Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeNegotiating an Australian job offer is not rude, greedy, or risky when you do it properly. It is a normal part of the hiring process, especially for professional, specialist, leadership, corporate, technical, and competitive roles. The real issue is not whether you should negotiate. The issue is whether you know what you are negotiating, how much leverage you actually have, and how to ask without sounding vague, entitled, or difficult.
As a recruiter, I can tell you this clearly: many candidates lose money at offer stage because they are too relieved to question the package. They focus only on getting the job and forget that the offer is also a business decision. Employers negotiate salaries, budgets, start dates, notice periods, flexibility, bonuses, titles, benefits, and sometimes even reporting lines. Candidates can negotiate too. The key is to do it with evidence, timing, and calm professionalism.
In Australia, job offer negotiation is usually acceptable if you handle it respectfully and realistically. Most hiring managers will not withdraw an offer simply because you asked a reasonable question about salary or conditions. That fear is common, but it is usually bigger in the candidate’s head than in the employer’s actual decision making.
What employers do react badly to is poor negotiation behaviour.
They do not mind a candidate saying, “I am very interested in the role, but I was hoping to discuss whether there is flexibility in the package.” That is normal.
They are much less impressed by a candidate who suddenly demands a large increase with no explanation, changes their expectations after the offer, or acts as though the company should be grateful they are considering it. Hiring managers are human. Recruiters are human. And yes, we notice tone.
The hiring team usually asks themselves a few practical questions:
Is this candidate still genuinely interested?
Is the request commercially reasonable?
Did we already discuss salary expectations earlier?
Are we at risk of losing the candidate if we do not improve the offer?
Is there internal equity to consider with existing employees?
Do we have room in the approved salary band?
Will approving this create problems with the team budget?
This is where many candidates misunderstand negotiation. They think the employer is deciding whether they “deserve” more money. In reality, the employer is usually balancing budget, salary bands, urgency, market rates, internal fairness, and how much they want to avoid reopening the search.
You should consider negotiating a job offer when the offer is below your stated expectations, below market rate, below the responsibility level of the role, or weaker than your current package once you compare the full value properly.
You may also negotiate if the salary is acceptable but other conditions need adjustment, such as flexible work, start date, bonus structure, car allowance, professional development, leave, relocation support, job title, or review timing.
A job offer is not just a salary figure. It is the full employment arrangement. I have seen candidates reject offers too quickly because the base salary was slightly under target, while ignoring the employer’s flexibility on bonus, hybrid work, leave, training, or progression. I have also seen candidates accept what looked like a decent salary, only to realise later that the hours, travel, expectations, or bonus conditions made the package much weaker than it first appeared.
Negotiate when there is a genuine gap between the offer and the value of the role. Do not negotiate just because someone on the internet told you to “always ask for more.” That advice sounds bold, but it is not always strategic. Good negotiation is not about performing confidence. It is about improving the offer where there is a reasonable basis to do so.
Most candidates go straight to salary, which makes sense, but it is not the only part of the offer that matters. In Australia, the items you may be able to negotiate depend on the employer, role level, industry, award or enterprise agreement coverage, internal salary bands, and company policy.
Common negotiable areas include:
Base salary
Superannuation arrangement
Bonus or commission structure
Sign on bonus
Car allowance
Mobile phone allowance
Work from home arrangements
Flexible start and finish times
Start date
Notice period alignment
Annual leave timing
Additional leave
Professional development budget
Study support
Relocation assistance
Job title
Reporting line
Probation review timing
Salary review date
Performance review structure
Travel expectations
Equipment and home office support
Salary is usually the most obvious negotiation point, but sometimes the smarter move is negotiating the parts that affect your daily life. A role paying slightly more can still be a poor move if it comes with vague “reasonable overtime,” unclear bonus rules, or a culture where flexibility exists only in the job ad.
This is one of those hiring realities candidates often learn too late: the best offer is not always the highest salary. It is the offer where the money, expectations, workload, flexibility, and growth potential make sense together.
Before you negotiate, you need to know whether the offer is actually low or just lower than you hoped. Those are not always the same thing.
A fair salary depends on several factors:
The role responsibilities
The seniority level
The industry
The state or city
Whether the role is permanent, contract, full time, or part time
The size and maturity of the company
The scarcity of your skill set
Your direct relevance to the role
Your current package
Competing opportunities
The employer’s approved salary band
Candidates often compare salary too loosely. They see a salary range online and assume the top number applies to them. But salary ranges are messy. Some include superannuation. Some exclude it. Some reflect Sydney and Melbourne rates more than regional markets. Some are inflated by agencies trying to attract applicants. Some include senior responsibilities hidden under a vague job title. Some are simply outdated.
A stronger way to assess the offer is to ask:
Does this offer match the level of responsibility?
Does it reflect the skills they repeatedly said were important?
Is it competitive for this role in this location?
Is the total package better than my current situation?
Am I being paid for the job they advertised or the job they actually described in interviews?
That last question matters. Job descriptions often look tidy. Interviews reveal the mess. If the role has grown during the process and now includes stakeholder management, leadership, travel, system transformation, after hours requirements, or strategic ownership, the salary conversation should reflect that.
The biggest mistake I see is waiting until the final offer to reveal a salary expectation that should have been discussed earlier.
If the employer asked for your salary expectations during the process and you gave a number, then at offer stage you suddenly ask for much more, you need a good reason. Otherwise, the hiring team may feel misled. That does not mean you cannot negotiate, but your explanation needs to be clear.
For example, the role may have changed during the interview process. You may have learned the responsibilities are broader than originally described. The package may be lower once super, bonus, car allowance, leave, or flexibility are properly compared. Or you may have another offer that has shifted your decision.
What does not work is saying, “I was hoping for more,” with no evidence.
Weak Example
Thank you for the offer. I was expecting a higher salary. Can you increase it?
This is weak because it gives the employer nothing to work with. There is no context, no business case, no explanation, and no signal that the candidate is still committed.
Good Example
Thank you for the offer. I am genuinely excited about the role and the team. After reviewing the package and the scope we discussed in the final interview, especially the additional stakeholder management and team leadership responsibilities, I wanted to ask whether there is flexibility to move the base salary closer to $125,000. At that level, I would feel comfortable accepting and moving forward.
This works better because it connects the request to the role scope, gives a clear figure, and signals genuine intent. It also makes the employer’s decision easier. Recruiters love clarity. Not because we are romantic about spreadsheets, but because vague negotiation creates unnecessary back and forth.
There is no perfect percentage, but in many Australian job offer negotiations, a reasonable salary request often sits within a modest increase from the initial offer unless the offer is clearly below market or the responsibilities are significantly larger than expected.
The more senior or specialised the role, the more room there may be. For entry level or tightly banded roles, there may be less flexibility. Government, university, public sector, award based, and enterprise agreement roles may have stricter salary structures than private sector roles. Startups may have less base salary flexibility but more room around equity, title, flexibility, or growth pathway. Larger corporates may have formal salary bands, but they may also have approval processes for exceptions.
A practical approach is to identify three figures before you respond:
Your ideal figure
Your acceptable figure
Your walk away figure
Your ideal figure is what you would confidently accept without hesitation. Your acceptable figure is the number that still makes the move worthwhile. Your walk away figure is the point where accepting the role would create resentment, financial pressure, or a poor career tradeoff.
Do not start negotiation without knowing these numbers. Candidates who negotiate without a clear range often either accept too quickly or keep pushing without knowing when to stop. That is how a reasonable negotiation becomes uncomfortable.
Once you receive the offer, thank the employer, confirm your interest, ask for time to review, and respond with a clear, evidence based request. Do not negotiate emotionally. Do not apologise excessively. Do not turn it into a dramatic speech about your worth. Keep it professional and specific.
A strong negotiation message usually includes:
Appreciation for the offer
Genuine interest in the role
A clear request
A reason connected to market value, role scope, experience, or competing package
A signal that agreement would allow you to move forward
Here is a simple structure:
Thank you for the offer. I am very interested in the role and can see a strong fit with the team and responsibilities. After reviewing the package and considering the scope of the position, I wanted to ask whether there is flexibility to adjust the base salary to $X. Based on the level of responsibility and my relevant experience in X, I believe that would better reflect the role. If we can align on that, I would be very comfortable accepting the offer.
This is calm, clear, and practical. It does not sound like a hostage note. It gives the employer a path to say yes.
When an employer says the salary is fixed, it may mean several things. Sometimes it genuinely is fixed. Sometimes the recruiter does not have approval yet. Sometimes the hiring manager has budget but needs a reason to request more. Sometimes the salary is fixed but other conditions are not.
Do not assume “fixed” means the conversation is over. Ask a useful follow up question.
You can say:
Thank you for clarifying. I understand there may be a set salary band. Is there any flexibility elsewhere in the package, such as a salary review after probation, additional leave, flexible work arrangements, a sign on bonus, or professional development support?
This works because it shows maturity. You are not arguing with their budget. You are exploring the full package.
If they still cannot move, you need to decide whether the offer is worth accepting as it stands. This is where candidates need honesty with themselves. Do not accept a salary you already resent unless there is a clear reason, such as strong career growth, a rare opportunity, better lifestyle, brand value, or a strategic pathway. Resentment does not politely disappear after onboarding. It usually joins you at your desk around week three.
Flexible work is one of the most important negotiation points in the Australian job market, but candidates often ask for it too vaguely.
“I want flexibility” can mean many things. It could mean two days working from home, school pickup flexibility, compressed hours, remote work from another state, flexible start times, or occasional appointments. Employers are more likely to respond well when the request is specific and connected to performance.
A stronger request sounds like:
I wanted to clarify the flexible work arrangement for this role. Based on the way the team operates, would two days working from home each week be possible once onboarding is complete? I am happy to be in the office for key meetings, collaboration days, and stakeholder sessions.
This is better because it shows you understand the employer’s concerns. Hiring managers usually worry about communication, availability, onboarding, collaboration, and fairness to the team. Address those concerns directly.
The hidden reality is that many companies advertise flexibility but still manage it inconsistently. Some teams are flexible in practice. Others only say they are flexible because the market expects it. Before accepting, ask what flexibility actually looks like in the team, not just in the policy.
Better questions include:
What does hybrid work usually look like for this team?
Are there set office days?
Does flexibility change during probation?
How does the manager prefer to handle remote communication?
Are there periods where full office attendance is expected?
These questions are not pushy. They are due diligence.
Negotiating after you have verbally accepted is delicate. It is not impossible, but it needs to be handled carefully.
If you accepted verbally and then received the written contract with different terms, you should absolutely raise it. If something changed or was unclear, that is fair.
If you accepted and then simply changed your mind because you now want more money, the employer may be less receptive. They may still consider it, but you have less leverage because you already signalled agreement.
The best approach is honesty without drama.
You could say:
I wanted to raise one point before signing the contract. After reviewing the written offer in detail, I realised the total package is different from what I had understood during our conversation, particularly around X. I am still very interested in the role, but I wanted to discuss whether there is room to adjust this before finalising.
This keeps the focus on clarification and alignment, not a sudden demand.
My recruiter view is simple: negotiate before you accept where possible. Once you accept, your leverage reduces and the relationship becomes more sensitive.
Some negotiation advice online sounds confident but performs badly in real hiring conversations. The goal is not to sound powerful. The goal is to get a better offer without damaging trust.
Avoid saying:
“This is my final number” unless it truly is
“I know my worth” without giving evidence
“Other companies are paying more” unless you can explain the comparison
“Can you do better?” without specifying what better means
“I need more because my expenses have gone up”
“I was expecting much more” with no context
“I will accept if you match this other offer” when the roles are not comparable
“I have another offer” if you do not
The last one deserves special attention. Do not invent a competing offer. Recruiters can usually smell it, and even when we cannot prove it, the conversation changes. You do not need a fake offer to negotiate well. You need a clear business case.
Also avoid over explaining your personal financial situation. Your rent, mortgage, childcare, or cost of living may be very real, but employers usually do not set salary based on personal need. They set it based on role value, market rate, internal equity, and budget. That may sound cold, but it is how hiring decisions work.
A stronger argument is not “I need more.” It is “The scope and market value of this role support more.”
Good recruiters do not automatically judge candidates for negotiating. In fact, when done well, negotiation can make a candidate look commercially aware and serious.
What I notice is how the candidate communicates.
A strong negotiator is calm, specific, respectful, and clear about what would allow them to accept. A weak negotiator is vague, reactive, defensive, or constantly moving the goalposts.
From the recruiter’s side, offer stage is where we are trying to close the process without creating problems for either side. We are balancing the candidate’s expectations, the hiring manager’s budget, the company’s process, and the risk of losing momentum. When a candidate negotiates well, it gives us something sensible to take back to the employer.
A useful recruiter message sounds like:
The candidate is very interested and would accept at $X. Their reasoning is based on the expanded scope discussed in the final interview and their direct experience with X.
That is a much easier message to advocate for than:
The candidate wants more money but did not say how much.
Do not make the recruiter guess. Give them the language to help you.
Scripts should sound natural, not robotic. Use them as a starting point and adapt the language to your situation.
Thank you for the offer. I am really pleased to have reached this stage and I am very interested in the role. After reviewing the package, I wanted to ask whether there is flexibility on the base salary. Based on the scope of the role and my relevant experience in X, I was hoping to align closer to $X. If that is possible, I would be very comfortable accepting.
Thank you for sending through the offer. I am excited about the opportunity. I wanted to discuss the salary in light of the final interview, where we spoke more about X, Y, and Z responsibilities. Given the broader scope, would there be flexibility to adjust the package closer to $X?
Thank you again for the offer. I am very interested in this role and it remains a strong preference for me. I did want to be transparent that I am also considering another offer at $X. If there is any flexibility to bring this package closer to that level, I would be in a much stronger position to accept.
Thank you for checking. I understand the salary may be fixed. In that case, would there be flexibility around a salary review after probation, an additional leave arrangement, hybrid work, or professional development support?
Thank you for the offer. I appreciate it and I am genuinely interested in the role. I would like to take some time to review the full package properly. Could I come back to you by X?
That last script is underrated. You do not need to respond instantly. A job offer affects your money, time, lifestyle, and career direction. Take a reasonable amount of time and review it properly.
Most negotiation mistakes are not caused by asking. They are caused by asking badly, too late, or without understanding the employer’s constraints.
Base salary matters, but the full package matters too. Superannuation, bonus, car allowance, leave, flexibility, travel, workload, and review timing can change the real value of the offer.
A $130,000 role with heavy travel, long hours, and limited flexibility is not automatically better than a $120,000 role with hybrid work, strong leadership, and a clearer growth path. Compare the whole role, not just the number.
If you ask for more, know what happens if they say yes. Employers get frustrated when they meet a candidate’s request and the candidate then says they need to “think about it” with no new reason. It can make the negotiation feel like a moving target.
Market data helps, but only when it is relevant. Do not quote a senior Sydney technology salary benchmark for a mid level regional operations role. Hiring managers will not take that seriously.
Employers often cannot simply pay one new employee far above existing team members without creating internal problems. This does not mean you should accept a low offer. It means you should understand that salary approval is not always about your value alone.
You do not need to apologise for asking a fair question. Over apologising can weaken your position. Be polite, not guilty.
The best job offer negotiation feels like alignment, not combat. You are not trying to defeat the employer. You are trying to reach terms that make sense for both sides.
Before you sign, review the written offer carefully. Do not rely only on what was said verbally. If something matters, it should be clear in writing.
Check:
Base salary
Whether salary includes or excludes superannuation
Bonus or commission rules
Probation period
Notice period
Leave entitlements
Working hours
Flexible work terms
Location and travel expectations
Job title
Reporting line
Start date
Restraint clauses
Confidentiality obligations
Intellectual property clauses
Any policies referenced in the contract
This is not about being suspicious. It is about being sensible. A good employer should expect you to read the contract properly.
Pay attention to vague language. Phrases like “reasonable additional hours,” “as required,” “discretionary bonus,” and “subject to business needs” can mean different things in practice. Ask questions before you sign, not after you are already annoyed.
If a condition is important to your acceptance, get it clarified. A verbal “yes, we are flexible” is weaker than a written arrangement or a clear email confirming expectations.
When I look at an offer, I would not start by asking, “Can I get more?” I would start by mapping the offer against the role, the market, and the tradeoff.
Use this framework:
Clarify the full package: Understand salary, superannuation, bonus, leave, flexibility, and benefits
Compare the real move: Look at what changes from your current role, including commute, hours, stress, growth, and career value
Identify the gap: Decide whether the gap is salary, flexibility, title, bonus, start date, or clarity
Build the case: Link your request to role scope, market alignment, scarce skills, or competing package
Choose your number: Know your ideal, acceptable, and walk away figures
Ask once, clearly: Make a direct, respectful request with a clear acceptance signal
Review the response: Decide whether to accept, counter, or walk away based on facts, not panic
The “ask once, clearly” point matters. Some candidates negotiate in tiny nervous fragments. They ask if there is “maybe any chance of possibly reviewing the salary slightly.” That wording makes the request sound weak and unclear.
You do not need to be aggressive. You do need to be precise.
Walking away is not failure. Sometimes it is the correct decision.
Consider walking away if:
The salary is below your minimum and there is no path to review
The employer avoids answering reasonable questions
The role scope keeps expanding without package movement
The flexibility promised verbally disappears in writing
The hiring process has revealed poor communication or disorganisation
The manager dismisses your negotiation in a disrespectful way
The contract contains terms you are not comfortable with
You feel pressured to accept before you can review the offer properly
A poor offer is not just a low number. Sometimes the bigger warning sign is how the employer handles the conversation. If they become defensive, vague, rushed, or dismissive when you ask reasonable questions, pay attention. Offer stage often shows you how the company communicates when there is a practical issue to solve.
And one honest point: do not ignore your instincts just because you are flattered by the offer. Being chosen feels good. Being underpaid and overworked feels less charming three months later.
The best Australian job offer negotiation is calm, clear, and grounded in reality. You do not need to act overly confident. You do not need to copy aggressive negotiation lines from social media. You need to understand the package, know your value, ask for what would make the offer work, and communicate like someone the employer can trust.
A strong negotiation does three things:
It confirms your interest
It explains the reason for your request
It gives the employer a clear path to agreement
That is the part many candidates miss. They ask for more, but they do not show the employer how to close the deal.
If you want a better offer, make it easy for the employer to understand what you need and why it is reasonable. If they can meet it, great. If they cannot, you make your decision with clear eyes.
That is how you negotiate without damaging the relationship, underselling yourself, or accepting an offer you already know is not right.
Written by Simar Malhi, a recruiter and headhunter with international recruitment experience. I write about CVs, job applications, hiring decisions, and the reality behind recruitment processes. My goal is to help candidates understand more honestly how employers, recruiters, and hiring managers actually select candidates.
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin