Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeResume red flags are the details that make recruiters pause, question your fit, or move your application down the pile before you ever get a phone call. In the Australian job market, most red flags are not dramatic. They are usually small signs of poor judgement, unclear positioning, weak relevance, missing context, or a resume that creates more questions than confidence. Recruiters are not looking for perfection. They are looking for evidence that your background matches the role, your story makes sense, and you are worth progressing to the next stage. A red flag does not always mean rejection, but it does mean your resume has created doubt. And in a competitive shortlist, doubt is expensive.
When candidates hear the phrase resume red flag, they often imagine something extreme. Fake qualifications. Ten jobs in two years. A mysterious six year gap explained only as “personal reasons”. Yes, those things can raise questions.
But most resume red flags I notice are quieter than that.
They are things like a resume that looks busy but says very little. A candidate who has the right experience but has buried it under vague duties. A senior professional whose resume reads like a task list from 2014. A job title that sounds impressive but has no measurable evidence behind it. A career gap that may be perfectly reasonable, but is left unexplained in a way that invites unnecessary assumptions.
Recruiters are not reading resumes like novels. We are screening for fit, risk, clarity, relevance, and credibility. That sounds blunt because it is. Hiring is not a moral judgement of your career. It is a decision process under time pressure.
In Australia, where many roles attract large applicant volumes, recruiters and hiring managers often make an initial judgement very quickly. That judgement may not be final, but it shapes whether your resume gets attention or gets skimmed into the “maybe later” pile. And “maybe later” is where many decent candidates quietly disappear.
The most common red flag is not a career gap or a short tenure. It is confusion.
If I read your resume and cannot quickly understand what you do, where you fit, and why your background is relevant to the role, that is a problem. Not because I am impatient, although recruiters are absolutely working against time, but because unclear resumes make hiring teams nervous.
A clear resume answers three questions fast:
What kind of role are you targeting?
What level are you operating at?
What evidence proves you can do the job?
A confusing resume forces the recruiter to guess. And guessing is not how strong candidates get shortlisted.
This is especially common when candidates try to keep their resume “open” for many different roles. They write a broad profile that could apply to operations, administration, customer service, project coordination, sales support, team leadership, and possibly hostage negotiation if the employer is flexible enough.
That does not make you look versatile. It makes you look unfocused.
Weak Example
“Hardworking and motivated professional with strong communication skills and experience across multiple industries. Looking for an opportunity to grow and contribute to a dynamic organisation.”
This says almost nothing. It could belong to a graduate, a retail supervisor, an office administrator, or a mid career professional trying to escape a toxic workplace. Recruiters cannot shortlist a vibe.
Good Example
“Customer service and operations professional with five years of experience supporting high volume service teams across retail and contact centre environments. Strong background in complaint resolution, rostering support, process improvement, and team performance reporting.”
This gives me a category, level, environment, and useful evidence. It tells me where to place you in my mental shortlist.
Clarity is not decoration. It is candidate positioning.
Some resumes are packed with words but empty of substance. This is one of the fastest red flags because it creates the illusion of experience without proving anything.
I often see resumes where every job has eight to twelve bullet points, but every bullet is a generic duty:
Responsible for managing emails
Worked with internal stakeholders
Provided customer service
Assisted with reporting
Maintained accurate records
Communicated with team members
None of this is wrong. It is just not enough.
The issue is not that these tasks are unimportant. The issue is that they do not show level, scale, complexity, quality, or outcome. A hiring manager wants to know what kind of environment you worked in and how well you performed, not just that you existed near a computer.
A better resume gives context:
Supported a national customer service team handling high volume enquiries across phone, email, and online channels
Prepared weekly service reports used by team leaders to track response times, complaint trends, and escalation patterns
Managed customer complaints through to resolution while maintaining compliance with internal service standards
That kind of detail helps recruiters understand your real working environment. It also makes your experience easier to compare against the role.
A vague resume makes average candidates look average. Worse, it can make strong candidates look average too.
Short tenures are not automatically a red flag. This is where generic career advice often gets lazy.
In the Australian job market, contract work, restructuring, fixed term roles, relocation, industry changes, and project based hiring are common. A candidate may have several short roles for completely valid reasons. Recruiters know this.
The red flag appears when the pattern is unexplained.
If I see four roles in four years with no context, I start asking questions. Were these contracts? Were you leaving before probation ended? Were roles misrepresented? Did performance become an issue? Were there restructures? Were you chasing salary increases without building depth?
That does not mean I assume the worst. It means your resume has made me investigate risk instead of focus on value.
A simple context line can change the entire interpretation.
Weak Example
Marketing Coordinator
ABC Group
March 2023 to October 2023
No context. Seven months. The reader is left to guess.
Good Example
Marketing Coordinator
ABC Group
March 2023 to October 2023
Fixed term contract supporting a product launch across digital campaigns, retail activations, and internal communications.
Now the short tenure makes sense. It stops looking like instability and starts looking like a defined assignment.
This matters because recruiters are constantly interpreting patterns. Your resume should help them interpret fairly, not force them to fill in the blanks.
Career gaps are not the scandal some candidates think they are. People take time away from work for caring responsibilities, study, travel, health, redundancy, visa matters, burnout, relocation, parenting, or simply life being life. Hiring teams in Australia see this all the time.
The red flag is not the gap itself. It is the silence around it.
A gap with no explanation can make recruiters wonder whether something is being hidden. That may be unfair, but it is also how risk assessment works in recruitment. When information is missing, people create theories. Usually bad ones. Humans are not known for assuming the most generous explanation when deadlines are involved.
You do not need to over explain personal details. You just need to make the timeline coherent.
Useful ways to explain a gap include:
Career break for family responsibilities
Relocation to Australia and transition into the local job market
Full time study and professional development
Parental leave
Travel and personal relocation
Redundancy followed by targeted job search
Keep it simple. Keep it factual. Do not turn your resume into a diary entry.
Weak Example
2021 to 2023
No employment listed
Good Example
Career Break
2021 to 2023
Took a planned career break for family responsibilities. Now actively seeking a return to office administration and customer support roles.
That does not weaken the resume. It reduces uncertainty.
This is one recruiters notice quickly because the mismatch is obvious.
A candidate calls themselves “Head of Operations”, but the resume shows no team leadership, no budget responsibility, no operational ownership, no stakeholder complexity, and no measurable outcomes. Or someone lists themselves as “Senior Project Manager” but describes basic coordination duties with no project scope, governance, timeline ownership, or delivery accountability.
Inflated titles create credibility problems.
Sometimes the title is real. Smaller businesses often give broad titles because people wear many hats. That is fine. But if your title sounds senior, your resume needs to prove seniority.
Recruiters ask questions like:
Did this person actually lead people, or were they an individual contributor?
Did they own outcomes, or support someone else who owned them?
What was the scale of the work?
Were they making decisions, or following instructions?
Does the evidence match the title?
This is why duties alone are not enough. Seniority is shown through accountability, complexity, influence, and results.
Weak Example
Operations Manager
Managed daily operations and supported the team with general administrative tasks.
This title and content are not aligned. It may be true, but it does not prove operational management.
Good Example
Operations Manager
Oversaw daily operations for a team of twelve across scheduling, supplier coordination, inventory control, customer escalations, and service reporting. Improved rostering accuracy and reduced repeat customer complaints through clearer escalation processes.
Now the title has support. The resume has substance.
Do not make the recruiter work too hard to believe you.
One of the most frustrating red flags is a strong candidate using a weak, generic resume.
This often happens when candidates apply for many roles quickly. I understand why. Job searching can feel like a numbers game, especially when employers take ages to respond or post job ads written like they are shopping for a unicorn with Excel skills. But sending the same broad resume everywhere usually weakens your chances.
Recruiters are screening against a specific role. Your resume needs to show relevance to that role.
This does not mean rewriting your entire resume every time. It means adjusting your positioning, profile, key skills, and most relevant achievements so the match is obvious.
A generic resume says:
A targeted resume says:
That distinction matters.
For example, if you are applying for an executive assistant role in Australia, the recruiter needs to see calendar management, executive support, board papers, stakeholder coordination, confidentiality, travel coordination, and competing priorities. If those details are hidden under “administration duties”, your resume is underselling you.
If you are applying for a business analyst role, the recruiter needs to see requirements gathering, process mapping, stakeholder workshops, documentation, systems, change impact, and delivery environment. If your resume only says “worked on projects”, you have made yourself harder to shortlist.
The best resumes do not make relevance subtle. They make it obvious without sounding forced.
Many candidates describe what they were responsible for. Stronger candidates show what changed because they were there.
Hiring managers do not only want to know what tasks sat in your job description. They want to know whether you improved something, solved something, managed complexity, increased efficiency, reduced errors, supported growth, handled pressure, or delivered outcomes.
This is not about turning every bullet into a fake achievement. Not every job has glamorous metrics. Plenty of valuable work is operational, supportive, or steady rather than dramatic. But your resume still needs to show contribution.
Ask yourself:
What did I make easier?
What did I improve?
What problems did I regularly solve?
What did people rely on me for?
What volume, scale, or complexity did I manage?
What would have gone wrong if I had not done my job well?
That last question is useful because many candidates overlook the value of prevention. In recruitment, good work is not always flashy. Sometimes the value is that payroll was accurate, reports went out on time, customers were handled properly, compliance was maintained, and the team did not descend into chaos before lunch.
Weak Example
Responsible for processing invoices.
Good Example
Processed high volume supplier invoices, resolved discrepancies with vendors, and maintained accurate payment records to support timely month end reconciliation.
The second version gives scale, action, and business relevance. It is still honest. It just does not sound asleep.
Design is not the main thing recruiters care about. Readability is.
A resume can look visually polished and still be painful to screen. It can also be simple and highly effective. In most Australian hiring processes, the best resume format is clean, structured, and easy to scan.
Red flags include:
Dense blocks of text with no clear section breaks
Tiny font used to squeeze in too much information
Overly designed layouts that confuse applicant tracking systems
Columns that break when uploaded into recruitment software
Graphics, icons, and rating bars that add no hiring value
Important experience hidden on page two or three
No clear dates or job titles
Inconsistent formatting that makes the document feel careless
Recruiters are not impressed because your resume has a colourful sidebar. We are impressed when we can quickly understand your value.
The applicant tracking system is also part of the reality. ATS software is not usually the magical robot villain candidates imagine, but it can struggle with messy formatting. More importantly, humans struggle with messy formatting too.
A clean resume usually works best:
Clear name and contact details
Short targeted profile
Relevant skills section
Reverse chronological work history
Education and certifications
Simple headings
Consistent dates
Clear bullet points with useful detail
The goal is not to win a design award. The goal is to make the recruiter’s job easy enough that your value is not lost in formatting gymnastics.
Few things make recruiters suspicious faster than missing dates.
When a resume lists job titles without months or years, or uses vague timelines like “recent experience”, it creates immediate doubt. Usually candidates do this because they are trying to hide gaps, short tenures, or older experience. The problem is that hiding the detail often looks worse than the detail itself.
A recruiter may wonder:
How long did this person actually stay in each role?
Are they hiding a pattern?
Is this experience current?
Did they hold this role for three months or three years?
Why is the timeline unclear?
Dates matter because they help employers understand depth of experience. Someone who supported payroll for three months is different from someone who owned payroll processing for four years. Both may be valuable, but they are not the same.
Use month and year where possible. If your career history is long, you can simplify older roles, but do not make the recent timeline vague.
Weak Example
Customer Service Officer
XYZ Insurance
Handled customer enquiries and claims support.
Good Example
Customer Service Officer
XYZ Insurance
February 2021 to August 2024
Handled inbound customer enquiries, claims updates, policy amendments, and complaint escalations in a high volume insurance contact centre.
The dates give the experience weight. They also reduce suspicion.
Skills sections can be useful. They can also become a dumping ground.
A red flag appears when the skills section lists everything from leadership to data analysis to strategy to stakeholder engagement to CRM systems to conflict resolution to project management, but the work history does not prove those skills.
Recruiters do not assess skills in isolation. We cross check them against your experience.
If your resume says you have “advanced stakeholder management”, I look for evidence of who the stakeholders were, what you managed, and what was difficult about it. If your resume says “project management”, I look for scope, timelines, budgets, deliverables, risks, and outcomes. If your resume says “leadership”, I look for team size, coaching, performance management, rostering, hiring input, or accountability.
A skills section should be a summary of evidence, not a wish list.
Good skills sections are specific to the role and supported by the employment history. They do not try to include every keyword from every job ad on Seek.
For example, instead of listing “communication skills”, write something more meaningful if relevant:
Customer complaint resolution
Executive stakeholder coordination
Board report preparation
Workforce scheduling
CRM data management
Supplier invoice reconciliation
Requirements gathering
Process mapping
These are easier for recruiters to understand because they connect to real work.
Candidates are often told to “beat the ATS”. This advice has created some truly strange resumes.
Keyword stuffing is when a resume crams in role keywords unnaturally, often in a skills section, hidden text, or awkward repeated phrases. It may be done to match an applicant tracking system, but it often makes the resume worse for the human reading it.
Recruiters can spot it quickly.
It looks like this:
Weak Example
“Project management, project coordination, project delivery, project support, project administration, project stakeholder project communication, Agile project project project.”
Painful. Also suspicious.
ATS optimisation is not about stuffing. It is about using the right terminology naturally where it reflects real experience.
If the job ad asks for stakeholder management, do not just add “stakeholder management” to your skills section. Show where you managed stakeholders, what kind, and in what context.
Good Example
“Coordinated project updates across finance, operations, and external vendors, ensuring stakeholders had clear visibility of timelines, risks, and delivery changes.”
That satisfies the keyword and the human reader. Which is useful, because humans still make hiring decisions. Annoying for the robots, perhaps, but true.
Recruiters do cross check.
Not always deeply. Not always at the first screening stage. But inconsistencies do get noticed, especially once a candidate is shortlisted.
Common issues include:
Different job titles on resume and LinkedIn
Different employment dates
Roles missing from one platform but included on another
Qualifications listed differently
Location details that do not make sense
Claims in the resume that are not reflected anywhere else
Small differences are not always a problem. LinkedIn does not need to mirror your resume perfectly. But major inconsistencies create trust issues.
For example, if your resume says you were a “Senior Manager” but LinkedIn says “Coordinator” for the same role, I will want to understand why. If the dates differ by a month or two, it may be harmless. If they differ by a year, that is a different conversation.
The practical fix is simple: align the core facts.
Your resume, LinkedIn profile, and application forms should tell the same career story. The wording can differ, but the timeline, titles, employers, and qualifications should not create confusion.
Trust is a hiring factor. Once a recruiter starts doubting the basics, everything else gets harder.
Australian resumes do not need excessive personal detail.
You generally do not need to include your date of birth, marital status, religion, full street address, number of children, photo, nationality, health information, or personal identification details. In most professional Australian hiring contexts, those details are unnecessary and can distract from what matters.
This becomes a red flag not because the personal detail is bad, but because it can signal that the candidate may not understand local resume norms.
A professional Australian resume should usually include:
Name
Mobile number
Professional email address
City and state
LinkedIn profile if relevant
Work rights if useful or relevant to the application
Work rights can be especially relevant in Australia, but handle it clearly and professionally. For example:
Full working rights in Australia
Australian permanent resident
Valid working holiday visa until February 2027
Student visa with work rights
If your work rights may affect the role, clarity helps. Recruiters do not enjoy discovering visa limitations late in the process after everyone has already emotionally invested in an interview schedule. Nobody wins there.
One typo will not usually destroy your application. A pattern of careless errors might.
This depends on the role. If you are applying for a role involving writing, reporting, compliance, administration, executive support, customer communication, legal support, marketing, or stakeholder documentation, errors matter more. They become evidence of how you may communicate at work.
The issue is not perfectionism. The issue is judgement.
If your resume says you have “excellent attention to detail” and then spells “attention” incorrectly, that is not ideal. It is also the sort of thing recruiters notice because the universe enjoys comedy.
Common resume errors include:
Inconsistent tense
Misspelled company names
Wrong phone number
Old email address
Incorrect dates
Poor punctuation
Copy and paste mistakes from another application
Referring to the wrong role or employer
That last one is especially painful. If you apply for an operations role and your profile says you are excited to join a “leading healthcare organisation” when the employer is a mining contractor, the resume immediately feels careless.
Before applying, read your resume like a recruiter would:
Is the role target clear?
Are the dates consistent?
Are names spelled correctly?
Is the formatting clean?
Does the resume match the job?
Is anything outdated or irrelevant?
Careless errors do not always mean a careless candidate. But in hiring, perception matters.
Some resumes are full of confident claims but short on proof.
Phrases like “results driven”, “strategic thinker”, “strong leader”, “excellent communicator”, and “highly motivated professional” are not automatically wrong. They are just weak unless supported by evidence.
Recruiters have seen these phrases thousands of times. They do not move the needle by themselves.
A red flag appears when the resume relies on self description instead of demonstrating capability.
Weak Example
“Strategic and results driven leader with excellent communication skills and a passion for success.”
This sounds polished, but it does not tell me what you actually did.
Good Example
“Led a team of eight customer service consultants across rostering, coaching, escalation handling, and performance reporting, improving response consistency during peak enquiry periods.”
This proves leadership more effectively than calling yourself a leader.
The rule is simple: do not make claims your work history does not support.
Your resume should not ask the recruiter to believe you. It should show them why they should.
Not everything you have done belongs on your resume.
This is hard for candidates because they often want to show everything. Every role. Every certificate. Every task. Every system. Every responsibility. The thinking is understandable: “Maybe something will help.”
But resumes are not storage units. They are selection documents.
Irrelevant information creates noise. Noise slows the recruiter down. When a resume contains too much unrelated detail, the important information becomes harder to find.
This is especially risky for experienced professionals, career changers, and candidates with mixed backgrounds.
For example, if you are applying for a project coordinator role, your early hospitality work may not need six bullet points. It may only need one line, or it may not need to appear at all if your recent experience is stronger. If you are applying for a finance role, a long list of unrelated short courses may distract from your accounting systems, reconciliations, reporting, and compliance experience.
Relevance is not about hiding your background. It is about controlling emphasis.
Ask yourself:
Does this detail support the role I am applying for?
Does it prove a skill the employer cares about?
Does it strengthen my positioning?
Would a recruiter miss it if it was removed?
Is this detail more important than something else on the page?
A strong resume is not the longest version of your career. It is the most useful version for the decision being made.
This is important: a red flag is not always a rejection.
Recruiters notice red flags, but we also assess context. A six month job may be fine if it was a contract. A career gap may be fine if explained. A career change may be strong if the transferable skills are clear. A redundancy is not a performance failure. A non linear career does not mean you are unreliable.
The problem is when the resume leaves the recruiter with unanswered questions.
A good resume does not pretend your career has been perfectly neat. Most careers are not. It simply gives enough context for the reader to understand your story without jumping to the wrong conclusion.
If you have a potential red flag, do not panic. Manage it.
Use short explanations where needed. Strengthen the evidence around your fit. Make the timeline clear. Show progression where possible. Focus on what is relevant now.
Recruiters are not expecting candidates to be flawless. We are looking for enough confidence to progress the application.
The strongest candidates are not always the ones with the smoothest career histories. They are often the ones who explain their value clearly and do not make the hiring team work harder than necessary.
Before you send your resume, do a recruiter style review. Do not read it like the person who lived the experience. Read it like someone who has ninety seconds, a job brief, and a shortlist to build.
Look for anything that creates confusion, doubt, or unnecessary effort.
Useful checks include:
Can a recruiter understand your target role within the first few seconds?
Does your profile match the type of job you are applying for?
Are your most relevant skills visible early?
Do your job titles, dates, and employers form a clear timeline?
Have you explained short roles or gaps where needed?
Does each recent role show scope, context, and contribution?
Are your achievements believable and specific?
Is the resume easy to read in a simple format?
Are your LinkedIn profile and resume broadly aligned?
Have you removed outdated or irrelevant detail?
Does every section help you get shortlisted?
The final question matters most.
Every line of your resume should earn its place. If it does not help the recruiter understand your fit, reduce risk, or see your value, it may be weakening the document.
Recruiters usually notice the same core things first:
Current or most recent job title
Current or most recent employer
Industry background
Employment dates
Career progression
Location
Work rights where relevant
Role specific skills
Resume clarity and formatting
Evidence of outcomes or responsibility
This is why the top half of your resume matters so much. It sets the frame for everything else.
If the first impression is clear and relevant, the recruiter reads with interest. If the first impression is confusing, generic, or messy, the recruiter reads with caution. Same resume, different lens.
That is the part candidates often underestimate. A recruiter’s first impression does not just affect whether they keep reading. It affects how they interpret everything that follows.
If your resume starts strong, small imperfections are easier to forgive. If it starts weak, even neutral details can look worse.
Written by Simar Malhi, a recruiter and headhunter with international recruitment experience. I write about CVs, job applications, hiring decisions, and the reality behind recruitment processes. My goal is to help candidates understand more honestly how employers, recruiters, and hiring managers actually select candidates.
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin