Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeAn executive resume package in Australia should do much more than make your resume look polished. At senior level, the real job is to position your leadership value, commercial impact, board level judgement, stakeholder influence, and fit for the kind of executive role you actually want next. A good package usually includes an executive resume, LinkedIn profile optimisation, cover letter or executive application letter, and sometimes selection criteria, biography, interview preparation, or career positioning strategy. But here is the part people often miss: the documents are not the product. The thinking behind them is. If the package does not clarify your leadership narrative, decision level, achievements, and market positioning, it is just expensive formatting with nicer fonts.
An executive resume package is a set of career documents and positioning assets designed for senior leaders, executives, general managers, directors, C suite candidates, board candidates, and senior professionals moving into higher responsibility roles.
In Australia, this may include:
Executive resume
Executive cover letter or application letter
LinkedIn profile rewrite
Executive biography
Board profile
Selection criteria responses for government, education, health, not for profit, or public sector roles
Career positioning consultation
You may need an executive resume package if your next role depends on positioning, not just experience.
That usually applies if you are:
Applying for executive, director, general manager, head of, chief, partner, or senior leadership roles
Moving from operational leadership into strategic leadership
Transitioning industries and need your value translated clearly
Moving from overseas into the Australian job market
Applying for public sector, government, university, health, board, or not for profit leadership roles
Struggling to explain a complex career history
Returning to the market after several years in one organisation
Interview preparation
Recruiter or hiring manager style feedback
Achievement development and leadership narrative work
The mistake many candidates make is assuming the package is mainly about writing. It is not. At executive level, writing is only the visible layer. The real value sits underneath: deciding what to emphasise, what to remove, what level to pitch you at, and how to make your experience credible without sounding inflated.
A junior resume answers, “Can this person do the job?”
An executive resume answers a more complex question: “Can this person be trusted with leadership, commercial outcomes, people, risk, strategy, money, reputation, and change?”
That is why an executive resume package needs to be strategic. A pretty resume that lists responsibilities will not carry you at senior level. Hiring managers and executive recruiters are looking for evidence of judgement, scale, leadership maturity, and outcomes. They are also quietly testing whether you understand your own value.
Targeting confidential roles through recruiters or networks
Finding that your resume gets polite silence despite strong experience
Here is the blunt recruiter reality: many senior candidates are not short on experience. They are short on positioning.
I see this often. Someone has led teams, managed budgets, influenced major stakeholders, improved performance, delivered transformation, handled risk, and made difficult decisions. Then their resume reads like a job description written by a committee that had lost the will to live.
That is not a lack of achievement. That is a translation problem.
An executive resume package is useful when your career story has value, but the market is not immediately seeing it.
A strong executive resume package should not be stuffed with random extras just to make it look more valuable. More documents do not automatically mean better positioning. The right package depends on your target role, sector, seniority, and application channel.
This is the core document. It should be concise, commercially sharp, and written for senior decision makers.
A strong executive resume should include:
A clear executive profile that positions your leadership value
Core leadership capabilities aligned with your target roles
Evidence of commercial, operational, strategic, people, or transformation impact
Scope indicators such as team size, budget, region, portfolio, revenue, assets, projects, or stakeholder scale
Selected achievements with context and outcomes
Career history that shows progression and decision level
Education, board roles, certifications, professional memberships, and relevant credentials
Australian market appropriate language and formatting
The executive resume should not read like a task list. At senior level, tasks matter less than decisions, outcomes, scale, and judgement.
Weak Example
Responsible for leading operations, managing stakeholders, improving performance, and delivering business outcomes.
Good Example
Led national operations across a multi site portfolio, improving service delivery consistency, reducing operational risk, and strengthening executive reporting for board and senior leadership decision making.
The good version works because it shows scope, leadership environment, business value, and senior relevance. It does not just say “I was responsible for things.” Everyone is responsible for things. Hiring managers want to know what changed because you were there.
LinkedIn matters more at executive level than many candidates admit. Not because every hiring manager is obsessively reading profiles at midnight, but because recruiters use LinkedIn constantly to validate, shortlist, search, and compare senior talent.
Your LinkedIn profile should not be a copy and paste version of your resume. It should support your positioning, show credibility, and make your leadership direction obvious.
A good executive LinkedIn profile should clarify:
What kind of leader you are
What sectors, functions, or business problems you understand
What outcomes you are known for delivering
What scale you have operated at
What keywords recruiters may search for
Whether your profile matches the level of roles you are targeting
One of the biggest LinkedIn mistakes I see is senior candidates sounding either too vague or too desperate. “Passionate transformational leader driving excellence” tells me almost nothing. I do not know what you transform, what excellence means, or whether you have done it in a $20 million business or a $2 billion organisation.
Strong executive positioning is specific without being noisy.
For senior roles, a cover letter should not repeat the resume. It should connect your background to the role’s priorities.
A useful executive cover letter should answer:
Why this role makes sense for you
Why your leadership background fits the organisation’s current needs
What evidence supports your suitability
How your experience aligns with the role’s strategic priorities
What you bring beyond technical competence
In Australia, cover letters are still requested in many formal recruitment processes, especially government, education, public sector, not for profit, and senior corporate roles. Even when they are optional, a strong letter can help when your fit needs explanation.
But I will say this clearly: a generic executive cover letter is worse than no cover letter. It signals that you are applying broadly without doing the thinking. At senior level, that is not a great look.
Selection criteria are common in Australian government, public sector, universities, health, community services, and some not for profit executive roles.
If your target roles require selection criteria, your executive resume package may need this included.
Good selection criteria responses should:
Address the criterion directly
Use relevant executive examples
Show context, action, judgement, and result
Demonstrate leadership capability at the correct level
Avoid waffle, repetition, and generic claims
Align with the organisation’s values, operating environment, and role expectations
The trap with selection criteria is writing too much and saying too little. I have seen candidates produce pages of technically correct but painfully vague responses. The reader finishes exhausted and still cannot tell what the candidate actually did.
Selection criteria should not be a diary. They should be evidence.
An executive biography is useful when you need a more narrative profile for board roles, speaking opportunities, consulting, advisory work, portfolio careers, or senior networking.
A board profile is slightly different. It needs to highlight governance value, strategic contribution, risk oversight, committee experience, sector relevance, and board level judgement.
Not every executive needs this. If you are only applying for corporate executive jobs, an executive bio may be nice to have but not essential. If you are targeting board appointments, advisory roles, or high level introductions, it becomes more valuable.
An executive resume is not just a longer resume with more impressive words. In fact, many executive resumes fail because they try too hard to sound senior.
The difference is in the evaluation logic.
A standard resume is often assessed for skills, experience, qualifications, and job match. An executive resume is assessed for leadership relevance, commercial impact, strategic judgement, stakeholder credibility, and risk.
At executive level, employers are asking:
Has this person operated at the right scale?
Have they led through complexity?
Can they influence senior stakeholders?
Do they understand commercial and organisational consequences?
Have they built teams, improved performance, or changed direction?
Can they make decisions without needing constant supervision?
Are they credible with boards, executives, regulators, clients, investors, or senior partners?
Does their career pattern make sense for this appointment?
This is where many executive resumes fall apart. They provide a long list of what the person managed, but not enough evidence of how they thought, led, influenced, or delivered.
For example, “managed a team of 120” is useful information. But it becomes stronger when the resume explains what kind of team, what challenge existed, what leadership was required, and what improved.
Weak Example
Managed a large team and oversaw business operations.
Good Example
Led a 120 person operations workforce through a period of service redesign, improving accountability, strengthening frontline leadership capability, and stabilising delivery across high pressure sites.
The good example gives me leadership context. It tells me the candidate did not just hold a title. They navigated a business problem.
Recruiters do not read executive resumes like novels. We scan, assess, question, compare, and then decide whether the candidate deserves deeper attention.
That may sound harsh, but it is useful to understand. Your resume is not being read in a quiet room with a cup of tea and emotional investment. It is being reviewed against a role brief, a shortlist, a hiring manager’s expectations, and sometimes a pile of other strong candidates.
When I read an executive resume, I am usually looking for:
Level of role and decision making authority
Relevant industry, function, or business model experience
Scale of responsibility
Evidence of results
Leadership scope
Stakeholder complexity
Career progression
Stability and movement patterns
Strategic relevance to the role
Any gaps, inconsistencies, or unexplained shifts
I am also looking for what is missing.
If someone says they are a transformation leader but there are no transformation outcomes, I notice.
If someone says they are commercial but there are no numbers, budgets, revenue, cost, margin, growth, risk, or investment references, I notice.
If someone says they are strategic but every bullet point is operational administration, I notice.
If the resume is full of leadership adjectives but no evidence, I notice that too.
This is the uncomfortable part of executive applications: senior candidates are often screened out not because they are incapable, but because the resume creates doubt. And once doubt enters the process, the recruiter does not always have time to solve it for you.
Your resume should reduce uncertainty. That is one of its main jobs.
A good executive resume package should not simply describe your past. It should position your future.
That means it needs to answer five strategic questions.
Many senior candidates undersell themselves because their resume is stuck at the level of their previous job description.
If you are targeting executive roles, your resume needs to show executive level contribution. That does not mean exaggerating. It means selecting the right evidence.
A candidate targeting a Chief Operating Officer role should not spend most of the resume describing routine operational tasks. The resume should highlight enterprise leadership, operating model improvement, performance accountability, risk, transformation, governance, and cross functional influence.
A candidate targeting a General Manager role should show business unit leadership, P&L exposure where relevant, people leadership, operational performance, stakeholder management, and commercial decision making.
A candidate targeting a Head of role should show functional leadership, strategy execution, team development, specialist expertise, and influence across the business.
The level matters because hiring managers are not just asking whether you have experience. They are asking whether your experience translates to the level of responsibility they need.
Your leadership narrative is the thread that makes your career make sense.
It might be:
Scaling businesses through growth
Leading operational turnaround
Building high performing teams
Driving digital transformation
Improving governance and risk maturity
Leading commercial strategy
Managing complex stakeholder environments
Transforming customer, employee, or service outcomes
Integrating acquisitions or restructuring functions
Bringing stability to messy organisations
The resume package should make this narrative clear. Without it, the reader gets a collection of jobs instead of a leadership story.
A common mistake is trying to be positioned for everything. The candidate wants to look flexible, so the resume says they are strategic, operational, commercial, transformational, people focused, innovative, hands on, visionary, collaborative, data driven, customer centric, and results oriented.
At that point, the resume has not positioned the candidate. It has emptied the leadership adjective drawer onto the page.
Strong positioning requires choice.
Executives often make big claims. The stronger resumes prove them.
Proof may include:
Revenue growth
Cost reduction
Margin improvement
Budget ownership
Team size
Geographic scope
Transformation outcomes
Risk reduction
Customer or employee metrics
Productivity improvements
Not every achievement needs a dollar figure. Some roles are more qualitative, especially in government, health, education, community services, policy, and people leadership. But there still needs to be evidence.
If you cannot share confidential numbers, use scale, context, or directional outcomes.
For example:
Good Example
Improved executive reporting and governance rhythm across a complex multi stakeholder environment, enabling faster decision making and clearer accountability during a major operating model change.
That does not reveal confidential data, but it still shows business value.
This is where many executive resume packages should earn their money.
A strong executive resume is not created by adding more. It is often created by removing the wrong things.
At senior level, you may need to reduce:
Early career detail
Outdated technical tasks
Repetitive responsibilities
Junior level execution points
Internal jargon
Overly detailed project lists
Generic leadership language
Old certifications that no longer matter
Unnecessary personal information
I know candidates can feel attached to every part of their career history. That is understandable. You worked hard for it. But the resume is not a museum. It is a decision document.
If a detail does not support the role you want next, it may not deserve prime space.
An executive resume package for Australia should reflect local expectations.
That usually means:
Clear, direct resume language
No excessive self promotion
No photo unless there is a very specific reason
No unnecessary personal details such as marital status, date of birth, or full home address
Strong achievement focus without sounding exaggerated
Australian spelling and terminology
ATS friendly formatting
Role relevant keywords used naturally
Evidence aligned with the level of the target role
Australian hiring culture can be interesting. Employers often say they want confident leaders, but they can be allergic to anything that sounds too glossy, inflated, or Americanised. You need to show value without sounding like a motivational poster in a suit.
That balance matters.
The value of an executive resume package is not just in the final documents. It is in the quality of the thinking, questioning, editing, and positioning.
A good provider should be able to:
Ask intelligent questions about your career
Identify achievements you have forgotten or undervalued
Challenge vague claims
Translate responsibilities into leadership value
Understand Australian hiring expectations
Adapt the package to your target roles
Explain what they are doing and why
Push back when your current positioning is too broad, too junior, or too unclear
This matters because senior candidates often have blind spots.
Some underestimate their impact because they see major achievements as “just part of the job.”
Some overestimate the importance of job titles and underestimate evidence.
Some assume the reader will understand the significance of a project because it was obvious internally. Outside the organisation, it is not obvious at all.
Some include too much context because they want to be thorough. Unfortunately, thorough can become unreadable very quickly.
A strong executive resume writer or strategist should help you make better decisions about what belongs in the story.
Not all executive resume packages are equal. Some are genuinely strategic. Others are generic templates dressed up as premium services.
Be careful if you see these red flags.
No resume writer can honestly guarantee you an executive job. They can improve your positioning, clarity, competitiveness, and application quality. They cannot control the market, internal candidates, recruiter preferences, remuneration fit, hiring freezes, role changes, board politics, or whether the CEO already has someone in mind.
A guarantee may sound comforting, but executive hiring is not that simple.
Design has a place. Readability matters. Formatting matters. But a beautiful resume with weak content is still weak.
At executive level, overly designed resumes can also create ATS issues or make the document harder to scan. The best format is usually clean, structured, professional, and easy to read.
The resume should feel premium because the thinking is sharp, not because there are decorative lines everywhere.
Watch for phrases like:
Visionary leader
Proven track record
Dynamic executive
Results driven professional
Strategic thinker
Passionate about excellence
Change agent
Highly motivated leader
These phrases are not automatically wrong, but they are often empty. If the resume relies on them heavily, it usually means the writer has not done the deeper work.
At executive level, vague praise is not positioning.
If someone can write your executive resume after a five minute form and no meaningful conversation, be cautious.
A strong executive resume requires digging. The writer needs to understand your decisions, context, challenges, scale, achievements, leadership style, and target direction.
Surface level input usually produces surface level output.
An executive resume for a corporate CFO role is not the same as one for a public sector executive role, board appointment, university leadership role, not for profit CEO role, or operations director role in mining, construction, health, logistics, technology, or professional services.
The package should reflect the audience. Senior hiring is contextual. A one size approach is lazy.
You will get a better result from an executive resume package if you prepare properly.
Before starting, gather:
Current resume
LinkedIn profile link
Target job titles
Example job ads or role descriptions
Preferred sectors or industries
Roles you do not want
Major achievements
Budget, revenue, team, portfolio, project, or operational scale where relevant
Board, committee, governance, or stakeholder experience
Awards, publications, speaking, media, or thought leadership if relevant
Performance metrics where you can share them
Career gaps or transitions that need careful explanation
Any selection criteria requirements
Your preferred next move
Do not worry if your notes are messy. The point is to bring useful raw material.
The best executive resume work often happens when a candidate says, “I do not know if this matters, but…” and then shares the most useful achievement in the whole conversation.
A good recruiter or resume strategist knows how to spot the gold. But they cannot use what they never uncover.
This is important.
An executive resume package can improve how your experience is presented. It cannot create experience you do not have.
It cannot fix:
A major mismatch between your background and the target role
Unrealistic salary expectations
Lack of required sector experience for highly specific appointments
Poor interview performance
Weak references
Reputation issues in a small market
Applying only to roles where internal candidates are heavily favoured
A job search strategy based only on online applications
Confusing career goals
Lack of evidence behind senior claims
This does not mean the package is useless. It means the resume is only one part of executive hiring.
At senior level, many roles are influenced by networks, search firms, referrals, board relationships, reputation, and timing. Your documents need to be strong, but they also need to support a broader market approach.
If you buy an executive resume package expecting it to magically overcome every hiring barrier, you will be disappointed. If you use it as a strategic positioning tool, it can be very valuable.
An executive resume package is worth it if it gives you clearer positioning, stronger evidence, better market alignment, and documents you can confidently use across serious opportunities.
It is probably worth considering if:
You are applying for roles above $150,000 to $200,000 and presentation matters
Your career is complex and hard to summarise
You are moving into a more senior leadership tier
You are not getting interviews despite relevant experience
You struggle to explain your impact clearly
You are entering the Australian market from overseas
You need selection criteria or government application support
You want to align your resume, LinkedIn, and executive narrative
It may not be worth it if:
You are not clear on your target roles
You expect the writer to decide your entire career direction for you
You are applying for roles far outside your realistic experience level
You only want a prettier template
You are unwilling to provide detail, examples, or honest input
You want someone to make you sound senior without evidence
The best executive resume package is collaborative. The writer brings structure, market judgement, positioning skill, and hiring insight. You bring the raw material, truth, context, and direction.
If either side is weak, the result suffers.
Once you receive your documents, do not judge them only by whether they sound impressive. Judge them by whether they make hiring decisions easier.
A strong executive resume package should pass these tests:
Can a recruiter understand your target level within 10 to 20 seconds?
Does the resume show scale, not just duties?
Are your achievements specific enough to be credible?
Does the LinkedIn profile align with the resume without copying it word for word?
Does the cover letter connect your background to role priorities?
Is the language clear, Australian appropriate, and not over inflated?
Is there enough evidence for your leadership claims?
Does the document remove confusion rather than create it?
Does it make your next move feel logical?
Would a hiring manager know why you are relevant?
One of my favourite tests is simple: remove the job titles and see whether the achievements still show seniority.
If the resume only sounds executive because the job titles are impressive, it is not working hard enough.
A strong executive resume should communicate senior value through evidence.
The more senior the candidate, the more tempting it becomes to use broad language. Strategy. Transformation. Leadership. Innovation. Growth. Excellence.
These words are not the problem. The lack of specificity is.
Instead of saying you drove transformation, explain what changed. Instead of saying you influenced stakeholders, explain who, why, and to what outcome. Instead of saying you improved performance, explain what performance issue existed and what improved.
Specific beats impressive.
Your executive resume is not supposed to include everything. It is supposed to include what matters for the next decision.
Early career detail can usually be reduced. Old technical tasks can often be removed. Repeated responsibilities can be consolidated. The reader does not need every project from 2008 unless it directly supports the current target.
Senior resumes become powerful when they are selective.
Candidates often think hiring managers are only looking for the best person. That is partly true, but they are also trying to avoid a bad appointment.
Executive hiring carries risk. A poor senior hire can affect strategy, culture, financial performance, team stability, stakeholder confidence, and delivery.
Your resume needs to reduce perceived risk by showing relevant context, sound judgement, credible outcomes, and appropriate seniority.
Every organisation has internal project names, frameworks, acronyms, and operating language. Inside the business, that language makes sense. Outside the business, it can be meaningless.
A good executive resume translates internal complexity into market relevant value.
Do not assume the reader understands your internal world. Make the significance clear.
This happens more than people realise. Senior candidates bury excellent achievements under generic responsibilities because they assume the reader will connect the dots.
The reader may not.
If you led a turnaround, say so clearly. If you stabilised a troubled function, explain it. If you influenced a major commercial decision, make that visible. If you built capability in a team that was underperforming, show the before and after.
Do not make the recruiter excavate your value with a tiny spoon.
Choose based on fit, not just price or inclusions.
Before buying, ask:
Does this provider understand executive hiring or just resume formatting?
Do they ask about target roles before recommending documents?
Can they explain their process clearly?
Do they understand Australian resume expectations?
Can they work with complex career histories?
Do they challenge generic claims?
Do they consider LinkedIn and recruiter search behaviour?
Do they understand selection criteria if you need them?
Do they focus on evidence, positioning, and clarity?
Do they avoid unrealistic promises?
Also pay attention to the conversation. If you feel like you are being pushed into a package before anyone understands your goals, that is not a great sign.
A proper executive resume package should feel tailored to your situation. Not in the fake personalised way where your name gets inserted into a template, but in the real way where the strategy reflects your market, level, and next move.
An executive resume package in Australia should help you present your leadership value clearly, credibly, and strategically. It should not just make your resume look nicer. It should make your career story easier to understand and your relevance easier to defend.
The strongest packages clarify your executive positioning, sharpen your evidence, align your resume and LinkedIn profile, and help recruiters and hiring managers quickly understand why you belong in the conversation.
The weakest packages do the opposite. They add generic language, over polish the formatting, and make you sound like every other “dynamic senior leader” in the pile.
At executive level, clarity is not a soft skill. It is a competitive advantage.
If your resume package helps the market understand your value faster, it is doing its job. If it only makes you sound more important without proving anything, it is decoration. And decoration does not get shortlisted when the hiring decision is serious.
Written by Simar Malhi, a recruiter and headhunter with international recruitment experience. I write about CVs, job applications, hiring decisions, and the reality behind recruitment processes. My goal is to help candidates understand more honestly how employers, recruiters, and hiring managers actually select candidates.
Compliance improvements
Board reporting exposure
Major projects delivered
Stakeholder groups influenced
Market expansion
Operational stabilisation
Culture or capability uplift
Long paragraphs that bury the point
Awareness of selection criteria where relevant
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin