Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeA proper LinkedIn profile review in Australia should assess whether your profile clearly positions you for the roles you want, not just whether it looks “complete”. Recruiters do not read LinkedIn profiles like personal biographies. We scan for relevance, role alignment, credibility, location, industry fit, recent experience, and whether your profile matches the type of opportunity we are trying to fill. A good LinkedIn profile review should look at your headline, About section, experience, keywords, achievements, job titles, skills, recommendations, activity, and overall candidate positioning. The goal is simple: make it easier for recruiters and hiring managers to understand who you are, what you do, what level you operate at, and why you are worth contacting.
A LinkedIn profile review should not be a cosmetic exercise. I see plenty of profiles that look polished but still fail commercially because they do not tell the market what the candidate is actually suitable for.
That is the part many people miss.
Your LinkedIn profile is not just an online resume. In Australia, recruiters use LinkedIn as a sourcing tool, screening tool, credibility check, and sometimes a quiet reference point before deciding whether to contact you. Hiring managers also look at it, especially for professional, corporate, leadership, technical, sales, finance, HR, operations, marketing, government-adjacent, consulting, and specialist roles.
A strong LinkedIn profile review should answer these questions:
Is it immediately clear what role, industry, and seniority level you fit?
Does your headline support your next career move?
Does your About section sound credible without being vague or self-important?
Does your experience show outcomes, scope, and responsibility?
Are the right Australian search terms and role keywords present?
In Australia, LinkedIn plays a slightly different role depending on your industry. For some candidates, it is a major source of recruiter outreach. For others, it works more as a credibility layer that supports job applications.
Either way, ignoring it is rarely smart.
When I review a LinkedIn profile, I am looking at how easily a recruiter or hiring manager can place the person in the market. That is the real value. Your profile should reduce confusion.
Hiring teams are often trying to answer very practical questions:
Is this person based in Australia or open to relocating?
Are they aligned with the level of this role?
Have they worked in a similar industry or environment?
Do they have the tools, systems, qualifications, or leadership exposure needed?
Do their job titles and responsibilities make sense?
Does the profile make you look relevant for current opportunities?
Are there gaps, inconsistencies, or weak signals that might make a recruiter hesitate?
Does the profile match the resume, or does it create confusion?
This matters because recruiters do not usually search LinkedIn by personality traits. We search by job titles, industries, skills, locations, tools, qualifications, company types, and role requirements. If your profile is missing those signals, you may be suitable and still invisible. Annoying? Yes. Common? Very.
Are they actively presenting themselves professionally?
Is there enough evidence to justify a conversation?
This is where candidates often misunderstand LinkedIn. They think the profile needs to impress everyone. It does not. It needs to make the right people understand your relevance quickly.
A generalist profile often feels safer to the candidate, but it usually performs worse. When you try to look suitable for everything, you often look clearly positioned for nothing. Recruiters are not sitting there admiring your flexibility with a cup of tea. They are trying to fill a specific role under time pressure.
Recruiters do not start by lovingly reading every word. We scan. Fast.
That does not mean we are careless. It means recruitment is pattern recognition. When reviewing candidates, recruiters quickly look for signals that match the role brief. If those signals are strong, we slow down. If they are weak or unclear, we move on.
The first things recruiters usually notice are your photo, headline, location, current role, current company, previous roles, industry alignment, and whether your profile looks complete enough to trust.
Your headline is especially important because it follows you around LinkedIn. It appears in search results, connection requests, comments, messages, and profile previews. A vague headline weakens your visibility before anyone even clicks.
A weak headline might say:
Weak Example: “Experienced Professional Seeking New Opportunities”
This tells me almost nothing. Experienced in what? At what level? In which market? For what type of role? It also frames the person around needing a job rather than offering value.
A stronger headline might say:
Good Example: “Senior HR Business Partner | Employee Relations, Workforce Planning & Organisational Change | Melbourne”
This is far more useful because it gives role level, function, specialisation, and location. It helps the recruiter understand relevance quickly.
The same principle applies across the whole profile. The stronger your positioning, the less work the reader has to do. And in hiring, making people work harder to understand you is rarely a winning strategy.
The biggest mistake is treating LinkedIn like a vague professional summary instead of a search and decision tool.
Many candidates write things like:
Weak Example: “I am a passionate, motivated and results-driven professional with excellent communication skills and a proven ability to work in fast-paced environments.”
This sentence appears everywhere. It gives no evidence, no market positioning, no role clarity, and no reason to keep reading. It sounds safe, but safe can become forgettable very quickly.
A stronger version would be more specific:
Good Example: “I help Australian retail and FMCG businesses improve workforce planning, reduce rostering pressure, and support frontline leaders through practical HR advice, employee relations support, and operational people strategy.”
That tells me what the person does, who they do it for, and what problems they help solve.
This is the difference between describing yourself and positioning yourself.
A LinkedIn profile review should identify where your profile is relying on generic claims instead of specific professional evidence. Recruiters do not need you to tell us you are passionate. We need to understand your function, impact, level, context, and fit.
Your LinkedIn headline should not simply repeat your job title unless your job title already explains your value clearly.
For many Australian professionals, job titles vary wildly between companies. A “Business Partner” in one organisation might be strategic and senior. In another, it might be more operational. A “Manager” might manage people, processes, clients, projects, risk, operations, or nobody at all. Charming little hiring mystery.
Your headline should clarify your professional identity.
A strong LinkedIn headline usually includes:
Your target role or current professional identity
Your specialisation or functional strengths
Your industry, sector, or audience if relevant
Your location if location matters in your market
A few important keywords recruiters are likely to search
For example:
Good Example: “Project Manager | Infrastructure, Stakeholder Engagement & Delivery Governance | Sydney”
Good Example: “Financial Controller | Month End, Compliance, Reporting & Team Leadership | Brisbane”
Good Example: “Customer Success Manager | SaaS, Account Growth & Client Retention | Australia”
Avoid stuffing the headline with every keyword you can think of. That looks desperate and reads terribly. The goal is not to turn yourself into a keyword salad. The goal is to help the right searches find you and help the right people understand you.
A recruiter reviewing your profile should be able to say within seconds: “Yes, this person fits the type of candidate I am looking for.”
The About section is where many LinkedIn profiles become either too bland or too dramatic.
Some candidates write a life story. Some write motivational quotes. Some write corporate language that sounds like it was assembled in a meeting room with no windows. None of that helps much.
Your About section should explain your professional positioning in plain, credible language.
A strong About section usually covers:
What you do professionally
The types of problems you solve
The industries, environments, or teams you have worked with
Your key strengths, tools, systems, or technical areas
Your level of responsibility
Your career direction, if relevant
Enough personality to sound human without becoming informal
Here is the recruiter reality: I do not need your About section to be poetic. I need it to be useful.
A weak About section says:
Weak Example: “I am a dynamic and hardworking individual who thrives in challenging environments and enjoys working with people.”
This could belong to almost anyone.
A stronger About section says:
Good Example: “I am an operations leader with experience improving service delivery, team performance, workforce planning, and process efficiency across multi-site environments. My work has focused on making operational teams easier to manage, measure, and scale, particularly where customer expectations, cost control, and frontline execution all need to be balanced.”
That is specific. It gives me context. It sounds like a real person who understands their work.
When I review LinkedIn profiles, I want the About section to create alignment between the person’s experience and the opportunities they want next. If your About section only describes your past but does not support your future, it is only doing half the job.
LinkedIn keywords matter, but not in the silly way people sometimes talk about them.
Recruiters do not just type “amazing leader” into LinkedIn and hope for magic. We search for practical role indicators. This can include job titles, skills, tools, systems, qualifications, industries, locations, and company types.
Depending on the role, recruiters may search for terms such as:
Business Analyst
Change Manager
Employee Relations
MYOB
Xero
Salesforce
Power BI
Agile
Procurement
Risk and Compliance
Aged Care
Mining
Construction
SaaS
CPA
CA
Baseline Clearance
Sydney
Melbourne
Brisbane
Hybrid
Your profile needs to contain the terms that match your real experience and target roles. Not fake keywords. Not trendy nonsense. Real searchable terms.
This is where many candidates accidentally disappear. They may have the experience, but they describe it using internal company language. Internal language is often useless outside your organisation.
For example, your company might call something “customer enablement operations”. The market may call it customer success, account management, client services, onboarding, service delivery, or sales operations. If your LinkedIn profile only uses internal terminology, recruiters may not find you.
A good LinkedIn profile review should translate your experience into market language while keeping it honest.
Your LinkedIn experience section should not be a copy-and-paste version of your resume, but it should still give enough substance to support credibility.
The biggest mistake is listing job titles and companies with almost no explanation. This forces the reader to guess what you actually did. Recruiters can infer some things from company and title, but we are not mind readers. Despite rumours, recruitment has not yet given us that superpower.
Each recent role should usually explain:
The type of organisation or team
Your scope of responsibility
Key functions or projects
Stakeholders you worked with
Systems, tools, or methodologies used
Achievements or improvements where relevant
Leadership responsibility if applicable
Commercial, operational, technical, or people impact
For example, instead of writing:
Weak Example: “Managed projects and worked with stakeholders.”
Write:
Good Example: “Managed cross-functional technology and process improvement projects across operations, finance, and customer service teams, coordinating timelines, vendor communication, risk tracking, and stakeholder updates for senior leadership.”
The second version gives evidence. It explains scope, function, stakeholders, and complexity. That is what makes a recruiter slow down.
For Australian hiring, context matters. A hiring manager wants to know whether your experience sits in a similar environment. Corporate, government, start-up, consulting, not-for-profit, mining, healthcare, retail, education, financial services, and construction all have different hiring expectations.
The more your experience section shows relevant context, the easier it is for a recruiter to judge fit.
Your photo does not need to look like a glossy corporate headshot. It does need to look current, clear, and professionally appropriate for the type of roles you want.
This is not about vanity. It is about trust and recognition.
A poor photo can create friction. A missing photo can make the profile feel inactive. A casual photo may be fine in some industries and completely wrong in others. The standard is not the same for a creative freelancer, construction project manager, graduate accountant, executive assistant, lawyer, nurse manager, or technology founder.
For most Australian professionals, a good LinkedIn photo is:
Clear
Recent
Friendly but professional
Well lit
Cropped properly
Not a wedding photo with someone clearly cut out
Not a party photo
Not a blurry car selfie
The banner image matters less, but it can support positioning. A blank banner is not fatal. A messy or irrelevant banner is worse than no banner. If you use one, keep it aligned with your field, industry, or professional identity.
A recruiter will not reject you because your banner is boring. But if your whole profile looks neglected, it can create the impression that you are not active or serious in the market.
The skills section is useful, but it is not strong enough on its own. Skills should reinforce your positioning, not replace real evidence in your headline, About section, and experience.
Choose skills that match the roles you want. Avoid loading your profile with low-value traits such as “teamwork” and “communication” if they crowd out more searchable or role-specific skills.
For example, a finance professional may need skills such as:
Financial Reporting
Budgeting
Forecasting
Month End Close
Management Accounting
Compliance
ERP Systems
A marketing professional may need skills such as:
Digital Marketing
Campaign Management
SEO
Content Strategy
CRM
Brand Management
Performance Marketing
Recommendations can help, especially when they come from credible managers, clients, peers, or senior stakeholders. But they should support the story your profile is already telling. A lovely recommendation saying you are “a pleasure to work with” is nice, but a recommendation that confirms your leadership, delivery, technical expertise, commercial judgement, or stakeholder impact is stronger.
Featured content can also help if you have relevant media, portfolio links, articles, case studies, presentations, or professional work samples. This is more important for some fields than others, especially marketing, design, writing, consulting, speaking, coaching, media, technology, and thought leadership roles.
The key question is always the same: does this section strengthen the hiring decision or just decorate the profile?
Not every LinkedIn profile should be written the same way.
A job seeker who is actively applying may need sharper alignment with target roles. A passive candidate may need a profile that attracts relevant outreach without looking like they are openly job hunting. An executive may need market positioning and credibility. A graduate may need potential, skills, projects, and education to work harder because the experience section is lighter.
This is why generic LinkedIn advice often fails. The right approach depends on your situation.
For active job seekers, the profile should make role fit obvious. Recruiters may compare your LinkedIn profile against your resume, so consistency matters. If your resume says you are targeting HR Business Partner roles but LinkedIn makes you look like a general administrator, that weakens your positioning.
For passive candidates, the profile should attract the right opportunities without sounding desperate. You do not need “open to work” language in every section. You need clear positioning, searchable keywords, and enough evidence that recruiters can identify you as suitable.
For career changers, the profile needs careful translation. You cannot simply list your past and hope people understand your future. You need to show transferable skills, relevant projects, industry exposure, tools, achievements, and a logical bridge into the new direction.
For senior professionals, the profile should not drown the reader in every responsibility from the last twenty years. It should show leadership scope, strategic impact, commercial outcomes, transformation work, stakeholder complexity, and the type of environments you are suited to.
A good LinkedIn profile review should always consider the candidate’s actual goal. Otherwise, it becomes generic polishing. And generic polishing is how people end up with pretty profiles that still do not convert.
LinkedIn is not the same as an applicant tracking system, but the logic overlaps.
An ATS is usually used when you apply for a job. LinkedIn is often used before you apply, after you apply, or instead of you applying at all because a recruiter finds you directly.
The mistake is thinking LinkedIn only matters if you are active on the platform. It does not.
Recruiters may use LinkedIn to:
Source candidates who have not applied
Check whether an applicant’s profile matches their resume
Understand career progression
Verify job titles and company history
Find extra context missing from a resume
Shortlist profiles before outreach
Build longlists for future roles
Assess market availability and role alignment
This means your LinkedIn profile should support both search visibility and credibility. It should contain enough relevant terms to be found and enough substance to be trusted.
However, do not write your LinkedIn profile like an ATS document. LinkedIn allows more professional voice, context, positioning, and narrative. Your resume should be tighter and more tailored. Your LinkedIn profile can be broader, but it still needs direction.
The best profiles do both: they are searchable and human-readable.
Most LinkedIn profile problems are not dramatic. They are small issues that create doubt, friction, or missed visibility.
The most common mistakes I see include:
A headline that says almost nothing useful
An About section full of generic personality claims
Experience sections with no scope, context, or achievements
Job titles that do not match the target market
Missing location or unclear work rights context
Outdated roles still presented as current
Too many unrelated skills
No industry-specific keywords
Overly casual profile photos
Inconsistent dates between LinkedIn and resume
A profile written for the old career direction, not the next one
Too much internal company language
No clear seniority level
Activity that undermines professional positioning
That last one matters. LinkedIn activity is visible. If your comments are aggressive, sloppy, bitter, or constantly dramatic, some hiring managers will notice. I am not saying you need to become a corporate robot. Please do not. But your public activity should not make people question your judgement before they have even spoken to you.
The strongest LinkedIn profiles feel consistent. The headline, About section, experience, skills, and activity all point in the same professional direction.
If you want to review your own LinkedIn profile properly, do not start by asking, “Does this sound good?”
That question is too vague.
Ask better questions:
Would a recruiter understand my target role within ten seconds?
Does my headline contain the role, level, function, or specialisation I want to be known for?
Does my About section explain what I actually do in market language?
Do my recent roles show scope, outcomes, tools, stakeholders, and context?
Are the keywords aligned with Australian job ads for my target roles?
Does my profile match my resume closely enough to avoid confusion?
Have I removed vague claims that do not prove anything?
Would a hiring manager trust this profile enough to speak with me?
Is my profile written for the job I want next, not just the job I already have?
A useful exercise is to compare your profile with five current Australian job ads that match your target role. Look at the language they use. Not to copy it blindly, but to understand the market vocabulary.
You are looking for recurring themes:
Role titles
Technical skills
Systems
Certifications
Industry terms
Stakeholder groups
Leadership expectations
Delivery responsibilities
Commercial outcomes
If those themes are genuinely part of your experience, your LinkedIn profile should reflect them naturally.
This is where candidates often become too modest. They leave out important terms because they assume people will “get it”. Recruiters will not always get it. Hiring teams are busy, and vague profiles do not reward busy people.
A professional LinkedIn profile review should go beyond grammar and formatting.
It should assess positioning, searchability, credibility, role alignment, and conversion. In plain English: can the right people find you, understand you, trust you, and want to contact you?
A proper review should usually cover:
Headline clarity and keyword strength
About section positioning
Experience section depth and relevance
Alignment with target Australian roles
Recruiter search visibility
Hiring manager credibility signals
Skills section relevance
Profile photo and banner suitability
Recommendations and social proof
Activity and public impression
Consistency with the resume
Career direction and market positioning
The best LinkedIn reviews are honest. Not brutal for theatre. Honest because vague encouragement does not help candidates.
If a profile is too broad, say so. If the headline is weak, fix it. If the About section sounds generic, rewrite it. If the experience section hides the strongest achievements, bring them forward. If the person is targeting roles their profile does not support, address the gap.
A LinkedIn profile review should leave the candidate with clear, practical changes, not just a list of nice observations.
Australian hiring tends to value clarity, relevance, credibility, and practical fit. Overly inflated language can backfire. So can underselling yourself.
There is a balance.
You want to sound confident, not arrogant. Specific, not robotic. Commercially aware, not buzzword-heavy. Human, not overly casual.
What works well is grounded evidence.
Instead of saying you are a “strategic leader”, show the scale of what you led. Instead of saying you are “results-driven”, show the result. Instead of saying you are “stakeholder-focused”, explain which stakeholders and what you delivered with them.
Recruiters and hiring managers respond well to profiles that answer the unspoken questions:
What level is this person operating at?
What problems have they solved?
What environments have they worked in?
What would they likely be useful for?
Are they credible for the role we are hiring?
Is there enough here to start a conversation?
A strong LinkedIn profile does not guarantee a job. Nothing does. But it can increase recruiter visibility, strengthen your applications, reduce doubt, and help hiring teams understand your value faster.
That is the real point. Not looking impressive for the sake of it. Becoming easier to choose.
Use this checklist to review your profile from a recruiter’s perspective.
Headline
Does it clearly explain your role, function, specialisation, and level?
Does it include keywords recruiters would actually search?
Does it avoid vague phrases like “seeking opportunities” or “motivated professional”?
About Section
Does it explain what you do in clear market language?
Does it connect your experience to the roles you want?
Does it include industry, tools, stakeholders, scope, or outcomes where relevant?
Does it sound like a real professional rather than a generic template?
Experience
Do your recent roles explain responsibility, context, and impact?
Have you included measurable outcomes where useful?
Are your job titles and descriptions understandable outside your company?
Does your experience support your target roles?
Keywords
Are your target job titles included naturally?
Have you included relevant systems, tools, qualifications, and industry terms?
Does the language match Australian job ads in your field?
Credibility
Is your profile consistent with your resume?
Are dates, job titles, and employers aligned?
Do you have recommendations or evidence that supports your positioning?
Presentation
Is your photo clear and professionally appropriate?
Is your banner clean or relevant?
Is the profile easy to scan?
Does your activity support your professional image?
If you can answer yes to most of these, your profile is likely doing the basics well. If you hesitate on several, that is where the review needs to focus.
You should consider a LinkedIn profile review when your profile no longer matches your career goal, when you are not attracting relevant recruiter contact, or when you are applying for roles and your LinkedIn profile feels weaker than your resume.
It is especially useful if:
You are actively job searching in Australia
You are changing careers or industries
You are returning to the Australian job market
You are moving from overseas into Australian roles
You are targeting a promotion or senior role
You are not getting recruiter messages for relevant opportunities
Your profile has not been updated in years
Your resume and LinkedIn profile tell different stories
You are unsure how to position your experience
A review is not only for people with bad profiles. Some of the most useful reviews are for strong candidates whose profiles are simply under-positioned.
That is a very common problem. The person has good experience, but the profile does not make the value obvious. Recruiters may still find them, but not for the best roles. Or hiring managers may read the profile and miss the strongest parts.
Your LinkedIn profile should not make people dig for your relevance. It should put the right evidence in the right places.
Written by Simar Malhi, a recruiter and headhunter with international recruitment experience. I write about CVs, job applications, hiring decisions, and the reality behind recruitment processes. My goal is to help candidates understand more honestly how employers, recruiters, and hiring managers actually select candidates.
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin