Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeIn most cases, no, you should not include referees on your resume in Australia. Your resume should focus on proving your suitability for the role, not giving away your referees’ contact details before anyone has seriously considered your application. Australian employers usually ask for referees later in the hiring process, often after interviews, when they are close to making a decision.
The better approach is to either leave referees off completely or write “References available upon request” only if the job ad specifically asks for referee information. Personally, I usually prefer leaving it off unless there is a clear reason to include it. Recruiters already know references are available if needed. We do not need a line taking up space to tell us that.
What matters more is knowing when referees are useful, when they can hurt you, and how Australian recruiters actually use them.
For most Australian resumes, you should not list referee names, phone numbers, email addresses, job titles, or company details directly on your resume.
That advice applies to most roles across:
Corporate jobs
Government jobs
Administration roles
Professional services
Sales and customer service roles
Trades and operations roles
Graduate roles
Management roles
Executive roles
There are exceptions, but they are not as common as many candidates think.
You may consider including referees if:
The job ad specifically asks for referee details in the application
The application form has a mandatory referee section
You are applying for certain government, education, health, aged care, childcare, or compliance sensitive roles
You have been directly instructed to include referees in the resume document
You are submitting a very formal application pack where referee details are expected
Even then, I would still be careful. There is a difference between providing referee details when required and throwing them onto every resume as if it is still 2008.
Hiring has changed. Recruiters move quickly, applicant tracking systems process applications at scale, and candidates apply across multiple platforms. Your referees should not be floating around every database, job board, agency inbox, and hiring manager folder before anyone has even decided to interview you.
The strongest reason is simple: your referees are not part of the first screening decision.
When I screen a resume, I am not thinking, “Excellent, they included three referees.” I am looking for evidence that the person can do the job. I am checking role relevance, recent experience, industry match, technical skills, achievements, career progression, salary alignment, location, work rights, and whether the person looks credible for the level of the role.
Referees matter later. They do not usually get you shortlisted.
Including referees too early can create several problems.
Resume space is not decoration. Every line should earn its place.
If your resume includes three referees with job titles, phone numbers, email addresses, and company names, that can easily take up a large section at the end of the document. For some candidates, it pushes stronger content onto another page or crowds out achievements.
That is a poor trade.
A hiring manager would rather see:
What you managed
What systems you used
What outcomes you delivered
What kind of team or business you supported
What level of responsibility you held
Why your experience matches the role
They do not need your former manager’s phone number before they know whether they want to speak to you.
Your referees are doing you a professional favour. Their contact details should not be sent everywhere without control.
This is especially important if you are applying actively and sending out many applications. Your resume may end up with:
Internal recruiters
External agencies
Hiring managers
HR coordinators
Talent pools
Applicant tracking systems
Shared inboxes
Downloaded files
Interview panels
Old databases
Not every person who touches your resume needs your referee’s direct mobile number.
This is not paranoia. It is basic professional judgement.
Good reference checks happen at the right stage, after you have had a chance to interview, understand the role, assess your interest, and prepare your referees.
When you list referees immediately, you create the risk that someone contacts them too early.
Most professional recruiters will not do that without permission. But not every hiring process is beautifully run. Some are messy. Some are rushed. Some employers treat referees like another admin step instead of a serious final decision tool.
You want control over when your referees are contacted.
Before a reference check, you should know:
Which role the reference is for
Who will contact the referee
What stage of the process you are at
Whether you are genuinely interested in the role
Whether your referee is available and prepared
What the employer is likely to ask
A reference check should not surprise your referee. It should not surprise you either.
This is not always fair, but it is real.
When I see a resume with a large referee section, especially with full personal contact details, it can make the document feel slightly old fashioned. That does not mean the candidate is weak. It means the resume format may not reflect modern hiring practice.
Australian resumes used to include referees more commonly. Many candidates were taught to add them automatically. But modern resumes are more focused, more targeted, and more privacy aware.
A strong resume today is not trying to include every possible piece of career information. It is trying to make a clear case for interview selection.
This is where candidates often misunderstand the process.
A referee is not usually used to decide whether you deserve a first interview. A reference check is more commonly used to validate the hiring team’s preferred decision after they have already decided you are a serious contender.
In plain English: references rarely rescue a weak application, but they can damage a strong one if they are handled poorly.
Recruiters and hiring managers usually use referees to check:
Whether your employment dates and role details broadly match what you presented
How you performed in the role
How you worked with managers, peers, clients, or stakeholders
Whether there were conduct, reliability, or performance concerns
Whether your strengths match what you showed during interview
Whether there are risks the employer needs to understand before making an offer
Whether your previous manager would rehire you
That last one is often more revealing than candidates realise.
A referee can say many polite things, but the real signal is usually in the strength, hesitation, detail, and tone of the response. Hiring teams listen for what is said, what is avoided, and whether the feedback sounds specific or generic.
A glowing reference with real examples is powerful. A vague reference that sounds like someone reading from a safe HR script is less useful. A reference that confirms concerns the interview panel already had can stop an offer.
This is why you should treat referees strategically, not as a resume footer.
You can write “References available upon request”, but most of the time it is unnecessary.
Recruiters already assume you can provide references if the process reaches that stage. You do not need to announce it in the same way you do not need to write “I can attend interviews if invited.” It is understood.
That said, the line is not a disaster. It is just not especially useful.
It is acceptable to include “References available upon request” if:
You are applying for a traditional employer or industry where formal resume conventions are still common
The job ad mentions references but does not require full details upfront
You want to signal that referees exist without sharing contact details
You have enough space and the line does not crowd out stronger content
If you do include it, place it at the very end of the resume. Do not create a large section for it. One line is enough.
I would leave it off if your resume is already tight, your final page is crowded, or you are applying for roles where modern resume formatting is expected.
For example, if you are applying for a project manager, marketing manager, business analyst, HR advisor, finance manager, software engineer, executive assistant, operations manager, or sales role, that line usually adds nothing.
Use the space for evidence instead.
References available upon request
This is not harmful, but it is filler. It does not improve your application.
No reference section at all. The resume ends after the candidate’s education, certifications, or relevant additional information.
This is often cleaner, more modern, and more focused.
There are situations where including referees may be appropriate. The key is not to follow a blanket rule. The key is to read the application context.
If the job ad says to include two referees with your application, follow the instruction.
Some employers still ask upfront, particularly in sectors where compliance, safeguarding, licensing, or formal selection processes are involved.
If you ignore a direct instruction, you may look careless. And yes, recruiters notice that. Not because we enjoy being difficult, but because following application instructions is often treated as a basic signal of attention to detail.
If the role says, “Please include two professional referees,” include them.
But do not include more than requested. If they ask for two, provide two. Not five. More information is not always more impressive. Sometimes it is just more admin.
Australian government applications can be more formal than private sector applications. Some government roles request referee details at application stage, especially where selection panels, merit based assessment, and structured hiring processes are involved.
For public sector applications, always read the application instructions carefully. Some will ask for referees in the application portal rather than the resume. Others may request them in a separate document.
Do not assume the resume is the best place unless the instructions say so.
In roles involving vulnerable people, compliance, safety, or regulated environments, references can carry more weight earlier in the process.
Examples include:
Teaching roles
Childcare roles
Nursing roles
Aged care roles
Disability support roles
Community services roles
Healthcare support roles
Some not for profit roles
Even then, referee checks usually happen at a later stage, often alongside police checks, Working With Children Checks, registration checks, or credential verification.
Include referees only if requested. Otherwise, prepare them separately.
Many employers now collect referee details through the applicant tracking system instead of the resume itself.
If the application form has mandatory referee fields, complete them. But be thoughtful. Use professional referees who are relevant, informed, and appropriate for the role.
Do not panic if you cannot provide your current manager. Many candidates cannot, especially if their job search is confidential. A previous manager, senior stakeholder, client, team leader, or project lead may be acceptable depending on the situation.
The better question is not “Should I include referees?” It is “What should I use that space for instead?”
Because if your resume is not winning interviews, the absence of referees is almost never the reason.
Use that space to strengthen the evidence that gets you shortlisted.
Most resumes are too responsibility heavy and too evidence light.
Candidates write what they were “responsible for,” but hiring managers want to know what changed because they were there.
Instead of using space for referees, use it to show outcomes.
Responsible for managing customer enquiries and supporting the sales team.
This tells me what the person did, but not whether they did it well.
Managed high volume customer enquiries across phone and email while supporting a sales team of eight, improving response consistency during peak campaign periods.
This is still simple, but it gives scale, context, and operational value.
Australian recruiters often search resumes quickly for practical match.
Depending on the role, that may include:
Systems such as Salesforce, Xero, MYOB, SAP, Workday, ServiceNow, HubSpot, Microsoft Dynamics, Pronto, Oracle, or Excel
Industry exposure such as construction, mining, healthcare, education, government, retail, logistics, professional services, technology, or financial services
Regulatory knowledge such as WHS, Fair Work, privacy, compliance, risk, safeguarding, or industry specific standards
Role scope such as team size, budget size, portfolio size, caseload, territory, project value, or stakeholder level
This information is often far more useful than referee details.
A resume should help the reader quickly understand where you fit.
For example:
Are you an administrator moving into coordination?
Are you a senior accountant ready for finance manager roles?
Are you a retail manager moving into area management?
Are you a recruiter moving into talent acquisition partnering?
Are you a project coordinator targeting junior project manager roles?
Are you an overseas trained professional adapting to the Australian market?
Referees do not explain your positioning. Your profile, experience, achievements, and skills do.
Leaving referees off your resume does not mean treating them casually. It means managing them properly.
A good referee strategy starts before the employer asks.
The most senior person is not always the best referee.
A CEO who barely worked with you is usually less useful than a direct manager who can explain your work clearly. Hiring teams value relevance, detail, and credibility.
Choose referees who can comment on:
Your actual work quality
Your reliability
Your communication style
Your technical skills
Your judgement
Your behaviour under pressure
Your ability to work with others
Your fit for the type of role you are pursuing
A referee who says, “Yes, they worked here,” is not enough. That is verification, not advocacy.
Never list someone as a referee without permission.
This should not need saying, but recruitment has taught me that it does.
A surprised referee is rarely your strongest referee. Even if they like you, they may not remember the details of your work. They may be busy, cautious, unreachable, or unprepared.
Before you use someone as a referee, ask clearly.
You can say:
“I am applying for roles in operations coordination and may be asked for references later in the process. Would you be comfortable acting as a professional referee for me?”
That gives them context and the chance to say yes properly.
This is one of the most overlooked steps.
Once you reach reference check stage, send your referee:
The job title
The company name
A short summary of the role
The key skills the employer is assessing
A reminder of relevant projects or achievements from your time working together
The name of the person who may contact them
Any timing they should expect
This is not coaching them to lie. It is helping them give useful, accurate, role relevant feedback.
Referees are human. They forget details. They manage their own workload. They may have worked with dozens of people since you left.
A good brief helps them remember the right context.
Create a separate referee document rather than placing referees on your resume.
A simple referee document can include:
Referee name
Current job title
Company
Relationship to you
Phone number
Email address
Best contact method
Short note on the role or project you worked on together
Only send this document when requested.
This gives you more control and keeps your resume cleaner.
This is more common than people think.
Candidates often worry because they do not have the “perfect” referee. Maybe their previous manager left the company. Maybe their current job search is confidential. Maybe they are returning to work after a break. Maybe they are new to Australia. Maybe their last workplace was toxic and asking for a reference feels like inviting chaos to dinner.
The solution depends on your situation.
This is normal. Most employers understand that candidates do not want their current workplace alerted.
You can usually use:
A previous manager
A former team leader
A senior colleague
A project manager
A client or stakeholder
A supplier or partner who worked closely with you
A previous business owner or director
Be honest if asked. You can say:
“My current search is confidential, so I am not able to provide my current manager at this stage. I can provide previous managers who can speak directly to my performance.”
That is reasonable.
Not every candidate leaves a healthy workplace. Some leave poor management, restructuring, bullying, burnout, unfair expectations, or leadership chaos dressed up as “fast paced culture.”
Do not automatically choose the most recent manager if they are not credible, fair, or able to speak professionally.
Choose someone who can give a balanced, work related reference.
If the employer insists on speaking to a specific former manager and you have concerns, explain calmly and professionally. Do not unload the whole workplace drama unless necessary. Keep it measured.
You might say:
“I can provide a referee from that organisation who worked closely with me and can speak to my performance. My direct reporting line changed during that period, so this person can provide more accurate context on my day to day work.”
That is much better than saying, “My manager was a nightmare.” Even if true. Especially if true.
For graduates, school leavers, interns, or people entering the workforce, referees may include:
Internship supervisors
Volunteer coordinators
Teachers or lecturers
Sports coaches
Community leaders
Managers from casual jobs
Supervisors from placements
Project mentors
The goal is to find someone who can speak to reliability, attitude, communication, learning ability, teamwork, and follow through.
For entry level roles, employers often know you may not have traditional management referees yet.
If your referees are overseas, that is usually fine. But make it easy for the employer.
Include international dialling details when you provide the referee document, and explain the relationship clearly. Time zones can slow things down, so it helps to provide email as well as phone.
Australian employers may prefer local referees, but a strong overseas manager is still valuable if they can speak credibly about your work.
What matters most is relevance and trust.
Employers are not usually looking for perfection. They are looking for risk clarity.
By the time reference checks happen, the employer is often asking, “Are we comfortable making this offer?”
That means referees are used to reduce uncertainty.
They want to know:
Is the candidate as strong as they appeared in interview?
Did they actually perform at the level they described?
Are there any behaviour or reliability concerns?
How much support will they need?
How did they respond to feedback?
Would their previous employer rehire them?
Are there any surprises before we commit?
This is why reference checks can feel formal, but underneath, they are about confidence.
A good referee gives the hiring manager confidence that the person they interviewed is the same person who shows up at work.
A poor or vague reference does not always kill the process, but it can create doubt. And hiring decisions are often made on confidence, not just capability.
Referees seem simple, but candidates make small mistakes that create unnecessary risk.
This is the biggest mistake.
A referee who is not expecting a call may sound confused, unavailable, or hesitant. None of that helps you.
Even strong referees need context.
Unless the employer specifically accepts character referees, avoid using friends.
A friend can say you are reliable and lovely. That is nice, but hiring managers need work based evidence.
Professional referees are usually stronger because they can speak to performance in a work setting.
A senior title looks impressive until the person cannot explain what you actually did.
A direct manager with detailed examples is usually better than a senior executive with vague praise.
Do not send referee details in the first email unless requested.
This can look overly eager and removes your control over timing.
This is a dangerous assumption.
Many candidates think, “I am at reference stage, so the job is basically mine.” Not always.
Reference checks can confirm the offer, delay the offer, change the salary conversation, shift the employer’s confidence, or stop the process completely.
Treat reference stage seriously.
If you are applying for leadership roles, choose someone who can discuss your leadership. If you are applying for technical roles, choose someone who understands your technical contribution. If you are moving industries, choose someone who can speak to transferable strengths.
A generic referee is weaker than a relevant one.
When a recruiter asks for referees, do not panic and do not automatically send details without asking a few sensible questions.
You can ask:
What stage of the process are we at?
Will the referee be contacted before or after the final interview?
Which skills or role requirements will the reference check focus on?
Who will conduct the reference check?
Will you let me know before contacting them?
This is not being difficult. It is being professional.
A good recruiter should be able to explain the process clearly. If they cannot, that tells you something too.
Before sending referee details, contact your referees and brief them. Then send the details in a separate document or email.
A simple message to the recruiter could be:
“Thanks, I can provide referee details. I will confirm availability with them first and send the details through once they are aware they may be contacted.”
That is polished, controlled, and completely reasonable.
When you are asked to provide referees, keep the format clean and professional.
Use this structure:
Referee 1
Name: Full name
Current role: Job title
Company: Company name
Relationship: Former manager, direct supervisor, senior stakeholder, client, project lead
Phone: Phone number
Email: Email address
Best contact time: Optional, but useful if relevant
Referee 2
Name: Full name
Current role: Job title
Company: Company name
Relationship: Former manager, team leader, department head, project sponsor
Phone: Phone number
Email: Email address
Best contact time: Optional, but useful if relevant
Do not overcomplicate it. Do not include long biographies. Do not include personal commentary such as “will give me an excellent reference.” Let the referee do that part.
Also, check that all details are current. Old phone numbers and bounced emails make the process slower and can make you look disorganised.
This is the core point candidates need to understand.
Your resume positions you. Your interview tests that positioning. Your references validate it.
When candidates include referees too early, they are often trying to create trust. I understand the instinct. But trust in hiring does not come from handing over three names at the bottom of a resume. It comes from a consistent story across your resume, interview, work examples, communication, and references.
The best applications have alignment.
Your resume says you managed stakeholders. Your interview gives examples. Your referee confirms you handled stakeholders well under pressure.
Your resume says you improved a process. Your interview explains how. Your referee confirms you were practical, reliable, and followed through.
Your resume says you led a team. Your interview shows judgement. Your referee confirms people trusted your leadership.
That is how strong hiring evidence builds.
Referees are not there to decorate your resume. They are there to confirm the employer is making a smart decision.
For most Australian job seekers, the best choice is to leave referees off your resume unless the employer specifically asks for them.
Do not list full referee details by default. Do not waste resume space. Do not hand out private contact details too early. Do not assume references are a harmless formality.
Instead, keep your resume focused on the evidence that gets you shortlisted:
Relevant experience
Clear achievements
Role scope
Skills and systems
Industry knowledge
Career progression
Practical value to the employer
Then prepare a separate referee document for later stages of the hiring process.
That is the modern, professional approach. It protects your referees, keeps your resume cleaner, and gives you more control over the hiring process.
And honestly, in recruitment, control matters. Not the dramatic kind. The practical kind. The kind that stops your former manager getting a random call before you have even decided whether the role is worth pursuing.
Written by Simar Malhi, a recruiter and headhunter with international recruitment experience. I write about CVs, job applications, hiring decisions, and the reality behind recruitment processes. My goal is to help candidates understand more honestly how employers, recruiters, and hiring managers actually select candidates.
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin