being made.
A strong APS statement of claims usually does four things well:
It directly responds to the job ad
It uses examples instead of empty traits
It shows judgement appropriate to the APS level
Most candidates think the panel is looking for the “best writer”. Not quite. Good writing helps, but the panel is really looking for evidence of fit.
In practical terms, they are looking for:
Relevant experience that matches the duties
Clear examples showing what you personally did
Evidence of judgement, problem solving, and communication
Understanding of the APS environment or transferable public sector style work
Signs that you can work with stakeholders, manage priorities, and handle complexity
Capability at the right classification level
The mistake many candidates make is treating all APS levels the same. They write an APS3 statement like an APS6 statement, or an APS6 statement like an APS4 task list. That is where applications start to wobble.
There is no single perfect structure because every APS job ad asks for something slightly different. Some ask for a 500 word pitch. Some ask for 750 words. Some ask for two pages. Some ask you to address specific criteria. Others ask for a general statement against the role description.
But for most APS statement of claims applications, this structure works well:
A short opening paragraph that positions you for the role
Two to four evidence based body paragraphs aligned to the key requirements
One or two strong examples that show capability in action
A closing sentence that reinforces fit without sounding desperate
The opening should not be a fluffy introduction. It should quickly tell the panel what kind of candidate you are and why your background is relevant.
Weak Example
I am excited to apply for this role because I am passionate about helping people and believe I would be a great fit for your team. I am hardworking, organised, and enthusiastic about contributing to the department.
Good Example
I offer three years of experience in high volume administrative and client service environments, with strong capability in case management support, records accuracy, stakeholder communication, and applying policy and procedure in time sensitive work. My background aligns closely with this APS4 role because I have consistently supported complex enquiries, managed competing priorities, and maintained quality standards while working with vulnerable clients and internal teams.
This example suits an entry level or early career APS3 role involving administration, customer service, processing, records, and team support.
Example
I offer practical experience in customer service, administration, records management, and team based support, with a strong focus on accuracy, reliability, and respectful communication. I am confident working with established procedures, managing routine enquiries, and supporting colleagues to deliver timely outcomes.
In my previous customer service role, I managed a high volume of enquiries from clients with different levels of urgency and understanding. I was responsible for confirming information, updating records, escalating complex matters, and ensuring each interaction was handled professionally. When our team experienced an increase in enquiry volumes, I helped maintain service standards by prioritising urgent matters, keeping notes accurate, and checking unclear information before responding. This reduced follow up errors and helped the team manage workload more consistently.
I also bring strong attention to detail. In my administrative work, I regularly handled data entry, document checks, inbox monitoring, and file updates. I understand that small errors in administrative work can create larger issues for clients, colleagues, and decision makers. For that reason, I use checklists, record keeping habits, and careful review before submitting work.
I would bring a dependable, service focused approach to this APS3 role. I understand the importance of following procedures, asking questions when required, treating people respectfully, and contributing to a team environment where accurate work matters.
Why this example works
This example does not try to oversell the candidate. For APS3, that is sensible. It shows reliability, accuracy, service focus, procedure following, escalation judgement, and team contribution. The example is not dramatic, but it is credible.
A panel does not expect an APS3 applicant to sound like a senior policy adviser. They want evidence that the person can do the work, learn quickly, follow instructions, and apply good judgement within the scope of the role.
This example suits an APS4 role involving client service, case support, compliance administration, operational delivery, or program support.
Example
I bring experience in client service, case administration, stakeholder communication, and managing competing operational priorities. My strengths align well with this APS4 role, particularly my ability to interpret procedures, maintain accurate records, support decision making, and communicate clearly with internal and external stakeholders.
In my recent role, I supported a busy service delivery team responsible for processing client requests within defined timeframes. I managed incoming enquiries, reviewed documentation for completeness, updated case files, and liaised with internal staff when information was missing or unclear. One recurring issue involved incomplete client submissions, which often delayed processing. I noticed that many delays came from the same missing information, so I created a simple checklist for my own workflow and shared it with colleagues. This helped improve consistency, reduced unnecessary back and forth, and made it easier to identify which matters could progress quickly.
I am comfortable working with procedures while still applying practical judgement. For example, when clients contacted us about sensitive or urgent matters, I remained calm, confirmed key details, and escalated issues appropriately rather than trying to resolve matters outside my authority. I understand the importance of balancing empathy with process, especially in a public service environment where fairness, accuracy, and consistency matter.
I would bring a careful, organised, and service oriented approach to this APS4 position. I am confident managing routine complexity, supporting team outcomes, and communicating in a way that is clear, respectful, and aligned with agency expectations.
Why this example works
This example shows the candidate is not just “doing tasks”. They are noticing patterns, improving their own workflow, communicating with stakeholders, and making appropriate escalation decisions. That is the shift panels want to see at APS4.
A common APS4 mistake is writing only a list of duties. Duties tell the panel what your job involved. Evidence tells them how well you performed and how your thinking fits the role.
This example suits an APS5 project officer, program officer, compliance officer, policy support officer, or operational coordination role.
Example
I offer experience in project support, stakeholder coordination, reporting, and process improvement, with a strong ability to manage competing priorities and deliver quality outcomes in structured environments. My background aligns with this APS5 role through my experience coordinating work across teams, preparing clear written material, and using sound judgement to resolve operational issues.
In my current role, I support a national program team responsible for coordinating service delivery across multiple locations. I manage weekly reporting, track action items, prepare briefing material, and liaise with operational staff to confirm progress against deadlines. During a recent reporting cycle, several teams were submitting inconsistent data, which made it difficult for senior staff to identify risks and prepare accurate updates. I reviewed the common gaps, clarified reporting expectations with team leads, and developed a standard summary format that captured progress, blockers, and decisions required. This improved the quality of information provided to managers and reduced the time spent clarifying incomplete updates.
I also bring strong stakeholder communication skills. I regularly work with colleagues across operations, policy, and corporate support areas, each with different priorities. I have learned that effective stakeholder management is not just being polite or responsive. It is about understanding what each stakeholder needs, clarifying expectations early, and keeping people informed before small issues become larger problems. In practice, this means documenting decisions, following up clearly, and escalating risks with enough context for managers to act.
This APS5 role requires someone who can work independently while staying aligned with team priorities. I would bring a practical, organised, and outcomes focused approach, supported by strong written communication, problem solving, and the ability to contribute to better ways of working.
Why this example works
This example shows APS5 level maturity. The candidate identifies an issue, improves consistency, supports managers, and works across teams. It also explains stakeholder management in a more realistic way than “I build strong relationships”.
This example suits an APS6 team leader, senior project officer, senior policy officer, senior program officer, or operational leadership role.
Example
I bring experience leading complex operational work, managing competing priorities, improving processes, and supporting teams to deliver high quality outcomes in deadline driven environments. My background aligns strongly with this APS6 role, particularly through my ability to exercise sound judgement, engage stakeholders, manage risk, and translate broader priorities into practical delivery.
In my current role, I lead a small team responsible for coordinating program reporting and operational support across several business areas. When I joined the team, reporting processes were inconsistent, deadlines were frequently missed, and senior managers lacked clear visibility of emerging risks. I reviewed the existing workflow, consulted key stakeholders, and identified that the issue was not simply workload. The real problem was unclear ownership, inconsistent escalation points, and reporting templates that did not capture decision ready information.
To address this, I clarified roles within the team, introduced a more structured reporting rhythm, and worked with business areas to agree on what information needed to be provided and when. I also coached team members on how to identify risks earlier and write updates that were concise, evidence based, and useful for decision makers. As a result, reporting became more consistent, managers received clearer information, and the team was able to focus less on chasing updates and more on improving the quality of advice provided.
I have also developed strong stakeholder judgement. In complex environments, stakeholders do not always want the same outcome, and the loudest request is not always the highest priority. I manage this by clarifying the objective, understanding constraints, documenting decisions, and escalating issues with options rather than simply presenting problems. This approach has helped me maintain productive relationships while still protecting governance, quality, and delivery standards.
I would bring to this APS6 role a calm, accountable, and practical leadership style. I am confident managing ambiguity, supporting staff, improving systems, and providing clear advice that helps senior leaders make informed decisions.
Use this as a structure, not a script. Panels can usually tell when a candidate has copied a template and lightly swapped the job title. The goal is to help you organise your evidence, not make every application sound the same.
Template
I offer experience in insert relevant capability areas, with a strong background in insert work environment, role type, or technical area. My experience aligns with this role through my ability to insert two to three key requirements from the job ad, while maintaining a focus on insert relevant APS value, outcome, or work style such as accuracy, service delivery, stakeholder engagement, governance, or quality advice.
In my role as insert role title, I was responsible for insert relevant responsibility linked to the vacancy. A key example was when insert situation or problem. I identified that insert issue, risk, gap, or need, and I took action by insert what you personally did. This involved insert stakeholder engagement, analysis, planning, communication, or decision making. As a result, insert outcome, improvement, delivered result, or impact.
This experience is relevant to the advertised role because insert direct link to the duty, selection criteria, or ideal candidate requirement. It demonstrates my ability to insert capability, while also showing insert judgement, independence, teamwork, or communication skill appropriate to APS level.
I would bring a insert practical professional style approach to this position, supported by insert strongest relevant skills and a clear understanding of the importance of insert agency relevant priority, public service context, or work requirement.
The strongest example is not always the biggest project. It is the example that best proves the capability the panel needs.
Candidates often choose examples based on what sounds impressive to them. Panels assess examples based on relevance. That is a different lens.
Before choosing an example, ask yourself:
Does this example match one of the main duties in the job ad?
Does it show the right APS level of responsibility?
Does it prove what I personally did?
Does it include a result or useful outcome?
Does it show judgement, not just activity?
Could a panel clearly map this example to the selection criteria?
A small but relevant example is usually stronger than a big but vague one.
The most common problem is not bad writing. It is unsupported writing.
Candidates often sound professional, but the panel cannot see enough evidence to shortlist them confidently. That is frustrating because many of these candidates probably can do the job. They simply have not made the case properly.
Common mistakes include:
Writing a cover letter instead of a statement of claims
Repeating the job ad without proving capability
Using generic phrases like “excellent communication skills” with no example
Describing the team’s work instead of personal contribution
Giving too much background before getting to the evidence
Ignoring the APS level of the role
You do not need to already work in the APS to write a strong APS statement of claims. But you do need to show that you understand the kind of work environment you are applying to.
APS work often values:
Fairness and consistency
Clear written communication
Evidence based decision making
Respectful service delivery
Accurate records
Stakeholder consultation
Policy and procedure awareness
Your APS statement of claims should match the level of the job. This is one of the biggest differences between an application that sounds plausible and one that sounds competitive.
For APS3, focus on:
Accuracy
Reliability
Customer or client service
Following procedures
Teamwork
Willingness to learn
Escalating issues appropriately
For APS4, focus on:
Follow the word limit or page limit exactly. If the job ad asks for 500 words, do not send 900. If it asks for two pages, do not submit four pages and hope your brilliance excuses the instruction breach. It does not.
In recruitment, ignoring the application instructions is not a bold strategic move. It is evidence.
A good length depends on the request:
For 500 words, use one strong opening and two focused examples
For 750 words, use two to three examples with clearer role alignment
For two pages, cover the major criteria with enough evidence but avoid padding
For separate selection criteria, respond to each criterion directly
The shorter the limit, the sharper your writing needs to be. Do not waste the first 100 words saying you are excited and passionate. The panel assumes you are interested because you applied. Use the space to prove fit.
A tight statement is not a shallow statement. It is a disciplined one.
Before submitting your APS statement of claims, read it like a panel member who has limited time and many applications to assess.
Ask yourself:
Have I addressed the actual job ad, not a generic APS role?
Have I shown evidence for the key requirements?
Have I made my personal contribution clear?
Have I included outcomes or results?
Have I matched the right APS level?
Have I avoided empty claims and vague adjectives?
Have I written clearly enough for the panel to assess quickly?
Written by Simar Malhi, a recruiter and headhunter with international recruitment experience. I write about CVs, job applications, hiring decisions, and the reality behind recruitment processes. My goal is to help candidates understand more honestly how employers, recruiters, and hiring managers actually select candidates.
Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeIt makes the panel’s assessment job easier
That final point is underrated. Candidates sometimes think a more complex application sounds more senior. It usually does the opposite. If the panel has to dig through dense paragraphs to find your evidence, you are making their job harder. In a competitive APS process, clarity is not a nice bonus. It is part of the assessment.
At APS3 and APS4, panels often want to see reliability, accuracy, service focus, teamwork, ability to follow process, and sound judgement within defined boundaries.
At APS5, they expect more independence. You should show that you can manage competing priorities, solve problems, communicate with stakeholders, and contribute to process improvement.
At APS6, the bar rises again. You need to show leadership, judgement, ownership, risk awareness, stakeholder influence, and the ability to drive outcomes through others or across a more complex work area.
This is where generic examples fail. Saying “I have strong stakeholder engagement skills” means very little unless you show the context, the difficulty, your action, and the result. Stakeholder engagement with one internal colleague is not the same as managing competing views across policy, legal, operations, and external providers. Panels notice that difference.
The good example works because it gives the panel useful information immediately. It names the relevant experience, connects it to the role, and shows practical value.
A simple framework I like is:
Context: Where did you use the capability?
Action: What did you personally do?
Judgement: What decisions, priorities, or risks did you manage?
Result: What improved, changed, or was delivered?
Relevance: Why does this matter for the APS role?
That relevance step is often missing. Candidates give an example, then leave the panel to guess why it matters. Do not make them guess. Connect the dots.
That is important because panels hear the same phrases constantly. Strong stakeholder engagement. Excellent communication. Proven problem solving. Results driven. These phrases are not wrong, but they are weak without evidence.
Why this example works
This example shows APS6 level thinking. It does not just say the candidate led a team. It shows diagnosis, consultation, process improvement, coaching, risk management, and decision support.
That is what many APS6 statements miss. Candidates describe being busy, senior, or responsible for important work, but they do not show the level of judgement behind their actions. APS6 panels are often looking for the thinking behind the work, not just the work itself.
For example, if the role is about compliance administration, a clear example about identifying documentation issues, applying procedure, escalating risk, and improving accuracy may be better than a grand project example that has nothing to do with compliance.
If the role is policy focused, the panel will want to see analysis, written advice, stakeholder consultation, evidence use, and awareness of consequences. If the role is service delivery focused, they may care more about client communication, prioritisation, accuracy, empathy, and process adherence. If the role is project based, they will look for planning, coordination, risk management, reporting, and delivery follow through.
The job ad is not decoration. It is the marking guide hiding in plain sight.
Using one example that does not cover enough of the criteria
Trying to sound senior by using vague corporate language
Forgetting to mention outcomes
Submitting the same statement for multiple APS jobs
The most dangerous mistake is sounding “generally suitable”. General suitability rarely wins in competitive APS recruitment. The panel needs specific suitability for this role.
Weak Example
I have excellent communication skills and have worked with many stakeholders. I am able to manage competing priorities and work well under pressure. I always try to deliver high quality work and support my team.
Good Example
In my current role, I coordinate weekly updates from five regional teams and prepare a consolidated report for senior managers. When reporting quality became inconsistent, I introduced a standard format that captured key risks, delayed actions, and decisions required. This improved the clarity of information provided to managers and reduced follow up requests from business areas.
The weak example tells. The good example proves. That is the difference.
Risk management
Accountability
Working within boundaries of authority
This does not mean you should stuff your statement with APS buzzwords. Please do not. Nothing says “I have no idea what this means” like forcing public service language into every second sentence.
Instead, show these qualities through your examples.
For example, rather than saying:
Weak Example
I understand the importance of governance and integrity in the APS.
Say:
Good Example
When reviewing client documentation, I noticed several cases where required evidence had not been recorded consistently. I checked the relevant procedure, corrected the records within my authority, and escalated the remaining cases with a clear summary of the issue and recommended next steps.
The good example shows governance and integrity without announcing them like a slogan on an office wall.
Managing routine complexity
Applying procedures with judgement
Supporting clients or stakeholders
Prioritising work
Improving small processes
Communicating clearly
Contributing to team outcomes
For APS5, focus on:
Working independently
Coordinating work across stakeholders
Solving operational problems
Preparing written material
Supporting projects or programs
Managing competing priorities
Identifying risks and improving processes
For APS6, focus on:
Leadership and accountability
Managing complexity
Coaching or guiding others
Stakeholder influence
Risk awareness
Decision support
Process improvement
Delivering outcomes through others
This is where many candidates misread the assignment. An APS6 statement that only says “I completed tasks accurately” is underselling the candidate. An APS3 statement that tries to sound like executive leadership can feel inflated. The best applications meet the level honestly and confidently.
Have I followed the word limit and instructions?
Does my statement work with my resume rather than repeat it?
Would the panel know why I should progress to interview?
One practical recruiter tip: after writing your statement, highlight every sentence that contains evidence. If most of the document is not highlighted, you probably have too much explanation and not enough proof.
Your statement of claims does not need to be perfect literature. It needs to be clear, relevant, and assessable. The best APS applications make it easy for the panel to say, “Yes, this person has shown the capability we need.”
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin