Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeA job description resume matcher helps you compare your resume against a job ad so you can see whether your experience, skills, keywords, and achievements line up with what the employer is actually asking for. Used properly, it can help your resume pass applicant tracking system checks and make sense to a recruiter faster. Used badly, it turns your resume into a keyword salad that looks desperate, generic, or oddly robotic.
In Australia, the best way to use a resume matcher is not to chase a perfect score. It is to identify the strongest overlap between your real experience and the role, then rewrite your resume so that match is clear, honest, and easy to assess. The tool should support your judgement, not replace it.
A job description resume matcher compares your resume against a job description and looks for alignment. That alignment usually includes job title relevance, hard skills, soft skills, qualifications, tools, industry terms, responsibilities, and sometimes seniority level.
Most tools give you some kind of match score. Some highlight missing keywords. Some suggest phrases to add. Some check formatting, ATS readability, and whether your resume includes enough measurable achievements.
That sounds helpful, and it can be. But here is the part candidates often misunderstand: a resume matcher is not the hiring decision. It is only a comparison tool.
A hiring manager is not sitting there thinking, “This candidate scored 84 percent, let us hire them.” Recruiters are usually asking much more practical questions:
Does this person appear to have done similar work before?
Can I quickly understand their level?
Are the core skills visible without digging?
Does their recent experience match the role closely enough?
Are they likely to be worth a phone screen?
Australian employers often receive a high volume of applications, especially for roles advertised on SEEK, LinkedIn, Indeed, company career pages, and recruiter managed portals. Many organisations use applicant tracking systems to store, search, sort, and manage applications. Some systems also help recruiters identify relevant keywords and candidate profiles.
This does not mean every resume is rejected by a robot before a human sees it. That idea is a bit too dramatic. Hiring is inefficient, not always evil.
The practical reality is this: recruiters are usually working under time pressure. Hiring managers want shortlists quickly. Job ads are often imperfect. ATS platforms vary. Some recruiters search within databases using keywords. Some review applications manually. Some rely heavily on screening questions. Some skim first and read properly only when the resume looks relevant.
So your resume needs to work in two ways at once:
It must be readable by recruitment software.
It must be convincing to a human who is scanning quickly.
That is where a job description resume matcher can be useful. It helps you see whether your resume reflects the language of the job ad closely enough to be found, understood, and shortlisted.
But do not confuse matching with copying. The goal is not to mimic the job ad. The goal is to show that your background genuinely fits the role.
Is anything missing that creates doubt?
A resume matcher can help you find gaps, but it cannot fully judge context. It does not know whether your project was complex, whether your company was highly regulated, whether your stakeholder environment was messy, or whether your job title underplayed your actual responsibilities. That is where your judgement matters.
The biggest mistake is treating the match score like the final answer.
I see this kind of thinking often: “The tool says I am only a 62 percent match, so I need to add more keywords.” Sometimes that is true. Often, it is not.
A low score can mean your resume is missing important terms. It can also mean the tool is too literal. It may not understand equivalent language, industry nuance, career progression, or transferable experience.
For example, an Australian job ad might ask for “stakeholder engagement”, while your resume says “managed internal relationships across operations, finance, and customer service”. A human recruiter may understand the connection. A basic matcher may not.
That does not mean you should stuff “stakeholder engagement” everywhere. It means you should rewrite the relevant bullet so the skill is obvious.
Weak Example
Managed internal relationships across departments.
Good Example
Led stakeholder engagement across operations, finance, and customer service to resolve service delivery issues and improve reporting accuracy.
The second version works better because it does three things at once. It uses the employer’s language, shows the context, and explains the outcome. That is the sweet spot.
Keyword stuffing is what candidates do when they are trying to please the tool instead of persuade the employer. It usually creates a resume that feels unnatural and thin.
Recruiters notice that. And yes, we judge it.
A resume matcher should be used as a diagnostic tool. Not a magic button. Not a truth machine. Not your new personality.
The smartest approach is to use it in stages.
Before you upload anything into a matcher, read the job description properly. Do not skim it like a person trying to assemble furniture without instructions.
Look for the actual hiring priorities. Most job ads contain several types of information:
Essential requirements
Preferred skills
Daily responsibilities
Tools, systems, or platforms
Industry or regulatory context
Soft skills
Seniority signals
Cultural language
Vague filler written by someone who may or may not understand the job
Not every line has equal weight. “Must have experience with Xero” is different from “nice to have exposure to reporting tools”. “Lead a team of five” is different from “collaborate with team members”.
A good resume match starts with understanding what the employer is really screening for.
Every job ad has obvious and hidden non negotiables.
Obvious non negotiables might include:
CPA or CA qualification
Australian working rights
AHPRA registration
Forklift licence
Advanced Excel
Salesforce experience
Construction industry experience
Baseline security clearance
Hidden non negotiables are more subtle. They are often buried in responsibilities or phrased softly.
For example, “comfortable working in a fast paced environment” might actually mean the team is under resourced and needs someone who can handle pressure. “Strong stakeholder management” might mean the role deals with difficult internal clients. “Ability to work independently” might mean there is limited training.
A matcher may highlight the phrase, but it will not explain the workplace reality behind it. That is your job as the candidate. You need to decide where your resume should prove you can handle that reality.
Once you understand the job ad, use the matcher to compare your resume. Look at the missing keywords, but do not panic.
Ask yourself:
Is this missing skill genuinely part of my experience?
Have I used a different term for the same thing?
Is the missing keyword important or just job ad noise?
Would adding this term make my resume more accurate?
Can I prove the skill through an achievement, not just a list?
If the answer is yes, revise the resume. If the answer is no, do not fake it.
This is where many candidates damage their own applications. They add every missing keyword because the tool suggests it. Then they get to the interview and cannot back it up. That is not optimisation. That is creating future discomfort for yourself with extra steps.
A job description resume matcher can tell you what is missing, but it cannot always tell you how to write it well.
A weak resume says:
Weak Example
Responsible for customer service, admin, reporting, and stakeholder communication.
A stronger resume says:
Good Example
Managed customer enquiries, weekly reporting, and stakeholder communication for a high volume service team, improving response times and reducing repeated follow ups.
The stronger version is not just more keyword rich. It is easier to understand. It gives the recruiter context. It shows scale. It suggests impact.
When I screen resumes, I am not rewarding people for using fancy words. I am trying to understand what they did, where they did it, how much responsibility they had, and whether that maps to the role I am filling.
Your resume should answer those questions quickly.
There is no universal perfect match score. Anyone promising one is probably selling certainty because uncertainty is harder to package nicely.
As a general rule, a strong resume should clearly match the main requirements of the job description. But chasing 100 percent can backfire because job ads often include unrealistic wish lists.
A 75 percent match with honest, relevant, well written evidence is usually stronger than a 95 percent match created by dumping every keyword into your resume.
The better question is not “What score did I get?”
The better question is:
“Would a recruiter understand within 20 seconds why I am relevant for this role?”
That is the real test.
If the answer is no, improve the resume. If the answer is yes, stop obsessing over the tool.
A job description resume matcher is useful when it helps you notice gaps. It becomes dangerous when it makes you rewrite your resume for software instead of humans.
Let me say the quiet part clearly: matching keywords may help your resume get found, but it will not carry a weak application.
Once a recruiter opens your resume, the evaluation becomes more human and more judgement based.
Recruiters usually look at:
Current or most recent role
Career progression
Relevance of industry experience
Similarity of responsibilities
Tools and systems used
Qualifications or licences
Location and work rights
Employment stability
Seniority level
Communication quality
Evidence of outcomes
The first page matters because recruiters often make an initial relevance judgement quickly. That does not mean they are careless. It means they are comparing many applications against a brief, and they are looking for signals.
A job description resume matcher helps with some signals, especially keywords and skills. It does not fix unclear positioning.
For example, if you are applying for a Business Analyst role in Australia and your resume starts with a vague profile like “dynamic professional with excellent communication skills”, you have wasted prime real estate. A matcher might not punish you enough for that. A recruiter will.
A stronger opening would say:
Good Example
Business Analyst with experience across process improvement, requirements gathering, stakeholder workshops, UAT support, and reporting within financial services and technology environments.
That opening gives me immediate relevance. I know the role type, the core skills, and the environment. No motivational fog. Lovely.
The best resume matching is honest translation.
You are not inventing experience. You are translating your experience into the language the employer is already using.
If the job ad says “client relationship management” and your resume says “handled customer accounts”, consider whether “client relationship management” is a more accurate and stronger phrase.
If the job ad says “rostering” and your resume says “staff scheduling”, you may include both naturally.
For example:
Good Example
Managed staff scheduling and rostering for a team of 30 casual and permanent employees across rotating shifts.
This works because it captures both the natural phrase and the job ad keyword without sounding forced.
Generic keyword matching is weak. Evidence based matching is stronger.
Do not just add “project management” to your skills section. Show where you managed projects.
Weak Example
Skills: Project management, communication, leadership, problem solving.
Good Example
Coordinated a six month system migration project, managing timelines, vendor communication, user testing, and weekly progress reporting for senior stakeholders.
The good version gives a recruiter something to believe. It also gives the hiring manager something to ask about in the interview.
Some job ads are bloated. They include repeated phrases, vague values, internal language, and requirements copied from old position descriptions. Trying to match every word is a fast way to make your resume unreadable.
Focus on the language that affects screening:
Job title and role type
Core technical skills
Tools and systems
Certifications and qualifications
Industry knowledge
Key responsibilities
Measurable outcomes
Seniority level
Ignore fluff unless it genuinely connects to something you can prove.
Australian resumes are usually direct, practical, and achievement focused. They do not need dramatic personal branding. They do need to make your relevance clear.
A few Australian specific points matter when using a resume matcher.
Use “resume” rather than relying on “CV” unless your industry commonly uses CV, such as academia, medicine, or research. In most Australian job applications, resume is the standard term.
Use Australian spelling:
Organisation
Specialised
Analysed
Prioritised
Programme only when referring to specific contexts that use it, otherwise program is common in business writing
This sounds small, but consistency matters. A resume written in mixed US and Australian spelling can feel copied, AI generated, or not localised.
For Australian roles, work rights can matter. If you are a citizen, permanent resident, or hold a valid visa, include it clearly when it helps reduce doubt.
You do not need to over explain it. A simple line in your resume header or profile can work.
Good Example
Australian permanent resident with full working rights.
This is especially useful if your background includes international roles and an employer may otherwise wonder whether sponsorship is needed.
Australian employers often use local industry terms that may differ from other markets. For example, role titles, compliance language, awards, licences, education terms, and sector specific acronyms can vary.
If you have international experience, do not assume the employer will translate everything for you. Help them.
For example, if your overseas qualification is equivalent to an Australian standard, clarify it briefly. If your previous job title is uncommon in Australia, use a more recognisable equivalent in your profile or summary.
The goal is not to erase your background. It is to remove unnecessary interpretation work from the recruiter.
Not every section of your resume carries the same weight. If you want the best return from a job description resume matcher, focus on the sections recruiters actually use to judge relevance.
Your summary should position you clearly for the target role. It should not be a personality paragraph.
A strong summary usually includes:
Role identity
Years or level of experience where useful
Key areas of expertise
Industry or environment
Major tools, systems, or methods
One or two strengths relevant to the job
Avoid writing a summary that could fit anyone.
Weak Example
Hardworking professional with strong communication skills and a passion for delivering results.
This tells me almost nothing. It sounds pleasant, but pleasant does not shortlist.
Good Example
Payroll Officer with experience processing end to end payroll for weekly and fortnightly pay cycles, interpreting awards, maintaining employee records, and resolving payroll queries across multi site Australian operations.
That is useful. It tells me what the candidate does and why they may match the role.
The skills section is useful for ATS matching and quick recruiter scanning, but it should not become a dumping ground.
Include skills that match the job description and your real experience. Group them logically if needed.
For example:
Payroll processing
Award interpretation
Timesheet reconciliation
Employee records management
Payroll queries
Excel reporting
Chris21 or Employment Hero, if relevant
Do not include skills you cannot discuss in an interview. Recruiters do ask. Hiring managers definitely ask. And “I added it because the tool suggested it” is not a glorious answer.
This is the most important section. A resume matcher may focus on keyword presence, but recruiters focus on proof.
Each role should show:
Scope of responsibility
Type of work performed
Tools, systems, or methods used
Stakeholders involved
Results, improvements, or outcomes
Scale where relevant
If the job description asks for “process improvement”, do not just add that phrase to your skills. Put it into the work experience where it belongs.
Good Example
Reviewed manual invoice approval processes and introduced a tracking system that reduced follow up emails and improved visibility across finance and operations teams.
That is much stronger than simply listing “process improvement”.
Achievements help separate candidates who performed tasks from candidates who created value.
Not every achievement needs a dramatic number. Some roles are not measured neatly. But you should still show improvement, scale, complexity, or contribution.
Useful achievement angles include:
Reduced errors
Improved turnaround time
Increased customer satisfaction
Supported revenue growth
Managed high volume workload
Delivered project milestones
Improved reporting accuracy
Trained team members
Strengthened compliance
A matcher may not fully understand the quality of an achievement. A recruiter will.
This is where candidates need to be careful. Resume matchers are useful, but they are limited.
They cannot always tell you whether your resume is strategically positioned. They cannot judge whether your achievements are believable. They cannot know whether the hiring manager will value one type of experience over another. They cannot see internal politics, salary constraints, team dynamics, urgency, or whether the employer already has an internal candidate.
A matcher also cannot tell you whether the job ad is well written. Many job ads are not. Some are vague. Some are copied from old position descriptions. Some ask for too much because nobody challenged the hiring manager. Some mix two roles into one and then act surprised when unicorns remain fictional.
This matters because candidates sometimes treat the job ad as perfect truth. It is not. A job ad is often a compromise document. It may reflect what the employer wants, what HR approved, what the hiring manager remembered, and what someone copied from a previous vacancy.
So use the matcher, but keep your brain switched on.
If the tool says you are missing five skills, ask whether those skills are genuinely essential. If they are, address them. If they are nice to have, do not distort your whole resume around them.
Here is the framework I would use if I were helping a candidate tailor their resume for an Australian job application.
Read the job description and separate the criteria into three groups:
Must have
Strong advantage
Nice to have
This prevents you from treating every phrase equally.
For each must have requirement, find proof in your resume. If there is no proof, decide whether you genuinely have the experience and need to rewrite it, or whether the role may not be the right fit.
Where your experience matches but your wording differs, adjust the language.
Do not paste keywords randomly. Add them into real sentences, bullet points, summaries, and skills sections where they belong.
Your first page should make your fit obvious. That means your summary, key skills, most recent role, and strongest achievements should align with the role.
If the recruiter has to reach page three to understand why you applied, your resume is making them work too hard.
After using the matcher, read your resume like a sceptical hiring manager.
Ask:
Where is the evidence?
What level was this person operating at?
Did they actually do this work or just support it?
What systems did they use?
What outcomes did they influence?
Can I see the connection to the job?
That is much closer to real screening logic.
Finally, read the resume out loud. If it sounds like a robot swallowed a job ad, revise it.
A resume should be optimised, not embalmed.
Resume matchers can help, but they can also encourage bad habits. These are the mistakes I would watch closely.
This is the fastest way to create interview trouble. If the job requires advanced Power BI and you only opened a dashboard twice, do not claim advanced Power BI.
You can mention exposure if it is true, but do not oversell it.
Good Example
Exposure to Power BI dashboards for weekly sales reporting.
That is honest. It also prevents the hiring manager from expecting you to build complex reports from scratch.
Some candidates repeat the same phrase in every section because they think the ATS will reward them. The result is usually awkward.
You do not need to mention “stakeholder management” seven times. Once in the summary, once in skills, and once or twice in relevant experience may be enough if the evidence is strong.
A resume can match the keywords and still miss the level.
For example, a coordinator applying for a manager role may include many of the same terms, such as reporting, scheduling, stakeholder communication, and compliance. But the hiring manager will also look for leadership, decision making, ownership, budget responsibility, escalation management, and strategic contribution.
Matching words is not the same as matching seniority.
Some resumes look nice but are difficult for ATS platforms to read. Heavy graphics, text boxes, columns, icons, unusual fonts, and embedded images can create parsing issues.
Australian resumes do not need to look like a design portfolio unless you are applying for a design role and even then, your content still needs to parse properly.
Use clean headings, standard section names, clear dates, and simple formatting.
This is the big one. Candidates optimise for the ATS and forget the person.
A recruiter wants clarity. A hiring manager wants relevance. An ATS wants readable data. Your resume has to satisfy all three.
If your resume is technically optimised but unpleasant to read, you have not solved the problem.
A resume matcher is especially useful when:
You are applying for competitive roles
You are changing industries
You are not getting interview callbacks
You are applying through large company portals
You are targeting government, corporate, healthcare, education, finance, technology, or high volume roles
You have international experience and need to localise your resume for Australia
You are unsure whether your resume reflects the job ad clearly
You are tailoring one base resume for several similar roles
It is less useful when the role is highly relationship based, referral driven, niche, confidential, or handled mainly through direct recruiter outreach. Even then, the exercise can still help you sharpen your positioning.
The best candidates do not use resume matchers because they are trying to trick the system. They use them because they want to reduce friction. They make the fit easier to see.
That is the point.
Good resume matching feels natural. The resume reads like it was written for the type of role, not copied from the job ad.
Let us say the job description asks for:
Account management
Client retention
CRM management
Sales reporting
Stakeholder communication
Revenue growth
A weak candidate might add those exact words into a skills list and call it done.
A stronger candidate would write something like:
Good Example
Managed a portfolio of small to medium business clients, using Salesforce to track account activity, identify retention risks, prepare sales reports, and support revenue growth through regular stakeholder communication.
That sentence does a lot of work. It includes relevant keywords, but it also explains the candidate’s actual function.
The difference is important. A matcher may like both versions. A recruiter will prefer the second.
Your resume is probably well matched when a recruiter can answer these questions quickly:
What role is this person targeting?
Do they meet the core requirements?
Have they done similar work before?
What level are they operating at?
What tools, systems, or methods have they used?
What industries or environments do they understand?
What outcomes have they delivered?
Is there enough reason to speak with them?
If the answer is clear, you are in a stronger position.
Your resume is probably not well matched if:
Your summary is vague
Your skills section is generic
Your most relevant experience is buried
Your achievements do not connect to the job
You use different terminology from the job ad without explanation
You list tasks but show no impact
Your resume could be sent to ten different roles without changing anything
A generic resume is rarely neutral. It usually creates doubt. And in recruitment, doubt quietly kills applications.
I like resume matchers when they are used properly. They can help candidates spot gaps, tailor more intelligently, and understand how their resume may be interpreted by software and humans.
But I do not like the way some candidates become dependent on them.
A tool can tell you that a keyword is missing. It cannot tell you whether your career story makes sense. It cannot tell you whether your strongest experience is being wasted halfway down page two. It cannot tell you whether your resume sounds senior enough, commercial enough, technical enough, or credible enough for the role.
That is the part candidates need to learn.
A good resume is not just a document with matching words. It is a positioning document. It tells the employer, quickly and believably, why you are relevant.
So yes, use a job description resume matcher. Use it to check your alignment. Use it to find missing language. Use it to improve ATS readability. But do not hand over your judgement to a percentage score.
The best resume is not the one with the highest match score. It is the one that gets the right recruiter or hiring manager to think, “This person makes sense for the role.”
That is what you are aiming for.
Written by Simar Malhi, a recruiter and headhunter with international recruitment experience. I write about CVs, job applications, hiring decisions, and the reality behind recruitment processes. My goal is to help candidates understand more honestly how employers, recruiters, and hiring managers actually select candidates.
Resolved recurring issues
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin